Culture, technology and local networks: towards a sociology of ‘making’ in education

References

• Akindes, F. (1999). Methodology as lived experience: Rhizomatic ethnography in Hawaii. Diegesis, 5, 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, J. (2011). The relentless revolution: A history of capitalism. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of Semiology. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (1996) The system of objects. (J. Benedict, Trans.). London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrman & C. Buching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors (pp. 203–222). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2014). Children are not hackers. In K. Peppler, E. Halverson, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 64–78). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz, B., Shively, K., Peppler, K., & Wohlwend, K. (2014). Hands on, hands off: Gendered access in crafting and electronics practices. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(4), 278–297.10.1080/10749039.2014.939762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2013). Beyond technology: Children’s learning in the age of digital culture. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cremin, C. (2015). Exploring videogames with Deleuze and Guattari: Towards an affective theory of form. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1902). The child and curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1956). The problem of ego identity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 4(1), 56–121.10.1177/000306515600400104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology (Vol. 5). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2010). Between reason and experience: Essays in technology and modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1974). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital labour and Karl Marx. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gelber, S. M. (2013). Hobbies: Leisure and the culture of work in America. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, E.R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (1999). Uses of Television. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacka, E. (2003). ‘Democracy as defeat’, the impotence of arguments for public service broadcasting. Television & New Media, 4(2), 177–191.10.1177/1527476402250675
   Google Scholar
• Jeanes, E. L. (2006). ‘Resisting creativity, creating the new’. A Deleuzian perspective on creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 127–134.10.1111/caim.2006.15.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2007). Pinboards and books: Juxtaposing, learning and materiality. In D. W. Kritt & L. T. Winegar (Eds.), Education and technology: Critical perspectives, possible futures (pp. 125–149). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2005). Object lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., & Rowe, D. W. (2006). Mapping literacy spaces in motion: A rhizomatic analysis of a classroom literacy performance. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 428–460.10.1598/RRQ.41.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. H., & Bottomore, T. (1950). Citizenship and social class. London: Pluto Classic.
   Google Scholar
• Montessori, M. (1965). Spontaneous activity in education. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2014). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nemorin, S., & Selwyn, N. (2016). Making the best of it? Exploring the realities of 3D printing in school. Research Papers in Education, 32(5), 578–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K. (2015). Chapter 5, A review of e-textiles in education and society. In M. Lesley & B. Guzzetti (Eds.), Handbook of research on the societal impact of digital media (pp. 268–289). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Perrotta, C., & Williamson, B. (2016). The social life of learning analytics: Cluster analysis and the ‘performance’ of algorithmic education. Learning, Media and Technology. doi:10.1080/17439884.2016.1182927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & McDougall, J. (2017). Third spaces and digital making. In Digital media, culture and education (pp. 37–59). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ratto, M., & Boler, M. (2014). DIY citizenship: Critical making and social media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, T. (2012). Deleuze and film: A feminist introduction. New York, NY: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2013). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, C. (2017). Disruptive fixation: School reform and the pitfalls of techno-idealism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sleigh, A., Stewart, H., & Stokes, K. (2015). Open datasets for UK makerspaces: A user guide. London: Nesta. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/open_dataset_of_uk_makerspaces_users_guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., & Bevan, B. (2014). Making and tinkering: A review of the literature. National Research Council Committee on Out of School Time STEM. Report commissioned by the Committee on Successful out-of-school STEM learning, part of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shirin_Vossoughi/publication/305725173_Making_and_Tinkering_A_Review_of_the_Literature/links/579d19e008ae80bf6ea48669.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2016). Political computational thinking: Policy networks, digital governance and ‘learning to code’. Critical Policy Studies, 10(1), 39–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, J., Gale, K., Gannon, S., & Davies, B. (2010). Deleuzian thought and collaborative writing: A play in four acts. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(9), 730–741.10.1177/1077800410374299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar