Teachers, performative techniques and professional values: how performativity becomes humanistic through interplay mechanisms

References

• Ab Kadir, M. A. (2017). Engendering a culture of thinking in a culture of performativity: The challenge of mediating tensions in the Singaporean educational system. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(2), 227–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2016). Subjectivity as a site of struggle: Refusing neoliberalism? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(8), 1129–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapham, A. (2013). Performativity, fabrication and trust: Exploring computer-mediated moderation. Ethnography and Education, 8(3), 371–387.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2003). Death to critique and dissent? The policies and practices of new managerialism and of ‘evidence-based practice’. Gender and Education, 15, 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Down, B., Hogan, C., & Chadbourne, R. (1999). Making sense of performance management: Official rhetoric and teachers’ reality. Asia–Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Englund, H., & Frostenson, M. (2017). Managing performance evaluation uncertainties in schools: When teachers become struggling performers. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 885–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, G. (2011). Performance management in education: Milestone or millstone? Management in Education, 25(1), 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish – The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (2019). Teacher evaluation as an onto-epistemic framework. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(2), 174–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., & Brass, J. (2018). Making accountable teachers: The terrors and pleasures of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B. (2002). Performativity and primary teacher relations. Journal of Education Policy, 17(5), 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., & Troman, G. (2011). The construction of performative identities. European Educational Research Journal, 10(4), 484–501.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., & Troman, G. (2012). Performativity in UK education. Ethnographic cases of its effects, agency and reconstructions. Stroud: E & E Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Katsuno, M. (2010). Teacher evaluation in Japanese schools: An examination from a micro‐political or relational viewpoint. Journal of Education Policy, 25(3), 293–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Holloway, J. (2019). Datafying the teaching ‘profession’: Remaking the professional teacher in the image of data. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew, W. M. (2012). Perform or else: The performative enhancement of teacher professionalism. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(3), 285–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, K., & Seifert, R. (2011). Teacher, lecturer or labourer? Performance management issues in education. Management in Education, 25(1), 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, J. C. S. (2009). Saving the teacher’s soul: Exorcising the terrors of performativity. London Review of Education, 7(2), 159–167.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A., & Clarke, M. (2016). ‘Cruel optimism’: Teacher attachment to professionalism in an era of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 666–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munday, I. (2014). Creativity: Performativity’s poison or its antidote? Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(3), 319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2015). The visibility and invisibility of performance management in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 1031–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2017). Conceptualising the surveillance of teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(7), 991–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2009). Inspection and the fabrication of professional and performative processes. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 611–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Robinson, S., & Biesta, G. (2012). Teacher agency, performativity and curriculum change: Reinventing the teacher in the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence? In B. Jeffrey & G. Troman (Eds.), Performativity in UK education: Ethnographic cases of its effects, agency and reconstructions (pp. 87–108). Stroud: E & E Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Skerritt, C. (2019). Discourse and teacher identity in business-like education. Policy Futures in Education, 17(2), 153–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. (2006). Educational leadership that fosters ‘student voice’. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(4), 279–284.
   Google Scholar
• Sugrue, C., & Mertkan, S. (2017). Professional responsibility, accountability and performativity among teachers: The leavening influence of CPD? Teachers and Teaching, 23(2), 171–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2013). Curriculum for the upper secondary school. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, S. Y. F. (2011). Teachers’ professional identity, educational change and neo–liberal pressures on education in Hong Kong. Teacher Development, 15(3), 363–380.
   Google Scholar
• Terhart, E. (2013). Teacher resistance against school reform: Reflecting an inconvenient truth. School Leadership and Management, 33(5), 486–500.
   Google Scholar
• Troman, G., Jeffrey, B., & Raggl, A. (2007). Creativity and performativity policies in primary school cultures. Journal of Education Policy, 22(5), 549–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. (2006). Arias of learning: Creativity and performativity in Australian teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 435–453.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. (2011). Professionalism and the post–performative teacher: New teachers reflect on autonomy and accountability in the English school system. Professional Development in Education, 37(3), 389–409.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. (2015). Education reform in England: Quality and equality in the performative school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(11), 1143–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C., Busher, H., Kakos, M., Mohamed, C., & Smith, J. (2012). Crossing borders: New teachers co–constructing professional identity in performative times. Professional Development in Education, 38(1), 65–77.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Holligan, C. (2013). Performativity, work-related emotions and collective research identities in UK university education departments: An exploratory study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(2), 223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, P., & Jeffrey, B. (2002). The reconstruction of primary teachers’ identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar