2,851
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The OECD and epistemic (de)colonisation: Globalising visions for knowledge in the Learning Compass 2030

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahmed, Y. 2021. “Political Discourse Analysis: A Decolonial Approach.” Critical Discourse Studies 18 (1): 139–155. doi:10.1080/17405904.2020.1755707.
  • Bhambra, G. K. 2007. Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bhambra, G. K. 2014. Connected Sociologies. London & New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Chouliaraki, L., and N. Fairclough. 2010. “Critical Discourse Analysis in Organizational Studies: Towards an Integrationist Methodology.” Journal of Management Studies 47 (6): 1213–1218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00883.x.
  • D’Agnese, V. 2015. “PISA’s Colonialism: Success, Money, and the Eclipse of Education.” Power and Education 7 (1): 56–72. doi:10.1177/1757743814567387.
  • Dasgupta, P. 2021. “The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review.” London. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/the-economics-of-biodiversity-the-dasgupta-review
  • Dussel, E. D. 2000. “Europe, Modernity, and Eurocentrism.” Nepantla: Views from South 1 (3): 465–478.
  • Elkington, B., M. Jackson, R. Kiddle, O. Ripeka Mercier, M. Ross, J. Smeaton, and A. Thomas, eds. 2020. Imagining Decolonisation. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
  • Escobar, A. 2010. “Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise: The Latin American Modernity/Coloniality Research Program.” In Globalization and the Decolonial Option, edited by W. D. Mignolo and A. Escobar, 33–64. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Fairclough, N. 2005. “Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism.” Organization Studies 26 (6): 915–939. doi:10.1177/0170840605054610.
  • Fairclough, N. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Fanon, F. 1963. The Wretched of the Earth. London: Penguin.
  • Gilman, N. 2003. Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Grek, S. 2009. “Governing by Numbers: The PISA ‘Effect’ in Europe.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (1): 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669.
  • Grosfoguel, R. 2002. “Colonial Difference, Geopolitics of Knowledge, and Global Coloniality in the Modern/Colonial Capitalist World-System.” Review 25 (3): 203–224.
  • Hughson, T. A., and B. E. Wood. 2020. “The OECD Learning Compass 2030 and the Future of Disciplinary Learning: A Bernsteinian Critique.” Journal of Education Policy. doi:10.1080/02680939.2020.1865573.
  • Kaess, K. 2018. “The Cross-Atlantic Knowledge Divide, or PISA for Development: Should One Size Ever Fit All?” Atlantic Studies : Global Currents 15 (3): 349–364. doi:10.1080/14788810.2017.1370356.
  • Kelly, G. J., A. Luke, and J. Green. 2008. “What Counts as Knowledge in Educational Settings: Disciplinary Knowledge, Assessment, and Curriculum.” Review of Research in Education 32 (1): vii–x. doi:10.3102/0091732X07311063.
  • Luckin, R., and K. Issroff. 2018. “Education and AI: Preparing for the Future.” OECD. h ttp ://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/about/documents/Education-and-AI-preparingfor-the- future-AI-Attitudes-and-Values.pdf
  • Melo Resende, V. D. 2021. “Decolonizing Critical Discourse Studies: For a Latin American Perspective.” Critical Discourse Studies 18 (1): 26–42. doi:10.1080/17405904.2018.1490654.
  • Mignolo, W. D. 2011. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Miles, J., and P. Nayak. 2020. “Curriculum Co-Presences and an Ecology of Knowledges.” Curriculum Inquiry 50 (2): 99–104. doi:10.1080/03626784.2020.1776970.
  • Naidoo, R. 2011. “Rethinking Development: Higher Education and the New Imperialism.” In Handbook on Globalization and Higher Education, edited by R. King, S. Marginson, and R. Naidoo, 40–58. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • OECD. 1996. The Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. 2005. The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies: Executive Summary. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. 2012. Education Today 2013: The OECD Perspective. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. 2019a. “Education 2030 Curriculum Content Mapping: An Analysis of the Netherlands Curriculum Proposal.” Paris. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/E2030_CCM_analysis_NLD_curriculum_proposal.pdf
  • OECD. 2019b. “Knowledge for 2030 Concept Note.” http://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/knowledge/Knowledge_for_2030_concept_note.pdf
  • OECD. 2019c. “OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Project Background.” https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/about/E2030Introduction_FINAL_rev.pdf
  • OECD. 2019d. “OECD Learning Compass 2030 List of Contributors.” https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/about/Acknowledgement_for_contributors.pdf
  • OECD. 2020. “OECD Learning Compass 2030.” https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/
  • Quijano, A. 2000. “Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America.” International Sociology 15 (2): 215–232. doi:10.1177/0268580900015002005.
  • Quijano, A. 2007. “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality.” Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 168–178. doi:10.1080/09502380601164353.
  • Rizvi, F., and B. Lingard. 2010. Globalizing Education Policy. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203867396.
  • Rudolph, S., A. Sriprakash, and J. Gerrard. 2018. “Knowledge and Racial Violence: The Shine and Shadow of ‘Powerful Knowledge.’.” Ethics and Education 13 (1): 22–38. doi:10.1080/17449642.2018.1428719.
  • Santos, B. 2007. “Beyond Abyssal Thinking: From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledges.” Review 30 (1): 45–89. doi:10.4324/9781315634876-14.
  • Santos, B. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. London & New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315634876.
  • Santos, B. 2018. The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham & London: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9781478002000.
  • Schleicher, A. 2012. “Using Data to Build Better Schools.” TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/andreas_schleicher_use_data_to_build_better_schools/transcript?language=en#t-984031
  • Sellar, S., and B. Lingard. 2014. “The OECD and the Expansion of PISA: New Global Modes of Governance in Education.” British Educational Research Journal 40 (6): 917–936. doi:10.1002/berj.3120.
  • Shahjahan, R. A. 2013. “Coloniality and a Global Testing Regime in Higher Education: Unpacking the OECD’s AHELO Initiative.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (5): 676–694. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.758831.
  • Shahjahan, R. A., and C. Morgan. 2016. “Global Competition, Coloniality, and the Geopolitics of Knowledge in Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 37 (1): 92–109. doi:10.1080/01425692.2015.1095635.
  • Shahjahan, R. A. 2016. “International Organizations (IOs), Epistemic Tools of Influence, and the Colonial Geopolitics of Knowledge Production in Higher Education Policy.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (6): 694–710. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1206623.
  • Simon, J., and L. T. Smith, eds. 2001. A Civilising Mission? Perceptions and Representations of the New Zealand Native Schools System. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
  • Sjøberg, S. 2016. “OECD, PISA, and Globalization: The Influence of the International Assessment Regime.” In Education Policy Perils: Tackling the Tough Issues, edited by C. H. Tienken and C. A. Mullen, 102–133. New York: Routledge.
  • Smith, L. T. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies. 2nd ed. Dunedin: Otago University Press.
  • Takayama, K. 2018. “How to Mess with PISA: Learning from Japanese Kokugo Curriculum Experts.” Curriculum Inquiry 48 (2): 220–237. doi:10.1080/03626784.2018.1435975.
  • Tikly, L. 2004. “Education and the New Imperialism.” Comparative Education 40 (2): 173–198. doi:10.1080/0305006042000231347.
  • Tinsley, M. 2021. “Towards a Postcolonial Critical Realism.” Critical Sociology. doi:10.1177/08969205211003962.
  • Tröhler, D. 2014. “Change Management in the Governance of Schooling: The Rise of Experts, Planners, and Statistics in the Early OECD.” Teachers College Record 116 (9): 1–26. doi:10.1177/016146811411600903.
  • Voogt, J., N. Nieveen, and A. Thijs. 2018. “Preliminary Findings from an International Literature Review on ‘Ensuring Equity and Innovations.’” Paris. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/EDU-EDPC(2018)14.pdf
  • Wilkinson, C., D. C. H. Hikuroa, A. H. MacFarlane, and M. W. Hughes. 2020. “Mātauranga Māori in Geomorphology: Existing Frameworks, Case Studies, and Recommendations for Incorporating Indigenous Knowledge in Earth Science.” Earth Surface Dynamics 8 (3): 595–618. doi:10.5194/esurf-8-595-2020.
  • Woodward, R. 2009. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). London & New York: Routledge.
  • Young, M. F. D., and J. Muller. 2016. Curriculum and the Specialization of Knowledge: Studies in the Sociology of Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Yusoff, K. 2018. A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.