‘Try walking in my shoes’: teachers’ interpretation of student perception surveys and the role of self-efficacy beliefs, perspective taking and inclusivity in teacher evaluation

References

• Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational politics. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 556–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, D. (2004). Inside the mind-reader’s toolkit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 340–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audia, P. G., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Benefiting from negative feedback. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 631–646.
   Google Scholar
• Bahou, L. (2017). ‘Why do they make us feel like we’re nothing? They are supposed to be teaching us to be something, to even surpass them!’: Student (dis)engagement and public schooling in conflict-affected Lebanon. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(4), 493–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1997). Good school/bad school: Paradox and fabrication. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(33), 317–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., & Qi, Y. (2012). An argument approach to observation protocol validity. Educational Assessment, 17(2–3), 62–87.
   Google Scholar
• Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2012). Asking students about teaching: Student perception surveys and their implementation. Seattle, WA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Birnhack, M., Perry-Hazan, L., & German Ben-Hayun, S. (2018). CCTV surveillance in primary schools: Normalisation, resistance, and children’s privacy consciousness. Oxford Review of Education, 44(2), 204–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble ‘Educational triage' and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self- efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(2), 239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., Harding, H., & Greenberg, S. (2012). Contextual influences on inquiries into effective teaching and their implications for improving student learning. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 83–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSA (Boston Student Advisory) Council. (2012). 'We are the ones in the classrooms—ask us!' Student voice in teacher evaluations. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion, M. C., Campion, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (2015). Improvements in performance management through the use of 360 feedback. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2019). The politics of student voice: Unravelling the multiple discourses articulated in schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. (2011). What is youth participation? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 340–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J., Noe, R., & Jackson, C. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 83–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence and power: 'Student voice' in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DET (Department of Education and Training), Victoria Australia. (2019). Student voice. Retrieved from https://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/discipline/humanities/civics/Pages/studentvoice.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J. P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(1), 75–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., & Morris, A. (2001). The origins and social significance of empathy-related responding. A review of empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice by M. L. Hoffman. Social Justice Research, 14(1), 95–120.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R., & Timulak, L. (2005). Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. A Handbook of Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology, 1(7), 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Espinilla, M., Andres, R., Martinez, F. J., & Martinez, L. (2013). A 360-degree performance appraisal model dealing with heterogeneous information and dependent criteria. Information Sciences, 222, 459–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. N. (2006). Testing, crime and punishment. Journal of Public Economics, 90(4–5), 837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finefter-Rosenbluh, I. (2016). Behind the scenes of reflective practice in professional development: A glance into the ethical predicaments of secondary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finefter-Rosenbluh, I. (2017). Incorporating perspective taking in reflexivity: A method to enhance insider qualitative research processes. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., & Perry-Hazan, L. (2018). Teacher diversity and the right to adaptable education in the religiously oriented school: What can we learn from students’ perceptions? Youth & Society, 50(5), 615–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 19(4), 378–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlbach, H., Brinkworth, M. E., & Harris, A. D. (2012). Changes in teacher–student relationships. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 690–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlbach, H., Robinson, C. D., Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., Benshoof, C., & Schneider, J. (2018). Questionnaires as interventions: Can taking a survey increase teachers’ openness to student feedback surveys? Educational Psychology, 38(3), 350–367.
   Google Scholar
• Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J. C., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., Grime, R. L., & Snarey, J. R. (2007). Moral judgment development across cultures: Revisiting Kohlberg’s universality claims. Developmental Review, 27(4), 443–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golann, J. W. (2018). Conformers, adaptors, imitators, and rejecters: How no-excuses teachers’ cultural toolkit shape their responses to control. Sociology of Education, 9(1), 28–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorozidis, G., & Papaioannou, A. (2011). Teachers’ self-efficacy, achievement goals, attitudes and intentions to implement the new Greek physical education curriculum. European Physical Education Review, 17(2), 231–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOV.UK. (2019). School inspections: Staff and pupil questionnaire text. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-inspections-staff-and-pupil-questionnaire-text
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Connor, C. M., Yang, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Morrison, F. J. (2012). The effects of teacher qualification, teacher self-efficacy, and classroom practices on fifth graders’ literacy outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, V. J. (2017). A tale of two narratives: Student voice—what lies before us? Oxford Review of Education, 43(2), 180–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, V. J. (2019). Reclaiming student voice(s): Constituted through process or embedded in practice? Cambridge Journal of Education, 1–20. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2019.1652247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamachek, D. (1999). Effective teachers: What they do, how they do it, and the importance of self-knowledge. In R. P. Lipka & T. M. Brinthaupt (Eds.), The role of self in teacher development (pp. 189–224). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanover Research. (2013). Student perception surveys and teacher assessment. Retrieved from: https://dese.mo.gov/sites/default/files/Hanover-Research-Student-Surveys.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hardré, P. L., & Sullivan, D. W. (2008). Teacher perceptions and individual differences: How they influence rural teachers’ motivating strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2059–2075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardré, P. L., & Sullivan, D. W. (2009). Motivating adolescents: High school teachers’ perceptions and classroom practices. Teacher Development, 13(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, R. (2008). Stepping back from ‘The Ladder’: Reflections on a model of participatory work with children. In A. Reid, A. B. Jensen, J. Nikel, & V. Simovska (Eds.), Participation and learning: Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability (pp. 19–31). Copenhagen, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2011). Feedback in schools. In R. M. Sutton, M. J. Hornsey, & K. M. Douglas (Eds.), Feedback: The communication of praise, criticism, and advise (pp. 265–279). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, R. (2008). Children’s participation and good governance: Limitations of the theoretical literature. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 16(3), 285–300.
   Google Scholar
• Hout, M., & Elliott, S. W. (2011). Incentives and test-based accountability in education. Washington, DC: National Research Council of National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher teaching. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(33), 843–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawahar, I. M. (2007). The influence of perceptions of fairness on performance appraisal reactions. Journal of Labor Research, 28(4), 735–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimmieson, N. L., Hannam, R. L., & Yeo, G. B. (2010). Teacher organizational citizenship behaviours and job efficacy: Implications for student quality of school life. British Journal of Psychology, 101(3), 453–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, R. B., & Overeld, D. V. (2011). Strengths, strengths overused, and lopsided leadership. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63(2), 89–109.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., McCaffrey, D. F., Miller, T., & Staiger, D. O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Karkoulian, S., Assaker, G., & Hallak, R. (2016). An empirical study of 360-degree feedback, organizational justice, and firm sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1862–1867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self‐understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(2), 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner, B., O’Donoghue, J. L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (Eds.). (2003). New directions for youth development: Youth participation improving institutions and communities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). The occupational commitment and intention to quit of practicing and pre-service teachers: Influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 114–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. M., Foster, R. Y., Rajani, S., & Bowman, C. (2009). Teaching in the Yukon: Exploring teachers’ efficacy beliefs, stress, and job satisfaction in a remote setting. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(6), 381–394.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinsasser, R. C. (2014). Teacher efficacy in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 168–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. (2017). The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhfeld, M. (2017). When students grade their teachers: A validity analysis of the Tripod student survey. Educational Assessment, 22(4), 253–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L. (2005). Extending the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness by an empirical investigation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(2), 103–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2008). Is test-driven external accountability effective? Synthesizing the evidence from cross-state causal-comparative and correlational studies. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 608–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, M. (2012). No citizen left behind. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundy, L. (2018). In defence of tokenism? Implementing children’s right to participate in collective decision-making. Childhood, 25(3), 340–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2010). Liquid surveillance: The contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to surveillance studies. International Political Sociology, 4(4), 325–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation: Revised and expanded from qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. R., & Hoy, A. W. (2003). A case study of an African American teacher’s self efficacy, stereotype threat, and persistence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 263–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitani, H. (2018). Principals’ working conditions, job stress, and turnover behaviors under NCLB accountability pressure. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(5), 822–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing 'student voice' in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. L. (2006). Increasing student voice and moving toward youth leadership. The Prevention Researcher, 13(1), 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. L. (2008). Student voice in school reform: Building youth-adult partnerships that strengthen schools and empower youth. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. L. (2009). Strengthening student voice initiatives in high schools: An examination of the supports needed for school-based youth-adult partnerships. Youth & Society, 40(3), 311–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. L., & Gross, S. J. (2009). Increasing student voice in high school reform: Building relationships, improving outcomes. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 37(4), 522–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, D., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2010). Left behind by design: Proficiency counts and test-based accountability. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), 263–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (2005). Aggression in the workplace: A social-psychological perspective. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior (pp. 13–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, D. C., Barry, A. L., & Staab, P. T. (2008). Teachers’ reflections of professional change during a literacy-reform initiative. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1288–1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2015). The visibility and invisibility of performance management in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 1031–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2017a). The surveillance of teachers and the simulation of teaching. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2017b). Conceptualising the surveillance of teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(7), 991–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajaras, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peiperl, M. A. (2001). Getting 360 degrees feedback right. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 142–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Hazan, L. (2015). Freedom of speech in schools and the right to participation: When the First Amendment encounters the Convention on the Rights of the Child. BYU Education and Law Journal, 2015(2), 421–452.
   Google Scholar
• Perry-Hazan, L. (2019). Conceptualising conflicts between student participation and other rights and interests. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–16. doi:10.1080/01596306.2019.1599324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. D., Wahlquist, C., & Bone, K. (2000). Student surveys for school teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(2), 135–153.
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, M. S., & Porter, A. C. (2014). Instructional alignment as a measure of teaching quality. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 399–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raver, J. L., Jensen, J. M., Lee, J., & O’Reilly, J. (2012). Destructive criticism revisited: Appraisals, task outcomes, and the moderating role of competitiveness. Applied Psychology, 61(2), 177–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E., Rogers, C. W., & Metlay, W. (2002). Improving the payoff from 360-degree feedback. Human Resource Planning, 25(3), 44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher -student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudduck, J., & Fielding, M. (2006). Student voice and the perils of popularity. Educational Review, 58(2), 219–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2000). Pupil participation and perspective: ‘Carving a new order of experience’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Rule, J. (2007). Social control and modern social structure. In S. Hier & J. Greenberg (Eds.), The surveillance studies reader (pp. 19–27). Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. V., Nathaniel, P., Pendergast, L. L., Saeki, E., Segool, N., & Schwing, S. (2017). Leaving the teaching profession: The role of teacher stress and educational accountability policies on turnover intent. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, D. A. (2018). Demoralized: Why teachers leave the profession they love and how they can stay. Boston, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M., & Datnow, A. (2005). Teachers’ sense-making about comprehensive school reform: The influence of emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 949–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1), 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Shier, H., Méndez, M. H., Centeno, M., Arróliga, I., & González, M. (2012). How children and young people influence policy‐makers: Lessons from Nicaragua. Children & Society, 28(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (4th ed.). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 33–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecher, B. M., Holtzman, D. J., Garet, M. S., Hamilton, L. S., Engberg, J., Steiner, E. D., ... , & Chambers, J. (2018). Improving teaching effectiveness. Final report – The intensive partnerships for effective teaching through 2015–2016. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M. P., & Donaldson, M. L. (2016). The new educational accountability: Understanding the landscape of teacher evaluation in the post-NCLB era. Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 340–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, S. (2011). Co-constructing efficacy: A 'communities of practice' perspective on teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 732–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Colorado Education Initiative. (2019). Student perception survey toolkit. Retrieved from: https://www.coloradoedinitiative.org/Resources/student-perception-survey-toolkit/
   Google Scholar
• Tisdall, E. K. M., & Punch, S. (2012). Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies, 10(3), 249–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, A. R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). Perspective-taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 374–387.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, A. R., Galinsky, A. D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Perspective taking undermines stereotype maintenance processes: Evidence from social memory, behaviour explanation, and information solicitation. Social Cognition, 30(1), 94–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, B. (2014). Student evaluation surveys: Anonymous comments that offend or are unprofessional. Higher Education, 68(3), 347–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuller, H. M., Bryan, C. J., Heyman, G. D., & Christenfeld, N. J. (2015). Seeing the other side: Perspective taking and the moderation of extremity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). U.N. Doc. A/RES/44/25.
   Google Scholar
• Voerman, L., Korthagen, F. A., Meijer, P. C., & Simons, R. J. (2014). Feedback revisited: Adding perspectives based on positive psychology. Implications for theory and classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., Göllner, R., Helmke, A., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2013). Construct validity of student perceptions of instructional quality is high, but not perfect: Dimensionality and generalizability of domain-independent assessments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, T. L., Kelcey, B., & Ruzek, E. (2016). What can student perception surveys tell us about teaching? Empirically testing the underlying structure of the tripod student perception survey. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1834–1868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnick, B. R. (2013). Understanding student rights in schools: Speech, religion, and privacy in educational settings. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, P., Vrikki, M., Færøyvik Karlsen, A. M., Dudley, P., & Vermunt, J. D. (2019). The role of pupil voice as a trigger for teacher learning in Lesson Study professional groups. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(4), 435–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, D. J., Manatt, R. P., Rogers, M. A., & Maughanm, R. (2000). Validation of student, principal, and self-ratings in 360° feedback (registered) for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(2), 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, B. B. (2009). The courage of innocence: Children as heroes in the struggle for justice. University of Illinois Law Review, 2009, 1567–1590.
   Google Scholar
• Yayli, D. (2008). Theory–practice dichotomy in inquiry: Meanings and preservice teacher mentor teacher tension in Turkish literacy classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 889–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J. S. (2002). Teacher characteristics as predictors of teacher-student relationships: Stress, negative affect, and self-efficacy. Social Behaviour and Personality, 30(5), 485–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar