Response of science learners to contradicting information: a review of research

References

• Abelson, R. P. (1959). Modes of resolution of belief dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275900300403
   Google Scholar
• Achor, E. E., & Abuh, P. Y. (2020). Fostering students’ academic performance in physics using cognitive conflict instructional strategy and conceptual change pedagogy. International Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v2i1.118
   Google Scholar
• Akmam, A., Anshari, R., Amir, H., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2018). Influence of learning strategy of cognitive conflict on student misconception in computational physics course. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335 (1) , 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/335/1/012074
   Google Scholar
• Allaire-Duquette, G., Bélanger, M., Grabner, R. H., Koschutnig, K., & Masson, S. (2019). Individual differences in science competence among students are associated with ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activation. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 97(9), 1163–1178. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaire-Duquette, G., Brault Foisy, L. -M., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., Larose, M., & Masson, S. (2021). An fMRI study of scientists with a Ph.D. in physics confronted with naive ideas in science. Npj Science of Learning, 6(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00091-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anggoro, S., Widodo, A., Suhandi, A., & Treagust, D. F. (2019). Using a discrepant event to facilitate preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual change about force and motion. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8), em1737. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105275
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, K. (1996). Students’ responses during discrepant event science lessons [Paper presentation]. The National Assication for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) Annual Conference, St-Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Modeley, C. (2012). A three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.680618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Baddock, M., & Bucat, R. (2008). Effectiveness of a classroom chemistry demonstration using the cognitive conflict strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1115–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701528824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baser, M. (2006). Fostering conceptual change by cognitive conflict instruction on students’ understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75458
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, M. (2018). Representational pluralism [Paper presentation]. The Conjoint Delegation Conference at UQAM, Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bendixen, L. D. (2016). Teaching for epistemic change in elementary classrooms. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 281–299). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brault Foisy, L. -M., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Masson, S. (2015). Is inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics? Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4(1–2), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2015.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Brod, G., Breitwieser, J., Hasselhorn, M., & Bunge, S. A. (2020). Being proven wrong elicits learning in children – But only in those with higher executive function skills. Developmental Science, 23(3), e12916. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brod, G., Hasselhorn, M., & Bunge, S. A. (2018). When generating a prediction boosts learning: The element of surprise. Learning and Instruction, 55 (3) , 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. E. (1993). Refocusing core intuitions: A concretizing role for analogy in conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1273–1290. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbules, N. C., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Response to contradiction: Scientific reasoning during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. A. (2008). On being certain: Believing you are right even when you’re not. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caleon, I., & Subramanian, R. (2010). Development and application of a three‐tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902890130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. (2014). Is water H₂O? Evidence, realism and pluralism. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy or responses to anomalous data in sciene. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Children’s responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 327. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2009). Conceptual change—Multiple routes, multiple mechanisms: A commentary on Ohlsson (2009). Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241–1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, J. R., Sinatra, G. M., Jones, S. H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Lombardi, D. (2014). Confidence in prior knowledge, self-efficacy, interest and prior knowledge: Influences on conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.0060361-476X/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coştu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2010). Promoting conceptual change in first year students’ understanding of evaporation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1039/C001041N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crujeiras-Pérez, B., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2019). Students’ progression in monitoring anomalous results obtained in inquiry-based laboratory tasks. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9641-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden, L. (2006). Reasoning in biological discoveries: Essays on mechanisms, interfield relations, and anomaly resolution. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C., & Lyndon, H. (1997). Conceptual mediation: A new perspective on conceptual exchange. Research in Science Education, 27(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461314
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, C. (2014). Towards a conceptual profile: Rethinking conceptual mediation in the light of recent cognitive and neuroscientific findings. Research in Science Education, 44(3), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9388-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2), 105–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 265–281). Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E., & Eliovitch, R. (1990). Applying the “cognitive conflict” strategy for conceptual change - Some applications, difficulties and problems. Science Education, 74(5), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change - A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatni, M., Asrizal, A., & Reni, P. (2020). Meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive conflict on physics learning. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6 (2) , . https://doi.org/10.21009/1.06213
   Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J., & Kass, H. (1988). Inconsistent or discrepant events in science instruction. Studies in Science Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268808559946
   Google Scholar
• Ferrero, M., Hardwicke, T. E., Konstantinidis, E., & Vadillo, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of refutation texts to correct misconceptions among educators. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 26(3), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furberg, A., & Arnseth, H. C. (2009). Reconsidering conceptual change from a socio-cultural perspective: Analyzing students’ meaning making in genetics in collaborative learning activities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(1), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9161-6
   Google Scholar
• Ganea, P. A., Larsen, N. E., & Venkadasalam, V. P. (2020). The role of alternative theories and anomalous evidence in children’s scientific belief revision. Child Development, 92(3 1137–1153). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González‐Espada, W. J., Birriel, J., & Birriel, I. (2010). Discrepant events: A challenge to students’ intuition. The Physics Teacher, 48(8), 508–511. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3502499
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (2016a). Handbook of epistemic cognition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (2016b). An introduction to epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gül, K. S., & Ateş, H. (2017). Science teachers’ perceptions toward discrepant events applied in science education [Paper presentation]. The Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching Hong-Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, M., Haury, D. L., & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjiachilleos, S., Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2013). The impact of cognitive and affective aspects of cognitive conflict on learners’ conceptual change about floating and sinking. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.811074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1990). Misconceptions and the certainty of response index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2003). When is conceptual change intended? A cognitive sociocultural view. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 407–425). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmerich, J. A., Van Voorhis, K., & Wiley, J. (2016). Anomalous evidence, confidence change, and theory change. Cognitive Science, 40(6), 1534–1560. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, P., & Gomez, L. M. (2009). Reconciling the cognitive, motivational, and social contexts of instruction. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 62–81). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, K. (2018 The future of education and skills: Education 2030 (OECD Education working paper)). .
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, M. W., & Christiansen, F. V. (2020). Handling anomalous data in the lab: Students’ perspectives on deleting and discarding. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00111-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., Scharmann, L. C., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(4), 483–485 doi:.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., Noh, T., & Koh, H. (2005). The influence of students’ cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., Shin, S. -H., & Noh, T. -H. (2002). A study on elementary school students’ responses to anomalous data. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(2), 252–260.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understanding, knowing and learning in a complex world (pp. 145–182). Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Butterfuss, R., Kim, J., & Van Boekel, M. (2019). Knowledge revision through the lenses of the three-pronged approach. Memory & Cognition, 47(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0848-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Walsh, E. K., Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51(5–6), 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.913961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienhues, D., Ferguson, L., & Stahl, E. (2016). Diverging information and epistemic change. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 318–330). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Epistemology or pedgogy, that is the question. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 144–157). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koumaras, P. (1996). Pupils’ conceptions as a factor for the development of experiments - The case of simple electricity. School & Science Review, 77(280), 97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). La structure des révolutions scientifiques [The structure of scientific revolutions]. Champs-Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G., & Byun, T. (2012). An explanation for the difficulty of leading conceptual change using a counterintuitive demonstration: The relationship between cognitive conflict and responses. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 943–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9234-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., & Kwon, J. (2001). What do we know about students’ cognitive conflict in science classroom: A theoretical model of cognitive conflict process [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Mesa, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G., Kwon, J., Park, -S. -S., Kim, J. -W., Kwon, H. -G., & Park, H. -K. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, E. L., & Galloway, D. (1996). Conceptual links between cognitive acceleration through science education and motivational style: A critique of Adey and Shayer. International Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limón, M., & Carretero, M. (1997). Conceptual change and anomalous data: A case study in the domain of natural sciences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. -Y. (2007). Responses to anomalous data obtained from repeatable experiments in the laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madu, B. C., & Orji, E. (2015). Effects of cognitive conflict instructional strategy on students’ conceptual change in temperature and heat. SAGE Open, 5(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015594662
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2000). Role of anomalous data and epistemological beliefs in middle school students’ theory change about two controversial topics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2001a). Introduction to special issue on conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 11(4), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00032-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2001b). Responses to anomalous data on controversial topics and theory change. Learning and Instruction, 11(6), 453–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00042-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2007). Introduction: Bridging the cognitive and sociocultural approaches in research on conceptual change: Is it feasible? Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520709336914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J., Bub, D. N., & Lalonde, C. E. (2011). Video-game training and naïve reasoning about object motion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, S., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Brault Foisy, L. -M. (2014). Differences in brain activation between novices and experts in science during a task involving a common misconception in electricity. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Trevors, G. J., & Chevrier, M. (2016). Epistemic climate for epistemic change. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 331–359). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., Heddy, B. C., Jones, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Johnson, M. (2018). Conceptual change in science teaching and learning: Introducing the dynamic model of conceptual change. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(2), 151–195. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.3349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1981, April). Creating cognitive dissonance between students’ preconceptions to encourage individual cognitive accommodation and a group cooperative construction of a scientific model [Paper presentation]. The American Educational Research Association (AERA), Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional science, 11(3), 183–200. doi: 10.1007/BF00414279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, S. (2009). Resubsumption: A possible mechanism for conceptual change and belief revision. Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, S. (2013). Beyond evidence-based belief formation: How normative ideas have constrained conceptual change research. Frontline Learning Research, 1 (2) , 70–85 doi:10.14786/flr.v1i2.58.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. (2006). Exploring the impact of varying degrees of cognitive conflict in the generation of both subject and pedagogical knowledge as primary trainee teachers learn about shadow formation. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1545–1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600780179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1975). L’équilibration des structures cognitives. Problème central du développement. Presses de l’Université de France.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichaels’ manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703–723). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M., & Monts, D. L. (1982). How students reconcile discordant data: A study of lab report discussions. Journal of Chemical Education, 59(9), 794. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed059p794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199. doi: 10.3102/00346543063002167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints on conceptual change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 3–13). Elsevier Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66(2), 211–227. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207
   Google Scholar
• Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accomodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., & Cyr, G. (2017). Toward a durable prevalence of scientific conceptions: Tracking the effects of two interfering misconceptions about buoyancy from preschoolers to science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1121–1142. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., Malenfant-Robichaud, G., Cormier, C., & Masson, S. (2020). Coexistence of misconceptions and scientific conceptions in chemistry professors: A mental chronometry and fMRI study. Frontiers in Education, 5 1–16 doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.542458 . https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.542458
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., Nenciovici, L., Malenfant-Robichaud, G., Thibault, F., Sy, O., Mahhou, M. A., Bernard, A., Allaire-Duquette, G., Blanchette Sarrasin, J., Brault Foisy, L. -M., Brouillette, N., St-Aubin, -A. -A., Charland, P., Masson, S., Riopel, M., Tsai, -C. -C., Bélanger, M., & Chastenay, P. (2020). Models of conceptual change in science learning: Establishing an exhaustive inventory based on support given by articles published in major journals. Studies in Science Education, 56(2), 157–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1744796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., Sauriol, É., & Riopel, M. (2015). Experimental evidence of the superiority of the prevalence model of conceptual change over the classical models and traditional teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1082–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., Skelling-Desmeules, Y., & Sy, O. (2015). Exploring secondary students’ conceptions about fire using a two-tier, true/false,easy-to-use diagnostic test. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 2(1), 62–78 doi:10.21891/jeseh.99647.
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., & Thouin, M. (2003). Étude qualitative d’évolutions conceptuelles en contexte d’explorations libres en physique-mécanique au secondaire [Qualitative study of conceptual evolutions in the context of free explorations in physics-mechanics in high school]. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 29(3), 525–544. 10.7202/011402ar
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, P. (2013). Proposition for improving the classical models of conceptual change based on neuroeducational evidence: Conceptual prevalence. Neuroeducation, 1(2), 16–43. https://doi.org/10.24046/neuroed.20130201.16
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, P. (2017). The coexistence claim and its possible implications for success in teaching for conceptual “change”. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9497
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, P. (2018). Faire apprendre les sciences et la technologie à l’école. Épistémologie, didactique, sciences cognitives et neurosciences au service de l’enseignant [Making students learn science and technology in school: Epistemology, didactics, cognitive sciences and neurosciences for teachers]. Presses de l’Université Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Ravanis, K., Christidou, V., & Hatzinikita, V. (2013). Enhancing conceptual change in preschool children’s representations of light: A sociocognitive approach. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2257–2276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9356-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayce, L. (2009). The Route to Cognitive Conflict (A Planning Toolkit for Teachers). Reading Borough Council and NCETM.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, L. E., Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Jenkins, A. C. (2008). Going beyond the evidence: Abstract laws and preschoolers’ responses to anomalous data. Cognition, 109(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P., & Moje, E. B. (1999). The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders’ frameworks for understanding electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtulman, A. (2009). Rethinking the role of resubsumption in conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P. I., diSessa, A. A., & Rochelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconcieved: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
   Google Scholar
• Stavy, R., & Berkovitz, B. (1980). Cognitive conflict as a basis for teaching quantitative aspects of the concept of temperature. Science Education, 64(5), 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730640514
   Google Scholar
• Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Foreword. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. x–xi). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2009). What human architecture tell us about constructivism. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 127–144). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. L., & Kirby, L. A. J. (2020). Situational interest helps correct misconceptions: An investigation of conceptual change in university students. Instructional Science, 48(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09509-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Toplis, R. (2007). Evaluating science investigations at ages 14–16: Dealing with anomalous results. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, E. E. (2016). Analyzing “real-world” anomalous data after experimentation with a virtual laboratory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9408-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X. (2017). Using analogies to facilitate conceptual change in mathematics learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(4), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0857-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2008b). International handbook of research on conceptual change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2008a). Conceptual change research: An introduction. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. xiii–xxviii). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. (2021). Brachistochrone curve. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brachistochrone_curve
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F., & O’Neill, K. (2009). A reframing on the debate on instructional guidance. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 82–105). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Blom, D. E. (1983). Toward an empirical test of the role of cognitive conflict in learning. Developmental Review, 3(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(83)90005-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Aharon-Kravetsky, S. (2005). Exploring the effects of cognitive conflict and direct teaching for students of different academic levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 829–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar