Standards as a social contract in curriculum-based qualifications: stakeholder views in Scotland

References

• Andrich, D. (2004). Controversy and the Rasch model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Medical care, 42(1), 7–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000103528.48582.7c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, J. (2007). Alternative conceptions of comparability. In P. E. Newton, J. Baird, H. Goldstein, H. Patrick, & P. Tymms (Eds.), Techniques for monitoring the comparability of examination standards (pp. 124–156). Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J. (2018). On different paradigms of educational assessment: Implications for the relationships with learning and teaching. British Psychological Society Vernon Wall Lecture, 1(37), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsvern.2017.1.37.4
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., Cresswell, M. J., & Newton, P. N. (2000). Would the real gold standard please step forward? Research Papers in Education, 15(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/026715200402506
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., & Gray, L. (2016). The meaning of curriculum-related examination standards in Scotland and England: A home–international comparison. Oxford review of. Oxford Review of Education, 42(3), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1184866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, J., Isaacs, T., Opposs, D., & Gray, L. (2018). Examination standards: How measures and meanings differ around the world. UCL IOE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P. (2021). The sociology of assessment: Comparative and policy perspectives: The selected works of Patricia Broadfoot. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Sociology-of-Assessment-Comparative-and-Policy-Perspectives-The-Selected/Broadfoot/p/book/9780367616724
   Google Scholar
• Cizek, G. J. (1993). Reconsidering standards and criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(2), 93–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• College Board. (2022). SAT understanding scores. https://satsuite.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/understanding-sat-scores.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, M. J. (1996). Defining, setting and maintaining standards in curriculum-embedded examinations: Judgemental and statistical approaches. In H. Goldstein & T. Lewis (Eds.), Assessment: Problems, developments and statistical issues (pp. 57–84). John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, M. J. (2003). Heaps, prototypes and ethics: The consequences of using judgements of student performance to set examination standards in a time of change. University of London Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cruess, S. R. (2006). Professionalism and medicine’s social contract with society. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 449, 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000229275.66570.97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, A., & Lysaght, Z. & O’Leary, M. (2021). High stakes assessment policy implementation in the time of COVID-19: The case of calculated grades in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1916565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francés-Gómez, P. (2020). Social contract theory and business legitimacy. In J. D. Rendtorff (Ed.), Handbook of business legitimacy: Responsibility, ethics and society (pp. 277–295). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14622-1_29
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions. The American Psychologist, 18(8), 519–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson. (1993). Testing testing: Social consequences of the examined life. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, L. (2023). It’s our future – Independent review of qualifications and assessment (report, 22 June). Scottish Government. https://www.gov.scot/publications/future-report-independent-review-qualifications-assessment/
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, L., Baird, J., Godfrey-Faussett, T., Rhandawa, A., Allan, S., MacIntosh, E., Hutchinson, C., Spencer, E., & Wiseman-Orr, L. (2023). National qualifications in Scotland: A lightning rod for public concern about equity in the pandemic. European Journal of Education, Research, Development and Policy, 58(1), 83–97. Special Issue: Trust in standardised assessments. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12543
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, or, the matter, form, and power of a common-wealth ecclesiastical and civil. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/thomas-hobbes-leviathan-9780199602629?cc=gb&lang=en&
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, T., & Gorgen, K. (2018). Culture, context and controversy in setting national examination standardsExamination standards: how measures & meanings differ around the world. In J. Baird, T. Isaacs, D. Opposs, & L. Gray (Eds.), Chapter (Vol. 15). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korn, L., Böhm, R., Meier, N. W., & Betsch, C. (2020). Vaccination as a social contract. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(26), 14890–14899. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919666117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn, M. (2008). An Atlantic crossing? The work of the international examination inquiry, its researchers, methods and influence (comparative histories of education). Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1823). Two treatises on civil government. George Routledge and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Madaus, G. F. (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L. N. Tanner (Ed.), Critical issues in curriculum (pp. 83–121). The National Society for the Study of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, M., Baird, J., Gray, L., Cadwallader, S., Godfrey-Faussett, T., Saville, L., Debnam, C., & Stobart, G. (2023). Standards in GCSEs in Wales: Approaches to defining standards. OUCEA/23/1. https://www.education.ox.ac.uk/research/research-on-standards-in-gcses-in-wales/
   Google Scholar
• Muir, K. (2022). Putting learners at the centre: Towards a future vision for Scottish education. Report to Scottish ministers. https://www.gov.scot/publications/putting-learners-centre-towards-future-vision-scottish-education/
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (1997). Examining standards over time. Research Papers in Education, 12(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152970120302
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2005). Examination standards and the limits of linking. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 12(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940500143795
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2010). Contrasting conceptions of comparability. Research Papers in Education, 25(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.498144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2011). A level pass rates and the enduring myth of norm-referencing. Research Matters, 20–26. Special Issue 2: Comparability, https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.100441
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2022). Demythologising a level exam standards. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 875–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1870543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M. (2021). What is participatory research?. [Video]. SAGE Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995528
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). Scotland’s curriculum for excellence: Into the future, implementing education policies. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (volume I): The state of learning and equity in education, PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
   Google Scholar
• Ofqual. (2017). Summer 2017 GCSE, AS and A level awards: a summary of our monitoring. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/639880/Summer_2017_monitoring_summary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust: The BBC reith lectures. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.764761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opposs, D. B., Chankseliani, J., Stobart, M., Kaushik, G., McManus, A., Johnson, D., & Johnson, D. (2020). Governance structure and standard setting in educational assessment. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(2), 192–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1730766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., Baird, J., Saville, L., Arnott, M., & Hell, N. (2023). Knowledge, expertise and policy in the examinations crisis in England. Oxford Review of Education, 49(6), 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2022.2158071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J., & Husek, T. R. (1969). IMPLICATIONS of CRITERION-REFERENCED MEASUREMENT 1,2. Journal of Educational Measurement, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1969.tb00654.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Shapira, M., Priestley, A., Ritchie, M., & Barnett, C. (2020). Rapid review of national qualifications experience 2020 [ Report]. https://www.gov.scot/publications/rapid-review-national-qualifications-experience-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Council of Independent Schools. (2022). Annual census. https://www.scis.org.uk/facts-and-figures/#:~:text=Annual%20Census&text=SCIS%20uses%20the%20information%20collected,4.2%25%20of%20pupils%20in%20Scotland
   Google Scholar
• Senthil, K., Russell, E., & Lantos, H. (2015). Preserving the social contract of HealthCare-A call to action. American Journal of Public Health, 105(12), 2404. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302898
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shafik, M. (2021). What we owe each other: A new social contract for a better society. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691220277
   Google Scholar
• Sobhy, H. (2021). The lived social contract in schools: From protection to the production of hegemony. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Elsevier BV, 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104986
   Google Scholar
• SQA. (2018). Guide to Scottish vocational qualifications (SVQs). https://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/files_ccc/GuideToSVQs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SQA. (2020a). 2020 alternative certification Model: Equality impact assessment. Retrieved April, 2022 from https://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/files_ccc/2020-sqa-alternative-certification-model-equality-impact-assessment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SQA. (2020b). SQA chief examining Officer’s 2020 National qualifications and awards results report. https://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/files_ccc/SQAChiefExaminingOfficer2020NQReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SQA. (2021a). National qualifications 2021 alternative certification Model (ACM): Methodology report. https://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/files_ccc/SQAAwardingMethodology2021Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SQA. (2021b). SQA information for OECD independent review of qualifications and assessment. https://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/files_ccc/20210312-sqa-information-for-oecd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SQA. (2022a). Approaches to certification in Scotland and other jurisdictions. Retrieved November, 2023 from https://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/files_ccc/acm-evaluation-approaches-certification-covid-19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SQA. (2022b). Experiences of the 2021 alternative certification Model (ACM). Retrieved November, 2023 from https://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/files_ccc/acm-evaluation-experiences-2021-acm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SQA. (2023). Evaluation of the 2022 approach to the assessment of graded national courses: Learner and practitioner experiences. Retrieved November, 2023 from https://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/files_ccc/learner-practitioner-experiences-main-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2021). Upper-secondary education student assessment in Scotland: A comparative perspective. OECD education working papers 253. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/upper-secondary-education-student-assessment-in-scotland_d8785ddf-en
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitiative and quantitative approaches. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2020, 11). COVID-19. A glance of national coping strategies on high-stakes examinations and assessments. Working Document. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/unesco_review_of_high-stakes_exams_and_assessments_during_covid-19_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together. A new social contract for education. International commission on the futures of education. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (1996). Meanings and consequences in standard setting. Assessment in Education, 3(3), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594960030303
   Google Scholar