References
- References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the analysis
- *Aguilar, M. S., Rosas, A., Zavaleta, J. G. M., & Romo-Vázquez, A. (2016). Exploring high-achieving students’ images of mathematicians. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9586-1
- *Ahi, B., Balci, S., & Alisinanoğlu, F. (2017). Exploring Turkish preservice teachers’ mental models of the environment: Are they related to gender and academic level? Journal of Environmental Education, 48(3), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1267102
- Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153
- *Barman, C. R. (1999). Students’ views about scientists and school science: Engaging K-8 teachers in a national study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009424713416
- *Bernard, P., & Dudek, K. (2017). Revisiting students’ perceptions of research scientists – Outcomes of an indirect draw-ascientist test (Indast). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 562–575. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2-52.0-85045423882&lang=zh-tw&site=eds-live
- *Boylan, C. R., Hill, D. M., Wallace, A. R., & Wheeler, A. E. (1992). Beyond stereotypes. Science Education, 76(4), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760502
- *Cakmakci, G., Tosun, O., Turgut, S., Orenler, S., Sengul, K., & Top, G. (2011). Promoting an inclusive image of scientists among students: Towards research evidence-based practice. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 627–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9217-4
- Carey, S. (2000). Science education as conceptual change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00046-5
- *Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213
- *Chang, C. J., Liu, C.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2016). Supporting scientific explanations with drawings and narratives on tablet computers: An analysis of explanation patterns. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0247-0
- *Chang, H.-Y. (2018). Students’ representational competence with drawing technology across two domains of science. Science Education, 102(5), 1129–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21457
- *Chang, H.-Y., Quintana, C., & Krajcik, J. (2014). Using drawing technology to assess students’ visualizations of chemical reaction processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9468-2
- Chang, Y.-H., Chang, C.-Y., & Tseng, Y.-H. (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2
- *Cheng, C.-C., & Huang, K.-H. (2016). Stereotypes and technology education: Different perceptions of computer career among elementary school students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(3), 271–283. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000382261700002&lang=zh-tw&site=eds-live
- *Chin, C., & Teou, L.-Y. (2010). Formative assessment: Using concept cartoon, pupils’ drawings and group discussions to tackle children’s ideas about biological inheritance. Journal of Biological Education, 44(3), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656206
- *Christidou, V., Bonoti, F., & Kontopoulou, A. (2016). American and Greek children’s visual images of scientists. Science & Education, 25(5-6), 497–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9832-8
- *Christidou, V., Hatzinikita, V., & Samaras, G. (2012). The image of scientific researchers and their activity in Greek adolescents’ drawings. Public Understanding of Science, 21(5), 626–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510383101
- *Cooper, M. M., Stieff, M., & DeSutter, D. (2017). Sketching the invisible to predict the visible: From drawing to modeling in chemistry. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 902–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12285
- *Dempster, E., & Stears, M. (2014). An analysis of children’s drawings of what they think is inside their bodies: A South African regional study. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.837401
- *Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., & Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290534
- *Eckhoff, A. (2017). Partners in inquiry: A collaborative life science investigation with preservice teachers and kindergarten students. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0769-3
- Edens, K. M., & Potter, E. (2003). Using descriptive drawings as a conceptual change strategy in elementary science. School Science and Mathematics, 103(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18230.x
- *Ehrlén, K. (2009). Drawings as representations of children’s conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701630455
- *Emvalotis, A., & Koutsianou, A. (2018). Greek primary school students’ images of scientists and their work: Has anything changed? Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1366899
- *Farland, D. (2006). The effect of historical, nonfiction trade books on elementary students’ perceptions of scientists. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18(2), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174686
- *Farland-Smith, D. (2009). How does culture shape students’ perceptions of scientists? Cross-national comparative study of American and Chinese elementary students. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182355
- Finson, K., & Pederson, J. (2011). What are visual data and what utility do they have in science education? Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674685
- Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
- *Finson, K. D. (2003). Applicability of the DAST-C to the images of scientists drawn by students of different racial groups. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174741
- *Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw-A-Scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15762.x
- Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9
- Fiorella, L., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Drawing boundary conditions for learning by drawing. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 1115–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9444-8
- *Fung, Y. Y. H. (2002). A comparative study of primary and secondary school students’ images of scientists. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514022000030453
- Haney, W., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Drawing on education: Using drawings to document schooling and support change. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 241–272. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.74.3.w0817u84w7452011
- Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. A. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5
- Hay, D. B., & Pitchford, S. (2016). *Curating blood: How students’ and researchers’ drawings bring potential phenomena to light. International Journal of Science Education, 38(17), 2596–2620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1253901
- *Hay, D. B., Williams, D., Stahl, D., & Wingate, R. J. (2013). Using drawings of the brain cell to exhibit expertise in neuroscience: Exploring the boundaries of experimental culture. Science Education, 97(3), 468–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21055
- *Hillman, S. J., Bloodsworth, K. H., Tilburg, C. E., Zeeman, S. I., & List, H. E. (2014). K-12 students’ perceptions of scientists: Finding a valid measurement and exploring whether exposure to scientists makes an impact. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2580–2595. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.908264
- *Hsieh, W.-M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Exploring students’ conceptions of science learning via drawing: A cross-sectional analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 274–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280640
- Hsieh, W.-M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). Learning illustrated: An exploratory cross-sectional drawing analysis of students’ conceptions of learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220357
- *Huber, R. A., & Burton, G. M. (1995). What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15804.x
- *İlkörücü-Göçmençelebi, Ş., & Tapan, M. S. (2010). Analyzing students’conceptualization through their drawings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2681–2684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.395
- *Jee, B. D., Gentner, D., Uttal, D. H., Sageman, B., Forbus, K., Manduca, C. A., Ormand, C.J., Shipley, T.F., & Tikoff, B. (2014). Drawing on experience: How domain knowledge is reflected in sketches of scientific structures and processes. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9405-2
- *Karaçam, S. (2016a). Investigating how the biographies of today’s scientists affect 8th graders’ scientist image. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 1971–1995. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1286a
- *Karaçam, S. (2016b). Scientist-image stereotypes: The relationships among their indicators. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 16(3), 1027–1049. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.3.0005
- *Katz, P., McGinnis, J. R., Hestness, E., Riedinger, K., Dai, A., Pease, R., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2011). Professional identity development of teacher candidates participating in an informal science education internship: A focus on drawings as evidence. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1169–1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.489928
- *Kaya, O. N., Dogan, A., & Oecal, E. (2008). Turkish elementary school students’ images of scientists. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 8(32), 83–100. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edo&AN=35690279&lang=zh-tw&site=eds-live
- *Koren, P., & Bar, V. (2009). Pupils’ image of ‘the scientist’ among two communities in Israel: A comparative study. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2485–2509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802449375
- *Laubach, T. A., Crofford, G. D., & Marek, E. A. (2012). Exploring native American students’ perceptions of scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1769–1794. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.689434
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by States. The National Academies Press
- *Leenaars, F. A. J., van Joolingen, W. R., & Bollen, L. (2013). Using self-made drawings to support modelling in science education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01272.x
- Ligorio, M. B., Schwartz, N. H., D’Aprile, G., & Philhour, D. (2017). Children’s representations of learning through drawings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.12.004
- *Losh, S. C., Wilke, R., & Pop, M. (2008). Some methodological issues with “Draw a Scientist Tests” among young children. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701250452
- Maoldomhnaigh, M. Ó., & Hunt, Á. (1988). *Some factors affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science & Technological Education, 6(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514880060206
- *Maoldomhnaigh, M. Ó., & Mhaoláin, V. N. (1990). The perceived expectation of the administrator as a factor affecting the sex of scientists drawn by early adolescent girls. Research in Science & Technological Education, 8(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514900080106
- *McCarthy, D. (2015). Teacher candidates’ perceptions of scientists: Images and attributes. Educational Review, 67(4), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2014.974510
- *Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of scientist among high-school students. Science, 126(3270), 384–390. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.126.3270.384
- Medina-Jerez, W., Middleton, K. V., & Orihuela-Rabaza, W. (2011). Using the dast-c to explore Colombian and Bolivian students’ images of scientists. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 657–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9218-3
- *Melber, L. M. (2003). Partnerships in science learning: Museum outreach and elementary gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(4), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700402
- Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005
- Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender‐science stereotypes: A meta analysis of 5 decades of US draw a scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039
- *Moseley, C., Desjean-Perrotta, B., & Utley, J. (2010). The draw-an-environment test rubric (DAET-R): Exploring pre-service teachers’ mental models of the environment. Environmental Education Research, 16(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903548674
- *Narayan, R., Park, S., Suh, J., & Peker, D. (2013). Students’ images of scientists and doing science: An international comparison study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.923a
- Nehete, C., Powar, V., Upadhyay, S., & Wadhwani, J. (2017). Checkpoint-An online descriptive answers grading tool. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(3), 637–640. https://doi.org/10.26483/ijarcs.v8i3.3067
- *Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (1992). Young children’s perceptions of science and the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140309
- *Newton, L. D., & Newton, D. P. (1998). Primary children’s conceptions of science and the scientist: Is the impact of a National Curriculum breaking down the stereotype? International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200909
- *Nyachwaya, J. M., Mohamed, A.-R., Roehrig, G. H., Wood, N. B., Kern, A. L., & Schneider, J. L. (2011). The development of an open-ended drawing tool: An alternative diagnostic tool for assessing students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90017j
- OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- *Ozel, M. (2012). Children’s images of scientists: Does grade level make a difference? Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 3187–3198. Retrieved from http://0-search.ebscohost.com.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1003011&lang=zh-tw&site=eds-live
- *Rahm, J., & Charbonneau, P. (1997). Probing stereotypes through students’ drawings of scientists. American Journal of Physics, 65(8), 774–778. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18647
- *Ranaweera, S. P. N., & Montplaisir, L. M. (2010). Students’ illustrations of the human nervous system as a formative assessment tool. Anatomical Sciences Education, 3(5), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.162
- *Reinisch, B., Krell, M., Hergert, S., Gogolin, S., & Krüger, D. (2017). Methodical challenges concerning the Draw-A-Scientist test: A critical view about the assessment and evaluation of learners’ conceptions of scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 39(14), 1952–1975. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1362712
- *Reiss, M. J., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Students’ understandings of human organs and organ systems. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013116228261
- *Reiss, M. J., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Andersen, A. M., Bartoszeck, A., Carvalho, G. S., Chen, S.-Y., Jarman R, Jónsson S, Manokore V, Marchenko N, & Mulemwa J. (2002). An international study of young peoples’ drawings of what is inside themselves. Journal of Biological Education, 36(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013116228261
- *Rubin, E., & Cohen, A. (2003). The images of scientists and science among Hebrew- and Arabic-speaking pre-service teachers in Israel. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 821–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305028
- *Ruiz-Mallén, I., & Escalas, M. T. (2012). Scientists seen by children: A case study in Catalonia, Spain. Science Communication, 34(4), 520–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547011429199
- Samaras, G., Bonoti, F., & Christidou, V. (2012). Exploring children’s perceptions of scientists through drawings and interviews. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1541–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.337
- *Schibeci, R. A., & Sorensen, I. (1983). Elementary school children’s perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 83(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1983.tb10087.x
- Selvvyn, N., Boraschi, D., & Ozkula, S. M. (2009). Drawing digital pictures: An investigation of primary pupils’ representations of ICT and schools. British Educational Research Journal, 35(6), 909–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902834282
- *She, H.-C. (1995). Elementary and middle school students’ image of science and scientists related to current science textbooks in Taiwan. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211260
- *Shelton, A., Smith, A., Lester, J., Wiebe, E., Behrle, C., & Sirkin, R. (2016). Drawing and writing in digital science notebooks: Sources of formative assessment data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9607-7
- *Slominski, T. N., Momsen, J. L., & Montplaisir, L. M. (2017). Drawing on student knowledge of neuroanatomy and neurophysiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(2), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00129.2016
- *Song, J., & Kim, K.-S. (1999). How Korean students see scientists: The images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 957–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290255
- Starr, C. R. (2018). “I’m not a science nerd!” STEM stereotypes, identity, and motivation among undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318793848
- *Steinke, J., Crocker, N., Williams, Y., Evergreen, S. H., Kuchibhotla, S., Lapinski, M. K., & Zietsman-Thomas, A. (2007). Assessing media influences on middle school-aged children’s perceptions of women in science using the draw-a-scientist test (DAST). Science Communication, 29(1), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007306508
- *Subramaniam, K., Esprívalo Harrell, P., & Wojnowski, D. (2013). Analyzing prospective teachers’ images of scientists using positive, negative and stereotypical images of scientists. Research in Science and Technological Education, 31(1), 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.742883
- *Tan, A.-L., Jocz, J. A., & Zhai, J. (2017). Spiderman and science: How students’ perceptions of scientists are shaped by popular media. Public Understanding of Science, 26(5), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515615086
- Thompson, M., Tiwari, A., Fu, R., Moe, E., & Buckley, D. I. (2012). A framework to facilitate the use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the design of primary research studies (Report No. 12-EHC009-EF). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
- *Toğrol, A. Y. (2013). Turkish students’ images of scientists. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(3), 289–298. http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstract.php?icid=1054463
- *Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. J. (1999). Students’ understandings about animal skeletons. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1187–1200. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290147
- *Türkmen, H. (2008). Turkish primary students’ perceptions about scientist and what factors affecting the image of the scientists. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75306
- *Ucar, S. (2012). How do pre-service science teachers’ views on science, scientists, and science teaching change over time in a science teacher training program? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9311-6
- *Van der Veen, J. (2012). Draw your physics homework? Art as a path to understanding in physics teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 356–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211435521
- *Van Dijk, A. M., Gijlers, H., & Weinberger, A. (2014). Scripted collaborative drawing in elementary science education. Instructional Science, 42(3), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9286-1
- *Van Joolingen, W. R., Aukes, A. V. A., Gijlers, H., & Bollen, L. (2015). Understanding elementary astronomy by making drawing-based models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9540-6
- Viennot, L., & Kaminski, W. (2006). Can we evaluate the impact of a critical detail? The role of a type of diagram in understanding optical imaging. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1867–1885. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600620979
- *Walls, L. (2012). Third grade African American students’ views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20450
- Xiao, Y., & Carless, D. R. (2013). Illustrating students’ perceptions of english language assessment: Voices from China. RELC Journal, 44(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688213500595
- Yang, X., Zhang, L., & Yu, S. (2017). Can short answers to open response questions be auto-graded without a grading rubric? In E. André, R. Baker, X. Hu, M. Rodrigo, & B. Du Boulay (Eds), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 10331. Artificial intelligence in education (pp.594–597). Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_72
- *Zhai, J., Jocz, J. A., & Tan, A.-L. (2014). ‘Am I like a scientist?’ Primary children’s images of doing science in school. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20443
- Zhang, Z. H., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1177–1198. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20443