Race to the classroom: the governance turn in Latin American education. The emerging era of accountability, control and prescribed curriculum

References

• Acosta, F., and G. Ruiz. 2018. “Revisiting Comparative Education in Latin America: Traditions, Uses, and Perspectives.” Comparative Education 54 (1): 62–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1400760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar Villanueva, L. 2006. Gobernanza y Gestión Pública. México DF: Fondo de Cultura Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. 2011. “Teaching under the New Taylorism: High‐stakes Testing and the Standardization of the 21st Century Curriculum.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 43: 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.521261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, E., and P. Morris. 2016. “PISA, Policy and Persuasion: Translating Complex Conditions into Education ‘Best Practice’.” Comparative Education 52 (2): 202–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1143278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagolin Zambon, L., and E. A. Terrazzan. 2013. “Políticas de Material Didático No Brasil: Organização Dos Processos de Escolha de Livros Didáticos Em Escolas Públicas de Educação Básica.” Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos 94 (237): 585–602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/s2176-66812013000200012.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. 1993. “What Is Policy? Texts, Trajectories and Toolboxes.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 13 (2): 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., and C. Junemann. 2012. Networks, New Governance and Education. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M., A. Moffit, and P. Kihn. 2010. Deliverology 101: A Field Guide For Educational Leaders. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2019. “The Paradox of Power in Ecuador: Governance and Education Reform (2007-2015).” In Politics of Education in Latin America: Reforms, Resistance and Persistence, edited by C. Ornelas, 134–65.Leiden: Brill J. Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, J. 2002. “Latin American Education: Perceptions of Linearities and the Construction of Discursive Space.” Comparative Education 38: 4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006022000030739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1996. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2003. Class, Codes and Control: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowe, R., S. Ball, and A. Gold. 1992. Reforming Education and Changing Schools: Case Studies in Policy Sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, M. 2013. “Control of Education: Issues and Tensions in Centralization and Decentralization.” In Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local, edited by R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, and S. Franz, 201–22. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, M., and M. Thomas. 1995. “Levels of Comparison in Educational Studies: Different Insights from Different Literatures and the Value of Multilevel Analyses.” Harvard Educational Review 65: 3. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.65.3.g3228437224v4877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, B., and J. Luque. 2014. Great Teachers: How to Raise Student Learning in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M. 1998. “National Voucher Plans in Chile and Sweden: Did Privatization Reforms Make for Better Education?” Comparative Education Review 42 (3): 309–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1189163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M. 2007. Cuba’s Academic Advantage. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cecchini, S., F. Filgueira, and C. Robles. 2014. Sistemas de Protección Social En América Latina y El Caribe: Una Perspectiva Comparada. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, L., and G. Steiner-Khamsi. 2008. South-South Cooperation in Education and Development. Nueva York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chizzotti, A., and B. J. Ponce. 2012. “O Currículo e Os Sistemas de Ensino No Brasil.” Currículo Sem Fronteiras 12 (3): 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, C., C. Beca, and M. Cerri. 2017. “The Teaching Profession in Latin America: Change, Policies and the Challenges of Poverty and Exclusion.” In Second International Handbook of Urban Education, edited by W. Pink and G. Noblit, 627–45. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., S. Huntington, and J. Watanuki. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. 1988. “A Fundamental Puzzle of School Reform.” Phi Delta Kappan 69: 341–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cuenca, R., and J. C. Vargas Castro. 2018. Peru: El Estado de Politicas Publicas Docentes. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos; Diálogo Interamericano.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, L. A. 2007. “O Desenvolvimento Meandroso Da Educação Brasileira Entre o Estado e o Mercado.” Educacao E Sociedade 28 (100): 809–829. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-73302007000300009.
   Google Scholar
• Echávarri, J., and C. Peraza. 2017. “Modernizing Schools in Mexico: The Rise of Teacher Assessment and School-Based Management Policies.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 25: 90. doi:https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2771.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. 1993. “School Decentralization: Who Gains? Who Loses?” In Decentralization and School Improvement: Can We Fulfill the Promise?, edited by J. Hannaway and M. Carnoy, 33–54. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Falabella, A. 2018. “The Seduction of Hyper-Surveillance: Standards, Testing and Accountability in Chilean Schools.” Paper Presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 1999. Change Forces: The Sequel. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2010. All Systems Go: The Change Imperative for Whole System Reform. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gajardo, M. 1999. Reformas Educativas En América Latina. Balance de Una Década. Santiago de Chile: PREAL.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, T. 2001. “Critical Policy Sociology: Historiography, Archaeology and Genealogy as Methods of Policy Analysis.” Journal of Education Policy 16 (5): 379–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110071002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. 2004. Despite the Odds. The Contentious Politics of Education Reform. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., and L. Woessmann. 2007. “The Role Of Education Quality For Economic Growth.” Policy Research Working Papers. World Bank. doi:https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4122.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, M., B. Lingard, F. Rizvi, and S. Taylor. 1997. Educational Policy and the Politics of Change. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, I. 1994. Rethinking the School: Subjectivity, Bureaucracy, Criticism. St. Leonards: A&U Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1998. “The Narrative of Enterprise and the Enterprise of Narrative: Place Marketing and the Entrepreneurial City.” In The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation. edited by T. Hall and P. Hubbard, 77–99. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. 2003. Governing as Governance. Governing as Governance. London: SAGE. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446215012.
   Google Scholar
• LLECE-UNESCO. 2013. Las Políticas Educativas de América Latina y El Caribe. Santiago de Chile: OREALC-UNESCO Santiago.
   Google Scholar
• López, N. 2007. Las Nuevas Leyes de Educación En América Latina: Una Lectura a La Luz Del Panorama Social de La Región. Buenos Aires: IIPE-UNESCO y CLADE.
   Google Scholar
• Maroy, C. 2012. “Towards Post-Bureaucratic Modes of Governance: A European Perspective.” In World Yearbook of Education 2012: Policy Borrowing and Lending in Education, edited by G. Steiner-Khamsi and F. Waldow, 82–99. London: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137628-12.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Boom, A. 2004. De La Escuela Expansiva a La Escuela Competitiva: Dos Modos de Modernización En América Latina. Bogotá: Anthropos, Convenio Andrés Bello.
   Google Scholar
• Martinic, S., and M. Pardo. 2001. Economía Política de Las Reformas Educativas En América Latina. Santiago de Chile: PREAL y CIDE.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. A. 2011. High-Stakes Reform: The Politics of Educational Accountability. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, L., and R. Elmore. 1987. “Getting the Job Done: Alternative Policy Instruments.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9 (2): 133–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737009002133.
   Google Scholar
• McGehee, J. J., and L. K. Griffith. 2001. “Large-Scale Assessments Combined with Curriculum Alignment: Agents of Change.” Theory Into Practice 40 (2): 137–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1477275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckes, L., and R. Carrasco. 2010. “Two Decades of SIMCE: An Overview of the National Assessment System in Chile.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice17 (2): 233–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003696214
   Google Scholar
• Mizala, A., and B. R. Schneider. 2014. “Negotiating Education Reform: Teacher Evaluations and Incentives in Chile (1990–2010).” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 27: 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, E., A. Pushparatnam, S. E. Rimm-Kaufman, and K. K.-Y. Wong. 2018. “Evidence-Based Teaching: Effective Teaching Practices in Primary School Classrooms.” 8656. Policy Research Working Paper. Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, L. 2011. La Década de América Latina y El Caribe, Una Oportunidad Real. Washington, DC: BID.
   Google Scholar
• Mourshed, M., C. Chijioke, and M. Barber. 2010. How the World’s Most Improved School Systems Keep Getting Better. Washington DC: McKinsey & Company.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Governing Education in a Complex World. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OREALC-UNESCO. 2014. El Liderazgo Directivo: Un Estado Del Arte En Base a Ocho Sistemas Escolares de América Latina y El Caribe. Santiago de Chile: UNES.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45 (4): 595–628. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, C. 1994. “Theorising the Governance of Education.” British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (1): 6–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.1994.9973980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivas, A. 2015. América Latina Después de PISA. Buenos Aires: CIPPEC & Instituto Natura.
   Google Scholar
• Rivero, J. 2000. Educación y Exclusión En América Latina. Reformas En Tiempos de Globalización. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.
   Google Scholar
• Roldán Vera, E., and C. I. Cortes Velasco. 2018. Report on Production, Distribution and Textbook Provision Policies in Four Latin American Countries. Georg Eckert Institute for International Textbook Research. 17. Eckert Dossiers 17.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouquié, A. 2011. A La Sombra de Las Dictaduras: La Democracia En América Latina. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. 2001. “The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 28: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Sarason, S. 1990. The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., C. C. McKnight, R. Houang, H. Wang, D. Wiley, L. Cogan, and R. Wolfe. 2001. Why Schools Matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Secretaría de Educación Pública. 2009. Historia de La CONALITEG (1944-1982).  Mexico DF: Secretaría de Educación Pública.
   Google Scholar
• Sunkel, G., and D. Trucco. 2010. Nuevas Tecnologías de La Información y La Comunicación Para La Educación En América Latina: Riesgos y Oportunidades. Santiago de Chile: División de Desarrollo Social, CEPAL. Naciones Unidas.
   Google Scholar
• Tedesco, J. C. 2012. Educación y Justicia Social En América Latina. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, C. A. 2002. “The State, Privatisation and Educational Policy: A Critique of Neo-Liberalism in Latin America and Some Ethical and Political Implications.” Comparative Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3099541.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. 1997. Reconceptualising Governance. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2013. Antecedentes y Criterios Para La Elaboración de Políticas Docentes En América Latina y El Caribe. Santiago de Chile: OREALC-UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant, D. 2011. “Improving and Supporting Principals’ Leadership in Latin America.” In International Handbook of Leadership for Learning, edited by T. Townsend and M. John, 571–585. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, G. A. 2014. “Curriculum Convergence in Chile : The Global and Local Context of Reforms in Curriculum Policy.” Comparative Education Review 48 (2): 174–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/382621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vegas, E., and J. Petrow. 2008. Raising Student Learning in Latin America. The Challenge for the 21st Century. Washington DC: Banco Mundial.
   Google Scholar
• Verger, A., C. Fontdevila, and L. Parcerisa. 2019. “Reforming Governance through Policy Instruments: How and to What Extent Standards, Tests and Accountability in Education Spread Worldwide.” Discourse 40 (2): 248–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1569882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verger, A., L. Parcerisa, and C. Fontdevila. 2018. “The Growth and Spread of Large-Scale Assessments and Test-Based Accountabilities: A Political Sociology of Gloval Education Reforms.” Educational Review 71 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verger, A., M. Moschetti, and C. Fontdevila. 2019. “The Expansion of Private Schooling in Latin America.” In The Wiley Handbook of Global Educational Reform, edited by K. Saltman and A. Means, 131–155. Medford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119082316.ch7.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, H. 1993. “Control versus Legitimation: The Politics of Ambivalence.” In Decentralization and School Improvement: Can We Fulfill the Promise?, edited by J. Hannaway and M. Carnoy, 55–83. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A., and A. Olmedo, eds. 2019. Education Governance and Social Theory: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Research. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2019. Brief: Teach. Washington: World Bank.
   Google Scholar