1,635
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Queer individuals’ experiences in STEM learning and working environments

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • *Alfrey, L., & Twine, F. W. (2017). Gender-fluid geek girls: Negotiating inequality regimes in the tech industry. Gender & Society, 31(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243216680590
  • Atherton, T. J., Barthelemy, R. S., Deconinck, W., Falk, M. L., Garmon, S., Long, E., Plisch, M., Simmons, E. H., & Kyle Reeves, M. D. (2016). LGBT climate in physics: Building an inclusive community. American Physical Society, College Park.
  • Avraamidou, L.(2019). Stories we live, identities we build: How are elementary teachers’ science identities shaped by their lived experiences?. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9855-8
  • *Barthelemy, R. S. (2020). LGBT+ physicists qualitative experiences of exclusionary behavior and harassment. European Journal of Physics, 41(6), 065703. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/abb56a
  • Bazzul, J., & Sykes, H. (2011). The secret identity of a biology textbook: Straight and naturally sexed. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(2), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9297-z
  • Bianchini, J. A. (2017). Equity in science education. In Science education (pp. 455–464). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_33
  • *Bilimoria, D., & Stewart, A. J. (2009). “don’t ask, Don’t tell”: The academic climate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender faculty in science and engineering. NWSA Journal, 21(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1353/nwsa.0.0077
  • Boustani, K., & Taylor, K. A. (2020). Navigating LGBTQ+ discrimination in academia: Where do we go from here? The Biochemist, 42(3), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1042/bio20200024
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (Ed.). (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage.
  • Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20241
  • Cech, E. A., & Pham, M. (2017). *queer in STEM organizations: Workplace disadvantages for LGBT employees in STEM related federal agencies. Social Sciences, 6(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010012
  • *Cech, E. A., & Rothwell, W. R. (2018). LGBTQ inequality in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(4), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20239
  • *Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.545065
  • *Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2021). Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM. Science Advances, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe0933
  • Clark Blickenstaff, J. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
  • *Cooper, K. M., Brownell, S. E., & Gormally, C. (2019). Coming out to the class: Identifying factors that influence college biology instructor decisions about revealing their LGBQ identities in class. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 25(3), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2019026085
  • *Cooper, K. M., E, S., & Marsteller, P. (2016). Coming out in class: Challenges and benefits of active learning in a biology classroom for LGBTQIA students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar37. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0074
  • *Costa, A. B., Peroni, R. O., de Camargo, E. S., Pasley, A., & Nardi, H. C. (2015). Prejudice toward gender and sexual diversity in a Brazilian public university: Prevalence, awareness, and the effects of education. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(4), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0191-z
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
  • Dancy, M., Rainey, K., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R., & Moller, S. (2020). Undergraduates’ awareness of white and male privilege in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00250-3
  • Danielsson, A. T. (2012). Exploring woman university physics students ‘doing gender’ and ‘doing physics’. Gender and Education, 24(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2011.565040
  • de B Vidor, C., Danielsson, A., Rezende, F., & Ostermann, F. (2020). What are the problem representations and assumptions about gender underlying research on gender in physics and physics education? A systematic literature review. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 1133–1168. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2020u11331168
  • Duran, A., Blockett, R. A., & Nicolazzo, Z. (2020). An interdisciplinary return to queer and Trans* studies in higher education. In L. W. Perna (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 111–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31365-4_9
  • *English, R., & Fenby-Hulse, K. (2019). Documenting diversity: The experiences of LGBTQ+ doctoral researchers in the UK. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 403–430. https://doi.org/10.28945/4328
  • European Commission. (2022). Gender gap at education level is shrinking, but women are still under-represented in research and innovation. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_6217
  • Forbes, T. D. (2020). Queer-free majors?: LGBTQ + college students’ accounts of chilly and warm academic disciplines. Journal of LGBT Youth, 19(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2020.1813673
  • *Friedensen, R. R., Kimball, E., Vaccaro, A., Miller, R. A., & Forester, R. (2021). Queer science: Temporality and futurity for queer students in STEM. Time & Society, 30(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X211008138
  • Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN). (2020) . Supporting LGBTQ students by protecting LGBTQ teachers. Research Brief).
  • Gilbert, J. (2001). Science and its ‘other’: Looking underneath ‘woman’ and ‘science’ for new directions in research on gender and science education. Gender and Education, 13(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250120063571
  • GLSEN. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2022). Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal5
  • Gonsalves, A., & Danielsson, A. T. (Eds). (2020). Physics education and gender: Identity as an analytic lens for research. Springer.
  • Gonsalves, A., Danielsson, A., & Pettersson, H. (2016). Masculinities and experimental practices in physics: The view from three case studies. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020120
  • Götschel, H. (2019). Teaching queering physics: An Agenda for research and practice. In W. Letts & S. Fifield (Eds.), STEM of desire: Queer theories and science education (pp. 124–141). Brill Sense.
  • Gunckel, K. L. (2009). Queering science for all: Probing queer theory in science education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 25(2), 62–75.
  • Gutzwa, J. A. (2021). “It’s not worth me being who I am”: Exploring how trans* collegians navigate classroom experiences through a funds of identity lens. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 14(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2021.1990077
  • *Hughes, B. E. (2017). “Managing by not managing”: How gay engineering students manage sexual orientation identity. Journal of College Student Development, 58(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0029
  • *Hughes, B. E. (2018). Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students. Science Advances, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao6373
  • Institute of Physics, Royal Astronomical Society and Royal Society of Chemistry. (2019). Exploring the workplace for LGBT+ physical scientists.
  • International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer Youth and Student Organisation (IGLYO), & Organising Bureau of European School Student Unions, (OBESSU). (2014). Guidelines for inclusive education sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression. https://www.obessu.org/site/assets/files/2103/guidelines_for_inclusion_education.pdf
  • Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2012). Systematic literature studies. Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement - ESEM (pp. 12). https://doi.org/10.1145/2372251.2372257
  • Kean, E. (2020). Advancing a critical trans framework for education. Curriculum Inquiry, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2020.1819147
  • *Kersey, E., & Voigt, M. (2020). Finding community and overcoming barriers: Experiences of queer and transgender postsecondary students in mathematics and other STEM fields. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(4), 733–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00356-5
  • Letts, W., & Fifield, S. (Eds.). (2019). STEM of desire: Queer theories and science education. Brill Sense.
  • LGBTQIA Resource Center Glossary. (2021). UC Davis. https://lgbtqia.ucdavis.edu/educated/glossary
  • *Linley, J. L., Renn, K. A., & Woodford, M. R. (2018). Examining the ecological systems of LGBTQ STEM majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2017018836
  • López López, M., González Álvarez, R., ten Brummelaar, M., van Mierlo, K. R. O., & Wieldraaijer-Vincent, L. (2021). Working with LGBTQIA+ youth in the child welfare system: Perspectives from youth and professionals. University of Groningen Press.
  • *Mattheis, A., Cruz-Ramírez De Arellan, D., & Yoder, J. B. (2019). A model of queer STEM identity in the workplace. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(13), 1839–1863. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1610632
  • *Miller, R. A., & Downey, M. (2020). Examining the STEM climate for queer students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 33(2), 69–181.
  • *Miller, R. A., Vaccaro, A., Kimball, E. W., & Forester, R. (2021). “it’s dude culture”: Students with minoritized identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(3), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000171
  • National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation. (2021). Women, Minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2021, Alexandria, VA. (Special Report NSF 21-321). https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd
  • Nguyen, U., & Riegle-Crumb, C. (2021). Who is a scientist? The relationship between counter-stereotypical beliefs about scientists and the STEM major intentions of black and latinx male and female students. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00288-x
  • Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Wong, R. (2010). Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: Consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 27(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00863.x
  • *Patridge, E. V., Barthelemy, R. S., & Rankin, S. R. (2014). Factors Impacting the Academic Climate for LGBQ STEM Faculty. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007429
  • Sarseke, G. (2018). Under-representation of women in science: From educational, feminist and scientific views. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 11(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2017.1380049
  • Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., Bhavnani, S., & Nail‐Chiwetalu, B. (2006). Use of information‐seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence‐based practice: The application of traditional and comprehensive pearl growing. A review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820600742190
  • Snyder, V. L., & Boradway, F. S. (2004). Queering high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20014
  • *Stout, J. G., & Wright, H. M. (2016). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer students’ sense of belonging in computing: An intersectional approach. Computing in Science & Engineering, 18(3), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2016.45
  • Traxler, A. L., Cid, X. C., Blue, J., & Barthelemy, R. (2016). Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), American Physical Society (APS). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.020114
  • Truong, N. L., Zongrone, A. D., & Kosciw, J. G. (2020a). Erasure and resilience: The experiences of LGBTQ students of color, Asian American and pacific islander LGBTQ youth in U.S. schools. GLSEN.
  • Truong, N. L., Zongrone, A. D., & Kosciw, J. G. (2020b). Erasure and resilience: The experiences of LGBTQ students of color, black LGBTQ youth in U.S. schools.
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2022). Women in science. http://uis.unesco.org/en/topic/women-science
  • Unsay, J. D. (2020). LGBTQ+ in STEM: Visibility and Beyond. Chemistry – A European Journal, 26(40), 8670–8675. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202002474
  • Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering - EASE ’14. the 18th International Conference. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268
  • Woolston, C. (2020). White men still dominate in UK academic science. Nature, 579(7800), 622–622. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00759-1
  • *Yang, J. A., Sherard, M. K., Julien, C., & Borrego, M. (2021). LGBTQ+ in ECE: Culture and (non)visibility. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3057542
  • *Yoder, J. B., & Mattheis, A. (2015). Queer in STEM: Workplace experiences reported in a national survey of LGBTQA individuals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632
  • Zongrone, A. D., Truong, N. L., & Kosciw, J. G. (2020a). Erasure and resilience: The experiences of LGBTQ students of color, latinx LGBTQ youth in U.S. schools. GLSEN.
  • Zongrone, A. D., Truong, N. L., & Kosciw, J. G. (2020b). Erasure and resilience: The experiences of LGBTQ students of color, Native American, American Indian, and Alaska Native LGBTQ youth in U.S. schools. GLSEN.