A scoping review of the changing landscape of doctoral education

References

• Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• ASSAf (Academy of Science in South Africa). 2010. “The PhD Study: An Evidence-Based Study on How to Meet the Demands for High-level Skills in an Emerging Economy.” Consensus Report. Pretoria: ASSAf. doi:10.17159/assaf.2016/0026.
   Google Scholar
• Baschung, L. 2016. “Identifying, Characterising and Assessing New Practices in Doctoral Education.” European Journal of Education 51 (4): 522–534. doi:10.1111/ejed.12191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendrups, D., A. L. K. Candelaria, and T. Hogan. 2021. “Collaborative Transnational Doctoral Education: Insights from a Philippines-Australia Partnership.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 58 (6): 682–692. doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1991833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, H. 2019. “Crossing Boundaries: The Affordances of New Technologies in Supporting a Collaborative Learning Environment for Doctoral Students Learning Transnationally.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 28 (3): 255–267. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2018.1559761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bursztyn, L. 2016. “Poverty and the Political Economy of Public Education Spending: Evidence from Brazil.” Journal of the European Economic Association 14 (5): 1101–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bursztyn, M., M. B. Maury, and G. Litre. 2016. “Interdisciplinary Graduate Studies in Brazil: Lessons from Sustainability and Environmental Sciences.” Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies 34: 122–142. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1171318.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Capello, S., M. Gyimah-Concepcion, B. Buckley-Hughes, R. Lance, S. Ryan, and E. Sorte-Thomas. 2022. “A Community of Practice Shares Perspectives on Utilizing Telepresence in Doctoral Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, S. 2021. “Transitioning the Team: Supporting Distance Supervised Doctor of Business Administration Students through Collaborative Online Workshops.” Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning 25 (1): 13–21. https://jofdl.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/451
   Google Scholar
• Carter-Veale, W. Y., R. G. Tull, J. C. Rutledge, and L. N. Joseph. 2016. “The Dissertation House Model: Doctoral Student Experiences Coping and Writing in a Shared Knowledge Community.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 15 (3): ar34. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHE (Council on Higher Education). 2021. “Vital Stats 2019.” Pretoria, South Africa: CHE.
   Google Scholar
• CHE (Council on Higher Education). 2022. “National Review of South Africa’s Doctoral Qualifications.” Pretoria, South Africa: CHE.
   Google Scholar
• Choy, S., B. L. Delahaye, and B. Saggers. 2015. “Developing Learning Cohorts for Postgraduate Research Degrees.” The Australian Educational Researcher 42 (1): 19–34. doi:10.1007/s13384-014-0147-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloete, N., J. Mouton, and C. Sheppard. 2015. “Doctoral Education in South Africa.” Cape Town: African Minds. https://www.idea-phd.net/images/Doctoral-Education-in-South-Africa-WEB-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H., G. Croucher, U. Weerakkody, K. Moore, M. Dollinger, P. Kelly, E. Bexley, and I. Grosemans. 2020. “An Education Design Architecture for the Future Australian Doctorate.” Higher Education 79 (1): 79–94. doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00397-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornér, S., K. Pyhältö, J. Peltonen, and S. S. Bengtsen. 2018. “Similar or Different? Researcher Community and Supervisory Support Experiences among Danish and Finnish Social Sciences and Humanities PhD Students.” Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 9 (2): 274–295. doi:10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council on Higher Education/Centre for Research on Evaluation Science and Technology. 2009. “Higher Education Monitor: Postgraduate Studies in South Africa - a Statistical Profile.” Pretoria, South Africa: CHE. https://www.che.ac.za/publications/research/postgraduate-studies-south-africa-statistical-profile
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M., and J. Backhouse. 2014. “Evaluating Doctoral Programmes in Africa: Context and Practices.” Higher Education Policy 27 (2): 155–174. doi:10.1057/hep.2014.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lange, N., G. Pillay, and V. Chikoko. 2011. “Doctoral Learning: A Case for A Cohort Model of Supervision and Support.” South African Journal of Education 31 (1): 15–30. doi:10.15700/saje.v31n1a413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Whitehead, Y., and F. Maringe. 2020. “A Cross-National Analysis of PhD Models.” International Journal of Comparative Education and Development 22 (3): 233–245. doi:10.1108/IJCED-01-2020-0003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doonan, F., L. Taylor, P. Branduardi, and J. P. Morrissey. 2018. “Innovative Training Networks: Overview of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie PhD Training Model.” FEMS Microbiology Letters 365 (19): fny207. doi:10.1093/femsle/fny207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Gaidi, K. 2014. “The journeyman as a metaphor for developing skills in postgraduate education: Experience, feedback and role models.” In Pushing boundaries in postgraduate supervision, edited by E. Bitzer, B. Frick, R. Albertyn, B. Grant, and F. Kelly, 153–165. Stellenbosch: Sun Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenge, L. A. 2012. “Enhancing the Doctoral Journey: The Role of Group Supervision in Supporting Collaborative Learning and Creativity.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (4): 401–414. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.520697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergusson, L., L. Van Der Laan, C. White, and J. Balfour. 2019. “The Ethos and Transformational Nature of Professional Studies: A Study of Student Experience in Australia.” Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning 9 (4): 695–711. doi:10.1108/HESWBL-01-2019-0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. M., J. A. Glass, S. Fujisaki, and S. L. Toner. 2010. “Group Process and Learning: A Grounded Theory Model of Group Supervision.” Training and Education in Professional Psychology 4 (3): 194. doi:10.1037/a0018970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonn, S., O. Egesah, D. Cole, F. Griffiths, L. Manderson, C. Kabiru, A. Ezeh, M. Thorogood, and C. Izugbara. 2016. “Building the Capacity to Solve Complex Health Challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa: CARTA’s Multidisciplinary PhD Training.” Canadian Journal of Public Health 107 (4): e381–e386. doi:10.17269/cjph.107.5511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geschwind, L., and G. Melin. 2016. “Stronger Disciplinary Identities in Multidisciplinary Research Schools.” Studies in Continuing Education 38 (1): 16–28. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2014.1000848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govender, K., and R. Dhunpath. 2011. “Student Experiences of the PhD Cohort Model: Working within or outside Communities of Practice?” Perspectives in Education 29 (1): 88–99. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC87632
   Google Scholar
• Granata, S. N., and F. Dochy. 2016. “Applied PhD Research in a Work-Based Environment: An Activity Theory-Based Analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (6): 990–1007. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.966666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., and I. Green. 2015. “They’re the Bosses’: Feedback in Team Supervision.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 39 (3): 320–335. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2013.831039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., K. Hytönen, J. Makkonen, and E. Lehtinen. 2016. “Extending Collective Practices of Doctoral Education from Natural to Educational Sciences.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (1): 63–78. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.914910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, D. J., and A. Wittkowski. 2015. “Optimisation of Research on ClinPsyD Programmes: Lessons Learnt at Manchester.” Clinical Psychology Forum 266: 44–48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284142196
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, S. S., and C. Hendrick. 2011. “Creating an Oncology Practicum: A Partnering Approach.” Training and Education in Professional Psychology 5 (4): 229–236. doi:10.1037/a0026229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J., and V. Swallow. 2014. “A Peer-Driven Community-Based Supervisory Model: Development from an Evaluation of an Ethics Workshop for Doctoral Students Undertaking Research with Children.” Health Science Journal 8 (2): 154–165. http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/18603/3/supervisory_models_ethics_workshop_evaluation_-_submitted.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, M. 2017. “Improving Doctoral Support through Group Supervision: Analysing Face-to-Face and Technology-Mediated Strategies for Nurturing and Sustaining Scholarship.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 533–550. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1058352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, B. T., R. M. Olsen, N. C. Øverby, R. Garred, and E. Enoksen. 2019. “Team Supervision of Doctoral Students: A Qualitative Inquiry.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 14: 69–84. doi:10.28945/4177.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. 2014. “Toward the Building of a Cross-Disciplinary Doctoral Research and Writing Culture.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 11 (1): 4. http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol11/iss1/4
   Google Scholar
• Kainz, K., T. Jensen, and S. Zimmerman. 2018. “Cultivating a Research Tool Kit for Social Work Doctoral Education.” Journal of Social Work Education 54 (4): 792–807. doi:10.1080/10437797.2018.1434446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M. I., M. Kronfeldner, and R. Meunier. 2016. “Problems and Prospects of Interdisciplinarity: The Case of Philosophy of Science.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 41 (1): 61–70. doi:10.1080/03080188.2016.1171583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, F., S. Dhaini, M. Briel, S. Henrichs, C. Höchsmann, D. Kalbermatten, N. Künzli, et al. 2018. “How to Conceptualize and Implement a PhD Program in Health Sciences—The Basel Approach.” Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development 24 (5): 2382120518771364. doi:10.1177/2382120518771364.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. H., S. R. Terrell, and M. F. Lohle. 2016. “A Grounded Theory of Persistence in A Limited-residency Doctoral Program.” The Qualitative Report 20 (3): 215–230. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2110.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. 2017. “Reflections on Change in Doctoral Education: An Australian Case Study.” Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 8 (2): 78–87. doi:10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., and D. P. Halliday. 2019. “Candidate and Supervisor Experiences of Doctoral Study in a Structured, Interdisciplinary Training Environment.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 56 (5): 663–674. doi:10.1080/14703297.2019.1570306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachmann, D., T. Martius, J. Eberle, M. Landmann, L. von Kotzebue, B. Neuhaus, and S. Herzig. 2020. “Regulations and Practices of Structured Doctoral Education in the Life Sciences in Germany.” PLoS one 15 (7): e0233415. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, J., Y. W. Su, C. C. Chen, and C. L. Dai. 2019. “Using a Collaborative Model in Supervision with International Counseling Students.” The Journal of Humanistic Counseling 58 (2): 150–164. doi:10.1002/johc.12103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazurko, A., T. Alamenciak, L. S. Hill, E. Muhl, A. K. Osei, D. Pomezanski, K. Schang, and D. F. Sharmin. 2020. “What Will a PhD Look like in the Future? Perspectives on Emerging Trends in Sustainability Doctoral Programs in a Time of Disruption.” World Futures Review 12 (4): 369–384.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2017. “Peer Support for International Doctoral Students in Managing Supervision Relationships.” Journal of International Students 7 (4): 1096–1103. doi:10.32674/jis.v7i4.194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limberg, D., H. Bell, J. T. Super, L. Jacobson, J. Fox, M. K. DePue, C. Christmas, M. E. Young, and G. W. Lambie. 2013. “Professional Identity Development of Counselor Education Doctoral Students: A Qualitative Investigation.” Professional Counselor 3 (1): 40–53. doi:10.15241/dll.3.1.40.
   Google Scholar
• Lindén, J., M. Ohlin, and E. M. Brodin. 2013. “Mentorship, Supervision and Learning Experience in PhD Education.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (5): 639–662. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.596526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, H., and A. Floyd. 2019. “Experiences of Using the Researching Professional Development Framework.” Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 10 (1): 54–68. doi:10.1108/SGPE-02-2019-049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloshonok, N., and E. Terentev. 2019. “National Barriers to the Completion of Doctoral Programs at Russian Universities.” Higher Education 77 (2): 195–211. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0267-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manabe, Y. C., H. Nambooze, E. S. Okello, M. R. Kamya, E. T. Katabira, I. Ssinabulya, M. Kaddumukasa, Y. Nabunnya, R. C. Bollinger, and N. K. Sewankambo. 2018. “Group Mentorship Model to Enhance the Efficiency and Productivity of PhD Research Training in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Annals of Global Health 84 (1): 170. doi:10.29024/aogh.25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. 2019. “‘Timescapes’ in Doctoral Education: The Politics of Temporal Equity in Higher Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 38 (6): 1227–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawson, K., and I. Abbott. 2017. “Supervising the Professional Doctoral Student: Less Process and Progress, More Peripheral Participation and Personal Identity.” Management in Education 31 (4): 187–193. doi:10.1177/0892020617738182.
   Google Scholar
• McCallin, A., and S. Nayar. 2012. “Postgraduate Research Supervision: A Critical Review of Current Practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (1): 63–74. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.590979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaghie, W. C. 2015. “Varieties of Integrative Scholarship: Why Rules of Evidence, Criteria, and Standards Matter.” Academic Medicine 90 (3): 294–302. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, S. 2017. “Crossing Conceptual Thresholds in Doctoral Communities.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (5): 458–466. doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1155471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mda, T. 2013. “Growing Researchers from the Historically Disadvantaged Groups through Internships.” Perspectives in Education 31 (2): 92–101. https://africaneditors.org/journal/PIE/abstract/59528-93032
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. H., K. T. Glenesk, D. K. Hulsizer, B. E. McCright, C. Wrenn, T. Sander, D. Fisher, and J. D. Childs. 2014. “Impact of an Innovative Clinical Internship Model in the US Army-Baylor Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy.” U.S. Army Medical Department Journal 30–35. https://web-s-ebscohost-com.ez.sun.ac.za/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=32ab96b0-0894-4d1b-997d-feebecbddd31%40redis
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Development Plan: Vision for 2030. 2011. November, 11. https://www.gov.za/issues/national-development-plan-2030
   Google Scholar
• Ngulube, P., and S. C. Ukwoma. 2019. “Mapping Supervision Trends in Doctoral Research in Library and Information Science in Nigeria and South Africa: Implications for Collective Learning.” African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science 29 (1): 1–16. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajlais/article/view/189698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østern, A. L. 2016. “Responding to the Challenge of Providing Stronger Research Base for Teacher Education: Research Discourses in the Norwegian National Research School for Teacher Education.” Educational Research 58 (1): 73–90. doi:10.1080/00131881.2015.1129116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, P., J. K. Olson, and R. B. Gul. 2014. “Co-supervision of Doctoral Students: Enhancing the Learning Experience.” International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship 11 (1): 31–38. doi:10.1515/ijnes-2012-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S., and L. Wittek. 2019. “New Directions in Doctoral Programmes: Bridging Tensions between Theory and Practice?” Teaching in Higher Education 25 (5): 560–578. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1577813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, L. 2017. “Structuralization of Doctoral Education in Germany: An Interdisciplinary Comparison.” European Journal of Higher Education 7 (3): 261–275. doi:10.1080/21568235.2017.1290876.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez, M. J. 2016. “Doctoral Studies in Spain: Changes to Converge with Europe in the Internationalisation of the Doctorate.” Educational Research and Reviews 11 (23): 2097–2107. doi:10.5897/ERR2016.2993.
   Google Scholar
• Reedy, K., and K. Taylor-Dunlop. 2015. “Mentor-Mentee Relationship in an Educational Leadership Doctoral Program at Lynn University.” Journal for Leadership and Instruction 14 (1): 38–40. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1080676.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. J. 2017. “Team Modes and Power: Supervision of Doctoral Students.” Higher Education Research & Development 36 (2): 358–371. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1208157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salimi, N., R. Bekkers, and K. Frenken. 2016. “Success Factors in University–Industry PhD Projects.” Science & Public Policy 43 (6): 812–830. doi:10.1093/scipol/scv076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, K. A., and K. Comer. 2010. “When the Governmental Tail Wags the Disciplinary Dog: Some Consequences of National Funding Policy on Doctoral Research in New Zealand.” Higher Education Research & Development 29 (3): 275–289. doi:10.1080/07294360903277372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, M. A., and H. Mariaye. 2014. “De-colonising International Collaboration: The University of Kwazulu-Natal-Mauritius Institute of Education Cohort PhD Programme.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 44 (4): 501–521. doi:10.1080/03057925.2013.795100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, M., and R. Vithal. 2011. “Emergent Frameworks of Research Teaching and Learning in a Cohort-Based Doctoral Programme.” Perspectives in Education 29 (1): 76–87. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/pie/article/view/76977
   Google Scholar
• Shen, W., Y. Gao, and S. Zhao. 2018. “Single-Advisor System or Joint Advisor System: The Preference and Satisfaction of PhD Students for Different Supervision Models.” Chinese Education & Society 51 (3): 222–231. doi:10.1080/10611932.2018.1454140.
   Google Scholar
• Skopek, J., M. Triventi, and H. P. Blossfeld. 2022. “How Do Institutional Factors Shape PhD Completion Rates? An Analysis of Long-Term Changes in a European Doctoral Program.” Studies in Higher Education 47 (2): 318–337. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1744125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R. 2018. “Reforming Doctoral Education: There Is a Better Way. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE. 9.18.” Center for Studies in Higher Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED592612.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stoten, D. W. 2019. “How Do Doctoral Students Interpret the Idea of Being Part of a Doctoral Community at an English Business School?” Qualitative Research Journal 20 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1108/QRJ-02-2019-0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. A. A. 2014. “Interdisciplinarity and Industry Collaboration in Doctoral Candidature: Tensions within and between Discourses.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (4): 546–559. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terentev, E., S. Bekova, and N. Maloshonok. 2021. “Three Challenges to Russian System of Doctoral Education: Why Only One Out of Ten Doctoral Students Defends Thesis?” International Journal of Chinese Education 10 (1): 22125868211007016. doi:10.1177/22125868211007016.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A., S. Lubarsky, S. J. Durning, and M. E. Young. 2017. “Knowledge Syntheses in Medical Education: Demystifying Scoping Reviews.” Academic Medicine 92 (2): 161–166. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmins, F., B. Timmins, P. O’Rourke, S. Long, R. Ekins, and E. Coyle. 2014. “Interdisciplinary Doctoral Supervision: Lessons for Nurse Education and Practice.” Nurse Education Today 34 (11): 1338–1342. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.05.01810.1016/j.nedt.2014.05.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonbul, Y. 2014. “A Comparative Study of Selection, Training and Advisory Practices for Doctoral Education.” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 55: 263–282. doi:10.14689/ejer.2014.55.15.
   Google Scholar
• Torka, M. 2021. “The Transition from In-person to Online Supervision: Does the Interaction between Doctoral Advisors and Candidates Change?” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 58 (6): 659–671. doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1993959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., E. Lillie, W. Zarin, K. O’Brien, H. Colquhoun, M. Kastner, D. Levac, et al. 2016. “A Scoping Review on the Conduct and Reporting of Scoping Reviews.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 16 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., H. Turunen, and T. Bondas. 2013. “Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis: Implications for Conducting a Qualitative Descriptive Study.” Nursing & Health Sciences 15 (3): 398–405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Watt, R. 2016. “Strengthening Doctoral Supervision in a Doctor of Psychology (Dpsych) Specialisation in Child and Adolescent Psychology.” Journal of Psychology in Africa 26 (1): 84–91. doi:10.1080/14330237.2016.1149332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanstone, M., K. Hibbert, A. Kinsella, P. J. McKenzie, A. Pittman, and L. Lingard. 2013. “Interdisciplinary Doctoral Research Supervision: A Scoping Review.” Canadian Journal of Higher Education 43 (2): 42. doi:10.47678/cjhe.v43i2.2403.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M., C. Byrne, A. Vocino, T. Sloan, S. J. Pervan, and D. Blackman. 2015. “A Decade of Change in Australia’s DBA Landscape.” Education + Training 57 (1): 31–47. doi:10.1108/ET-07-2013-0096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, R., E. Bambacus, and D. Gibson. 2017. “An Approach to Supervision for Doctoral and Entry-level Group Counseling Students.” The Journal for Specialists in Group Work 42 (4): 338–363. doi:10.1080/01933922.2017.1350231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. D., K. Doherty, L. Andersen, S. Bingham, K. I. Ford, P. A. Crookes, and R. McSherry. 2018. “Just Imagine that … ”: A Solution Focused Approach to Doctoral Research Supervision in Health and Social Care.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 30 (1): 161–171. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1169824.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J., S. Hatch, J. Petrin, R. Anderson, A. Nega, C. Raudebaugh, K. Shannon, and M. Finlayson. 2021. “The Impact of a Virtual Doctoral Student Networking Group during COVID-19.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 46 (5): 1–13. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2021.1987401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmot, K. 2021. “Fail Early and Fail Fast’: The Value of Group Supervision for Doctoral Candidates.” Higher Education Research & Development 1–14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2021.1969543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigley, C., P. Wolifson, and J. Matthews. 2021. “Supervising Cohorts of Higher Degree Research Students: Design Catalysts for Industry and Innovation.” Higher Education 81 (6): 1177–1196. doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00605-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeegers, M., and D. Barron. 2012. “Pedagogical Concerns in Doctoral Supervision: A Challenge for Pedagogy.” Quality Assurance in Education 20 (1): 20–30. doi:10.1108/09684881211198211.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C., Y. Cai, and K. François. 2017. “Perceptions of European and Chinese Stakeholders on Doctoral Education in China and Europe.” European Journal of Higher Education 7 (3): 227–242. doi:10.1080/21568235.2017.1290866.
   Google Scholar