Outdoor environmental education programme leaders’ theories of experiential learning

References

• Athman, J. A., & Monroe, M. C. (2001). Elements of effective environmental education programs. In A. J. Fedler (Ed.), Defining best practices in fishing, boating and stewardship education (pp. 37–48). Washington, DC: Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Begum, S. (2012). A secondary science teacher’s beliefs about environmental education and its relationship with the classroom practices. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 2(1), 10–29.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2008). Comfort zone: Model or metaphor? Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 12(1), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cincera, J. (2013a). Managing cognitive dissonance: Experience from an environmental education teachers’ training course in the Czech Republic. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 15(2), 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Cincera, J. (2013b). Střediska ekologické výchovy mezi teorií a praxí [Environmental education centres between theory and practice]. Praha: BEZK, Agentura Koniklec a Masarykova univerzita.
   Google Scholar
• Cincera, J., & Johnson, B. (2013). Earthkeepers in the Czech Republic: Experience from the implementation process of an earth education programme. Envigogika: Charles University E-journal for Environmental Education, 8(4), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, K., Smith, H., & Dyment, J. (2014). Pedagogical approaches to exploring theory – Practice relationships in an outdoor education teacher education programme. Asia-Pacific Journal of teacher Education, 42(2), 167–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Implementing curriculum guidance on environmental education: The importance of teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docekal, V. (2012). Prozitkove, zazitkove, nebo zkusenostni uceni? [Experiential, experiential, or experiential learning?]. e-Pedagogium, 12(1), 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fives, H., & Gill, M. G. (2014). International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flogaitis, E., Daskolia, M., & Agelidou, E. (2005). Kindergarten teachers’ conceptions of environmental education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(3), 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., & Zint, M. (2011). Elementary teachers’ beliefs about, perceived competencies for, and reported use of scientific inquiry to promote student learning about and for the environment. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42(1), 30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, M., & Sharp, J. (2000). Exploring the actual and potential rhetoric-reality gaps in environmental education and their implications for pre-service teacher training. Environmental Education Research, 6(4), 331–345.
   Google Scholar
• Grimwood, B. S. R., Gordon, M., & Stevens, Z. (2018). Cultivating nature connection: Instructor narratives of urban outdoor education. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(2), 204–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, J. J., Wang, J., Keil, C., & Zoffel, J. (2007). Enhancing teachers’ beliefs and practices through problem-based learning focused on pertinent issues of environmental health science. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(4), 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Jirasek, I. (2016). Doxa a episteme zazitkove pedagogiky [Dox and epistem of experiential pedagogy]. Pedagogika, 66(2), 154–178.
   Google Scholar
• Jirasek, I. (2020). Transformative experience as a change of horizon. In J. Parry & P. Allison (Eds.), Experiential learning and outdoor education. Traditions of practice and philosophical perspectives (pp. 112–129). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jirasek, I., & Turcova, I. (2017). The Czech approach to outdoor adventure and experiential education: The influence of Jaroslav Foglar’s work. The Czech approach to outdoor adventure and experiential. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 17(4), 321–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirasek, I., & Turcova, I. (2020). Experiential pedagogy in the Czech Republic. In J. Parry & P. Allison (Eds.), Experiential learning and outdoor education. Traditions of practice and philosophical perspectives (pp. 8–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., & Cincera, J. (2015). Examining the relationship between environmental attitudes and behaviour in education programmes. Socialni studia, 12(3), 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2006). Joining together. Group theory and group skills. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, A. (2008). The Evolution of John Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Journal of Transformative Education, 6(2), 104–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kolar, J. (2013). Práce s reflexí u lektorů osobnostně sociálního rozvoje [The application of reflection by the leaders of socio-personal development]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). The experiential educator. Principles and practices of experiential learning. Kaunakakai: Elbls.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kyung‐Ran Kim, & Buchanan, T. K. (2009). Teacher beliefs and practices survey: Operationalising the 1997 NAEYC guidelines. Early Child Development and Care, 179(8), 1113–1124.
   Google Scholar
• Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS ONE, 12(5), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2011). The dramaturgy approach to education in nature: Reflections of a decade of international vacation school Lipnice courses, Czech Republic, 1997–2007. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 11(1), 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Merizow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adults and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2017). Identifying Effective Climate Change Education Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J. A. (2005). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, T. H. (2019). Experiential learning – A systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, C., & Utley, J. (2008). An exploratory study of preservice teachers’ beliefs about the environment. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(4), 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikel, J. (2007). Making sense of education ‘responsibly’: Findings from a study of student teachers’ understanding(s) of education, sustainable development and education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 13(5), 545–564.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments. First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, J., & Allison, P. (Eds.). (2020). Experiential learning and outdoor education. Traditions of practice and philosophical perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, S., & Gass, M. A. (2005). Effective leadership in adventure programming. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Prouty, D., Panicucci, J., & Collinson, R. (2006). Adventure education. Theory and applications. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Real World Learning. (2015). Real world learning model. Retrieved from http://www.rwlnetwork.org/rwl-model.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207–320.
   Google Scholar
• Ross., N., Medin, D., Coley, J. D., & Atran, S. (2003). Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development, 18(1), 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. (1993). Children’s special places. Exploring the role of forts, dens, and bush houses in middle childhood. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. (2008). Childhood and nature: Design principles for educators. Portsmouth, NH: Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. W., & Caldarelli, M. (2004). Teaching beliefs of non-formal environmental educators: A perspective from state and local parks in the United States. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 451–469.
   Google Scholar
• Van Matre, S. (1990). Earth education: A new beginning. Greenville, WV: Institute for Earth Education.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, K. E. (2001). Recommended educational practices for youth environmental education from a 4-H youth development perspective. In A. J. Fedler (Ed.), Defining best practices in fishing, boating and stewardship education (pp. 157–172). Washington, DC: Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2013). Conceptual change in learning and instruction. The framework theory approach. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 11–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlers, L., & Johnson, B. (2003). A programmatic approach: Purposeful experiences. Zeitschrift Für Erlebnispädagogik, 23(5/6), 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, G., Lam, C.-C., & Wong, N.-Y. (2010). Developing an instrument for identifying secondary teachers’ beliefs about education for sustainable development in China. Journal of Environmental Education, 41(4), 195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar