By nature, a social animal: an exploration of perceptions of online group work

References

• Aristotle (350 B.C.E). (1981). The Politics. Sinclair Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Belbin, R. M. (1981). Management Teams: Why they succeed or fail. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D. (2007a). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D. (2007b). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. N., & Haas, M. R. (2012). So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 316–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-75160000016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Yong, N. C. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2014). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac, E. (2014). Group work as an incentive for learning – students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(558), 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harper, B. (2018). Technology and teacher-student interactions: A review of empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1450690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P. C., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2020). Interaction in computer supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the implementation phase. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00202-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4) , 85–118.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2013). Toward a framework for CSCL research. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamm, A. J., Shoulders, C., Roberts, T. G., Irani, T. A., Snyder, J. L., & Brendemuhl, B. J. (2012). The influence of cognitive diversity on group problem solving strategy. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.01018
   Google Scholar
• Lowes, S. (2014). How much “group” is there in online group work? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i1.373
   Google Scholar
• Luse, A., McElroy, J. C., Townsend, A. M., & DeMarie, S. (2013). Personality and cognitive style as predictors of preference for working in virtual teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1825–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, L., Hall, H., & Raeside, R. (2018). Applications and applicability of social cognitive theory in information science research. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(4), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618769985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moule, P. (2007). Challenging the five-stage model for e-learning: A new approach. Research in Learning Technology, 15(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v15i1.10911
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, I., Tinoca, L., & Pereira, A. (2011). Online group work patterns: how to promote a successful collaboration. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1348–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, E., & Badea, G. (2020). Exploring a community of inquiry supported by a social media-based learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). The American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
   Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M., Ni, A., Medina, P., Canelon, J., Kordrostami, M., Zhang, J., & Liu, Y. (2020). Integrating students’ perspectives about online learning: A hierarchy of factors. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(53). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00229-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar