References
- Arikan, S., F. J. R. van de Vijver, and K. Yagmur. 2017. “PISA Mathematics and Reading Performance Differences of Mainstream European and Turkish Immigrant Students.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 29 (3): 229–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9260–6
- Arikan, S. 2018. “Factors Predicting Creative Problem-solving Competence in PISA 2012: Evidence from Six Countries.” Croatian Journal of Education 20 (2): 361–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v20i2.2419.
- Asparouhov, T., and B. O. Muthén. 2012. Multiple Group Multilevel Analysis. Mplus Web Notes: No. 16. http://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote16.pdf
- Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
- Barcellos, S. H., L. S. Carvalho, and P. Turley. 2018. “Education Can Reduce Health Differences Related to Genetic Risk of Obesity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (42): E9765–E9772. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802909115.
- Bellibaş, M. Ş. 2016. “Who are the Most Disadvantaged? Factors Associated with the Achievement of Students with Low Socio- Economic Backgrounds.” Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 16 (2): 691–710. doi:https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0257.
- Benner, A. D., A. E. Boyle, and S. Sadler. 2016. “Parental Involvement and Adolescents’ Educational Success: The Roles of Prior Achievement and Socioeconomic Status.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 45 (6): 1053–1064. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0431-4.
- BERA. 2018. British Educational Research Associations’ Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4.a ed.
- Brincks, A. M., C. K. Enders, M. M. Llabre, R. J. Bulotsky-Shearer, G. Prado, and D. J. Feaster. 2017. “Centering Predictor Variables in Three-level Contextual Models.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 52 (2): 149–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1256753.
- Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2004. “Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection.” Sociological Methods and Research 33 (2): 261–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644.
- Caprara, G. V., R. Fida, M. Vecchione, G. Del Bove, G. M. Vecchio, C. Barbaranelli, and A. Bandura. 2008. “Longitudinal Analysis of the Role of Perceived Self-efficacy for Self-regulated Learning in Academic Continuance and Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 100 (3): 525–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.525.
- Caro, D. H. 2015. “Causal Mediation in Educational Research: An Illustration Using International Assessment Data.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 8 (4): 577–597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1086913.
- Creemers, B., and L. Kyriakides. 2016. “Theory Development in Educational Effectiveness Research.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Educational Effectiveness and Improvement, edited by C. Chapman, D. Muijs, D. Reynolds, P. Sammons, and C. Teddlie, 149–172. London: Routledge.
- Davies, N. M., M. Dickson, G. Davey Smith, G. van den Berg, and F. Windmeijer. 2018. “The Causal Effects of Education on Health, Mortality, Cognition, Well-being, and Income in the UK Biobank.” Nature Human Behaviour 2 (2): 117–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0279-y.
- Dobbie, W., and R. G. Fryer. 2011. “Are High-quality Schools Enough to Increase Achievement among the Poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3 (3): 158–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.3.158.
- Enders, C. K., and D. Tofighi. 2007. “Centering Predictor Variables in Cross-sectional Multilevel Models: A New Look at an Old Issue.” Psychological Methods 12 (2): 121–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.12.2.121.supp.
- Fernández-Alonso, R., J. Suárez-Álvarez, and J. Muñiz. 2015. “Adolescents’ Homework Performance in Mathematics and Science: Personal Factors and Teaching Practices.” Journal of Educational Psychology 107 (4): 1075–1085. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000032.
- Fung, W. K., and K. K. Chung. 2020. “The Role of Socioeconomic Status in Chinese Word Reading and Writing among Chinese Kindergarten Children.” Reading and Writing 33 (2): 377–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09967-2.
- Gamazo, A., F. Martínez-Abad, S. Olmos-Migueláñez, and M. J. Rodríguez-Conde. 2017. “Assessment of Factors Related to School Effectiveness in PISA 2015. A Multilevel Analysis | Evaluación De Factores Relacionados Con La Eficacia Escolar En PISA 2015. Un Análisis Multinivel.” Revista de Educacion 2017 (379): 56–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-379-369.
- Gleason, P. M., C. C. Tuttle, B. Gill, I. Nichols-Barrer, and B.-R. Teh. 2014. “Do KIPP Schools Boost Student Achievement?” Education Finance and Policy 9 (1): 36–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00119.
- Göllner, R., R. I. Damian, B. Nagengast, B. W. Roberts, and U. Trautwein. 2018. “It’s Not Only Who You are but Who You are With: High School Composition and Individuals’ Attainment over the Life Course.” Psychological Science 29 (11): 1785–1796. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618794454.
- Gromada, A., G. Rees, and Y. Chzhen. 2019. “Comparing Inequality in Adolescents’ Reading Achievement across 37 Countries and over Time: Outcomes versus Opportunities.” Compare, August 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1640597.
- Grosz, M. P., J. M. Rohrer, and F. Thoemmes. 2020. “The Taboo against Explicit Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Psychology.” Perspective on Psychological Science 15 (5): 1243–1255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620921521.
- Hattie, J. 2012. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. New York: Routledge.
- Hayes, A. F. 2018. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. 2.a ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Hemmerechts, K., O. Agirdag, and D. Kavadias. 2017. “The Relationship between Parental Literacy Involvement, Socio-economic Status and Reading Literacy.” Educational Review 69 (1): 85–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1164667.
- Hernández, E., and A. Bazán. 2016. “Efectos contextuales, socioeconómicos y culturales, sobre los resultados de México en Lectura en PISA 2009.” REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 14 2 (2016): 79–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2016.14.2.005.
- Janks, H. 2019. “Critical Literacy and the Importance of Reading with and against a Text.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 62 (5): 561–564. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.941.
- Jerrim, J., L. A. Lopez-Agudo, O. D. Marcenaro, and N. Shure. 2017. “To Weight or Not to Weight? The Case of PISA Data.” In Investigaciones De Economía De La Educación, edited by J. C. Gómez, M. C. Pérez, and L. Nieto, 285–302, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.
- Komatsu, and J. Rappleye. 2017. “A PISA Paradox? An Alternative Theory of Learning as A Possible Solution for Variations in PISA Scores.” Comparative Education Review 61 (2): 269–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/690809.
- Lafontaine, D., A. Baye, S. Vieluf, and C. Monseur. 2015. “Equity in Opportunity-to-learn and Achievement in Reading: A Secondary Analysis of PISA 2009 Data.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 47: 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.05.001.
- Lee, J., and L. Stankov. 2018. “Non-cognitive Predictors of Academic Achievement: Evidence from TIMSS and PISA.” Learning and Individual Differences 65: 50–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.009.
- Lenkeit, J., and D. H. Caro. 2014. “Performance Status and Change – Measuring Education System Effectiveness with Data from PISA 2000–2009.” Educational Research and Evaluation 20 (2): 146–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.891462.
- León, J., E. Medina-Garrido, and M. Ortega. 2018. “Teaching Quality: High School Students’ Autonomy and Competence.” Psicothema 30 (2): 218–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.23.
- Li, S., Q. Xu, and R. Xia. 2020. “Relationship between Ses and Academic Achievement of Junior High School Students in China: The Mediating Effect of Self-concept.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2513. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02513.
- Loh, C. E., and B. Sun. 2019. “Cultural Capital, Habitus and Reading Futures: Middle-class Adolescent Students’ Cultivation of Reading Dispositions in Singapore.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1690426.
- Marsh, H. W., O. Lüdtke, B. Nagengast, U. Trautwein, A. J. S. Morin, A. S. Abduljabbar, and O. Köller. 2012. “Classroom Climate and Contextual Effects: Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Evaluation of Group-level Effects.” Educational Psychologist 47 (2): 106–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.670488.
- Meng, L., C. Qiu, and B. Boyd-Wilson. 2019. “Measurement Invariance of the ICT Engagement Construct and Its Association with Students’ Performance in China and Germany: Evidence from PISA 2015 Data.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (6): 3233–3251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12729.
- Meng, L., M. Muñoz, K. King Hess, and S. Liu. 2017. “Effective Teaching Factors and Student Reading Strategies as Predictors of Student Achievement in PISA 2009: The Case of China and the United States.” Educational Review 69 (1): 68–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1155537.
- Merry, J. J. 2013. “Tracing the U.S. Deficit in PISA Reading Skills to Early Childhood: Evidence from the United States and Canada.” Sociology of Education 86 (3): 234–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712472913.
- Núñez, J. L., C. Fernández, J. León, and F. Grijalvo. 2015. “The Relationship between Teacher’s Autonomy Support and Students’ Autonomy and Vitality.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 21 (3): 191–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.928127.
- OECD. 2009. PISA Data Analysis Manual. OECD Publishing.
- OECD. 2018. Equity in Education: Breaking down Barriers to Social Mobility. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073234-en.
- OECD. 2019. PISA 2018 and the EU: Striving for Social Fairness through Education.
- Pearl, J., and D. Mackenzie. 2018. The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Pereira, D., M. J. Perales, and M. Bakieva. 2016. “Análisis de tendencias en las investigaciones realizadas a partir de los datos del Proyecto PISA.” RELIEVE - Revista Electronica De Investigacion Y Evaluacion Educativa 22 (1): 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.22.1.8248.
- Raudenbush, S. W., and A. S. Bryk. 2002. “Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.” In Hierarchical Linear Models. 2.a ed. London: Sage.
- Raudenbush, S. W., and J. D. Willms. 1995. “The Estimation of School Effects.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 20 (4): 307–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986020004307.
- Ray, A. K. 2008. “Measurement of Social Development : An International Comparison.” Social Indicators Research 86 (1): 1–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/sll205-007-9097-3.
- Reynolds, D., C. Teddlie, C. Chapman, and S. Stringfield. 2016. “Effective School Processes.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Educational Effectiveness and Improvement, edited by C. Chapman, D. R. Daniel Muijs, P. Sammons, and C. Teddlie, 77–99. London: Routledge.
- Richardson, M., C. Abraham, and R. Bond. 2012. “Psychological Correlates of University Students’ Academic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 138 (2): 353–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838.
- Rojas, S. P., A. Meneses, and E. Sánchez. 2019. “Teachers’ Scaffolding Science Reading Comprehension in Low-income Schools: How to Improve Achievement in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (13): 1827–1847. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1641855.
- Sammons, P., S. Davis, and J. Gray. 2016. “Methodological and Scientific Properties of School Effectiveness Research: Exploring the Underpinnings, Evolution, and Future Directions of the Field.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Educational Effectiveness and Improvement, edited by C. Chapman, D. Muijs, D. Reynolds, P. Sammons, and C. Teddlie, 25–76. London: Routledge.
- Sanderson, E., G. Davey Smith, J. Bowden, and M. R. Munafò. 2019. “Mendelian Randomisation Analysis of the Effect of Educational Attainment and Cognitive Ability on Smoking Behaviour.” Nature Communications 10 (1): 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10679-y.
- Scheerens, J., R. J. Bosker, and B. P. M. Creemers. 2001. “Time for Self-criticism: On the Viability of School Effectiveness Research.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 12 (1): 131–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.12.1.131.3464.
- Stanley, L., F. W. Kellermanns, and T. M. Zellweger. 2017. “Latent Profile Analysis: Understanding Family Firm Profiles.” Family Business Review 30 (1): 84–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516677426.
- Stapleton, L. M., J. S. Yang, and G. R. Hancock. 2016. “Construct Meaning in Multilevel Settings.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 41 (5): 481–520. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998616646200.
- United Nations. 2019. Human Development Report 2019. Beyond Income beyond Averages, beyond Today: Inequalities in Human Development in the 21st Century. United Nations Development Programme.