Cultivating imaginative thinking: teacher strategies used in high-performing arts education classrooms

References

• Anderson, M. (2014). The challenge of post-normality to drama education and applied theatre. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 19, 110–120.10.1080/13569783.2013.872425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Schools. Canberra: ABS.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M. (2007). Using visual data in qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2008). Prospective teachers’ beliefs about imaginative thinking in K-12 schooling. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 134–142.10.1016/j.tsc.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryce, J., Mendelovits, J., Beavis, A., McQueen, J., & Adams, I. (2004). Evaluation of school-based arts education programmes in Australian schools. Canberra: Australian Council for Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., Craft, A., Cremin, T., Duffy, B., Hanson, R., Keene, J., Haynes, J., & Burns, D. (2006). Documenting ‘possibility thinking’: A journey of collaborative enquiry. Internaional Journal of Early Years Education, 14, 243–262.10.1080/09669760600880001
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P., & White, J. (2008). Creativity and performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian education. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 667–682.10.1080/01411920802224238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell, K., Craft, A., Rolfe, L., & Jobbins, V. (2009). Dance partners for creativity: Choreographing space for co‐participative research into creativity and partnership in dance education. Research in Dance Education, 10, 177–197.10.1080/14647890903324147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charleroy, A., Gentry, C., Rubiono, N., & Schatz, M. (2011). International arts education standards: A survey of the arts education standards and practices of fifteen countries and regions. New York, NY: The College Board.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2004). Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: Revisiting the foundations. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 976–993.10.1177/1049732304266795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2001a). An analysis of research and literature on creativity in education. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2001b). Little c creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in Education (pp. 45–61). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A., Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Chappell, K. (2007). Teacher stance in creative learning: A study of progression. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 136–147.10.1016/j.tsc.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 108–119.10.1016/j.tsc.2006.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education – A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deasy, R. (2002). Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (2003). The arts and the creation of mind. Language Arts, 80, 340–344.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. London: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, E. (1999). Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning. Washington, DC: President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, J., & Mansour, M. (in press). Reading the intersection of the qualitative and quantitative approaches. In J. Fleming, R. Gibson, & M. Anderson (Eds.), The arts, motivation and engagement: How the arts makes a difference. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2012). The rise of the creative class revisited: 10th (anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1989). Zero-based arts education: An introduction to ARTS PROPEL. Studies in Art Education, 30, 71–83.10.2307/1320774
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18, 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. (2010). The ‘art’ of creative teaching: Implications for higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 607–613.10.1080/13562517.2010.493349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & Anderson, M. (2008). Touching the void: Arts education research in Australia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28, 103–112.10.1080/02188790701849818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1995a). Art and imagination: Reclaiming the sense of possibility. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 378–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1995b). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (2013). The turning of the leaves: Expanding our vision or the arts in education. Harvard Educational Review, 83, 251–252.10.17763/haer.83.1.j3k4055083178g5k
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822394358
   Google Scholar
• Hammershøj, L. G. (2014). Creativity in education as a question of cultivating sensuous forces. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 168–182.10.1016/j.tsc.2014.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. J. (2012). Musical imagination: Perception and production, beauty and creativity. Psychology of Music, 40, 539–557.10.1177/0305735612444893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, J., Kinder, K., Lord, P., Scott, A., Schagen, L., & Haynes, J. (2000). Arts education in secondary schools: Effects and effectiveness. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2014). The creative turn. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6209-551-9
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2004). Cognitive transfer from arts education. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), Handbook on research and policy in art education (pp. 135–162). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education (1st ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2013). Studio thinking 2: The real benefits of visual arts education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2006). Creative learning and possibility thinking. In B. Jeffrey (Ed.), Creative Learning Practices: European Experiences (pp. 49–64). London: Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511763205
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladwig, J., & Gore, J. (2003). Companion paper 1: The future of quality teaching in NSW Government schools. In N.S.W. Department of Education and Training, Report of the consultation on future directions for public education and training: One size doesn’t fit all (pp. 113–119). Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Ladwig, J., & Gore, J. (2006). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: A classroom practice guide Quality teaching in NSW public schools. Ryde: NSW Department of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mages, W. (2006). Drama and imagination: A cognitive theory of drama’s effect on narrative comprehension and narrative production. Research in Drama Education, 11, 329–340.10.1080/13569780600900750
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic lifespan: A developmental construct validity study of elementary school, high school, and university/college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 794–824.10.1177/0013164409332214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2010). Motivation and engagement scale. Retrieved January 12, 2015 from http://www.lifelongachievement.com
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., Mansour, M., Anderson, M., Gibson, R., Liem, G., & Sudmalis, D. (2013). The role of arts participation in students’ academic and nonacademic outcomes: A longitudinal study of school, home, and community factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 709–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 45, 263–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montuori, A. (2011). Beyond postnormal times: The future of creativity and the creativity of the future. Futures, 43, 221–227.10.1016/j.futures.2010.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE). (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London: Department for Education and Employment.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. (2012). Young people’s embodied voices: Experiences and learning in dance education practices across the world. Paper presented at the Global Dance Summit: Dance, young people and change, 14–20 July 2012, Taipei.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2009). The element: How finding your passion changes everything. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 209–229.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardar, Z. (2010). Welcome to postnormal times. Futures, 42, 435–444.10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33, 12–20.10.3102/0013189X033002012
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and Technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, S., Tishman, S., Winner, E., Hetland, L., & Palmer, P. (2009). The qualities of quality: Understanding excellence in arts education. Cambridge, MA: Project Zero, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. (1996). The paradox of case study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 225–240.10.1080/0305764960260206
   Google Scholar
• Snell, J. (2011). Interrogating video data: Systematic quantitative analysis versus microethnographic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14, 253–258.10.1080/13645579.2011.563624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Creativity as a Habit. In A. G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp. 3–25). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. (1993). Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory Into Practice, 32, 147–153. 10.1080/00405849309543590
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. C. (2012). Play, imagination, and creativity: A brief literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 1, 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent-Lancrin, S., Kärkkäinen, K., Pfotenhauer, S., Atkinson, A., Jocotin, G., & Rimini, M. (2014). Measuring innovation in education. Paris: Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1967/2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–97; English translation, M. E. Sharpe. Originally from Voobrazhenie i tvorchestvo v detskom vozraste. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. (2002). Case study, case records and multimedia. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 109–127.10.1080/03057640220116463
   Google Scholar
• Wiltshire, K., & Donnelly, K. (2014). Review of the Australian curriculum: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar