A scoping review of interventions in primary science education

References

• Abdi, A., Laei, S., & Ahmadyan, H. (2013). *The effect of teaching strategy based on multiple intelligences on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 281–284. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010401
   Google Scholar
• Acar, D., Tertemiz, N., & Taşdemir, A. (2018). *The effects of STEM training on the academic achievement of 4th graders in science and mathematics and their views on STEM training. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018438141
   Google Scholar
• Akar, H. (2018). The relationships between quality of work life, school alienation, burnout, affective commitment and organizational citizenship: A study on teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.169
   Google Scholar
• Akcay, B., & Akcay, H. (2015). *Effectiveness of science-technology-society (STS) instruction on student understanding of the nature of science and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.50889
   Google Scholar
• Akcay, H., & Yager, R. E. (2010). *The impact of a science/technology/society teaching approach on student learning in five domains. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9226-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyurek, E., & Afacan, O. (2013). Effects of brain-based learning approach on students’ motivation and attitudes levels in science class. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 3(1), 104–119. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543600.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ali, M. M., Yager, R. E., Hacieminoglu, E., & Caliskan, I. (2013). Changes in student attitudes regarding science when taught by teachers without experiences with a model professional development program. School Science and Mathematics, 113(3), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12008
   Google Scholar
• Altun, S. (2015). *The effect of cooperative learning on students’ achievement and views on the science and technology course. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 451–468. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/91/89
   Google Scholar
• Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). *Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2002.10668709
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, D., Smith, E. R., & Basmadjian, K. G. (2007). Bridging the University–School divide: Horizontal expertise and the “Two-Worlds Pitfall”. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106297841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton, K. (1992). Discipline knowledge and confidence to teach science: Self-perceptions of primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 22, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356874 1
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023666618800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Asan, A. (2007). *Concept mapping in science class: A case study of fifth grade students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 186–195. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.1.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashiabi, G. S. (2007). Play in the preschool classroom: Its socioemotional significance and the teacher’s role in play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0165-8 2
   Google Scholar
• Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orion, N. (2010). *System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubusson, P., Schuck, S., Ng, W., Burke, P., & Pressick-Kilborn, K. (2015). Quality learning and teaching in primary science and technology literature review Sydney: Association of Independent Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Aubusson, P., Skamp, K., Burke, P. F., Pressick-Kilborn, K., Ng, W., Palmer, T. A., & Ferguson, J. (2019). Primary connections: Linking science with literacy stage 6 research evaluation final report. Prepared for Steering Committee of Primary Connections, Australian Academy of Science. Accessed 22 December https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/134515/1/Primary%20Connections%20Stage%206%20Evaluation_redacted_report_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2013). National assessment program – science literacy year 6 report 2012 (pp. 1–118). http://www.nap.edu.au/verve/_resources/NAP-SL_2012_Public_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2017). Cross-curriculumpriorities. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/cross-curriculum-priorities/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2019). National assessment program – science literacy year 6 report 2018 (pp. 1–160). https://nap.edu.au/docs/default-source/resources/nap-sl-report-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=8737e5e_2
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2021). Naplan 2021 summary results. Author. https://reports.acara.edu.au/NAP
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2021). Australian teacher workforce data: National teacher workforce characteristics report (New South Wales). Author. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/atwd/national-teacher-workforce-char-report.pdf?sfvrsn=9b7fa03c_4
   Google Scholar
• Australian Primary Principals Association (APPA). (2014). The overcrowded primary curriculum: A way forward. Author. Retrieved on 12 April 2022 from https://appa.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Overcrowded-primary-curriculum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aydede, M. N., & Matyar, F. (2009). *The effect of active learning approach in science teaching on cognitive level of student achievement. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 115–127 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fatih-Matyar/publication/26605588_The_Effect_of_Active_Learning_Approach_in_Science_Teaching_on_Cognitive_Level_of_Student_Achievement/links/02e7e529472d663d96000000/The-Effect-of-Active-Learning-Approach-in-Science-Teaching-on-Cognitive-Level-of-Student-Achievement.pdf?_sg%5B0%5D=started_experiment_milestone&origin=journalDetail.
   Google Scholar
• Aydeniz, M., & Brown, C. L. (2017). Enhancing pre-service elementary school teachers’ understanding of essential science concepts through a reflective conceptual change model. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(2), 305–326. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1052019
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. P. (1997). Surviving TIMSS. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(4), 295. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20439195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balim, A. G., Inel-Ekici, D., & Özcan, E. (2016). *Concept cartoons supported problem based learning method in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p272
   Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R. (2019). Understanding the big picture for science teacher education: The 2018 NSSME+. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(3), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1591920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). *The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethke Wendell, K., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 513–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). *Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleicher, R. E., & Lindgren, J. (2005). Success in science learning and preservice science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-4861-1
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S., Hill, C. J., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(4), 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802400072
   Google Scholar
• Boon, H. J. (2010). Climate change? Who knows? A comparison of secondary students and pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 104–120. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n1.9 1
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bracey, G. W. (2000). The TIMSS “final year” study and report: A critique. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029004004
   Google Scholar
• Brackmann, C. P., Román-González, M., Robles, G., Moreno-León, J., Casali, A., & Barone, D. (2017November). *Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school. In Proceedings of the 12th workshop on primary and secondary computing education. Nijmegen, Netherlands, (pp. 65–72).
   Google Scholar
• Brandstädter, K., Harms, U., & Großschedl, J. (2012). *Assessing system thinking through different concept-mapping practices. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2147–2170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.716549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakwell, G. M., & Beardsell, S. (1992). Gender, parental and peer influences upon science attitudes and activities. Public Understanding of Science, 1(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/2/003
   Google Scholar
• Brigido, M., Borrachero, A. B., Bermejo, M. L., & Mellado, V. (2013). Prospective primary teachers’ self-efficacy and emotions in science teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.686993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A “content-first” approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. A., Ryoo, K., & Rodriguez, J. (2010). *Pathway towards fluency: Using ‘disaggregate instruction’ to promote science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1465–1493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903117921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulunuz, M. (2013). *Teaching science through play in kindergarten: Does integrated play and science instruction build understanding? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(2), 226–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2013.789195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulu, S. T., & Pedersen, S. (2010a). *Scaffolding middle school students’ content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2014). NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9381-4
   Google Scholar
• Çakici, Y., & Turkmen, N. (2013). *An investigation of the effect of project-based learning approach on children’s achievement and attitude in science. The Online Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2), 9–17 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojsat/issue/22659/242010.
   Google Scholar
• Can, B., Yıldız-Demirtaş, V., & Altun, E. (2017). *The effect of project-based science education programme on scientific process skills and conceptions of kindergarten students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 395. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardak, O., Dikmenli, M., & Saritas, O. (2008December). *Effect of 5E instructional model in student success in primary school 6th year circulatory system topic. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching (Vol. 9, No. 2). https://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/download/v9_issue2_files/cardak.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Celikten, O., Ipekcioglu, S., Ertepinar, H., & Geban, O. (2012). *The effect of the conceptual change oriented instruction through cooperative learning on 4th grade students’ understanding of earth and sky concepts. Science Education International, 23(1), 84–96. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ975551
   Google Scholar
• Çetin, P. S., & Eymur, G. (2017). Developing students’ scientific writing and presentation skills through argument driven inquiry: An exploratory study. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), 837–843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. L. S., & Tytler, R. (2017). Inquiry teaching and learning: Forms, approaches, and embedded views within and across cultures. In M. W. Hackling, J. Ramseger, H. L. S. Chen (Eds.), Quality teaching in primary science education (pp. 93–122). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, K. Y., Hong, Z. W., & Chen, Y. L. (2014). *Impact of using an educational robot-based learning system on students’ motivation in elementary education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(4), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2014.2346756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, A., Klein, V., & Hershberger, S. (2015). Success, difficulty, and instructional strategy to enact an argument-based inquiry approach: Experiences of elementary teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 991–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9525-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. L., & Cohen, E. S. (1983). Theory and practice of radon monitoring with charcoal adsorption. Health Physics, 45(2), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198308000-00027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, S. (2005). Changing times in the classroom: Teaching as a ‘crowded profession’. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 15(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210500200130
   Google Scholar
• Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). *Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalacosta, K., Kamariotaki-Paparrigopoulou, M., Palyvos, J. A., & Spyrellis, N. (2009). *Multimedia application with animated cartoons for teaching science in elementary education. Computers & Education, 52(4), 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalvi, T., & Wendell, K. (2017). Using student video cases to assess pre-service elementary teachers’ engineering teaching responsiveness. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 1101–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9547-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deehan, J. (2021a2). Primary science education in Australian universities: An overview of context and practice. Research in Science Education 52 6 1735–1759 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10026-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deehan, J. (2021b). Online education practices and teaching team compositions in Australian preservice primary science education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(6), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n6.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deehan, J., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of the science teaching efficacy beliefs and science experiences of a cohort of preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2548–2573. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1393706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deehan, J., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2020). From students to teachers: Investigating the science teaching efficacy beliefs and experiences of graduate primary teachers. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 885–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9716-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deehan, J., McKinnon, D. H., & Danaia, L. (2019). A long-term investigation of the science teaching efficacy beliefs of multiple cohorts of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teaching Education, 30(8), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1672377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., Ogden, H., & Pero, E. (2015). Reconceptualizing elementary preservice teacher education: Examining an integrated-curriculum approach. The New Educator, 1(3), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2014.960986
   Google Scholar
• Demirdöğen, B., Hanuscin, D. L., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Köseoğlu, F. (2016). Development and nature of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 575–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9472-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denessen, E., Vos, N., Hasselman, F., & Louws, M. (2015). The relationship between primary school teacher and student attitudes towards science and technology. Education Research International, 2015, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/534690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170–2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Osborne, J. (2014). Science-related aspirations across the primary–secondary divide: Evidence from two surveys in England. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1609–1629. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.871659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakidoy, I. A. N., & Kendeou, P. (2001a). *Facilitating conceptual change in astronomy: A comparison of the effectiveness of two instructional approaches. Learning and Instruction, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00011-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donna, J. D., & Hick, S. R. (2017). Developing elementary preservice teacher subject matter knowledge through the use of educative science curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1279510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durmuş, J., & Bayraktar, Ş. (2010a). *Effects of conceptual change texts and laboratory experiments on fourth grade students’ understanding of matter and change concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9216-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyment, J. E., & Downing, J. J. (2020). Online initial teacher education: A systematic review of the literature. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1631254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggleston, J. (Ed.). (2018). School-based curriculum development in Britain: A collection of case studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., Delacruz, G., & Kumar, M. (2012a). *Learning physics through play in an augmented reality environment. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 7(3), 347–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9150-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan, O. (2014a). *The effects of multimedia learning material on students’ academic achievement and attitudes towards science courses. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(5), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/14.13.608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, M. (2011a). *The effects of ecology-based summer nature education program on primary school students’ environmental knowledge, environmental affect and responsible environmental behavior. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 2233–2237. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ962697
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, M. (2015a). *The effect of summer environmental education program (seep) on elementary school students’ environmental literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(2), 165–181. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1062929
   Google Scholar
• Eshach, H., & Fried, M. N. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-7198-9
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, M. B. (2011). Investigative primary science: A problem-based learning approach. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(9), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n9.2
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, C., & Constantinou, C. (2009b). *An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing system thinking skills in elementary school: A case study with fifth‐graders and sixth‐graders. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fentie, R. (2019). Using online Professional Learning Networks (PLNs) for K-6 teachers’ professional development in science education? Science Education News, 68(1), 51–54. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.224964
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Cézar, R., & Solano Pinto, N. (2017). Attitude towards school science in primary education in Spain. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 19(4), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2017.19.4.1393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, G. (2009a). *The effects of the use of Renzulli Learning on student achievement in reading comprehension, reading fluency, social studies, and science. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 4(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v4i1.629
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: Perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck, S., & Simon, G. (2013, November). *An augmented reality environment for astronomy learning in elementary grades: An exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine, Talence, France. Association for Computing Machinery, (pp. 14–22).
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D. J., Fifield, S., Madsen, J., & Qian, X. (2013). The science semester: Cross-disciplinary inquiry for prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(6), 1049–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9326-8
   Google Scholar
• Fouad, K. E., Masters, H., & Akerson, V. L. (2015a). *Using history of science to teach nature of science to elementary students. Science and Education, 24(9), 1103–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9783-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France, A. (2021). Teachers using dialogue to support science learning in the primary classroom. Research in Science Education, 51(3), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09863-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, S., Beswick, K., & Crowley, S. (2019). Responding to the demands of the STEM education agenda: The experiences of primary and secondary teachers from rural, regional and remote Australia. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 5(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2019.62
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genc, M. (2015a). *The effect of scientific studies on students’ scientific literacy and attitude. Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(1), 141–152. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/omuefd/issue/20280/215035
   Google Scholar
• Girod, M., Twyman, T., & Wojcikiewicz, S. (2010a). *Teaching and learning science for transformative, aesthetic experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 801–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9175-2
   Google Scholar
• Gluckman, M., Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2014a). *Spacing simultaneously promotes multiple forms of learning in children’s science curriculum. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonski, D. (2011). Review of funding for schooling. Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2019). Enhancing science self-efficacy and attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers (PST) through a flipped classroom learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrum, D., & Rennie, L. (2007). Australian school science education - national action plan 2008-2012 - volume 1. Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Gresnigt, R., Taconis, R., van Keulen, H., Gravemeijer, K., & Baartman, L. (2014). Promoting science and technology in primary education: A review of integrated curricula. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 47–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.877694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlüer, E., & Kesercioğlu, T. (2012). *The effect of using activities improving scientific literacy on students’ achievement in science and technology lesson. International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) 1300-915X, 1(1), 8–12. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iojpe/issue/69839/1114008
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., Tonks, S., & Tonks, S. (2004a). *Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halsey, J. (2018). Independent review into regional, rural and remote education. Common wealth of Australia. https://docs.education.gov.au/node/50281
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2015). Towards big ideas of science education. School Science Review, 97(359), 97–107. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5553990
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. J., Penuel, W. R., D’Angelo, C. M., DeBarger, A. H., Gallagher, L. P., Kennedy, C. A., Krajcik, J. S., & Krajcik, J. S. (2015a). *Impact of project‐based curriculum materials on student learning in science: results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1362–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field’: Factors shaping identities of secondary science and mathematics. Teaching Science, 58(1), 21–29. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.192291
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., Chittleborough, G., Herbert, S., Jones, M., Kenny, J., Redman, C., Gilbert, A., & King, J. (2015). School-based pedagogies and partnerships in primary science teacher education: The Science Teacher 19 Education Partnerships with Schools (STEPS) project. Report to the Office for Learning and Teaching.Sydney, NSW, Australia: Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-steps-project
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., & Jones, M. (2018). School-based partnerships in teacher education: A research informed model for universities, schools and beyond. Springer Nature:.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (1994). Seeking directions for change: The personalisation and politicisation of science education. Curriculum Studies, 2(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965975940020104
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howitt, C. (2007). Pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions of factors in an holistic methods course influencing their confidence in teaching science. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9015-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, P., Cho, Y., Liu, M., & Schallert, D. L. (2008). *Examining the interplay between middle school students’ achievement goals and self-efficacy in a technology-enhanced learning environment. American Secondary Education, 36(3), 33–50. https://web.s.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=102025af-8e88-4dbb-bf22-b9eeb2f5fe75%40redis
   Google Scholar
• Hume, A. C. (2012). Primary connections: Simulating the classroom in initial teacher education. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9210-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., Chen, N. S., & Ho, H. J. (2014a). *Effects of an integrated concept mapping and web-based problem-solving approach on students’ learning achievements, perceptions and cognitive loads. Computers & Education, 71, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Chen, C. C., & Tu, N. T. (2016). *Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students’ learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895–1906. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1057747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson, K. A., & Benson, A. C. (2010). Barriers to providing physical education and physical activity in Victorian state secondary schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n8.1
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, A., & Menendez Alvarez-Hevia, D. (2021). Perceptions of primary school students toward learning about science: The case of Spain. Education 3-13, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, S. A., & VanWynsberghe, R. (2020). A synthesis of the research on community service learning in preservice science teacher education. Frontiers in Education, 5(45), retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.00045/full
   Google Scholar
• Kamii, C., & Ewing, J. K. (1996). Basing teaching on Piaget’s constructivism. Childhood Education, 72(5), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1996.10521862
   Google Scholar
• Kandlhofer, M., & Steinbauer, G. (2016). *Evaluating the impact of educational robotics on pupils’ technical-and social-skills and science related attitudes. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 679–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, D. E. (2010). *Doing the project and learning the content: Designing project‐based science curricula for meaningful understanding. Science Education, 94(3), 525–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaçalli, S., & Korur, F. (2014). *The effects of project‐based learning on students’ academic achievement, attitude, and retention of knowledge: The subject of “electricity in our lives”. School Science and Mathematics, 114(5), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12071
   Google Scholar
• Kaynar, D., Tekkaya, C., & Çakiroğlu, J. (2009a). *Effectiveness of 5e learning cycle instruction on students’ achievement in cell concept and scientific epistemological beliefs. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(37), 96–105. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/hunefd/issue/7801/102230
   Google Scholar
• Keil, C., Haney, J., & Zoffel, J. (2009). *Improvements in student achievement and science process skills using environmental health science problem-based learning curricula. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 1–18. https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/7782/5549
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. P., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools, Teaching Science, 60(2), 34–46. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.203841
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J. D. (2012). University-school partnerships: Pre-service and in-service teachers working together to teach primary science. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n3.1
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J. D., Hobbs, L., Herbert, S., Jones, M., Chittleborough, G., Campbell, C., Redman, C., & Redman, C. (2014). Science teacher education partnerships with schools (STEPS): Partnerships in science teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(12), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n12.4
   Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., & Bolger, M. (2017). Analysis of Korean elementary pre-service teachers’ changing attitudes about integrated STEAM pedagogy through developing lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9709-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Tan, A. L., & Talaue, F. T. (2013). New vision and challenges in inquiry-based curriculum changes in Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 189–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.636844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleickmann, T., Tröbst, S., Jonen, A., Vehmeyer, J., & Möller, K. (2016). The effects of expert scaffolding in elementary science professional development on teachers’ beliefs and motivations, instructional practices, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2013). *Impact of environmental power monitoring activities on middle school student perceptions of STEM. Science Education International, 24(1), 98–123. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1015828
   Google Scholar
• Lall, M., & Vickers, E. (Eds.). (2009). Education as a political tool in Asia (Vol. 11). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. R., Castleberry, S. B., & Green, G. T. (2010). *Effects of an environmental education program on the environmental orientations of children from different gender, age, and ethnic groups. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 28(3), 95–113. https://js.sagamorepub.com/jpra/article/view/1376
   Google Scholar
• Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblebicioglu, G., Metin, D., Yardimci, E., & Cetin, P. S. (2011). *The effect of informal and formal interaction between scientists and children at a science camp on their images of scientists. Science Education International, 22(3), 158–174. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ941681
   Google Scholar
• Lester, J. C., Spires, H. A., Nietfeld, J. L., Minogue, J., Mott, B. W., & Lobene, E. V. (2014). *Designing game-based learning environments for elementary science education: A narrative-centered learning perspective. Information Sciences, 264, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. D. (2019). Practice what you teach: How experiencing elementary school science teaching practices helps prepare teacher candidates, Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Huang, Z., Jiang, M., & Chang, T. W. (2016). *The effect on pupils’ science performance and problem-solving ability through Lego: An engineering design-based modeling approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 143–156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, B. (2007). A longitudinal study of students’ attitudes towards science and choice of career. 80th NARST International Conference, New Orleans. National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, C., O˝stman, L., Roberts, D. A., Wickman, P.-O., Erickson, G., & Mackinnon, A. (2011) Exploring the Landscape of Scientific Literacy (Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Linder, S. M., & Simpson, A. (2017). Towards an understanding of early childhood mathematics education: A systematic review of the literature focusing on practising and prospective teachers. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 19(3), 274–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117719553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, T., & Nasri, N. M. (2019). A systematic review: Issues on equity in education. Creative Education, 10(12), 3163–3173. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012240
   Google Scholar
• Liou, H. H., Yang, S. J., Chen, S. Y., & Tarng, W. (2017). *The influences of the 2D image-based augmented reality and virtual reality on student learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 20(3), 110–121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26196123
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Horton, L., Olmanson, J., & Toprac, P. (2011). A study of learning and motivation in a new media enriched environment for middle school science. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9192-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T. C., Peng, H., Wu, W. H., & Lin, M. S. (2009). *The effects of mobile natural-science learning based on the 5E learning cycle: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 344–358. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.4.344
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, A., Huser, C., Sikder, S., & Danaia, L. (2020). Effective early childhood STEM education: findings from the little scientists evaluation. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-01004-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamitsa, K., Kasoutas, M., & Kokkotas, P. (2009). *Developing Greek primary school students’ critical thinking through an approach of teaching science which incorporates aspects of history of science. Science and Education, 18(3–4), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9150-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., Durksen, T. L., Williamson, D., Kiss, J., & Ginns, P. (2016). *The role of a museum‐based science education program in promoting content knowledge and science motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(9), 1364–1384. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1997). Science achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). TIMSS International Study Centre, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, C. V. (2016). STEM education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International 27(4), 530–569. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1131146
   Google Scholar
• McDonnough, J. T., & Matkins, J. J. (2010). The role of field experience in elementary preservice teachers’ self‐efficacy and ability to connect research to practice. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.00003.x
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, D. H., Danaia, L., & Deehan, J. (June, 2017). The design of preservice primary teacher education science subjects: The emergence of an interactive educational design model. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education (JAESE), 4(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.19030/jaese.v4i1.9972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTigue, E. M. (2009). *Does multimedia learning theory extend to middle-school students? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meluso, A., Zheng, M., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. (2012). *Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2018). Sources of science teaching self-efficacy for preservice elementary teachers in science content courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(5), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9813-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesci, G., & Renee’S, S. (2017). Changing preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science: Why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, M. P. (2013). *Assessment of an interactive internet program to educate children aged 7 - 9 about science, the brain and drugs. Creative Education, 4(11), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.411097
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, I., Pannizon, D., Keast, S., & Loughran, J. (2015). Exploring the pedagogical reasoning of expert teachers. Paper presented at the Australian Science Education Research Association (ASERA) Conference, Perth, Australia. Australian Science Education Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Molina, R., Borror, J., & Desir, C. (2016). *Supporting STEM success with elementary students of color in a low-income community. Distance Learning, 13(2), 19–25. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1822358250?accountid=10344
   Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S., MacDonald, A., Danaia, L., & Wang, C. (2019). An analysis of Australian STEM education policies. Policy Futures in Education, 17(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318774190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S., MacDonald, A., Wang, C., & Danaia, L. (2019). Towards an understanding of STEM engagement: A review of the literature on motivation and academic emotions. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 19(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00054-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., & Smith, G. (2012). The impact of a curriculum course on pre-service primary teachers’ science content knowledge and attitudes towards teaching science. Irish Educational Studies, 31(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2011.634061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naizer, G., Hawthorne, J. H., & Henley, T. B. (2014). *Narrowing the gender gap: Enduring changes in middle school students’ attitude toward math, science and technology. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 15(3), 29–34. https://jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1825
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Mathematics. (, N. A. S. E. M.) (2022). Engineering, and Mathematics. The National Academies Press https://doi.org/10.17226/26215.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Mathematics. (2022). Science and engineering in preschool through elementary grades: The brilliance of children and the strengths of educators. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26215 And it may be worth noting that it’s from the U.S.
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). (2013). www.nextgenscience.org/
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., & Cakitaki, B. (2016). Mapping Australian higher education 2016. Grattan Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., Cherastidtham, I., & Mackey, W. (2018). Mapping Australian higher education 2018. Grattan Institute.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA). (2017). NSW Syllabus for the Australian Curriculum, Science and Technology K-6. http://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/learning-areas/science/science-and-technology-k-6-new-syllabus
   Google Scholar
• Ocak, G. (2010). *The effect of learning stations on the level of academic success and retention of elementary school students. The New Educational Review, 21(2), 146–157. https://tner.polsl.pl/e21/a11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ozogul, G., Miller, C. F., & Reisslein, M. (2019). *School fieldtrip to engineering workshop: Pre-, post-, and delayed-post effects on student perceptions by age, gender, and ethnicity. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(5), 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1518408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9007-0
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. (2008). Practices and innovations in Australian science teacher education programs. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9043-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. (2011). Sources of efficacy information in an inservice program for elementary teachers. Science Education, 95(4), 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panasan, M., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2010). *Learning outcomes of project-based and inquiry-based learning activities. Online Submission, 6(2), 252–255. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509723
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J., Heywood, D., & Jolley, N. (2012). Developing pre-service primary teachers’ perceptions of cross-curricular teaching through reflection on learning. Teachers and Teaching, 18(6), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.746504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, C. Y. J., & Chen, L. T. (2014). Beyond Cohen’s d: Alternative effect size measures for between-subject designs. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(1), 22–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.745471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Khalil, H. (2020). Scoping reviews () . In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (pp. 406–450). Joanna Briggs Institute. Available online at https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
   Google Scholar
• Pino-Pasternak, D., & Volet, S. (2020). Starting and staying strong: Pre-service primary teachers’ attitudinal profiles towards science learning and their outcomes in an introductory science unit. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47, 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00372-w 3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K–12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Kvasničák, R. (2007). *Short-term effects of field programme on students’ knowledge and attitude toward biology: A Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9044-8
   Google Scholar
• Pyle, A., & Danniels, E. (2017). A continuum of play-based learning: The role of the teacher in play-based pedagogy and the fear of hijacking play. Early Education and Development, 28(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1220771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, C., Pongsanon, K., & Akerson, V. L. (2010). If we teach them, they can learn: Young students’ views of nature of science aspects to early elementary students during an informal science education program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 887–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9164-5
   Google Scholar
• Randler, C., & Hulde, M. (2007). *Hands‐on versus teacher‐centred experiments in soil ecology. Research in Science and Technological Education, 25(3), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701535091
   Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D. R., Smith, J. A., & Fawson, P. C. (2005). *An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(3), 276–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. M., Tomas, L., & Tones, M. (2011). *Writing stories to enhance scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 685–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003728039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II (pp. 559–572). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0201_2
   Google Scholar
• Roth, K. (2014).Elementary science teaching. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.) The handbook of research on science education (Volume 2), (pp.361–394) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, E., & Perry, L. B. (2020). Inequalities in the private funding of public schools: Parent financial contributions and school socioeconomic status. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 52(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2019.1689234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, J. P., Shores, L. R., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2010). Integrating learning and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 166–177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Saçkes, M., Flevares, L. M., Gonya, J., & Trundle, K. C. (2012). Preservice early childhood teachers’ sense of efficacy for integrating mathematics and science: Impact of a methods course. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33(4), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2012.732666
   Google Scholar
• Sadi, Ö., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2011). *Effects of hands-on activity enriched instruction on students’ achievement and attitudes towards science, Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(2), 87–97. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safaruddin, S., Ibrahim, N., Juhaeni, J., Harmilawati, H., & Qadrianti, L. (2020). *The effect of project-based learning assisted by electronic media on learning motivation and science process skills. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i1.5
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). *The effect of augmented reality technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144, 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, Z., Summers, R., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Wang, S. (2016). Attitudes toward science among grades 3 through 12 Arab students in Qatar: Findings from a cross-sectional national study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1156184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salloum, S., Siry, C., & Espinet, M. (2020). Examining the complexities of science education in multilingual contexts: Highlighting international perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 42(14), 2285–2289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1831644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, J. H., & Ringstaff, C. (2011). Reversing the downward spiral of science instruction in K-2 classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(6), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9246-z
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, J. H., & Ringstaff, C. (2013). Assessing the impact of teacher professional development on science instruction in the early elementary grades in rural US schools. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 678–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.751044
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, J. H., & Ringstaff, C. (2016). The influence of contextual factors on the sustainability of professional development outcomes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9451-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sari, D. K., Banowati, E., & Purwanti, E. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning model increase the creative thinking skill and students activities on elementary school. Journal of Primary Education, 7(1), 57–63. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/21861
   Google Scholar
• Schuelka, M. J. (2013). Excluding students with disabilities from the culture of achievement: The case of the TIMSS, PIRLS, and PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 28(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.708789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebaganwa, A. (2013). *Introducing complex situations in primary education: Their impact on student’s results in terms of efficiency. International Journal of Education, 5(3), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v5i3.4146
   Google Scholar
• Sempowicz, T., & Hudson, P. (2011). Analysing mentoring dialogues for developing a preservice teacher’s classroom management practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n8.4
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., & Farris, A. V. (2012). *Learning kinematics in elementary grades using agent-based computational modeling: A visual programming-based approach. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on interaction design and children, Bremen, Germany: Association for Computing Machinery (pp. 78–87).
   Google Scholar
• Shine, K. (2018). Reporting education: How can we do it better? Asia Pacific Media Educator, 28(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X18805330
   Google Scholar
• Shine, K. (2020). ‘Everything is negative’: Schoolteachers’ perceptions of news coverage of education. Journalism, 21(11), 1694–1709. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917743827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shine, K., & Rogers, S. (2020). Public perceptions of the tone and emotional impact of educational news coverage. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4s6gw
   Google Scholar
• Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Howley, I., Hayashi, K., & Hagita, N. (2015). *Can a social robot stimulate science curiosity in classrooms? International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(5), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0303-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siry, C. (2020). Dialogic Pedagogies and multimodal methodologies: Working towards inclusive science education and research. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6(2), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-BJA10017
   Google Scholar
• Skamp, K. (2020). Research in Science Education (RISE): A review (and story) of research in RISE articles (1994-2018). Research in Science Education. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09934-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43–69. 1 https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, S., Andrade, R., & Page, M. (2016). *Motivating young Native American students to pursue STEM learning through a culturally relevant science program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 947–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9629-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgess, J. (2003). A model describing play as a child-chosen activity—Is this still valid in contemporary Australia? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 50, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1630.2003.00362.x
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K., Perry, L., & McConney, A. (2018). A comparison of rural educational disadvantage in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand using OECD’s PISA. SAGE Open, 8(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018805791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarhan, L., Ayyıldız, Y., Ogunc, A., & Sesen, B. A. (2013). *A jigsaw cooperative learning application in elementary science and technology lessons: Physical and chemical changes. Research in Science and Technological Education, 31(2), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.811404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taşkın-Can, B. (2013). The effects of using creative drama in science education on students' achievements and scientific process skills. Elementary Education Online, 12(1), 120–131.
   Google Scholar
• Taşkın-Can, B. (2013). *The effects of using creative drama in science education on students’ achievements and scientific process skills. Elementary Education Online, 12(1), 120–131. http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11499/8164
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., Wernert, N., Rodrigues, S., & O’Grady, E. (2020a). TIMSS 2019 Highlights. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-616-1
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., Wernet, N., Buckley, S., Rodrigues, S., O’Grady, E., & Schmid, M. (2020b). TIMSS Australia 2019: Volume II School and Classroom Contexts for Learning. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-615-4
   Google Scholar
• Ting, K. L., & Siew, N. M. (2014). *Effects of outdoor school ground lessons on students’ science process skills and scientific curiosity. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(4), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n4p96
   Google Scholar
• Toma, R. B., & Greca, I. M. (2018). *The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383–1395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, R. B., Greca, I. M., & Orozco Gómez, M. L. (2019). Attitudes towards science and views of nature of science among elementary school students in terms of gender, cultural background and grade level variables. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(4), 492–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1561433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2007). A longitudinal study of conceptual change: Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma, K., & Linn, M. C. (2012). *Using interactive technology to support students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect and global warming. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(4), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9337-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, W. P. (1999). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences.Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). *Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 381–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1977). The development of higher psychological functions. Soviet Psychology, 15(3), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405150360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. S., & Coffey, D. J. (2019). Investigating elementary preservice teachers’ designs for integrated science/literacy instruction highlighting similar cognitive processes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(5), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1587569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2001). TIMSS primary and middle school data: Some technical concerns. Educational Researcher, 30(6), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030006017
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. E., Basile, C. G., & Albright, L. (2011). *The effect of an experiential learning program on middle school students’ motivation toward mathematics and science. RMLE Online, 35(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2011.11462086
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, K., & Rogers, C. (2013). *Engineering design‐based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 513–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. L., Eberstein, K., Scott, D. M., & Ito, E. (2018). *Birds in the playground: Evaluating the effectiveness of an urban environmental education project in enhancing school children’s awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards local wildlife. PloS one, 13(3), e0193993. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). *Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmes, S. E., & Siry, C. (2021). Multimodal Interaction Analysis: A powerful tool for examining plurilingual students’ engagement in science practices. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09977-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, G. W., & Park, S. (2022). The effects of flipped classrooms on K-16 students’ science and math achievement: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 58(1), 95–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1933354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, T., & Albion, P. (2019). Investigating remote access laboratories for increasing pre-service teachers’ STEM capabilities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 82–93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26558830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H. K., & Hsieh, C. E. (2006). *Developing sixth graders’ inquiry skills to construct explanations in inquiry‐based learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1289–1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazicioğlu, S., & Çavuş-Güngören, S. (2019). *Investigate the effect of game-based activities on middle school students’ science learning according to achievement, motivation, attitude and gender variables. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 13(1), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.584673
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09367-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar