Farmers' rights and food sovereignty: critical insights from India

References

• Alker, D., and F. Heidhues. 2002. Farmers’ rights and intellectual property rights: reconciling conflicting concepts. In Economic and social issues in agricultural biotechnology, ed. R.E. Evenson, V. Santaniello, and D. Ziberman, 61–92. Wallingford: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, R. 2005. The history of farmers’ rights: a guide to central documents and literature. Lysaker, Norway: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, R. 2006. Realizing farmers’ rights under the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Summary of findings from the farmers’ rights project, Phase 1. Lysaker, Norway: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, R., and T. Winge. 2008. Success stories from the realization of farmers’ rights related to plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Lysaker, Norway: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, E. 2002. The summit-to-summit merry-go-round. Seedling July: 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bertacchini, E. E. 2008. Coase, Pigou and the potato: Whither farmers’ rights?. Ecological Economics 68: 183–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowiak, C. 2004. Farmers’ rights: intellectual property regimes and the struggle over seeds. Politics & Society 32, no. 4: 511–43. doi: 10.1177/0032329204269979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caduff, C., and S. Randeria. 2010. Reinventing the commons. In Turn over. Cultural turns in der soziologie, ed. S. Frank and J. Schwenk, 289–305. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Sustainable Agriculture (CSA) n.d. Open source seed systems. http://agrariancrisis.in/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Open-Source-Seed-Systems-1.01.pdf [accessed July 8, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Chandhoke, N. 2007. Engaging with civil society: The democratic perspective. NGPA Working Paper Series, London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Claeys, P. 2012. The creation of new rights by the food sovereignty movement: the challenge of institutionalizing subversion. Sociology 46, no. 5: 844–60. doi: 10.1177/0038038512451534
   Google Scholar
• Coalition for a GM-Free India. 2013. Critique of the biotechnology regulatory authority of India (BRAI) bill, 2013. New Delhi: Coalition for a GM-Free India. http://indiagminfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/brai-2013-coalition-critique.pdf [accessed October 8, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M.J., and A. Ramanna. 2007. Public access to seeds and the human right to adequate food. In Global obligations for the human right to food, ed. G. Kent, 161–90. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Cullet, P. 2005. Monsanto v Schmeiser: a landmark decision concerning farmer liability and transgenic contamination. Journal of Environmental Law 17, no. 1: 83–108. doi: 10.1093/envlaw/eqi004
   Google Scholar
• Cullet, P., and R. Kolluru. 2003. Plant variety protection and farmers’ rights. Towards a broader understanding. Delhi Law Review 24: 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Deccan Development Society (DDS). n.d. http://www.ddsindia.com [accessed July 7, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 2014. Linking the rights of peasants to the right to food in the United Nations. Law, Culture and the Humanities 10, no. 2: 196–211. doi: 10.1177/1743872112456669
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and C. James. 2011. Peasants’ rights and the UN system: Quixotic struggle? Or emancipatory idea whose time has come?. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 1: 81–108. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment Support Group. 2013. Transferring prosecuting officers exposes Indian and Karnataka governments weak intent to tackle biopiracy by Mahyco/Monsanto and others. Press release, Bangalore, 9 March. http://www.esgindia.org/campaigns/press/transferring-prosecuting-officers-expose.html [accessed October 8, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1994. Welcome to cyberia: notes on the anthropology of cyberculture. Current Anthropology 35: 211–31. doi: 10.1086/204266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmers' Rights Project. n.d. http://www.farmersrights.org [accessed July 8, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization. 1987. Report by the Chairman of the Working Group on its Second Meeting, Report of the Second Session of the Commission on Plant Genetic Resources, CL 91/14, Appendix F.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization. 1989. Resolution 5/89. Farmers’ Rights. Report of the Conference of FAO. 25th Session. Rome, 29 November.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization. 2001. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome, 3 November.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam, P.L., A.K. Singh, M. Srivastava, and P.K. Singh. 2012. Protection of plant varieties and farmers’ rights: a review. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 25, no. 1: 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gene Campaign. 2003. Oppose UPOV! save farmers! Gene campaign's legal action against Indian government. New Delhi: Gene Campaign.
   Google Scholar
• Ghose, J.R. 2004. Saving seeds or saving face? Seed acquisition mechanisms among farmers in Jharkhand, India and sui generis protection. http://ranaghose.com/research/sssf.pdf [accessed October 8, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• GOI (Government of India). 1970. Patents Act, 1970. Act No. 39.
   Google Scholar
• GOI (Government of India). 2001. Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001. Act No. 53.
   Google Scholar
• GOI (Government of India). 2002a. Biological Diversity Act, 2002. Act No. 18.
   Google Scholar
• GOI (Government of India). 2002b. Patents Amendment Act, 2002. Act No. 38.
   Google Scholar
• GOI (Government of India). 2004. Seeds Bill, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• GOI (Government of India). 2009. The Gazette of India Extraordinary. Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i). G.S.R. 452 (E). June 30.
   Google Scholar
• GOI (Government of India). 2013a. Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India (BRAI) Bill. Bill No. 57.
   Google Scholar
• GOI (Government of India). 2013b. National Food Security Act, 2013. Act No. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Golay, C. 2013. Legal reflections on the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas. Background paper. Prepared for the first session of the working group on the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas (15–19 July 2013). http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/WGPleasants/Golay.pdf [accessed February 17, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2007. What's wrong with rights?. Seedlings October: 2–23.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN, with D. Sharma. 2005. India's new seed bill. Seedling July: 22–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. 1998. Postcolonial developments: agriculture in the making of modern India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2010. The state of India after liberalization: interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, G., and K. Thomas. 2013. Low-cost drugs in poor nations get a lift in Indian court. The New York Times, 1 April.
   Google Scholar
• High Court of Karnataka. 2012. Public interest litigation, writ petition No. 41532/2012, High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore. http://www.esgindia.org/sites/default/files/campaigns/press/esg-pil-biopiracy-hc-kar-oct-2012-final-.pdf [accessed October 8, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2004 [1988]. First the seed: the political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2010. Impeding dispossession, enabling repossession: biological open source and the recovery of seed sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change 10, no. 3: 367–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneen, B. 2009. The tyranny of rights. Ottawa: Ram's Horn.
   Google Scholar
• Kochhar, S. 2010. How effective is sui generis plant variety protection in India: some initial feedback. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 15: 237–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kochupillai, M. 2011. India's plant variety protection law: historical and implementation perspectives. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 16, no. 2: 88–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, A. 2012. No food security without ecological and livelihood security. Infochange News and Features, May. http://www.infochangeindia.org/environment/politics-of-biodiversity/no-food-security-without-ecological-and-livelihood-security.html [Accessed 16 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P.S., S.M. Khan, M. Hora, and M.P. Rao. 2011. Implementation of Indian PPV&FR Act and Rules: inadequacies leading to avoidable litigation. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 16: 102–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurmanath, K.V. 2013. AP asserts its right on seed price, royalty payouts. The Hindu Business Line 25 March.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, L. 2012. Monsanto to face biopiracy charges in India. Nature Biotechnology 30, no. 1: 11. doi: 10.1038/nbt0112-11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lushington, K. 2012. The registration of plant varieties by farmers in India: a status report. Review of Agrarian Studies 2, no. 1: 112–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lutringer, C. 2009. Acting on institutions to preserve agricultural biodiversity: the Syngenta controversy in Chhattisgarh. In The changing identity of rural India: a socio-historic analysis, ed. E. Basile and I. Mukhopadhyay, 259–86. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, D. 2002. Globalizing intellectual property rights: the TRIPS agreement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Millet Network of India (MINI). n.d. http://www.milletindia.org [accessed July 7, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Commerce and Industry. 2002. India and the WTO. A monthly newsletter of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry (May). New Delhi: Government of India. http://commerce.nic.in/writereaddata/publications/wto_may2002.pdf [accessed October 11, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Montecinos, C. 1996. Sui generis: a dead end alley. Seedling 13, no. 4: 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Navdanya. 2013. The law of the seed. http://www.navdanya.org/attachments/Latest_Publications1.pdf [accessed October 9, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• No Patents on Seeds. 2011. Opposition to Monsanto's patent on Indian melon. International coalition ‘No patents on seeds’ concerned about abuse of patent law. 3 February. http://www.no-patents-on-seeds.org/en/information/news/opposition-monsanto-s-patent-indian-melon [accessed July 31, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Protection of Plant Varieties & Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Authority. 2012. Annual report 2011–12. PPV&FR Authority, Department of Agriculture & Co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Protection of Plant Varieties & Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Authority. 2013a. Implementation of the protection of plant varieties and farmers’ rights act, 2001. Updated Status – February, 6p.
   Google Scholar
• Protection of Plant Varieties & Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Authority. 2013b. List of registered certificates issued, updated 31.05.2013. http://www.plantauthority.gov.in [accessed July 10, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Protection of Plant Varieties & Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Authority. 2013c. Status of crop wise applications, updated 14.06.2013. http://www.plantauthority.gov.in [accessed July 10, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Protection of Plant Varieties & Farmers' Rights (PPV&FR) Authority. n.d. Annual Reports 2008–2013. http://www.plantauthority.gov.in [accessed July 7, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• PRS. 2010. Official amendments to the Seeds Bill, 2004. PRS Legislative Research. Centre for Policy Research. http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Note%20on%20official%20Amendments%20in%20Seeds%20Bill%202004.pdf [accessed October 9, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Ramanna, A. 2006. The farmers’ rights project - background study 4. Farmers rights in India - A Case Study. FNI Report 6/2006. Lysaker, Norway: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanna, A., and M. Smale. 2004. Rights and access to plant genetic resources under India's new law. Development Policy Review 22, no. 4: 423–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2004.00258.x
   Google Scholar
• Randeria, S. 2003a. Between cunning states and unaccountable international institutions: social movements and rights of local communities to common property resources. Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) Discussion Paper No. SP IV 2003–502.
   Google Scholar
• Randeria, S. 2003b. Cunning states and unaccountable international institutions: legal plurality, social movements and rights of local communities to common property resources. European Journal of Sociology 44, no. 1: 27–60. doi: 10.1017/S0003975603001188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randeria, S. 2003c. Glocalization of law: environmental justice, World Bank, NGOs and the cunning state in India. Current Sociology 51: 305–28. doi: 10.1177/0011392103051003009
   Google Scholar
• Randeria, S. 2007. The state of globalization. Legal plurality, overlapping sovereignties and ambiguous alliances between civil society and the cunning state in India. Theory, Culture & Society 24: 1–33. doi: 10.1177/0263276407071559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randeria, S., and C. Grunder. 2010. The (un)making of policy in the shadow of the World Bank: infrastructure development, urban resettlement and the cunning state in India. In Policy worlds, ed. C. Shore, S. Wright, and D. Però, 187–204. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rangnekar, D. 1998. Tripping in front of UPOV: plant variety protection in India. Social Action 48, no. 4: 432–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ravi, S.B. 2004. Effectiveness of Indian sui generis law on plant variety protection and its potential to attract investment in crop improvement. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 9: 553–48.
   Google Scholar
• Right to Food Campaign. n.d. http://www.righttofoodindia.org [accessed July 7, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Sahai, S. 2001. India: plant variety protection, farmers’ rights bill adopted. http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/variety.htm [accessed October 11, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Sahai, S. n.d.[1]. Gene Campaign public interest litigation to protect farmers’ rights. http://www.genecampaign.org/articles/gc_publicinterest_protectfarmer.pdf [accessed October 8, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Sahai, S. n.d.[2]. Why India should have sui generis IPR protection on plant varieties. http://www.genecampaign.org/articles/whyIndia_have_suigeneris_iprprotection.pdf [accessed July 19, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Santilli, J. 2009. Agrobiodiversidade e direitos dos agricultores. São Paulo: Peirópolis & Instituto Internacional de Educação do Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, S.K. 1999. Multinational corporations as agents of change: the globalization of intellectual property rights. In Private authority and international affairs, ed. A.C. Cutler, V. Haufler and T. Porter, 169–97. New York: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Seshia, S. 2002. Plant variety protection and farmers’ rights: law-making and cultivation of varietal control. Economic and Political Weekly 37: 2741–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, D.C. 2012. ICAR prepares to open India's plant gene bank to private companies. Mail Online, November 25. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2238319/ICAR-prepares-open-Indias-plant-gene-bank-private-companies.html [accessed October 11, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 1997. The turmeric patent is just the first step in stopping biopiracy. Third World Network 86. http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/tur-cn.htm [accessed July 22, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Sood, J. 2012. Whose germplasm is it? Down to Earth, 15 October.
   Google Scholar
• Sood, J. 2013a. Biopiracy case turns intense. Down to Earth, 28 February.
   Google Scholar
• Sood, J. 2013b. India to confront Monsanto in US. Down to Earth, 15 June.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, G.D. 2002. Biotechnology and suicide in India. Anthropology News 46, no. 5: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Syngenta. n.d. PACS/biodiversity Overview. http://www.syngentafoundation.org/index.cfm?pageID=482 [accessed October 17, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Third World Network. 2013. TWN info service on intellectual property issues. February 26. http://twnside.org.sg/title2/intellectual_property/info.service/2013/ipr.info.130203.htm [accessed July 8, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• UNHRC Advisory Committee. 2012. Final study of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on the advancement of the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas, A/HRC/19/75. http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/19/75 [accessed February 21, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Verkey, E. 2007. Shielding farmers’ rights. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2, no. 12: 825–31. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpm189
   Google Scholar
• Via Campesina. 2001. The position of Via Campesina on biodiversity, biosafety and genetic resources. Development 44, no. 4: 47–51. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.development.1110291
   Google Scholar
• Via Campesina. 2009. Declaration of rights of peasants – women and men, document adopted by the Via Campesina International Coordinating Committee in Seoul, March 2009. http://viacampesina.net/downloads/PDF/EN-3.pdf [accessed July 5, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Via Campesina. 2013. The International Seed Treaty: A resolution in support of Farmers’ Rights. Press Release, 3 October. http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/biotk/2014/btk140101.htm [accessed February 18, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Winter, L. 2010. Cultivating farmers’ rights: reconciling food security, indigenous agriculture, and TRIPS. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 43, no. 1: 223–54.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. 1994. Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs). 1994. Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Legal Instruments - Results of the Uruguay Round Vol. 31; 33 I.L.M. 1197, 1201, 15 April.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. 2008. TRIPS: Reviews, Article 27.3(B) and Related Issues. Last updated: November 2008. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/art27_3b_background_e.htm [accessed July 19, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Zaidi, A. 2005. Seeds of despair. Frontline 22, no. 16.
   Google Scholar