References 1 (Literature included in our synthesis.)
- Adams, J. D., & Gupta, P. (2017). Informal science institutions and learning to teach: An examination of identity, agency, and affordances. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21270
- Adamuti-Trache, M., & Sweet, R. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and math readiness: Ethno-linguistic and gender differences in high-school course selection patterns. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 610–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.819453
- Adedokun, O. A., Bessenbacher, A. B., Parker, L. C., Kirkham, L. L., & Burgess, W. D. (2013). Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students’ aspirations for research careers: Mediating effects of research self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 940–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21102
- Adibelli-Sahin, E., & Deniz, H. (2017). Elementary teachers’ perceptions about the effective features of explicit-reflective nature of science instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 761–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1308035
- Allen, C. D., & Eisenhart, M. (2017). Fighting for desired versions of a future self: How young women negotiated STEM-related identities in the discursive landscape of educational opportunity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 407–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1294985
- Andersen, L., & Ward, T. J. (2014). Expectancy-value models for the STEM persistence plans of ninth-grade, high-ability students: A comparison between black, Hispanic, and white students. Science Education, 98(2), 216–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21092
- Andrée, M., & Hansson, L. (2013). Marketing the ‘Broad Line’: Invitations to STEM education in a Swedish recruitment campaign. International Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.695880
- Ares, N. (2008). Cultural practices in networked classroom learning environments. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9044-6
- Azevedo, F. S., & Mann, M. J. (2017). Seeing in the dark: Embodied cognition in amateur astronomy practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(1), 1–48.
- Balgopal, M. M., Casper, A. M. A., Atadero, R. A., & Rambo-Hernandez, K. E. (2017). Responses to different types of inquiry prompts: College students’ discourse, performance, and perceptions of group work in an engineering class. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1625–1647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1346847
- Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2015). Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21204
- Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20392
- Barroso, L. R., Bicer, A., Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M., Foran, A. L., Grant, M. R., Lincoln, Y. S., Nite, S. B., Oner, A. T., & Rice, D. (2017). Run! Spot. Run!: Vocabulary development and the evolution of STEM disciplinary language for secondary teachers. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 49(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0826-4
- Basile, V., & Lopez, E. (2015). And still I see no changes: Enduring views of students of color in science and mathematics education policy reports. Science Education, 99(3), 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21156
- Berland, L. K., & Steingut, R. (2016). Explaining variation in student efforts towards using math and science knowledge in engineering contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2742–2761. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1260179
- Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Lyons, T., & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people’s achievement-related choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549621
- Bolger, M. S., Kobiela, M., Weinberg, P. J., & Lehrer, R. (2012). Children’s mechanistic reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(2), 170–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2012.661815
- Borko, H., Carlson, J., Mangram, C., Anderson, R., Fong, A., Million, S., Mozenter, S., & Villa, A. M. (2017). The role of video-based discussion in model for preparing professional development leaders. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0090-3
- Bottia, M. C., Mickelson, R. A., Giersch, J., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2017). The role of High School racial composition and opportunities to learn in students’ STEM college participation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(3), 446–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21426
- Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., & Moller, S. (2018). Boosting the numbers of STEM majors? The role of high schools with a STEM program. Science Education, 102(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21318
- Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2012). “GodMode is his video game name”: Situating learning and identity in structures of social practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9410-6
- Brown, B. A., Henderson, J. B., Gray, S., Donovan, B., Sullivan, S., Patterson, A., & Waggstaff, W. (2016). From description to explanation: An empirical exploration of the African-American pipeline problem in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 146–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21249
- Brown, J. C., & Crippen, K. J. (2017). The knowledge and practices of high school science teachers in pursuit of cultural responsiveness. Science Education, 101(1), 99–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21250
- Buchholz, B., Shively, K., Peppler, K., & Wohlwend, K. (2014). Hands on, hands off: Gendered access in crafting and electronics practices. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(4), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.939762
- Burgin, S. R., McConnell, W. J., & Flowers, A. M. (2015). “I actually contributed to their research”: The influence of an abbreviated summer apprenticeship program in science and engineering for diverse high-school learners. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 411–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.989292
- Cannady, M. A., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K. N. (2014). Problematizing the STEM pipeline metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Science Education, 98(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21108
- Capobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2017). Characterizing elementary teachers’ enactment of high-leverage practices through engineering design-based science instruction. Science Education, 102(2), 342–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21325
- Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., & Lents, N. H. (2017). Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21341
- Carreira, S., & Baioa, A. M. (2017). Mathematical modelling with hands-on experimental tasks: On the student’s sense of credibility. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 50(1–2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0905-1
- Cerinsek, G., Hribar, T., Glodez, N., & Dolinsek, S. (2013). Which are my future career priorities and what influenced my choice of studying science, technology, engineering or mathematics? Some insights on educational choice—Case of Slovenia. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2999–3025. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.681813
- Chabalengula, V. M., & Mumba, F. (2017). Engineering design skills coverage in K-12 engineering program curriculum materials in the USA. International Journal of Science Education, 39(16), 2209–2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1367862
- Chachashvili-Bolotin, S., Milner-Bolotin, M., & Lissitsa, S. (2016). Examination of factors predicting secondary students’ interest in tertiary STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1143137
- Charity Hudley, A. H., & Mallinson, C. (2017). “It’s worth our time”: A model of culturally and linguistically supportive professional development for K-12 STEM educators. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(3), 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9743-7
- Civil, M. (2016). STEM learning research through a funds of knowledge lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9648-2
- Clark, D. B., Sengupta, P., Brady, C. E., Martinez-Garza, M. M., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2015). Disciplinary integration of digital games for science learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0014-4 1
- Convertino, C., & Mein, E. (2017). Bridgework: Diversity and collaboration in an undergraduate pre-engineering course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24(4), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1362001
- Craig, C. J., Verma, R., Stokes, D., Evans, P., & Abrol, B. (2018). The influence of parents on undergraduate and graduate students’ entering the STEM disciplines and STEM careers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1431853
- Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 924–942. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209349460
- De Smet, C., De Wever, B., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2016). Differential impact of learning path based versus conventional instruction in science education. Computers and Education, 99, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.001
- DiGiacomo, D. K., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2016). Relational Equity as a Design Tool Within Making and Tinkering Activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1058398
- Dika, S. L., & D’Amico, M. M. (2016). Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21301
- DiSessa, A. A. (2018). Computational literacy and “the big picture” concerning computers in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403544
- Dixon, C., & Martin, L. (2017). Make to relate: Analyzing narratives of community practice. Cognition and Instruction, 35(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1282484
- Eisenhart, M., & Allen, C. D. (2016). Hollowed out: Meaning and authoring of high school math and science identities in the context of neoliberal reform. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1188962
- Eisenhart, M., Weis, L., Allen, C. D., Cipollone, K., Stich, A., & Dominguez, R. (2015). High school opportunities for STEM: Comparing inclusive STEM-focused and comprehensive high schools in two US cities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 763–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21213
- Ellis, J., Kelton, M. L., & Rasmussen, C. (2014). Student perceptions of pedagogy and associated persistence in calculus. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 46(4), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0577-z
- Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J.-Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998–2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1 1
- Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–241. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.92315ww157656k3u
- Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mäntylä, T. (2015). The role of visual representations in scientific practices: From conceptual understanding and knowledge generation to ‘seeing’ how science works. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x 1
- Faber, C., Hardin, E., Klein-Gardner, S., & Benson, L. (2014). Development of teachers as scientists in research experiences for teachers programs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(7), 785–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9400-5
- Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., Staus, N. L., Wyld, J. N., Bailey, D. L., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). The Synergies research–practice partnership project: A 2020 Vision case study. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9716-2
- Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M.-T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2017). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419
- Garibay, J. C. (2015). STEM students’ social agency and views on working for social change: Are STEM disciplines developing socially and civically responsible students? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21203
- Garner, P. W., Gabitova, N., Gupta, A., & Wood, T. (2017). Innovations in science education: Infusing social emotional principles into early STEM learning. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4),1–15.
- Gaydos, M. J., & Squire, K. D. (2012). Role playing games for scientific citizenship. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9414-2
- Gehrke, S., & Kezar, A. (2017). The roles of STEM faculty communities of practice in institutional and departmental reform in higher education. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 803–833. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217706736
- Geiger, V., Mulligan, J., Date-Huxtable, L., Ahlip, R., Jones, D. H., May, E. J., Rylands, L., & Wright, I. (2018). An interdisciplinary approach to designing online learning: Fostering pre-service mathematics teachers’ capabilities in mathematical modelling. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 50(1–2)1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0920-x
- Gough, A. (2015). STEM policy and science education: Scientistic curriculum and sociopolitical silences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9590-3
- Graesser, A. C., Hu, X., Nye, B. D., Vanlehn, K., Kumar, R., Heffernan, C., Heffernan, N., Woolf, B., Olney, A. M., Rus, V., Andrasik, F., Pavlik, P., Cai, Z., Wetzel, J., Morgan, B., Hampton, A. J., Lippert, A. M., Wang, L., Cheng, Q., Kelly, C. N., … Baer, W. (2018). ElectronixTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with multiple learning resources for electronics. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0110-y 1
- Hingant, B., & Albe, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504543
- Hinze, S. R., Rapp, D. N., Williamson, V. M., Shultz, M. J., Deslongchamps, G., & Williamson, K. C. (2013). Beyond ball-and-stick: Students’ processing of novel STEM visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 26, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.12.002
- Hoeg, D., & Bencze, L. (2017b). Rising against a gathering storm: A biopolitical analysis of citizenship in STEM policy. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(4), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9838-9
- Hoeg, D. G., & Bencze, J. L. (2017a). Values underpinning STEM education in the USA: An analysis of the Next Generation Science Standards. Science Education, 101(2), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21260
- Howe, C., Ilie, S., Guardia, P., Hofmann, R., Mercer, N., & Riga, F. (2015). Principled improvement in science: Forces and proportional relations in early secondary–school teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.975168
- Hutchins, K. L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2012). Science faculty belief systems in a professional development program: Inquiry in college laboratories. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(8), 867–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9294-z
- Itzek-Greulich, H., Flunger, B., Vollmer, C., Nagengast, B., Rehm, M., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Effects of a science center outreach lab on school students’ achievement - Are student lab visits needed when they teach what students can learn at school? Learning and Instruction, 38, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.03.003
- Jacobs, J., Seago, N., & Koellner, K. (2017). Preparing facilitators to use and adapt mathematics professional development materials productively. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(30). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0089-9 1
- Jones, S. R. (2015). Areas, anti-derivatives, and adding up pieces: Definite integrals in pure mathematics and applied science contexts. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 38, 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.001
- Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: computer game design as a context for children's learning. Routledge.
- Kassam, K. A. S., Avery, L. M., & Ruelle, M. L. (2017). The cognitive relevance of Indigenous and rural: Why is it critical to survival? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9745-5
- Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005
- King, D., & English, L. D. (2016). Engineering design in the primary school: Applying stem concepts to build an optical instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 2762–2794. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1262567
- Kisiel, J. F. (2014). Clarifying the complexities of school-museum interactions: Perspectives from two communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 342–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21129
- Kitchen, J. A., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2018). The impact of college- and university-run high school summer programs on students’ end of high school STEM career aspirations. Science Education, 102(3),529–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21332
- Lamb, R., Akmal, T., & Petrie, K. (2015). Development of a cognition-priming model describing learning in a STEM classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 410–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21200
- Lee, A. (2015). Determining the effects of computer science education at the secondary level on STEM major choices in postsecondary institutions in the United States. Computers & Education, 88, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.019
- Liben, L. S., Kastens, K. A., & Christensen, A. E. (2011). Spatial foundations of science education: The illustrative case of instruction on introductory geological concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 29(1), 45–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.533596
- Lykkegaard, E., & Ulriksen, L. (2016). Choices and changes: Eccles’ expectancy-value model and upper-secondary school students’ longitudinal reflections about their choice of a STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 701–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1156782
- Lynch, S., Peters-Burton, E., Behrend, T., House, A., Ford, M., Spillane, N., Matray, S., Han, E., & Means, B. (2017). Understanding inclusive STEM high schools as opportunity structures for underrepresented students: Critical components. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(5),712–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21437
- Malone, K. R., & Barabino, G. (2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its Discontents. Science Education, 93(3), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20307
- Maltese, A. V., Melki, C. S., & Wiebke, H. L. (2014). The nature of experiences responsible for the generation and maintenance of interest in STEM. Science Education, 98(6), 937–962. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21132
- Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441
- Mark, S. L. (2017). A bit of both science and economics: A non-traditional STEM identity narrative. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4),1–21.
- Martins, I., Pinhão, F., & Vilanova, R. (2017). The interplay between structure and agency in the enactment of STEM policy. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(4), 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9837-x
- Mayes, R. L., Forrester, J. H., Christus, J. S., Peterson, F. I., Bonilla, R., & Yestness, N. (2014). Quantitative reasoning in environmental science: A learning progression. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.819534
- McGee, E. O. (2016). Devalued black and Latino racial identities. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1626–1662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216676572
- McGee, E. O., & Bentley, L. (2017). The troubled success of black women in STEM. Cognition and Instruction, 35(4), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1355211
- McGee, E. O., & Martin, D. B. (2011). “You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!” Stereotype management among academically successful black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1347–1389. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211423972
- Means, B., Wang, H., Wei, X., Lynch, S., Peters, V., Young, V., & Allen, C. (2017). Expanding STEM opportunities through inclusive STEM-focused high schools. Science Education, 101(5), 681–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21281
- Means, B., Wang, H., Young, V., Peters, V. L., & Lynch, S. J. (2016). STEM-focused high schools as a strategy for enhancing readiness for postsecondary STEM programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 709–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21313
- Meluso, A., Zheng, M., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. (2012). Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning. Computers and Education, 59(2), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.019
- Micari, M., Van Winkle, Z., & Pazos, P. (2016). Among friends: The role of academic-preparedness diversity in individual performance within a small-group STEM learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 1904–1922. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1218091
- Miller, B. G., & Roehrig, G. (2016). Indigenous cultural contexts for STEM experiences: Snow snakes??? Impact on students and the community. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(1), 1–28.
- Mintos, A., Hoffman, A. J., Kersey, E., Newton, J., & Smith, D. (2018). Learning about issues of equity in secondary mathematics teacher education programs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 1–26.
- Mulligan, J. (2015). Looking within and beyond the geometry curriculum: Connecting spatial reasoning to mathematics learning. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 47(3), 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0696-1
- Nasir, N. S., & Vakil, S. (2017). STEM-focused academies in urban schools: Tensions and possibilities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 376–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1314215
- Nickels, M., & Cullen, C. J. (2017). Mathematical thinking and learning through robotics play for children with critical illness: The case of Amelia. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(1), 22–77. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.1.0022
- Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C. (2015). A Model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863
- Nye, B. D., Pavlik, P. I., Windsor, A., Olney, A. M., Hajeer, M., & Hu, X. (2018). SKOPE-IT (Shareable Knowledge Objects as Portable Intelligent Tutors): Overlaying natural language tutoring on an adaptive learning system for mathematics. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0109-4 1
- Ong, M., Smith, J. M., & Ko, L. T. (2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21417
- Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2
- Osei-Kofi, N., & Torres, L. E. (2015). College admissions viewbooks and the grammar of gender, race, and STEM. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9656-2
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
- Peralta, C., Caspary, M., & Boothe, D. (2013). Success factors impacting Latina/o persistence in higher education leading to STEM opportunities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(4), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9520-9
- Peterman, K., Daugherty, J. L., Custer, R. L., & Ross, J. M. (2017). Analysing the integration of engineering in science lessons with the Engineering-infused lesson rubric. International Journal of Science Education, 39(14), 1913–1931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1359431
- Philip, T. M., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Turpen, C. (2018). Why ideology matters for learning: A case of ideological convergence in an engineering ethics classroom discussion on drone warfare. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381964
- Philip, T. M., Olivares-Pasillas, M. C., & Rocha, J. (2016). Becoming racially literate about data and data-literate about race: Data visualizations in the classroom as a site of racial-ideological micro-contestations. Cognition and Instruction, 34(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1210418
- Pinkard, N., Erete, S., Martin, C. K., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2017). Digital youth divas: Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school girls’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 477–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1307199
- Purzer, Ş., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R. S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0019-7 1
- Rahm, J., & Moore, J. C. (2016). A case study of long-term engagement and identity-in-practice: Insights into the STEM pathways of four underrepresented youths. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 768–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21268
- Rau, M. A., Michaelis, J. E., & Fay, N. (2015). Connection making between multiple graphical representations: A multi-methods approach for domain-specific grounding of an intelligent tutoring system for chemistry. Computers and Education, 82, 460–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.009
- Resnick, M, Berg, R, & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. The Journal Of The Learning Sciences, 9(1), 7-30. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0901_3
- Reyes, M.-E. (2011). Unique challenges for women of color in STEM transferring from community colleges to universities. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.324m5t1535026g76
- Rosa, K. (2018). Science identity possibilities: A look into Blackness, masculinities, and economic power relations. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13 (4)1–9.
- Roth, W. M., & Eijck, M. V. (2010). Fullness of life as minimal unit: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning across the life span. Science Education, 94(6), 1027–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20401
- Rushton, G. T., & Criswell, B. A. (2013). Response to Johannsen, Rump, and Linder’s Penetrating a wall of introspection: A critical attrition analysis. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9469-0
- Ruthven, K., & Hofmann, R. (2013). Chance by design: Devising an introductory probability module for implementation at scale in English early-secondary education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0470-6
- Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21007
- Sahin, A., Ekmekci, A., & Waxman, H. C. (2017). The relationships among high school STEM learning experiences, expectations, and mathematics and science efficacy and the likelihood of majoring in STEM in college. International Journal of Science Education, 39(11), 1549–1572. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1341067
- Salvador Inventado, P., Scupelli, P., Ostrow, K., Heffernan III, N., Ocumpaugh, J., Almeda, V., & Slater, S. (2018). Contextual factors affecting hint utility. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(13). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0107-6 1
- Saribas, D., & Ceyhan, G. D. (2015). Learning to teach scientific practices: Pedagogical decisions and reflections during a course for pre-service science teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0023-y 1
- Schuchardt, A. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2016). Modeling scientific processes with mathematics equations enhances student qualitative conceptual understanding and quantitative problem solving. Science Education, 100(2), 290–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21198
- Schwartz, J. (2012). Faculty as undergraduate research mentors for students of color: Taking into account the costs. Science Education, 96(3), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21004
- Sevinc, S., & Lesh, R. (2017). Training mathematics teachers for realistic math problems: A case of modeling-based teacher education courses. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 50(1–2), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0898-9
- Shah, A. M., Wylie, C., Gitomer, D., & Noam, G. (2018). Improving STEM program quality in out-of-school-time: Tool development and validation. Science Education, 102(2),238–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21327
- Shank, D. B., & Cotten, S. R. (2014). Does technology empower urban youth? The relationship of technology use to self-efficacy. Computers and Education, 70, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.018
- Sharkawy, A. (2015). Envisioning a career in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Some challenges and possibilities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(3), 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9636-6
- Sinclair, N., & Patterson, M. (2018). The dynamic geometrisation of computer programming. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403541
- Sjaastad, J. (2012). Sources of inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1615–1636. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.590543
- Sjaastad, J. (2013). Measuring the ways significant persons influence attitudes towards science and mathematics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.672775
- Skinner, A., Diller, D., Kumar, R., Cannon-Bowers, J., Smith, R., Tanaka, A., Julian, D., & Perez, R. (2018). Development and application of a multi-modal task analysis to support intelligent tutoring of complex skills. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(14). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0108-5 1
- Sondergeld, T. A., & Johnson, C. C. (2014). Using Rasch measurement for the development and use of affective assessments in science education research. Science Education, 98(4), 581–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21118
- Steele, A. (2016). Troubling STEM: Making a case for an ethics/STEM partnership. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9463-6
- Stevenson, A. D., Gallard Martinez, A. J., Brkich, K. L., Flores, B. B., Claeys, L., & Pitts, W. (2017). Latinas’ heritage language as a source of resiliency: Impact on academic achievement in STEM fields. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14, 1–13. 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9789-6
- Stieff, M., Lira, M. E., & Scopelitis, S. A. (2016). Gesture supports spatial thinking in STEM. Cognition and Instruction, 34(2), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1145122
- Storksdieck, M. (2016). Critical information literacy as core skill for lifelong STEM learning in the 21st century: Reflections on the desirability and feasibility for widespread science media education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9714-4
- Strobel, J., Wang, J., Weber, N. R., & Dyehouse, M. (2013). The role of authenticity in design-based learning environments: The case of engineering education. Computers and Education, 64, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.026
- Stull, A. T., Gainer, M. J., & Hegarty, M. (2017). Learning by enacting: The role of embodiment in chemistry education. Learning and Instruction, 30, 1–13.
- Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., & O’Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21123
- Taub, M., Azevedo, R., Bradbury, A. E., Millar, G. C., & Lester, J. (2018). Using sequence mining to reveal the efficiency in scientific reasoning during STEM learning with a game-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 54, 93–103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.005
- Taylor, H. A., & Hutton, A. (2013). Think3d!: Training spatial thinking fundamental to stem education. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 434–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.828727
- Tekkumru-Kisa, M., & Stein, M. K. (2017). A framework for planning and facilitating video-based professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(28). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0086-z 1
- Teo, T. W., & Osborne, M. (2012). Using symbolic interactionism to analyze a specialized STEM high school teacher’s experience in curriculum reform. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(3), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9364-0
- Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs, 16(1), 128–157.
- Varelas, M., Morales-Doyle, D., Raza, S., Segura, D., Canales, K., & Mitchener, C. (2018). Community organizations’ programming and the development of community science teachers. Science Education, 102(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21321
- Venkat, H. (2015). Mathematical practices and mathematical modes of enquiry: Same or different? International Journal of STEM Education, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0018-8 1
- Walsh, E. M., & Tsurusaki, B. K. (2017). “Thank you for being republican”: Negotiating science and political identities in climate change learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(1), 1–41.
- Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213488622
- Weis, L., Eisenhart, M., Cipollone, K., Stich, A. E., Nikischer, A. B., Hanson, J., Ohle Leibrandt, S., Allen, C. D., & Dominguez, R. (2015). In the guise of STEM education reform: Opportunity structures and outcomes in inclusive STEM-focused high schools. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1024–1059. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215604045
- Wild, A. (2015). Relationships between high school chemistry students’ perceptions of a constructivist learning environment and their STEM career expectations. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2284–2305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1076951
- Wilensky, U, & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—an embodied modeling approach. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 171-209. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2402_1
- Wilkerson-Jerde, M., Wagh, A., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Balancing curricular and pedagogical needs in computational construction kits: Lessons from the DeltaTick project. Science Education, 99(3), 465–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21157
- Wilson-Lopez, A., Sias, C., Smithee, A., & Hasbún, I. M. (2017). Forms of science capital mobilized in adolescents’ engineering projects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 246–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21418
- Wong, V., Dillon, J., & King, H. (2016). STEM in England: Meanings and motivations in the policy arena. International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2346–2366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1242818
- Worsham, H. M., Friedrichsen, P., Soucie, M., Barnett, E., & Akiba, M. (2014). Recruiting science majors into secondary science teaching: Paid internships in informal science settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(1), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9360-1
- Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9156-x
- Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z
- Zhang, L., & Barnett, M. (2015). How high school students envision their STEM career pathways. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(3), 637–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9557-9
- Zouda, M. (2018). Issues of power and control in STEM education: A reading through the postmodern condition. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4),1109–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9820-6
References 2 (Literature not included in the synthesis.)
- Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham, the United Kingdom: Duke University Press.
- Azevedo, F. S. (2013). The tailored practice of hobbies and its implication for the design of interest-driven learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 462–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.730082
- Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
- Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
- Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329(5995), 996. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
- Carter, L. (2017). Neoliberalism and STEM education: Some Australian policy discourse. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(4), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2017.1380868
- Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). Philosophy of STEM education. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press.
- Council of Canadian Academies. (2015). Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity.
- Das, A., & Adams, J. (2019). Critical transdisciplinary STEM: A critical numeracy approach to STEM praxis by Urban environments and education research coven. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 291–306). Springer.
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to philosophy of education. Macmillan.
- Dewey, J. (1934/2005). Art as experience. Penguin.
- Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in Grades K-8. The National Academies Press.
- Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
- Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (2008). Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation. Sense Publishers.
- Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
- Farris, A. V., & Sengupta, P. (2016). Democratizing children’s computation: Learning computational science as aesthetic experience. Educational Theory, 66(1–2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12168
- Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
- Foucault, M. (1991). Politics and the study of discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 53–72). The University of Chicago Press.
- Foucault, M. (1978/2007). One: January 11, 1978. In A. Davidson (Ed.), Security, territory, population: Lectures at the college de France (pp. 1–27). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
- Giroux, H. A. (2008). Public intellectuals, race, and public space. In D. Goldberg & J. Solomons (Eds.). A companion to racial and ethnic studies (pp. 383–404). Blackwell.
- Gordon, L. (2006). Disciplinary decadence: Living thought in trying times. Routledge.
- Gupta, A., Turpen, C., Philip, T., & Elby, A. (2019). Narrative co-construction of stances towards engineers’ work in socio-technical contexts. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 251–272). Springer.
- Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005019
- Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
- Gutiérrez, K. D. (2016). Designing resilient ecologies: Social design experiments and a new social imagination. Educational Researcher, 45(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16645430
- Hall, S. (1992). The West and the Rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of Modernity (pp. 275–331). Polity Press.
- Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Wagner, D., Johnson, K. R., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: Revelations on an imported theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9588-5
- Higgins, C. (2008). Instrumentalism and the clichés of aesthetic education: A Deweyan corrective. Education and Culture, 24(1), 7–20.
- Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
- Irani, L. (2019). Chasing innovation: Making entrepreneurial citizens in modern India. Princeton University Press.
- Kelly, G. J. (2014). Discourse practices in science learning and teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.). Handbook of research on science education (2nd Ed.) (pp. 321–336). Routledge.
- Khine, M. S. (2018). Computational thinking in the STEM disciplines: Foundations and research highlights. Springer International Publishing.
- Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957
- Kim, B., Rasporich, S., & Gupta, D. (2019). Imagining the sustainable future through the construction of fantasy worlds. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 61–82). Springer.
- Lam-Herrera, M., Ajkem Council, & Sengupta, P. (2019). Decolonizing complexity education: A Mayan perspective. In P. Sengupta, M.-C. Shanahan, & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 329–350). Springer.
- Langer-Osuna, J. M., & Esmonde, I. (2017). Identity in research on mathematics education. In J. Cai (Ed.,) Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 637–648). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Langman, J., & Hansen-Thomas, H. (2017). Discourse analytic perspectives on STEM education: Exploring interaction and learning in the multilingual classroom. Springer.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Lee, C. D. (2008). The centrality of culture to the scientific study of learning and development: How an ecological framework in education research facilitates civic responsibility. Educational Researcher, 37(5), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08322683
- Lee, C. D., Spencer, M. B., & Harpalani, V. (2007). “Every shut eye ain’t sleep”: Studying how people live culturally. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005006
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. Cambridge University Press.
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Developing model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00049-0
- Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing.
- Li, W., & Chiang, F.-K. (2019). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of STEAM education and attitudes toward STEAM disciplines and careers in China. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 83–100). Springer.
- Luke, A. (2019). Educational policy, narrative and discourse. Routledge.
- MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2016). Interdisciplinary problem-solving: Emerging modes in integrative systems biology. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(3), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-016-0157-x
- MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2018). Modeling complexity: Cognitive constraints and computational model-building in integrative systems biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-017-0183-9
- Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295–338.
- McKinney de Royston, M., & Sengupta-Irving, T. (2019). Another step forward: Engaging the political in learning. Cognition and Instruction, 37(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1624552
- Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
- Mignolo, W. D. (2011). Epistemic disobedience and the decolonial option: A manifesto. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(2), 44–66.
- Moschkovich, J. (2007). Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 24–30.
- Nakamura, L. (2012). “It’s a nigger in here! Kill the nigger!”: User-generated media campaigns against racism, sexism, and homophobia in digital games. In A. Valdivia (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media studies (Vol. 5, pp. 2–15). Blackwell Publishing.
- National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. United States Department of Education.
- Lead States, N. G. S. S. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
- Ortiz, S. M. (2019). “You can say I got desensitized to it”: How men of color cope with everyday racism in online gaming. Sociological Perspectives, 62(4), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419837588
- Ong, J. I. P. L., & Tzuo, P. W. (2011). Girls’ perceptions of characters’ gender roles in digital games: A study in Singapore. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(3), 620–642.
- Paré, D., Shanahan, M.-C., & Sengupta, P. (in press). Queering complexity using multi-agent simulations. To be published in the Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences.
- Paré, D., Sengupta, P., Windsor, S., Craig, J., & Thompson, M. (2019). Queering virtual reality: A prolegomenon. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 307–328). Springer.
- Philip, T. M., Bang, M., & Jackson, K. (2018). Articulating the “How,” the “For What,” the “For Whom,” and the “With Whom” in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1413530
- Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press.
- Pruitt, S. L. (2014). The next generation science standards: The features and challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2),145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9385-0
- Puar, J. K. (2005). Queer times, queer assemblages. Social Text, 8485(23), 3–4.
- Reinhold, S., Holzberger, D., & Seidel, T. (2018). Encouraging a career in science: A research review of secondary schools’ effects on students’ STEM orientation. Studies in Science Education, 54(1), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2018.1442900
- Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.491752
- Technology, S., & Council, I. (2009). State of the nation 2008: Canada’s science, technology and innovation system. Government of Canada (Science, Technology and Innovation Council).
- Technology, S., & Council, I. (2015). State of the nation 2014: Canada’s science, technology and innovation system. Government of Canada (Science, Technology and Innovation Council).
- Sen, A. (1997). Human capital and human capability. World Development, 25(12), 1959–1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)10014-6
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Anchor Books.
- Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., & Farris, A. (in press). Voicing code in STEM: A dialogical imagination. The MIT Press.
- Sengupta, P., Shanahan, M.-C., & Kim, B. (2019). Reimagining STEM education: Critical, transdisciplinary, and embodied education. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 2–22). Springer.
- Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., & Farris, A. (2018). Toward a phenomenology of computational thinking in STEM education. In M. Khine (Ed.). Computational thinking in the STEM disciplines (pp. 49–72). Springer.
- Sengupta, P., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2017). Boundary play and pivots in public computation: New directions in STEM education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(3), 1124–1134. Retrieved from https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c330317.html
- Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x
- Sharp, H., & Robinson, H. (2004). An ethnographic study of XP practice. Empirical Software Engineering, 9(4), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMSE.0000039884.79385.54
- Sharma, J., & Yarlagadda, P. K. (2018). Perspectives of ‘STEM education and policies’ for the development of a skilled workforce in Australia and India. International Journal of Science Education, 40(16), 1999–2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1517239
- Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. (1995). Multidisciplinary design optimization: An emerging new engineering discipline. In J. Herskovits (Ed). Advances in structural optimization (pp. 483–496). Springer.
- Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253
- Shanahan, M.-C., & Nieswandt, M. (2011). Science student role: Evidence of social structural norms specific to school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 367–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20406
- Shanahan, M.-C., Carol-Ann Burke, L. E., & Francis, K. (2016). Using a boundary object perspective to reconsider the meaning of STEM in a Canadian context. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166296
- Shanahan, M.-C. (2011). Science blogs as boundary layers: Creating and understanding new writer and reader interactions through science blogging. Journalism, 12(7), 903–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412844
- Schoenfeld, A. H., & Herrmann, D. J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 484–494.
- Slaton, A. E. (2001). Reinforced concrete and the modernization of American building, 1900–1930. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624
- Strong, L., Adams, J. D., Bellino, M. E., Pieroni, P., Stoops, J., & Das, A. (2016). Against neoliberal enclosure: Using a critical transdisciplinary approach in science teaching and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1202982
- Takeuchi, M. A. (2016). Friendships and group work in linguistically diverse mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(3), 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1169422
- Takeuchi, M. A. (2018). Power and identity in immigrant parents’ involvement in early years mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9781-4
- Takeuchi, M. A., & Dadkhahfard, S. (2019). Rethinking bodies of learners through STEM education. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 199–216). Springer.
- Thomas, B., & Watters, J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002
- Vakil, S., & Ayers, R. (2019). The racial politics of STEM education in the USA: Interrogations and explorations. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 22 (4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592831
- Vossoughi, S., & Vakil, S. (2018). Toward what ends? A critical analysis of militarism, equity & STEM education. In A. Ali & T. Buenavista (Eds.). Education at war (pp. 117–140). Fordham University Press.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge University Press.
- Wilkerson-Jerde, M. H., & Wilensky, U. J. (2011). How do mathematicians learn math?: Resources and acts for constructing and understanding mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9306-5