The hidden human rights curriculum of surveillance cameras in schools: due process, privacy and trust

References

• Addington, L. A. (2009). Cops & cameras: Public school security as a policy response to Columbine. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1426–1446. 10.1177/0002764209332556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. W., Coopman, S. J., Hart, J. L., & Walker, K. L. (2007). Workplace surveillance and managing privacy boundaries. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 172–200. 10.1177/0893318907306033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almog, S., & Perry-Hazan, L. (2011). The ability to claim and the opportunity to imagine: Rights consciousness and the education of ultra-Orthodox girls. Journal of Law and Education, 40, 273–303.
   Google Scholar
• Bajaj, M. (2011). Human rights education: Ideology, location, and approaches. Human Rights Quarterly, 33, 481–508. 10.1353/hrq.2011.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J., & Raab, C. D. (2006). The governance of privacy: Policy instruments in global perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1791). Panopticon; or, the inspection house. London: T. Payne.
   Google Scholar
• Binkhorst, J., & Kingma, S. F. (2012). Safety vs. reputation: Risk controversies in emerging policy networks regarding school safety in the Netherlands. Journal of Risk Research, 15, 913–935. 10.1080/13669877.2012.686049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, D. W. (2015). The constitutional limit of zero tolerance in schools. Minnesota Law Review, 99, 823–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bracy, N. L. (2011). Student perceptions of high security school environments. Youth and Society, 43, 365–395. 10.1177/0044118X10365082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C., & Osler, A. (2000). Human rights, identities and conflict management: A study of school culture as experienced through classroom relationships. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30, 335–356. 10.1080/03057640020004496
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155–170). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). U.N. Doc. A/RES/44/25.
   Google Scholar
• Covell, K. (2010). School engagement and rights-respecting schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40, 39–51. 10.1080/03057640903567021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, P., Adams, C., & Hoy, W. (2011). Collective trust: Why schools can’t improve without it. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan Trans.). New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. N., Pavlovic, Z., & Zeidner, M. (2001). The ISPA cross-national children’s rights research project. School Psychology International, 22, 99–129. 10.1177/0143034301222001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschfield, P. J., & Celinska, K. (2011). Beyond fear: Sociological perspectives on the criminalization of school discipline. Sociology Compass, 5(1), 1–12. 10.1111/soco.2010.5.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Hope, A. (2009). CCTV, school surveillance and social control. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 891–907. 10.1080/01411920902834233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, A. (2010). Student resistance to the surveillance curriculum. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 20, 319–334. 10.1080/09620214.2010.530857
   Google Scholar
• Kayama, M., Haight, W., Gibson, P. A., & Wilson, R. (2015). Use of criminal justice language in personal narratives of out-of-school suspensions: Black students, caregivers, and educators. Children and Youth Services Review, 51, 26–35. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knesset Education, Culture and Sport Committee. (2012). Protocol no. 700 [Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Kupchik, A. (2010). Homeroom security: School discipline in an age of fear. New York, NY: New York University Press. 10.18574/nyu/9780814748206.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Marx, G. T. (2003). A tack in the shoe: Neutralizing and resisting the new surveillance. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 369–390. 10.1111/josi.2003.59.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCahill, M., & Finn, R. (2010). The social impact of surveillance in three UK schools: Angels, devils and teen mums. Surveillance & Society, 7, 273–289.
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey, G., Lloyd, G., Stead, J., Kane, J., Riddell, S., & Weedon, E. (2008). ‘I was dead restorative today’: From restorative justice to restorative approaches in school. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38, 199–216. 10.1080/03057640802063262
   Google Scholar
• McCowan, T. (2012). Human rights within education: Assessing the justifications. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42, 67–81. 10.1080/0305764X.2011.651204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2015a). Cameras in educational institutions. Retrieved from http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Applications/Mankal/EtsMedorim/3/3-7/HoraotKeva/K-2015-9-1-3-7-85.htm[Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2015b). Optimal educational climate: Dealing with violent and dangerous events in schools. Retrieved from http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Applications/Mankal/EtsMedorim/2/2-1/HoraotKeva/K-2015-8-2-2-1-15.htm[Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, T. (2006). The surveillance curriculum: Risk management and social control in the neoliberal school. In T. Monahan (Ed.), Surveillance and security: Technological politics and power in everyday life (pp. 109–124). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, T., & Torres, R. D. (2009). Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in public education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrill, C., Edelman, L. B., Tyson, K., & Arum, R. (2010). Legal mobilization in schools: The paradox of rights and race among youth. Law & Society Review, 44, 651–694. 10.1111/lasr.2010.44.issue-3-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, B. E. (2003). Regulating safe school communities: Being responsive and restorative. Journal of Educational Administration, 41, 689–704.
   Google Scholar
• Mullin, A. (2014). Children, paternalism and the development of autonomy. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17, 413–426.10.1007/s10677-013-9453-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2010). Teachers and human rights education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.
   Google Scholar
• Perry-Hazan, L. (2015). Freedom of speech in schools and the right to participation: When the First Amendment encounters the Convention on the Rights of the Child. BYU Education and Law Journal, 2015, 421–452.
   Google Scholar
• Perry-Hazan, L., & Birnhack, M. (2016). Privacy, CCTV, and school surveillance in the shadow of imagined law. Law and Society Review, 50, 415–449. 10.1111/lasr.12202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRACTIS. (2011). Report on changing perceptions of privacy and the changing role of the state. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1iHVDHU
   Google Scholar
• Pupils' Rights Act. (2000). Israeli Laws 42 [Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M., & Denvir, J. (2006). Front-loading due process: A dignity-based approach to school discipline. Ohio State Law Journal, 67, 277–302.
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, T. (2010). Trusting children: How do surveillance technologies alter a child’s experience of trust, risk and responsibility? Surveillance & Society, 7, 344–355.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2011). ‘It’s all about standardisation’–Exploring the digital (re) configuration of school management and administration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41, 473–488. 10.1080/0305764X.2011.625003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 264–268. 10.1111/cdir.2007.16.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skop, Y. (2016). The principal becomes an investigator: Half of the schools have been networked by cameras. Haaretz. Retrieved from http://www.haaretz.co.il/news/education/.premium-1.2916038 [Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szrubka, W. (2013). Video surveillance and the question of trust. In F. Jörklund & O. Svenonius (Eds.), Video surveillance and social control in a comparative perspective (pp. 131–152). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. (2010). I spy with my little eye: The use of CCTV in schools and the impact on privacy. The Sociological Review, 58, 381–405. 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01930.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. (2011). UK schools, CCTV and the Data Protection Act 1998. Journal of Education Policy, 26, 1–15. 10.1080/02680939.2010.493226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. (2012). The rise of the surveillance school. In K. Ball, K. D. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 225–231). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. (2013). Surveillance schools: Security, discipline and control in contemporary education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137308863
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. (2015). Why trust matters with juveniles. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85, S93–S99. 10.1037/ort0000104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., Fagan, J., & Geller, A. (2014). Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11, 751–785. 10.1111/jels.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnick, B. (2007). Surveillance cameras in schools: An ethical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 77, 317–343. 10.17763/haer.77.3.r2k76507rrjw8238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wearmouth, J., & Berryman, M. (2012). Viewing restorative approaches to addressing challenging behaviour of minority ethnic students through a community of practice lens. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42, 253–268. 10.1080/0305764X.2012.676626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar