Bringing knowledge back in: perspectives from liberal education

References

• Beck, J. (2013). Powerful knowledge, esoteric knowledge, curriculum knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43, 177–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., & Priestley, M. (2013). Capacities and the curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 35–49). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I. (2005, September). The content of schooling: From knowledge and subject matter to knowledge formation and subject specific ways of knowing. Paper presented at the meeting of European Conference on Educational Research, University College Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015a). Content, Joseph Schwab and German Didaktik. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 773–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z. (2015b). Michael Young, knowledge and curriculum: An international dialogue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 723–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and education: The 60th anniversary edition. West Lafayette: Kappa Delta Pi. (Original work published in 1938).
   Google Scholar
• Elvin, L. (1977). The place of commonsense in educational thought. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Gundem, B. B. (2000). Understanding European didactics. In B. Moon, M. Ben-Peretz, & S. Brown (Eds.), Routledge international companion to education (pp. 235–262). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. H. (1965). Liberal education and the nature of knowledge. In R. D. Archambault (Ed.), Philosophical analysis and education (pp. 113–140). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. H., & Peters, R. S. (1970). The logic of education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common cores of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6, 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 417–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humboldt, W. V. (2000). Theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 57–61). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Karseth, B., & Sivesind, K. (2010). Conceptualising curriculum knowledge within and beyond the national context. European Journal of Education, 45, 103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ker, I. (1990). The achievement of John Henry Newman. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (1998). Characteristics of critical constructive Didaktik. In B. B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue (pp. 307–330). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (2000). Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 139–159). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, R. A. (2008). The Significance of the concepts “elemental” and “fundamental” in didactic theory and practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 215–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Künzli, R. (2013). Memorizing a memory: Schwab’s the practical in a German context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 668–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, D. N. (2006). Powers of the mind: The reinvention of liberal learning in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226475783.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Løvlie, L. (2002). The promise of bildung. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36, 467–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løvlie, L., & Standish, P. (2002). Introduction: Bildung and the idea of a liberal education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36, 317–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüth, C. (2000). On Wilhelm von Humboldt’s theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 63–84). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1994). Changing the educational landscape: Philosophy, women, and curriculum. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, R. (1937). Education and the disciplines. International Journal of Ethics, 47, 370–381.10.1086/intejethi.47.3.2989393
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, R. (1949). The nature and teaching of the humanities. The Journal of General Education, 3, 290–303.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, R. (1953). Spiritual autobiography. In Z. K. McKeon (Ed.), Richard McKeon, freedom and history and other essays: An introduction to the thought of Richard McKeon (pp. 3–36). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, M., Abbas, A., & Ashwin, P. (2013). University knowledge, human development and pedagogic rights. In A. Boni & M. Walker (Eds.), Human development and capabilities (pp. 30–43). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. (2007). Rhetoric, paideia and the old idea of a liberal education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41, 183–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. G. (2008). Newman’s theory of a liberal education: A reassessment and its implications. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 219–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. G. (2009). What should it mean to have a liberal education in the 21st century? Curriculum Inquiry, 39, 465–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. H. (1982). The idea of a university. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published in 1852).
   Google Scholar
• Nordenbo, S. E. (2002). Bildung and the thinking of Bildung. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36, 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozoliņš, J. T. (2013). RS Peters and JH Newman on the aims of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45, 153–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pring, R. (1993). Liberal education and vocational preparation. In R. Barrow & P. White (Eds.), Beyond liberal education: Essays in honour of Paul H. Hirst (pp. 49–78). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, W. A. (1980). Democracy, perfectability, and the battle of the books: Thoughts on the conception of liberal education in the writings of Schwab. Curriculum Inquiry, 10, 249–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1962). The concept of the structure of the discipline. Educational Record, 43, 197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1969). College curriculum and student protest. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review, 81, 501–522.10.1086/443100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1978). Eros and education: A discussion of one aspect of discussion. In I. Westbury & N. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberation: Selective essays (pp. 105–132). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tingley, E. (2002). Knowledge for the sake of knowledge. First Things, 2002, 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N. (2010). Do we need to talk to each other? How the concept of experience can contribute to an understanding of Bildung and democracy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42, 293–309.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00441.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, F. C. (1992). The idea and practice of general education: An account of the college of the University of Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weniger, E. (2000). Didaktik as a theory of education. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 111–125). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Westbury, I., & Wilkof, N. J. (1978) Introduction. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilhof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberation: Selective essays (pp. 1–40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. (1986). The anatomy of a Victorian debate: An essay in the history of liberal education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 34, 38–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. (Ed.). (2004). Rethinking the school curriculum: Values, aims and purposes. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2009). Why general education? Peters, Hirst and history. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43, 123–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willbergh, I. (2015). The problems of “competence” and alternatives from the Scandinavian perspective of Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 334–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L., & Collins, C. (2010). The absence of knowledge in Australian curriculum reforms. European Journal of Education, 45, 89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2007). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2009). Education, globalisation and the “voice of knowledge”. Journal of Education and Work, 22, 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1, 229–250. doi:10.1002/rev3.3017
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2015). Curriculum and the specialization of knowledge: Studies in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., Lambert, D., Roberts, C., & Roberts, M. (2014). Knowledge and the future school: Curriculum and social justice. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar