Doing the ‘work of hearing’: girls’ voices in transnational educational development campaigns

References

• Abu-Lughod, L. 2013. Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674726338
   Google Scholar
• Bae, M., and O. Ivashkevich. 2012. Girls, Cultural Productions and Resistance. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bent, E. 2013. “A Different Girl Effect: Producing Political Girlhoods in the ‘Invest in Girls’ Climate.” In Youth Engagement: The Civic-political Lives of Children and Youth (Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, Volume 16), edited by Sandi Kawecka Nenga and Jessica K. Taft, 3–20. Bradford: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. 1990. “The Third Space: Interview with Homi Bhabha.” In Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by J. Rutherford, 207–221. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M. 2004. Democratic Dialogue in Education: Troubling Speech, Disturbing Silence. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. 2012. Out of Wedlock, into Schools: Combating Child Marriage through Education. The Office of Gordon and Sarah Brown. http://gordonandsarahbrown.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Child-Marriage-FINAL-for-Print.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2007. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Crows Nest, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2014. “Margin Becoming Centre: For a World-centred Rethinking of Masculinities.” NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies 9 (4): 217–231.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by S. Randall. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeCastell. 2004. “No Speech is Free: Affirmative Action and the Politics of Give and Take.” In Democratic Dialogue in Education: Troubling Speech, Disturbing Silence, edited by Megan Boler, 51–56. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• DesAutels, P., and J. Waugh. 2001. Feminists Doing Ethics. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Dingo, R. 2008. “Linking Transnational Logics: A Feminist Rhetorical Analysis of Public Policy Networks.” College English 70 (5): 490–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G(irls) 20 Summit. Official Website. www.girls20summit.com
   Google Scholar
• Grewal, I. 2005. Transnational America: Feminisms, Diasporas, Neoliberalisms. North Carolina: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822386544
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, S. 1997. Scenes of Subjection. Terror, Slavering, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickel, J. 2014. “The ‘Girl Effect’: Liberalism, Empowerment and the Contradictions of Development.” Third World Quarterly 35 (8): 1355–1373.10.1080/01436597.2014.946250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2004. “Talking Cure: The Desire for Dialogue.” In Democratic Dialogue in Education: Troubling Speech, Disturbing Silence, edited by Megan Boler, 57–68. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Khoja-Moolji, S. 2014. “Producing Neoliberal Citizens: Critical Reflections on Human Rights Education in Pakistan.” Gender and Education 26 (2): 103–118.10.1080/09540253.2014.898025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoja-Moolji, S. 2015. “Suturing Together Girls and Education: An Investigation into the Social (Re)Production of Girls’ Education as a Hegemonic Ideology.” Journal of Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education 9 (2): 87–107.10.1080/15595692.2015.1010640
   Google Scholar
• Khoja-Moolji, S., and E. Jaffer, eds. 2011. Women Leaders of Tomorrow: An Anthology of Students’ Expressions. Hyderabad: Aga Khan Education Board.
   Google Scholar
• Lesko, N., M. Chacko, and S. Khoja-Moolji. 2015. “The Promises of Empowered Girls.” In Handbook of Childhood and Youth, edited by J. Wyn and H. Cahill, 35–48. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, C. 2004. “The Tolerance That Dare Not Speak Its Name.” In Democratic Dialogue in Education: Troubling Speech, Disturbing Silence, edited by Megan Boler, 33–50. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, K. 2013. “Proving ‘The Girl Effect’: Corporate Knowledge Production and Educational Intervention.” International Journal of Educational Development 33 (6): 612–621.10.1016/j.ijedudev.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moletsane, L., Claudia Mitchell, and Linda Chisholm. 2008. Methodologies for Mapping a Southern African Girlhood in the Age of Aids. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mupotsa, Danai. 2010. “If I Could Write This in Fire/African Feminist Ethics for Research in Africa.” Agenda Africa 6 (1): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Switzer, H. 2013. “(Post)Feminist Development Fables: The Girl Effect and the Production of Sexual Subjects.” Feminist Theory 14 (3): 345–360.10.1177/1464700113499855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayama, K. 2014. “Deploying the Post-colonial Predicaments of Researching on/with ‘Asia’ in Education: A Standpoint from a Rich Peripheral Country.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 1–14. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2014.927114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ticktin, M. 2011. Casualties of Care. Immigration and the Politics of Humanitarianism in France. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520269040.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Wells, K. 2015. “Violent Lives and Peaceful Schools: NGO Constructions of Modern Childhood and the Role of the State.” In Gender Violence in Poverty Contexts: The Educational Challenge, edited by Jenny Parkes, 168–182. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegman, R.. 2012. Object Lessons. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822394945
   Google Scholar