988
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Unpacking readiness for elementary science teaching: what preservice teachers bring and how that can be shaped through teacher education

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abed, O., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2015). Jordanian preservice primary teachers’ perceptions of mentoring in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1010629
  • Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Akerson, V., & Bartels, S. L. (2023). Elementary science teaching: Toward the goal of scientific literacy. In N. G. Lederman, D. Zeidler, & J. S. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. III pp. 528–558). Routledge.
  • Akerson, V., Buzellii, C., & Donnelly, L. (2010). On the nature of teaching nature of science: Preservice early childhood teachers’ instruction in preschool and elementary settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20323
  • Akerson, V., Buzellii, C., & Eastwood, J. (2010). The relationship between preservice early childhood teachers’ cultural values and their perceptions of scientists’ cultural values. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9176-1
  • Akyol, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., & Traynor, A. (2012). Modeling the interrelationships among pre-service science teachers’ understanding and acceptance of evolution, their views on nature of science and self-efficacy beliefs regarding teaching evolution. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(8), 937–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9296-x
  • Anderson, L. M., Smith, D. C., & Peasley, K. (2000). Integrating learner and learning concerns: Prospective elementary science teachers’ paths and progress. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00017-2
  • Arias, A., & Davis, E. A. (2017). Supporting children to construct evidence-based claims in science: Individual learning trajectories in a practice-based program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.011
  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). The Australian curriculum: Science.
  • Avraamidou, L. (2013). Prospective elementary teachers’ science teaching orientations and experiences that impacted their development. International Journal of Science Education, 35(10), 1698–1724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.708945
  • Avraamidou, L. (2015). Reconceptualizing elementary teacher preparation: A case for informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 108–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.969358
  • Avraamidou, L. (2016). Intersections of life histories and science identities: The stories of three preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 861–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1169564
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  • Bang, M., Brown, B. A., Calabrese Barton, A., Rosebery, A. S., & Warren, B. (2017). Toward more equitable learning in scienceHelping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices (C. Schwarz, C. Passmore, & B. J. Reiser, Eds.), National Science Teachers Association.
  • Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research Inc
  • Bartels, S., Rupe, K., & Lederman, J. (2019). Shaping preservice teachers’ understandings of STEM: A collaborative math and science methods approach. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(6), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1602803
  • Bautista, N. (2011). Investigating the use of vicarious and mastery experiences in influencing early childhood education majors’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9232-5
  • Berland, L. K. (2011). Explaining variation in how classroom communities adapt the practice of scientific argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(4), 625–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.591718
  • Beyer, C., & Davis, E. A. (2012). Learning to critique and adapt science curriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96(1), 130–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20466
  • Bismack, A. S. (2019). Content knowledge for teaching science: A longitudinal study of novice elementary teachers’ knowledge development in a practice-based teacher education program and school contexts, [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan].
  • Bismack, A. S., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2022). Science practice‐readiness: Novice elementary teachers’ developing knowledge of science practices. Science Education, 106(2), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21698
  • Blatt, E., & Patrick, P. (2014). An exploration of pre-service teachers’ experiences in outdoor ‘places’ and intentions for teaching in the outdoors. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2243–2264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.918294
  • Bleicher, R. E. (2004). Revisiting the STEBI‐B: Measuring self‐efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 104(8), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18004.x
  • Bottoms, S., Ciechanowski, K., & Hartman, B. (2015). Learning to teach elementary science through iterative cycles of enactment in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(8), 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9447-6
  • Bravo, M., Mosqueda, E., Solís, J., & Stoddart, T. (2014). Possibilities and limits of integrating science and diversity education in preservice elementary teacher preparation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(5), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9374-8
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<871:AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-9
  • Carrier, S., Whitehead, A., Walkowiak, T., Luginbuhl, S., & Thomson, M. (2017). The development of elementary teacher identities as teachers of science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1733–1754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1351648
  • Cartwright, T., & Atwood, J. (2014). Elementary pre-service teachers’ response-shift bias: Self-efficacy and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2421–2437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.925152
  • Casanoves, M., González, A., Salvadó, Z., Haro, J., & Novo, M. (2015). Knowledge and attitudes towards biotechnology of elementary education preservice teachers: The first Spanish experience. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2923–2941. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1116718
  • Chen, J., & Mensah, F. M. (2018). Teaching contexts that influence elementary preservice teachers’ teacher and science teacher identity development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(5), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1469187
  • Cobern, W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Skjold, B., Muğaloğlu, E., Bentz, A., & Sparks, K. (2014). Pedagogy of science teaching tests: Formative assessments of science teaching orientations. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2265–2288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.918672
  • Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1999). Shaping a professional landscape: Stories of educational practice. Teachers College Press.
  • Criado, A., & García-Carmona, A. (2010). Prospective teachers’ difficulties in interpreting elementary phenomena of electrostatic interactions: Indicators of the status of their intuitive ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 769–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792393
  • Crowl, M., Devitt, A., Jansen, H., van Zee, E., & Winograd, K. (2013). Encouraging prospective teachers to engage friends and family in exploring physical phenomena. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9310-3
  • d’Alessio, M. (2018). The effect of microteaching on science teaching self-efficacy beliefs in preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(6), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1456883
  • Dalvi, T., & Wendell, K. (2017). Using student video cases to assess pre-service elementary teachers’ engineering teaching responsiveness. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 1101–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9547-5
  • Danielsson, A., Andersson, K., Gullberg, A., Husse´nius, A., & Scantlebury, K. (2016). “In biology class we would just sit indoors…”: Experiences of insideness and outsideness in the places student teachers’ associate with science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9702-8
  • Danielsson, A., & Warwick, P. (2014a). ‘All we did was things like forces and motion …’: Multiple discourses in the development of primary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.734639
  • Danielsson, A., & Warwick, P. (2014b). ‘You have to give them some science facts’: Primary student teachers’ early negotiations of teacher identities in the intersections of discourses about science teaching and about primary teaching. Research in Science Education, 44(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9383-9
  • Davis, E. A., & Haverly, C. (2022). Well-started beginners: Preparing elementary teachers for rigorous, consequential, just, and equitable science teaching. In J. A. Luft & G. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teacher education (pp. 83–96). Routledge.
  • Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004607
  • Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93(4), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20311
  • Deehan, J., Daniaia, L., & McKinnon, D. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of the science teaching efficacy beliefs and science experiences of a cohort of preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2548–2573. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1393706
  • Deehan, J., McKinnon, D., & Daniaia, L. (2019). A long-term investigation of the science teaching efficacy beliefs of multiple cohorts of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(8), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1672377
  • Dianovsky, M., & Wink, D. (2012). Student learning through journal writing in a general education chemistry course for pre-elementary education majors. Science Education, 96(3), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21010
  • Duckworth, E. (2006). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning (Third ed.). Teachers College Press.
  • Eick, C., & Stewart, B. (2010). Dispositions supporting elementary interns in the teaching of reform-based science materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 783–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9174-3
  • Eshach, H., & Fried, M. N. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-7198-9
  • Farr, R., & Anastasiow, N. (1969). Tests of reading readiness and achievement: A review and evaluation. International Reading Association.
  • Fitzgerald, A. (2020). Out in the field: Examining the role of school-based experiences in preparing primary preservice teachers as confident and competent teachers of science. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1710618
  • Forbes, C. (2011). Preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based elementary science. Science Education, 95(5), 927–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20444
  • Forbes, C. (2013). Curriculum-dependent and curriculum-independent factors in preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9245-0
  • Forbes, C., & Davis, E. A. (2010). Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers’ mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 820–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20379
  • Ford, D., Fifield, S., Madsen, J., & Qian, X. (2013). The science semester: Cross-disciplinary inquiry for prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(6), 1049–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9326-8
  • Frisch, J. (2019). Use of a “hybrid” science notebook by preservice elementary education teachers: Combining paper and digital tools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(6), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1589847
  • García-Carmona, A., Criado, A., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2017). Primary pre-service teachers’ skills in planning a guided scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9536-8
  • Gilbert, A., & Byers, C. (2017). Wonder as a tool to engage preservice elementary teachers in science learning and teaching. Science Education, 101(6), 907–928. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21300
  • Gray, R., McDonald, S., & Stroupe, D. (2022). What you find depends on how you see: Examining asset and deficit perspectives of preservice science teachers’ knowledge and learning. Studies in Science Education, 58(1), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1897932
  • Gross, M., & Huchberg, N. (2016). Characteristics of place identity as part of professional identity development among pre-service teachers. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 1243–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9646-4
  • Grossman, P. (2018). Teaching core practices in teacher education. Harvard Education Press.
  • Gross, L., McGee, J., James, J., & Hodge, C. (2019). From play to pedagogy: Formative childhood experiences and the development of preservice elementary science educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(8), 856–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1616516
  • Gullberg, A., Andersson, K., Danielsson, A., Scantlebury, K., & Husse´nius, A. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ views of the child—reproducing or challenging gender stereotypes in science in preschool. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 691–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9593-z
  • Gunning, A., & Mensah, F. M. (2011). Preservice elementary teachers’ development of self-efficacy and confidence to teach science: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9198-8
  • Hanuscin, D. (2013). Critical incidents in the development of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science: A prospective elementary teacher’s journey. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(6), 933–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9341-4
  • Hanuscin, D., & Zangori, L. (2016). Developing practical knowledge of the Next Generation Science Standards in elementary science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(8), 799–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9489-9
  • Haverly, C., Calabrese Barton, A., Schwarz, C., & Braaten, M. (2020). “Making space”: How novice teachers create opportunities for equitable sense-making in elementary science. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118800706
  • Haverly, C., Schwarz, C. V., Davis, E. A., Sharma, M., Ibourk, A., Burgess, T., Cheuk, T., Canipe, M., Cooper-Wagoner, J. A., McKenna, T. J., Gunckel, K. L., & Mensah, F. M. (2022, March). Building an elementary science teacher education community to advance equity and justice [Symposium]. Annual International Conference of NARST, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Hechter, R. (2011). Changes in preservice elementary teachers’ personal science teaching efficacy and science teaching outcome expectancies: The influence of context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9199-7
  • Herbert, S., & Hobbs, L. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ views of school-based approaches to pre-service primary science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 777–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9587-x
  • Hernandez, C., & Shroyer, M. G. (2017). The use of culturally responsive teaching strategies among Latina/o student teaching interns during science and mathematics instruction of CLD students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(4), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1343605
  • Hestness, E., McGinnis, R., Riedinger, K., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2011). A study of teacher candidates’ experiences investigating global climate change within an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9234-3
  • Hollon, R. E., Roth, K. J., & Anderson, C. W. (1991). Science teachers‘ conceptions of teaching and learning. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2 pp. 145–186). JAI Press.
  • Hufnagel, E. (2015). Preservice elementary teachers’ emotional connections and disconnections to climate change in a science course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(9), 1296–1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21245
  • Johnson, H. J., & Cotterman, M. E. (2015). Developing preservice teachers’ knowledge of science teaching through video clubs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(4), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9429-0
  • Kenny, J. (2010). Preparing pre‐service primary teachers to teach primary science: A partnership‐based approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1267–1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902977994
  • Kier, M., & Lee, T. (2017). Exploring the role of identity in elementary preservice teachers who plan to specialize in science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.016
  • Kim, M., & Tan, A. -L. (2011). Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry‐based practical work: Stories from elementary pre‐service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003639913
  • Kinskey, M. (2017). Using action research to improve science teaching self-efficacy. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1795–1811. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1502898
  • Kloser, M. (2014). Identifying a core set of science teaching practices: A Delphi expert panel approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1185–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21171
  • Köksal, M. (2011). Epistemological predictors of “self efficacy on learning biology” and “test anxiety related to evaluation of learning on biology” for pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9205-0
  • Küçükaydın, M., & Gökbulut, Y. (2020). Beliefs of teacher candidates toward science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1673603
  • Lambert, J., & Bleicher, R. (2013). Climate change in the preservice teacher’s mind. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(6), 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9344-1
  • Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. Yale University Press.
  • Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347321
  • Lee, Y., Lee, C., Lam, I., Kwok, P., & So, W. (2020). Inquiry science learning and teaching: A comparison between the conceptions and attitudes of pre-service elementary teachers in Hong Kong and the United States. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9687-2
  • Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_6
  • Mandrikas, A., Skordoulis, C., & Halkia, K. (2013). Pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions about wind. International Journal of Science Education, 35(11), 1902–1924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.706374
  • Mandrikas, A., Stavrou, D., Halkia, K., & Skordoulis, C. (2018). Preservice elementary teachers’ study concerning wind on weather maps. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1423458
  • Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2012). A comparison of student teachers’ beliefs from four different science teaching domains using a mixed methods design. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608092
  • Marshall, S. L., Haverly, C., & Ibourk, A. (2021). Toward equitable science instruction: The current state of elementary science education in the United States and policy considerations. In M. M. Atwater (Ed.), International Handbook of Research on Multicultural Science Education (pp. 1–23). Springer Nature.
  • Martin, J., & Carter, L. (2015). Preservice teacher agency concerning education for sustainability (EfS): A discursive psychological approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21217
  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Harvard University Press.
  • McLaughlin, D. S., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2013). Preservice teachers’ uptake and understanding of funds of knowledge in elementary science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9284-1
  • Menon, D., Chandrasekhar, M., Kosztin, D., & Steinhoff, D. (2020). Impact of mobile technology‐based physics curriculum on preservice elementary teachers’ technology self‐efficacy. Science Education, 104(2), 252–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21554
  • Menon, D., & Sadler, T. (2016). Preservice elementary teachers’ science self-efficacy beliefs and science content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 649–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9479-y
  • Mensah, F. M., Brown, J., Titu, P., Rozowa, P., Sivaraj, R., & Heydari, R. (2018). Preservice and inservice teachers’ ideas of multiculturalism: Explorations across two science methods courses in two different contexts. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(2), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1425820
  • Mensah, F. M., & Jackson, I. (2018). Whiteness as property in science teacher education. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000108
  • Mikeska, J. N., Anderson, C. W., & Schwarz, C. V. (2009). Principled reasoning about problems of practice. Science Education, 93(4), 678–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20312
  • Milford, T., & Tippett, C. (2013). Preservice teachers’ images of scientists: Do prior science experiences make a difference? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(4), 745–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9304-1
  • Miller, M., Hanley, D., & Brobst, J. (2019). The impacts of a research-based model for mentoring elementary preservice teachers in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(4), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1573127
  • NASEM. (2021) . Call to action for science education: Building opportunity for the future. The National Academies Press.
  • NASEM. (2022) . Science and engineering in preschool through elementary grades: The brilliance of children and the strengths of educators. The National Academies Press.
  • National Agency for Education. (2018) . Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare. The Swedish National Agency for Education Stockholm.
  • National Center for Educational Statistics. (2019) . TIMSS International Data Explorer. U.S. Department of Education.
  • National Research Council. (2012) . A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
  • Nelson, M., & Davis, E. A. (2012). Preservice elementary teachers’ evaluations of elementary students’ scientific models: An aspect of pedagogical content knowledge for scientific modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1931–1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.594103
  • Nilsson, P., & van Driel, J. (2011). How Will We Understand What We Teach? - Primary Student Teachers’ Perceptions of their Development of Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Physics. Research in Science Education, 41(4), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9179-0
  • Nixon, R., Smith, L., & Sudweeks, R. (2019). Elementary teachers’ science subject matter knowledge across the teacher career cycle. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(6), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21524
  • Norris, C., Morris, J., & Lummis, G. (2018). Preservice teachers’ self-efficacy to teach primary science based on ‘science learner’ typology. International Journal of Science Education, 40(18), 2292–2308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1528645
  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
  • Palmberg, I., Berg, I., Jeronen, E., Kärkkäinen, S., Norrgård-Sillanpää, P., Persson, C., Vilkonis, R., & Yli-Panula, E. (2015). Nordic–Baltic student teachers’ identification of and interest in plant and animal species: The importance of species identification and biodiversity for sustainable development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(6), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9438-z
  • Palmberg, I., Hermans, M., Jeronen, E., Kärkkäinen, S., Persson, C., & Yli-Panula, E. (2018). Nordic student teachers’ views on the importance of species and species identification. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(5), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1468167
  • Papadouris, N., Hadjigeorgiou, A., & Constantinou, C. (2014). Pre-service elementary school teachers’ ability to account for the operation of simple physical systems using the energy conservation law. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(8), 911–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9407-y
  • Parker, J., & Heywood, D. (2013). Exploring how engaging with reflection on learning generates pedagogical insight in science teacher education. Science Education, 97(3), 410–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21049
  • Pino-Pasternak, D., & Volet, S. (2018). Evolution of pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards learning science during an introductory science unit. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1520–1541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1486521
  • Plummer, J., Zahm, V., & Rice, R. (2010). Inquiry and astronomy: Preservice teachers’ investigations of celestial motion. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(4), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9189-9
  • Powietrzyn´ska, M., & Gangji, A. (2016). “I understand why people need to ease their emotions”: Exploring mindfulness and emotions in a conceptual physics classroom of an elementary teacher education program. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(3), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9772-2
  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004
  • Ratinen, I. (2013). Primary student-teachers’ conceptual understanding of the greenhouse effect: A mixed method study. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 929–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.587845
  • Ratinen, I., Viiri, J., & Lehesvuori, S. (2013). Primary school student teachers’ understanding of climate change: Comparing the results given by concept maps and communication analysis. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1801–1823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9329-7
  • Rice, D., & Kaya, S. (2012). Exploring relations among preservice elementary teachers’ ideas about evolution, understanding of relevant science concepts, and college science coursework. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9193-2
  • Riegle-Crumb, C., Morton, K., Moore, C., Chimonidou, A., Labrake, C., & Kopp, S. (2015). Do inquiring minds have positive attitudes? The science education of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 99(5), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21177
  • Rivera Maulucci, M. (2011). Language experience narratives and the role of autobiographical reasoning in becoming an urban science teacher. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(2), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9323-9
  • Rivero, A., Azcárate, P., Porlán, R., Martín Del Pozo, R., & Harres, J. (2011). The progression of prospective primary teachers’ conceptions of the methodology of teaching. Research in Science Education, 41(5), 739–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9188-z
  • Ross, D., & Cartier, J. (2015). Developing pre-service elementary teachers’ pedagogical practices while planning using the learning cycle. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(6), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9439-y
  • Roth, K. (2014). Elementary science teaching. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching (Vol. II pp. 361–394). Routledge.
  • Ruiz-Gallardo, J., García Fernández, B., & Jiménez, A. (2019). Visual literacy in preservice teachers: A case study in biology. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9634-2
  • Saçkes, M., & Trundle, K. (2014). Preservice early childhood teachers’ learning of science in a methods course: Examining the predictive ability of an intentional learning model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9355-y
  • Santau, A., Maerten-Rivera, J., Bovis, S., & Orend, J. (2014). A mile wide or an inch deep? Improving elementary preservice teachers’ science content knowledge within the context of a science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(8), 953–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9402-3
  • Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311423382
  • Settlage, J. (2011). Counterstories from White mainstream preservice teachers: Resisting the master narrative of deficit by default. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(4), 803–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9324-8
  • Seung, E., Park, S., & Jung, J. (2014). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ understanding of the essential features of inquiry-based science teaching using evidence-based reflection. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9390-x
  • Shaughnessy, M., & Boerst, T. A. (2018). Uncovering the skills that preservice teachers bring to teacher education: The practice of eliciting a student’s thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702574
  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Siry, C., & Lara, J. (2012). “I didn’t know water could be so messy”: Coteaching in elementary teacher education and the production of identity for a new teacher of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9339-1
  • Skarstein, T., & Skarstein, F. (2020). Curious children and knowledgeable adults – early childhood student-teachers’ species identification skills and their views on the importance of species knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1710782
  • Smithey, J. (2008). The development of preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge about learners’ science ideas, [ doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor].
  • Södervik, I., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., & Vilppu, H. (2014). Promoting the understanding of photosynthesis among elementary school student teachers through text design. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(5), 581–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9373-9
  • Steele, A., Brew, C., Rees, C., & Ibrahim-Khan, S. (2013). Our practice, their readiness: Teacher educators collaborate to explore and improve preservice teacher readiness for science and math instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9311-2
  • Subramaniam, K. (2013). Minority preservice teachers’ conceptions of teaching science: Sources of science teaching strategies. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9284-3
  • Subramaniam, K., Asim, S., Lee, E., & Koo, Y. (2018). Student teachers’ images of science instruction in informal settings: A focus on field trip pedagogy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(4), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1452531
  • Subramaniam, K., & Harrell, P. (2013). Framing prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of dissolving as a ladder of explanations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1177–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9356-x
  • Szyjka, S., Mumba, F., & Wise, K. (2011). Cognitive and attitudinal predictors related to line graphing achievement among elementary pre-service teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9207-y
  • Tapia, R. R., Delgado-Iglesias, J., & Fernández, I. (2019). Learning difficulties, alternative conceptions and misconceptions of student teachers about respiratory physiology. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2602–2625. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1690177
  • Taştan Kırık, O. (2013). Science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers: Examination of the multiple factors reported as influential. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2497–2515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9357-y
  • Thompson, S., Lotter, C., Fann, X., & Taylor, L. (2016). Enhancing elementary pre-service teachers’ plant processes conceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(4), 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9469-0
  • Todorova, M., Sunder, C., Steffensky, M., & Moller, K. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ professional vision of instructional support in primary science classes: How content-specific is this skill and which learning opportunities in initial teacher education are relevant for its acquisition? Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.016
  • United Kingdom Department for Education. (2015) . National curriculum in England: Science programmes of study. Crown Publishing.
  • van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. (2014). Research on science teacher knowledge (handbook of Research on Science Education (Vol. II). Routledge.
  • Velthuis, C., Fisser, P., & Pieters, J. (2014). Teacher training and pre-service primary teachers’ self-efficacy for science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(4), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9363-y
  • Wang, J. -R., Kao, H. -L., & Lin, S. -W. (2010). Preservice teachers’ initial conceptions about assessment of science learning: The coherence with their views of learning science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 522–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.014
  • Weiland, I., & Morrison, J. (2013). The integration of environmental education into two elementary preservice science methods courses: A content-based and a method-based approach. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(6), 1023–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9336-1
  • Wendell, K., Swenson, J., & Dalvi, T. (2019). Epistemological framing and novice elementary teachers’ approaches to learning and teaching engineering design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(7), 956–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21541
  • Wendt, J., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2018). A psychometric evaluation of the English version of the dimensions of attitudes toward science instrument with a U.S. population of elementary educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.009
  • Wilder, O., Butler, M., Acharya, P., & Gill, M. (2019). Preservice elementary science teacher attitudes matter: A new instrument on positive affect toward science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(6), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1589849
  • Wilson, R., & Kittleson, J. (2012). The role of struggle in pre-service elementary teachers’ experiences as students and approaches to facilitating science learning. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9221-x
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21027
  • Yoon, H. -G., Joung, Y., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: Difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9212-y
  • Yoon, J., & Martin, L. (2019). Infusing culturally responsive science curriculum into early childhood teacher preparation. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9647-x
  • Zangori, L., & Forbes, C. (2013). Preservice elementary teachers and explanation construction: Knowledge-for-practice and knowledge-in-practice. Science Education, 97(2), 310–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21052
  • Zapata, M. (2013). Substantiating the need to apply a sociocultural lens to the preparation of teachers in an effort to achieve science reform. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(4), 777–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9513-8
  • Zembal-Saul, C., Carlone, H. B., & Brown, M. (2020). A possibility-centric vision of elementary teachers and ambitious science teaching. In D. Stroupe, K. Hammerness, & S. McDonald (Eds.), Preparing science teachers through practice-based teacher education (pp. 117–132). Harvard University Press.
  • Zembal-Saul, C., Siry, C., Monteira, S., & Bose, F. (2022). Preparing early childhood teachers to support young children’s equitable science sensemaking. In J. A. Luft & G. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teacher education (pp. 69–82). Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.