Joining up the DOTs: authentic teaching and learning in Design and Technology education

References

• Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Anderman, E.M., & Maehr, M.L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks. (2009). Research on teaching and learning in technology education. In: A. Jones & M. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 373–390). Rotterdam/Taipei/Boston: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Barlex, D. (2011). Dear Minister, this is why design and technology is a very important subject in the school curriculum. Design and Technology: An International Journal, 16(3), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., Craft, A., Cremin, T., Duffy, B., Hanson, R., Keene, J., Haynes, L., & Burns, D. (2006). Documenting ‘possibility thinking’: A journey of collaborative enquiry. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14, 243–262.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Universal Design. (2013). The principles of universal design. North Carolina State University website. Retrieved January 18, 2013, from http://www.ncsu.edu/project/design-projects/udi/center-for-universal-design/the-principles-of-universal-design/
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P.J., Coleman, R., Hosking, I., & Waller, S. (2007). Inclusive design toolkit. Cambridge: Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. (1994). The case for inclusive design – an overview. Proceedings of the 12th Triennial Congress, International Ergonomics Association and the Human Factors Association, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R., Clarkson, J., Dong, H., & Cassim, J. (2007). Design for inclusivity: A practical guide to accessible, Innovative and User-Centred Design. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2001). Little ‘c’ creativity. In: A. Craft, B. Jeffrey & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education. London: Continuum . (pp. 45–61).
   Google Scholar
• Finney, J., Hickman, R., Morrison, M., Nicholl, B., & Rudduck, J. (2005). Rebuilding engagement through the arts: Responding to disaffected students. Cambridge: Pearson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Turnbull, W., & Snape, P. (2011). Design and technology through a constructivist approach. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16, 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1971). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (2007). Beyond incomprehensibility. Retrieved February 7, 2013, from http://www.maxinegreene.org/articles.php
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognition apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., Bunting, C. & de Vries, M. J. (2011). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. http://www.springerlink.com/content/m0011512152471n1
   Google Scholar
• Keates, S., & Clarkson, J. (2004). Countering design exclusion: An introduction to inclusive design. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R., & Perry, D. (2001). Design and technology in a knowledge economy. London: The Engineering Council.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., Klampfleitner, M., McCune, V., Bayne, S., & Knottenbelt, M. (2007). What do you mean by ‘authentic’? A comparative review of the literature on conceptions of authenticity in teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 58, 22–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, M. M. (2007)., Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. ELI Paper 1. Washington, DC: Educause.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, R., & Nicholl, B. (2011). ‘If I was going to design a chair, the last thing I would look at is a chair’. Product analysis and the causes of fixation in students’ design work 11–16 years. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P., & Hennessy, S. (2001). Realising the potential – and lost opportunities – for peer collaboration in a D&T. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11, 203–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MYRAD. (2002). The City Centre: A research and policy rationale. Melbourne (Australia): Victorian Department of Education, Employment and Training.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Authority (NDA) (2012). Designing our tomorrow: 2nd level Irish universal design pilot report. Dublin: NDA.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Gregor, P. (2002). Design for older and disabled people – where do we go from here? Universal Access in the Information Society, 2, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F.M., & Archbald, D. (1992). The nature of authentic academic achievement. In: H. Berlak, F. M. Newmann, E. Adams, D. A. Archbald, T. Burgess, J. Raven & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Toward a new science of educational testing and assessment (pp. 71–84). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholl, B., Hosking, I., Elton, E., Lee, Y., Bell, J., & Clarkson, P. (2012). Inclusive design in the Key Stage 3 classroom: An investigation of teachers’ understanding and implementation of user-centred design principles in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-012-9221-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholl, B., & McLellan, R. (2007). ‘Oh yeah, yeah you get a lot of love hearts. the year 9s are notorious for love hearts. Everything is love hearts’. Fixation in students’ design and technology work (11–16 years). Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 12, 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholl, B., & McLellan, R. (2008). ‘We’re all in this game whether we like it or not to get a number of As to Cs.’ Design and technology teachers’ struggles to implement creativity and performativity policies. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 585–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholl, B., & McLellan, R. (2009). ‘This isn’t my project [work]…just do it…you just do research’. What student voice reveals about the nature of D&T lessons in English schools and the implications this has on their motivation and learning of complex tasks. In: A. Jones & M. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 223–232). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholl, B., McLellan, R., & Kotob, W. (2008). Understanding creativity for creative understanding: Dissemination conference 22 April 2008 report. Cambridge: Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (various dates). Annual reports of the chief inspector of schools. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S. M. (2007) A technology-based program that matches enrichment resources with student strengths. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 2. Retrieved February 22, 2013 http://online-journals.org/i-jet/article/viewArticle/126
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J., Gentry, M., & Reis, S. (2003). Enrichment clusters: A practical plan for real-world, student-driven learning. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudduck, J., Chaplain, R., & Wallace, G. (1996). School improvement: What can pupils tell us?. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2004). The challenge of year 8: Sustaining pupils’ engagement with learning. Cambridge: Pearson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rudduck, J., & McIntyre, D. (2007). Improving learning through consulting pupils. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Snape, P., & Fox-Turnbull, W. (2013). Perspectives on authenticity: Implementation in technology education. International Journal of Design Education, 23(1), 51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story, M., Mueller, J., & Mace, R. (1998). The universal design file: Designing for people of all ages and abilities. Raleigh, NC: NC State University, The Center for Universal Design.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar