The Rural School and the Creation of Modern Attitudes: a Venezuelan case_[1]

NOTES AND REFERENCES

• The research for this paper was made possible by an AID 211 D grant administered by the Center for Latin American Studies, UCLA
   Google Scholar
• In Venezuela campesino usually refers to a farmer who works either a subsistence holding or one which produces a small surplus
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal , G. 1968 . Asian Drama , Vol. I, II, III , New York : Pantheon .
   Google Scholar
• Kahl , J. 1968 . The Measurement of Modernism , Austin : University of Texas Press .
   Google Scholar
• Inkeles , A. 1969 . Making men modern . American Journal of Sociology , 75 ( 2 ) : 208 – 226 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazamias , A. 1967 . Potential elites in Turkey . Comparative Education Review , 11 ( 1 ) : 22 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Peshkin , A. 1970 . Education and modernism in Borneo . Comparative Education Review , 14 ( 3 ) : 283 – 300 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havighurst , R. and Gouveia , A.J. 1969 . Brazilian Secondary Education and Socio‐Economic Development , New York : Praeger .
   Google Scholar
• Holsinger , D.B. 1973 . The elementary school as modernizer, a Brazilian study . International Journal of Comparative Sociology , 14 : 180 – 202 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armer , M. and Youtz , R. Formal education and individual modernity in an African society . American Journal of Sociology , 76 ( 1 ) 604 – 626 .
   Google Scholar
• Where an individual served as the representative for more than one child he or she was counted twice. The actual totals of different representatives were 21 and 51 respectively
   Google Scholar
• Smith , D. and Inkeles , A. 1966 . The OM scale: a comparative socio‐psychological measure of individual modernity . Sociometry , 29 ( 4 ) : 353 – 377 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahl . op. cit. ,
   Google Scholar
• Armer , A. and Schnaiberg , A. 1972 . Measuring individual modernity: a near myth . American Sociological Review , 37 ( 3 ) : 301 – 316 . They criticize the use of individual modernity scales by suggesting that none of those investigated could accurately discriminate between modernity and certain other constructs. Inkeles, A. & Smith, D. (1974) Becoming Modern (Cambridge, Harvard Press). They have countered this argument by pointing out the limited nature of the Armer & Schnaiberg research and the large body of cross‐cultural evidence supporting their own position
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• It must be remembered that the discussion focuses on students who have already survived at least three years of schooling and that they indeed may have more modern parents than those students who have already dropped out
   Google Scholar