Advanced search
Publication Cover
Studies in Science Education Volume 56, 2020 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
6,203
Views
89
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Transdisciplinarity in STEM education: a critical review

Miwa A. TakeuchiEducational Studies in Learning Sciences, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-7506View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Pratim SenguptaEducational Studies in Learning Sciences, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-4028View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Marie-Claire ShanahanEducational Studies in Learning Sciences, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5287-9729View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Jennifer D. AdamsEducational Studies in Learning Sciences, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1327-580XView further author information
ORCID Icon &
Maryam HachemEducational Studies in Learning Sciences, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaView further author information
Pages 213-253 | Received 29 Jul 2019, Accepted 11 Apr 2020, Published online: 12 May 2020

References 1 (Literature included in our synthesis.)

References 2 (Literature not included in the synthesis.)

  • Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham, the United Kingdom: Duke University Press.
  • Azevedo, F. S. (2013). The tailored practice of hobbies and its implication for the design of interest-driven learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 462–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.730082
  • Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
  • Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
  • Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329(5995), 996. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
  • Carter, L. (2017). Neoliberalism and STEM education: Some Australian policy discourse. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(4), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2017.1380868
  • Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). Philosophy of STEM education. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press.
  • Council of Canadian Academies. (2015). Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity.
  • Das, A., & Adams, J. (2019). Critical transdisciplinary STEM: A critical numeracy approach to STEM praxis by Urban environments and education research coven. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 291–306). Springer.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to philosophy of education. Macmillan.
  • Dewey, J. (1934/2005). Art as experience. Penguin.
  • Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in Grades K-8. The National Academies Press.
  • Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
  • Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (2008). Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation. Sense Publishers.
  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
  • Farris, A. V., & Sengupta, P. (2016). Democratizing children’s computation: Learning computational science as aesthetic experience. Educational Theory, 66(1–2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12168
  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
  • Foucault, M. (1991). Politics and the study of discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 53–72). The University of Chicago Press.
  • Foucault, M. (1978/2007). One: January 11, 1978. In A. Davidson (Ed.), Security, territory, population: Lectures at the college de France (pp. 1–27). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
  • Giroux, H. A. (2008). Public intellectuals, race, and public space. In D. Goldberg & J. Solomons (Eds.). A companion to racial and ethnic studies (pp. 383–404). Blackwell.
  • Gordon, L. (2006). Disciplinary decadence: Living thought in trying times. Routledge.
  • Gupta, A., Turpen, C., Philip, T., & Elby, A. (2019). Narrative co-construction of stances towards engineers’ work in socio-technical contexts. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 251–272). Springer.
  • Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005019
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
  • Gutiérrez, K. D. (2016). Designing resilient ecologies: Social design experiments and a new social imagination. Educational Researcher, 45(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16645430
  • Hall, S. (1992). The West and the Rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of Modernity (pp. 275–331). Polity Press.
  • Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Wagner, D., Johnson, K. R., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: Revelations on an imported theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9588-5
  • Higgins, C. (2008). Instrumentalism and the clichés of aesthetic education: A Deweyan corrective. Education and Culture, 24(1), 7–20.
  • Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
  • Irani, L. (2019). Chasing innovation: Making entrepreneurial citizens in modern India. Princeton University Press.
  • Kelly, G. J. (2014). Discourse practices in science learning and teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.). Handbook of research on science education (2nd Ed.) (pp. 321–336). Routledge.
  • Khine, M. S. (2018). Computational thinking in the STEM disciplines: Foundations and research highlights. Springer International Publishing.
  • Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957
  • Kim, B., Rasporich, S., & Gupta, D. (2019). Imagining the sustainable future through the construction of fantasy worlds. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 61–82). Springer.
  • Lam-Herrera, M., Ajkem Council, & Sengupta, P. (2019). Decolonizing complexity education: A Mayan perspective. In P. Sengupta, M.-C. Shanahan, & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 329–350). Springer.
  • Langer-Osuna, J. M., & Esmonde, I. (2017). Identity in research on mathematics education. In J. Cai (Ed.,) Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 637–648). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Langman, J., & Hansen-Thomas, H. (2017). Discourse analytic perspectives on STEM education: Exploring interaction and learning in the multilingual classroom. Springer.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, C. D. (2008). The centrality of culture to the scientific study of learning and development: How an ecological framework in education research facilitates civic responsibility. Educational Researcher, 37(5), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08322683
  • Lee, C. D., Spencer, M. B., & Harpalani, V. (2007). “Every shut eye ain’t sleep”: Studying how people live culturally. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005006
  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Developing model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00049-0
  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing.
  • Li, W., & Chiang, F.-K. (2019). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of STEAM education and attitudes toward STEAM disciplines and careers in China. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 83–100). Springer.
  • Luke, A. (2019). Educational policy, narrative and discourse. Routledge.
  • MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2016). Interdisciplinary problem-solving: Emerging modes in integrative systems biology. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(3), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-016-0157-x
  • MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2018). Modeling complexity: Cognitive constraints and computational model-building in integrative systems biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-017-0183-9
  • Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295–338.
  • McKinney de Royston, M., & Sengupta-Irving, T. (2019). Another step forward: Engaging the political in learning. Cognition and Instruction, 37(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1624552
  • Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
  • Mignolo, W. D. (2011). Epistemic disobedience and the decolonial option: A manifesto. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(2), 44–66.
  • Moschkovich, J. (2007). Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 24–30.
  • Nakamura, L. (2012). “It’s a nigger in here! Kill the nigger!”: User-generated media campaigns against racism, sexism, and homophobia in digital games. In A. Valdivia (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media studies (Vol. 5, pp. 2–15). Blackwell Publishing.
  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. United States Department of Education.
  • Lead States, N. G. S. S. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
  • Ortiz, S. M. (2019). “You can say I got desensitized to it”: How men of color cope with everyday racism in online gaming. Sociological Perspectives, 62(4), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419837588
  • Ong, J. I. P. L., & Tzuo, P. W. (2011). Girls’ perceptions of characters’ gender roles in digital games: A study in Singapore. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(3), 620–642.
  • Paré, D., Shanahan, M.-C., & Sengupta, P. (in press). Queering complexity using multi-agent simulations. To be published in the Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences.
  • Paré, D., Sengupta, P., Windsor, S., Craig, J., & Thompson, M. (2019). Queering virtual reality: A prolegomenon. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 307–328). Springer.
  • Philip, T. M., Bang, M., & Jackson, K. (2018). Articulating the “How,” the “For What,” the “For Whom,” and the “With Whom” in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1413530
  • Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press.
  • Pruitt, S. L. (2014). The next generation science standards: The features and challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2),145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9385-0
  • Puar, J. K. (2005). Queer times, queer assemblages. Social Text, 8485(23), 3–4.
  • Reinhold, S., Holzberger, D., & Seidel, T. (2018). Encouraging a career in science: A research review of secondary schools’ effects on students’ STEM orientation. Studies in Science Education, 54(1), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2018.1442900
  • Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.491752
  • Technology, S., & Council, I. (2009). State of the nation 2008: Canada’s science, technology and innovation system. Government of Canada (Science, Technology and Innovation Council).
  • Technology, S., & Council, I. (2015). State of the nation 2014: Canada’s science, technology and innovation system. Government of Canada (Science, Technology and Innovation Council).
  • Sen, A. (1997). Human capital and human capability. World Development, 25(12), 1959–1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)10014-6
  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Anchor Books.
  • Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., & Farris, A. (in press). Voicing code in STEM: A dialogical imagination. The MIT Press.
  • Sengupta, P., Shanahan, M.-C., & Kim, B. (2019). Reimagining STEM education: Critical, transdisciplinary, and embodied education. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 2–22). Springer.
  • Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., & Farris, A. (2018). Toward a phenomenology of computational thinking in STEM education. In M. Khine (Ed.). Computational thinking in the STEM disciplines (pp. 49–72). Springer.
  • Sengupta, P., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2017). Boundary play and pivots in public computation: New directions in STEM education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(3), 1124–1134. Retrieved from https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c330317.html
  • Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x
  • Sharp, H., & Robinson, H. (2004). An ethnographic study of XP practice. Empirical Software Engineering, 9(4), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMSE.0000039884.79385.54
  • Sharma, J., & Yarlagadda, P. K. (2018). Perspectives of ‘STEM education and policies’ for the development of a skilled workforce in Australia and India. International Journal of Science Education, 40(16), 1999–2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1517239
  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. (1995). Multidisciplinary design optimization: An emerging new engineering discipline. In J. Herskovits (Ed). Advances in structural optimization (pp. 483–496). Springer.
  • Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253
  • Shanahan, M.-C., & Nieswandt, M. (2011). Science student role: Evidence of social structural norms specific to school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 367–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20406
  • Shanahan, M.-C., Carol-Ann Burke, L. E., & Francis, K. (2016). Using a boundary object perspective to reconsider the meaning of STEM in a Canadian context. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166296
  • Shanahan, M.-C. (2011). Science blogs as boundary layers: Creating and understanding new writer and reader interactions through science blogging. Journalism, 12(7), 903–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412844
  • Schoenfeld, A. H., & Herrmann, D. J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 484–494.
  • Slaton, A. E. (2001). Reinforced concrete and the modernization of American building, 1900–1930. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624
  • Strong, L., Adams, J. D., Bellino, M. E., Pieroni, P., Stoops, J., & Das, A. (2016). Against neoliberal enclosure: Using a critical transdisciplinary approach in science teaching and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1202982
  • Takeuchi, M. A. (2016). Friendships and group work in linguistically diverse mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(3), 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1169422
  • Takeuchi, M. A. (2018). Power and identity in immigrant parents’ involvement in early years mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9781-4
  • Takeuchi, M. A., & Dadkhahfard, S. (2019). Rethinking bodies of learners through STEM education. In P. Sengupta., M.-C. Shanahan., & B. Kim (Eds.). Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 199–216). Springer.
  • Thomas, B., & Watters, J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002
  • Vakil, S., & Ayers, R. (2019). The racial politics of STEM education in the USA: Interrogations and explorations. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 22 (4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592831
  • Vossoughi, S., & Vakil, S. (2018). Toward what ends? A critical analysis of militarism, equity & STEM education. In A. Ali & T. Buenavista (Eds.). Education at war (pp. 117–140). Fordham University Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilkerson-Jerde, M. H., & Wilensky, U. J. (2011). How do mathematicians learn math?: Resources and acts for constructing and understanding mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9306-5

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.