Data, performativity and the erosion of trust in teachers

References

• Anagnostopoulos, D., Rutledge, S., & Jacobsen, R. (2013). The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2015). Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 299–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2016). Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast. Policy Futures in Education, 14(8), 1046–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroutsis, A. (2016). Media accounts of school performance: Reinforcing dominant practices of accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 567–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2012). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology & Practice, 6(2), 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, A., & Roberts-Holmes, G. (2018). The datafication of primary and early years education: Playing with numbers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, J., & Holloway, J. (2021). Re-professionalizing teaching: The new professionalism in the United States. Critical Studies in Education, 62(4), 519–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R., & McPherson, A. (2019). Teachers and learners in a time of big data. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 6(1), 26–43.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., & Lewis, S. (2017). The ‘doublethink’ of data: Educational performativity and the field of schooling practices. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(5), 671–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. (2014). A logic of appropriation: Enacting national testing (NAPLAN) in Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 29(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. (2015). A logic of enumeration: The nature and effects of national literacy and numeracy testing in Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 335–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. (2018). Governing teacher learning: Understanding teachers’ compliance with and critique of standardization. Journal of Education Policy, 33(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. (2021). The quandary of quantification: Data, numbers and teachers’ learning. Journal of Education Policy, 36(1), 44–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henig, J. (2012). The politics of data use. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., & Brass, J. (2018). Making accountable teachers: The terrors and pleasures of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2014). ‘It’s like Spiderman … with great power comes great responsibility’: School autonomy, school context and the audit culture. School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 502–517.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kilderry, A. (2015). The intensification of performativity in early childhood education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(5), 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn, M. (2013). The rise of data in education systems: Collection, visualisation and use. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Holloway, J. (2019). Datafying the teaching ‘profession’: Remaking the professional teacher in the image of data. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Lewis, S. (2017). Accountabilities in schools and school systems. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education in schools (pp. 181–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.74
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). ‘Catalyst data’: Perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 634–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Thompson, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). National testing from an Australian Perspective. In B. Lingard, G. Thompson, & S. Sellar (Eds.), National testing in schools: An Australian assessment (pp. 20–38). Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., & Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society, 19(5), 780–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHMRC. (2018). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. https://nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2007-updated-2018
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust. The BBC Reith lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2003). Trust with accountability? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 8(1). Editorial.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2017). Accountable institutions, trustworthy cultures. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 9(2), 401–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2018). Linking trust to trustworthiness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 26(2), 293–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O.(2005). Accountability, trust and professional practice: The end of professionalism? In N. Ray (Ed.), Architecture & its ethical dilemmas (pp. 77–88). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2016). Trust in numbers? Digital education governance and the inspection process. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, N. (2019). The politics of scale in policy: Scalecraft and education governance. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker-Jenkins, M. (2018). Problematising ethnography and case study: Reflections on using ethnographic techniques and researcher positioning. Ethnography and Education, 13(1), 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberalism. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 459–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts-Holmes, G., & Bradbury, A. (2016). Governance, accountability and the datafication of early years education in England. British Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 600–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnerman, K., Edwards-Groves, C., & Grootenboer, P. (2017). The practice architectures of middle leading in early childhood education. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 11(8), 2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2015). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2016). ‘There’s so much data’: Exploring the realities of data-based school governance. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, M. (2015). Governing education without reform: The power of the example. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., & Mockler, N. (2016). Principls of audit: Testing, data and ‘implicated advocacy’. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 48(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2016). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar