Children’s lived experiences of ‘ability’ in the Key Stage One classroom: life on the ‘tricky table’

References

• Alvidrez, J., & Weinstein, R. S. (1999). Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 731–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansalone, G. (2010). Tracking: Educational differentiation or defective strategy. Educational Research Quarterly, 34(2), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. (1990). Writing about teachers: How British and American ethnographic texts describe teachers and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, E. (2012). Grouping pupils by ability in schools. In P. Adey & J. Dillon (Eds.), Bad education: Debunking myths in education (pp. 37–56). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benn, M. (2011). School wars: The battle for Britain’s education. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., Hallam, S., Ireson, J., Kutnick, P., & Creech, A. (2008). Classes, groups and transitions: Structures for teaching and learning (Primary Review Research Survey 9/2). Cambridge: The University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (1997). Setting, social class and survival of the quickest. British Educational Research Journal, 23(5), 575–595.
   Google Scholar
• Boylan, M., & Povey, H. (2014). Ability thinking. In D. Leslie & H. Mendick (Eds.), Debates in mathematics education (pp. 28–37). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, A., & Roberts-Holmes, G. (2017). Grouping in early years and Key Stage 1: ‘A necessary evil’? Retrieved from https://neu.org.uk/media/3191/view
   Google Scholar
• Brantlinger, E. (1990). Low-income adolescents’ perceptions of school, intelligence, and themselves as students. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(3), 305–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, T. (2010). Anyone listening: Evidence of children and young people’s participation in England. London: National Children’s Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. (2013). In-school ability grouping and the month of birth effect. Retrieved from https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Ability-grouping-and-the-month-of-birth-effect-T-Campbell-March-2013-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Catsambis, S., Mulkey, L. M., Buttaro, A., Jr., Steelman, L. C., & Koch, P. R. (2011). Examining gender differences in ability group placement at the onset of schooling: The role of skills, behaviors, and teacher evaluations. Journal of Educational Research, 105(1), 8–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorzempa, B. F., & Graham, S. (2006). Primary-grade teachers’ use of within-class ability grouping in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 529–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S., & Major, L. E. (2014). What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research. Retrieved from https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/What-Makes-Great-Teaching-REPORT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. M. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child’s struggle to be seen as competent. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M. (1979). Pygmalion grows up: Studies in the expectation communication process. Research on Teaching Monograph Series, 49(3), 389–410.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, C., Burke, T., & Shaw, C. (2010). Children’s participation in decision-making: A children’s views report. Retrieved from https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Childrens_participation_in_decision-making_-_A_childrens_views_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deary, I. J. (2006). Intelligence, destiny and education: The ideological roots of intelligence testing. Intelligence, 34(6), 621–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2008). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2011). Teachers’ standards. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2012). Academically more able pupils. Retrieved from https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130104124247/https://www.education.gov.uk/schools/pupilsupport/inclusionandlearnersupport/a00205083/academically-more-able-pupils
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2018). Schools that work for everyone: Government consultation response. Retrieved from https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130104124247/https://www.education.gov.uk/schools/pupilsupport/inclusionandlearnersupport/a00205083/academically-more-able-pupils
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D C Heath & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. (2010). Injustice: Why social inequality persists. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, M. J., & Yarker, P. (2013). The enduring problem of fixed ability: But is a new conversation beginning? FORUM, 55(1), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, D. (1981). Ability grouping as a self-fulfilling prophecy: A micro-analysis of teacher-student interaction. Sociology of Education, 54(3), 151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einarsdóttir, J. (2010). Children’s experiences of the first year of primary school. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(2), 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint, K., & Peim, N. (2012). Rethinking the education improvement agenda: A critical philosophical approach. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Taylor, B., & Travers, M. (2017). Exploring the relative lack of impact of research on ‘ability grouping’ in England: A discourse analytic account. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M., & Mathison, S. (2009). Researching children’s experiences. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, N. (2018). Fund for bright disadvantaged pupils launched. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/fund-for-bright-disadvantaged-pupils-launched
   Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D., & Youdell, Y. (2001). The new IQism: Intelligence, ‘ability’ and the rationing of education. In J. Demaine (Ed.), Sociology of education today (pp. 65–99). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, S., & Hogan, D. (2005). Researching children’s experience: Methods and approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hallam, S., Ireson, J., Lister, V., Chaudhury, I. A., & Davies, J. (2003). Ability grouping practices in the primary school: A survey. Educational Studies, 29(1), 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., & Corbett-Whittier, C. (2013). Using case study in education research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., & O’Hara, P. (2011). The tyranny of setting (ability grouping): Challenges to inclusion in Scottish primary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 712–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, D. (2011). An encounter with children: Seeking meaning and understanding about childhood. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(1), 331–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, D., & Einarsdóttir, J. (2011). Introducing children’s perspectives and participation in research. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(3), 301–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatt, B. (2012). Smartness as a cultural practice in schools. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 438–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Katsipataki, M., Kokotsaki, D., Coleman, R., Major, L. E., & Coe, R. (2018). Teaching and learning toolkit. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Toolkit/complete/EEF-Teaching-Learning-Toolkit-October-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holt, J. (1982). How children fail (2nd ed.). London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2009). Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 201–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, M., Oates, T., Pollard, A., & Wiliam, D. (2011). The framework for the National Curriculum: A report by the expert panel for the National Curriculum review. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H., & Schnettler, B. (2012). Videography: Analysing video data as a ‘focused’ ethnographic and hermeneutical exercise. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 334–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, C., & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 415–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kususanto, P., Ismail, H. N., & Jamil, H. (2010). Students’ self-esteem and their perception of teacher behavior: A study of between-class ability grouping. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(2), 707–724.
   Google Scholar
• Kutnick, P., Sebba, J., Blatchford, P., Galton, M., & Thorp, J. (2005). The effects of pupil grouping: Literature review. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Laosa, L. M. (1996). Intelligence testing and social policy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17(2), 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løndal, K. (2010). Children’s lived experience and their sense of coherence: Bodily play in a Norwegian after-school programme. Child Care in Practice, 16(4), 391–407.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, B., & Claxton, G. (2010). New kinds of smart: How the science of learnable intelligence is changing education. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising article 12 of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, A. (2009). Drawing stories: The power of children’s drawings to communicate the lived experience of starting school. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(3), 40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macqueen, S. (2010). Primary teacher attitudes in achievement-based literacy classes. Issues in Educational Research, 20(2), 118–136.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. (2014a). The dinosaur in the classroom: What we stand to lose through ability grouping in the primary school. FORUM, 56(1), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. (2014b). Educational triage and ability grouping in primary mathematics: A case-study of the impacts on low-attaining pupils. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 38–53.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R. (2016). Ability grouping in primary schools: Case studies and critical debates. Northwich: Critical Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mavers, D. (2012). Transcribing video (working paper 05/12). London: National Centre for Research Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Mazenod, A., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2019). Nurturing learning or encouraging dependency? Teacher constructions of students in lower attainment groups in English secondary schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 53–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGillicuddy, D., & Devine, D. (2018). ‘Turned off’ or ‘ready to fly’: Ability grouping as an act of symbolic violence in primary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 88–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, S., Moreton, G., & Newton, H. (1996). Differentiation. Cambridge: Pearson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1986). Keeping track, part 1: The policy and practice of curriculum inequality. The Phi Delta Kappan, 68(1), 12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J., & Guiton, G. (1995). Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 3–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2013). The most able students: Are they doing as well as they should in our non-selective secondary schools? Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/405518/The_most_able_students.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2015). The most able students: An update on progress made since June 2013. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/408909/The_most_able_students_an_update_on_progress_since_June_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Byers, V. T. (2014). An exemplar for combining the collection, analysis, and interpretations of verbal and nonverbal data in qualitative research. International Journal of Education, 6(1), 183–246.
   Google Scholar
• Palaiologou, I. (2014). ‘Do we hear what children want to say?’ Ethical praxis when choosing research tools with children under five. Early Child Development and Care, 184(5), 689–705.
   Google Scholar
• Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2017). Ability grouping and differentiated instruction in an era of data-driven decision making. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 281–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S., & Hallam, S. (2014). The impact of streaming on attainment at age seven: Evidence from the Millennium cohort study. Oxford Review of Education, 40(5), 567–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, A. (1996). The social world of children’s learning: Case studies of pupils from four to seven. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Gotz, T., & Frenzel, A. (2010). Ability grouping of gifted students: Effects on academic self-concept and boredom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 451–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pring, R. (2015). Philosophy of educational research (3rd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts‐Holmes, G., & Bradbury, A. (2016). Governance, accountability and the datafication of early years education in England. British Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 600–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C., & Fielding, M. (2007). Children and their primary schools: Pupils’ voices. Cambridge: The University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubie-Davies, C., Weinstein, R. S., Huang, F. L., Gregory, A., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2014). Successive teacher expectation effects across the early school years. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 181–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrank, W. R. (1968). The labeling effect of ability grouping. The Journal of Educational Research, 62(2), 51–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrank, W. R. (1970). A Further Study of the Labeling Effect of Ability Grouping. The Journal of Educational Research, 63(8), 358–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, C., Brady, L., & Davey, C. (2011). Guidelines for research with children and young people. London: National Children’s Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Spina, N. (2018). ‘Once upon a time’: Examining ability grouping and differentiation practices in cultures of evidence-based decision-making. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(3), 329–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Moon, S. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2014). The expert learner: Challenging the myth of ability. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sukhnandan, L., & Lee, B. (1998). Streaming, setting and grouping by ability: A review of the literature. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sumsion, J., Harrison, L., Press, F., McLoud, S., Goodfellow, J., & Bradley, B. (2011). Researching infants’ experiences of early childhood education and care. In D. Harcourt, B. Perry, & T. Waller (Eds.), Researching young children’s perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children (pp. 113–127). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tach, L. M., & Farkas, G. (2006). Learning-related behaviors, cognitive skills, and ability grouping when schooling begins. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1048–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. (2017). Phenomenology in its original sense. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 810–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljaranta, J., Tolvanen, A., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2014). The developmental dynamics between interest, self-concept of ability, and academic performance. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 734–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, R. S., Marshall, H. H., Sharp, L., & Botki, M. (1987). Pygmalion and the student: Age and classroom differences in children’s awareness of teacher expectations. Child Development, 58(4), 1079–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. (2005). Puritan intelligence: The ideological background to IQ. Oxford Review of Education, 31(3), 423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., Huntington, C., Goldsack, L., Kyrou, E., & Millward, L. (2014). Eliciting rich dialogue through the use of activity-oriented interviews: Exploring self-identity in autistic young people. Childhood, 21(2), 190–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar