The geopolitics of Brazilian soybeans

References

• Acioly, L., E. Pinto, and M. Cintra. 2011. China e Brasil: oportunidades e desafios [China and Brazil: opportunities and challenges]. In A China na nova configuração global: impactos políticos e econômicos, ed. R. Leão, E. Pinto and L. Acioly, [China in the new global configuration: political and economic impacts], 307–50. Brasília: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 1994. The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of international political economy 1, no. 1: 53–80. doi: 10.1080/09692299408434268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amanor, K. 2013. South–South cooperation in context: Perspectives from Africa. FAC Working Paper No. 54. Brighton: Future Agricultures Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Andino, J., K. Mulik, and W. Koo. 2005. The impact of Brazil and Argentina's currency devaluation US soybean trade. Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report No. 574. Fargo, ND: Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies, North Dakota State University.
   Google Scholar
• Arcand, J.-L., P. Guillaumont, and S. Jeanneney. 2008. Deforestation and the real exchange rate. Journal of Development Economics 75: 242–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano-Lopez, F. 2012. Conflicting land use agendas: Environment, indigenous land rights and development in central Bolivia. The case of the Isiboro-Sécure Indigenous Territory and National Park. Paper presented at the LDPI International Conference on Land Grabs II, Cornell University, 17–19 October. http://www.cornell-landproject.org/download/landgrab2012papers/arellano.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arrighi, G., and B. Silver. 1999. Chaos and governance in the modern world system. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, A., T. Narciso, and M. Biancalana. 2009. Brazil in Africa: Another emerging power in the continent? Politikon 36, no. 1: 59–86. doi: 10.1080/02589340903155401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, E. 1984. As ligas camponesas [The peasant leagues]. Petropolis, RJ: Editora Vozes.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., Jr, J.C. Franco, S. Gómez, C. Kay, and M. Spoor. 2012. Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3–4: 845–72. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.679931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S., J. Franco, R. Isakson, L. Levidow, and P. Vervest. 2014. Towards understanding the politics of flex crops and commodities: Implications for research and policy advocacy. Think Piece Series on Flex Crops and Commodities, No.1. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute (TNI).
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, W. 2001. Making meat: Science, technology, and American poultry production. Technology and Culture 42, no. 4: 631–64. doi: 10.1353/tech.2001.0150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazil. 2008. Decree number 6.592. Brasilia: Presidency of the Republic, 2 October.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil-China Business Council (CEBC). 2012. The commercial relation between Brazil and China in agribusiness. Carta Brasil-China No. 6. Rio de Janeiro: CEBC.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil-China Business Council (CEBC). 2013. Chinese Investments in Brazil from 2007–2012. Rio de Janeiro: CEBC.
   Google Scholar
• BRICS. 2009. Joint Statement of the BRIC Countries’ Leaders. Yekaterinburg, Russia, June 16. http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/docs/2009/06/217963.shtml (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. 2012. Full planet, empty plates: The new geopolitics of food scarcity. New York: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cabral, L., and A. Shankland. 2013. Narratives of Brazil-Africa cooperation for agricultural development: new paradigms? FAC Working Paper No. 51, Brighton: Future Agricultures Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, R., and D. Hedrick. 2009. Will the US dollar be dethroned as the main reserve currency? Global Economy Journal 9, no. 3: 1–14. doi: 10.2202/1524-5861.1541
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, D. 2008. Sistema de pagamentos em moeda local: aspectos jurídicos da nova alternativa para remessas de valores entre o Brasil e a Argentina [System of payments in local currency: juridical aspects of the new alternative for value exchange between Brazil and Argentina]. Revista da Procuradoria-Geral do Banco Central do Brasil 2, no. 2: 199–224.
   Google Scholar
• Cashin, P., L.F. Céspedes, and R. Sahay. 2004. Commodity currencies and the real exchange rate. Journal of Development Economics 75, no. 1: 239–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalett, O., and E. Ortega. 2010. Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 18, no. 1: 55–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Research on the Cerrado (CPAC). 1975. Cerrado: filosofia e programa do centro de pesquisa [Cerrado: philosophy and program of the research center]. Cerrado 7, no. 27: 22–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cesarino, L. 2013. Brazil as an emerging donor in Africa: from discourse to the frontline. African Studies Association Annual Meeting Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2236885 (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., and Y-W. Cheung. 2011. Renminbi going global. China & World Economy 19, no. 2: 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-124X.2011.01232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and K. Rogoff. 2003. Commodity currencies. Journal of International Economics 60, no. 1: 133–60. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00072-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chichava, S., J. Duran, L. Cabral, A. Shankland, L. Buckley, T. Lixia, and Z. Yue. 2013. Brazil and China in Mozambican agriculture: Emerging insights from the field. IDS Bulletin 44: 101–15. doi: 10.1111/1759-5436.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, M., and J. Frankel. 2007. Will the euro eventually surpass the dollar as leading international reserve currency? In G7 current account imbalances: Sustainability and adjustment, ed. R. Clarida, 283–335. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, E.A., and B.M. Fernandes. 2013. Land grabbing, agribusiness and the peasantry in Brazil and Mozambique. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 2, no. 1: 41–69. doi: 10.1177/2277976013477185
   Google Scholar
• Clements, K.W., and R. Fry. 2008. Commodity currencies and currency commodities. Resources Policy 33, no. 2: 55–73. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. 1998. The geography of money. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couto e Silva, G. 1957. Aspectos geopolíticos do Brasil (Geopolitical aspects of Brazil). Rio de Janeiro: Biblioteca do Exército Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Couto e Silva, G. 1981. Planejamento estratégico (Strategic planning). Brasília: Editora da Universidade de Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Couto e Silva, G., and A. Franco. 1967. Geopolítica do Brasil (Geopolitics of Brazil). Rio de Janeiro: Editora José Olympio.
   Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, P., and D. Farias. 2012. The rise of Brazil as a global development power. Third World Quarterly 33, no. 5: 903–17. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2012.674704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EcoNexus and Berne Declaration. 2013. Agropoly: A handful of corporations control world food production. http://econexus.info/publication/agropoly-handful-corporations-control-world-food-production (accessed August 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 2010. The global power of Brazilian agribusiness. London: The Economist-Accenture.
   Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, B. 2010. Exorbitant privilege: The rise and fall of the dollar and the future of the international monetary system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estevam, L. 2004. O tempo da transformação: estrutura e dinâmica da formação econômica de Goiás (The time of transformation: structure and dynamics of the economic formation of Goiás). Goiânia: Editora da Universidade Católica de Goiás.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. 1979. Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. 2013. Indirect dispossession: Domestic power imbalances and foreign access to land in Mozambique. Development and Change 44, no. 2: 335–56. doi: 10.1111/dech.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausto, B. 1994. História do Brasil [History of Brazil]. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. 2011. Currency blocs in the 21st century. Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies No. 12. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, M. 2007. Between sub-imperialism and globalization: A case study in the internationalization of Brazilian capital. Latin American Perspectives 34, no. 6: 9–27. doi: 10.1177/0094582X07308113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foweraker, J. 1981. The struggle for land: A political economy of the pioneer frontier in Brazil from 1930 to the present day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J., L. Mehta, and G. Veldwisch. 2013. The global politics of water grabbing. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1651–75. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, J. 2004. A escola geopolítica Brasileira [The Brazilian school of geopolitics]. Rio de Janeiro: Biblioteca do Exército Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, H. 1982. The political economy of food: The rise and fall of the postwar international food order. American Journal of Sociology 88: S248–86. doi: 10.1086/649258
   Google Scholar
• Frischtak, C. 2012. A monetary tsunami? Brazil in the cross-fire of new style currency wars. In New challenges for the global economy, new uncertainties for the G-20, ed. I. Atiyas, 13–7. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Frischtak, C., and A. Soares. 2012. Yuan Internationalization. Carta Brasil-China Special Edition No.5: Rio de Janeiro: CEBC.
   Google Scholar
• Galeano, L. 2012. Paraguay and the expansion of Brazilian and Argentinian agribusiness frontiers. Canadian journal of development studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 33, no. 4: 458–70. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2012.744301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, P., B. Li, J. Fruin, and R. Hirsch. 2004. Global shifts in agro-industrial capital and the case of soybean crushing: Implications for managers and policy makers. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 7, no. 2: 87–115.
   Google Scholar
• Gourinchas, P.-O., and H. Rey. 2007. From world banker to world venture capitalist: The U.S. external adjustment and the exorbitant privilege. In G7 current account imbalances: Sustainability and adjustment, ed. R. Clarida, 11–55. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grain. 2008. Seized! The 2008 land grab for food and financial security. Barcelona: Grain.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2008. The new bonfire of vanities: Soybean cultivation and globalization in South America. Development 51, no. 4: 512–8. doi: 10.1057/dev.2008.55
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, G., and F. Bueno. 1996. O Brasil da soja: abrindo fronteiras, semeando cidades [The Brazil of soy: opening frontiers, seeding cities]. Porto Alegre: Ceval Alimentos/L & PM Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. 2005. Soybeans, development and conservation on the Amazon frontier. Development and Change 36, no. 2: 375–404. doi: 10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, S., and C. Mann. 2008. How Brazil outfarmed the American farmer. Fortune, 19 January, 92–105.
   Google Scholar
• High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE). 2011. Price volatility and food security. Report to the Committee on World Food Security of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome: CFS/FAO.
   Google Scholar
• HighQuest Partners and Soyatech. 2011. How the global oilseed and grain trade works. http://www.unitedsoybean.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/RevisedJan12_GlobalOilSeedGrainTrade_2011.pdf (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Hollerman, L. 1988. Japan's economic strategy in Brazil: Challenge for the United States. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. 2013. New protagonists in global economic governance: Brazilian agribusiness at the WTO. New Political Economy 18, no. 4: 603–23. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2013.736957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianni, O. 1979. Ditadura e agricultura: o desenvolvimento do capitalismo na Amazônia [Dictatorship and agriculture: the development of capitalism in the Amazon]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Civilização Brasileira.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue, C., and A. Vaz. 2012. Brazil as ‘Southern donor’: Beyond hierarchy and national interests in development cooperation? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25, no. 4: 507–34. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2012.734779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Lula. 2014. Blairo Maggi e Lula em Cuba para ampliar produção de alimentos (Blairo Maggi and Lula in Cuba to expand food production). São Paulo: Instituto Lula, 26 February. http://www.institutolula.org/blairo-maggi-e-lula-em-cuba-para-ampliar-producao-de-alimentos/#.Ux3tDeddWMP (in Portuguese) (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, M. 2010. Yuan as a reserve currency: likely prospects & possible implications. Deutsche Bank Research Briefing, 16 July. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R., and A. Barbosa. 2012. Fear for manufacturing? China and the future of industry in Brazil and Latin America. The China Quarterly 209, no. 2: 59–81. doi: 10.1017/S0305741011001482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, W., C. Brannstrom, and A. Filippi. 2010. Access regimes and regional land change in the Brazilian Cerrado, 1972–2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100, no. 1: 87–111. doi: 10.1080/00045600903378960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2002. The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24, no. 2: 343–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justiça Ambiental et al. 2013. Leaked ProSAVANA Master Plan confirms worst fears. http://www.grain.org/article/entries/4703-leaked-prosavana-master-plan-confirms-worst-fears (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kirshner, J. 2008. Dollar primacy and American power: what's at stake? Review of International Political Economy, 15, no. 3: 418–38. doi: 10.1080/09692290801928798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, J. 2013. Brazil and China agree currency swap. Financial Times, 26 March.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, S., and D. McDowell. Forthcoming. Redback rising: China's bilateral swap agreements and RMB internationalization. International Studies Quarterly.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, L. 2011. Legitimating foreignization in Bolivia: Brazilian agriculture and the relations of conflict and consent in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Paper presented at the LDPI International Conference on Land Grabs, IDS University of Sussex, 8 April. http://www.iss.nl/fileadmin/ASSETS/iss/Documents/Conference_papers/LDPI/23_Lee_Mackey.pdf (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Magdoff, H., and P. Sweezy. 1981. The U.S. dollar, petrodollars, and US imperialism. In The deepening crisis of U.S. capitalism, ed. H. Magdoff and P. Sweezy, 94–106. New York: Monthly Review.
   Google Scholar
• Mamone, I. 2007. Water and geopolitics: a closer look at the Paraguay-Paraná Waterway program. Paper presented at the 37th St. Gallen Symposium ‘The power of natural resources’, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 31 May.
   Google Scholar
• Margulis, M. 2014. Trading out of the global food crisis? The world trade organization and the geopolitics of food security. Geopolitics 19, no. 2: 322–50. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2014.920233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, R. 1972. Brazilian subimperialism. Monthly Review 23, no. 9: 14–24. doi: 10.14452/MR-023-09-1972-02_2
   Google Scholar
• Martins, P., and B. Pelegrini. 1984. Cerrados: uma ocupação Japonesa no campo (Cerrados: a Japanese occupation in the countryside). Rio de Janeiro: Editora Codecri.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., and P. Singer. 1980. Animal factories. New York: Harmony Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mazoyer, M., and L. Roudart. 2006. A history of world agriculture: From the neolithic age to the current crisis. New York: Monthly Review.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2012. The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3–4: 681–701. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.661369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (MAPA). 2002. Programas de cooperação em desenvolvimento agrícola entre Japão-Brasil na região do Cerrado no Brasil (Agricultural development cooperation programs between Japan and Brazil in the Cerrado region of Brazil). Brasília: MAPA.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, H. 2013. A formação da nova geopolítica das mudanças climáticas [The formation of the new geopolitics of climate change]. Sustentabilidade em Debate 4, no. 1: 275–92.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 2000 [1979]. Merchants of Grain: The power and profits of the five giant companies at the center of the world's food supply. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.
   Google Scholar
• Motta, M., and P. Zarth. 2008. Formas de Resistência Camponesa, vol. II [Forms of Peasant Resistance, vol. II]. São Paulo: NEAD.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S., D. Burch, and J. Clapp. 2012. Cereal secrets: The world's largest grain traders and global agriculture. Oxfam Research Report. Oxford: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• National Confederation of Agriculture and Livestock of Brazil (CNA). 2014a. Agronegócio no Brasil (Agribusiness in Brazil). http://agroinvestbrasil.com.br/agronegocio-brasil (in Portuguese) (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• National Confederation of Agriculture and Livestock of Brazil (CNA). 2014b. Rússia é mercado promissor para o agronegócio brasileiro (Russia is a promising market for Brazilian agribusiness). http://www.canaldoprodutor.com.br/comunicacao/noticias/russia-e-mercado-promissor-para-o-agronegocio-brasileiro (in Portuguese) (accessed September 3, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G. de L. T. 2013. Land regularization in Brazil and the global land grab. Development and Change 44, no. 2: 261–83. doi: 10.1111/dech.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G. de L. T., and M. Schneider. Forthcoming. The politics of flexing soybeans: China, Brazil, and global agroindustrial restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, H. 2010. Brasil e China: uma nova aliança não escrita? [Brazil and China: a new unwritten alliance?]. Revista Brasileira de Polítca Internacional 53, no. 2: 88–105. doi: 10.1590/S0034-73292010000200005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, R. 2008. Stuffed and starved: The hidden battle for the world food system. New York and London: Melville House.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R. 2013. The long green revolution. Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 1: 1–63. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.719224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peine, E. 2013. Trading on pork and beans: Agribusiness and the construction of the Brazil-China-soy-pork commodity complex. In The ethics and economics of agrifood competition, ed. H. James Jr, 193–210. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pires, M. 2000. Programas agrícolas na ocupação do Cerrado [Agricultural programs in the occupation of the Cerrado]. Sociedade e Cultura 3, no. 1: 111–31.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, D. 2011. The dragon's appetite for soy stokes Brazilian protectionism. Financial Times, 10 October.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, P., and F. Ramos. 2009. From Mercosur to Unasur? Geopolitics of South American integration and the role of Brazilian diplomacy. Paper presented at the Joint International Meeting meeting of the ISA - ABRI, Rio de Janeiro, 22 July. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p381229_index.html (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Richards, P.D., R.J. Myers, S.M. Swinton, and R.T. Walker. 2012. Exchange rates, soybean supply response, and deforestation in South America. Global Environmental Change 22, no. 2: 454–62. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. 2008. Latin America and global capitalism: A critical globalization perspective. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. 2011. Feeding China's pigs: Implications for the environment, China's smallholder farmers, and food security. Minneapolis and Geneva: Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shurtleff, W., and A. Aoyagi. 2009. History of soybeans and soyfoods in South America (1882–2009) Extensively annotated bibliography and sourcebook. Lafayette, CA: Soyinfo Center.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, M., and L. Costa. 2012. A indústria de defensivos agrícolas [The pesticide and herbicide industry]. BNDES Setorial 35: 233–76.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerville, M., J. Essex, and P. Le Billon. 2014. The ‘global food crisis’ and the geopolitics of food security. Geopolitics 19, no. 2: 239–65. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2013.811641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, I., and R. Vieira. 2008. Soybeans and soy foods in Brazil, with notes on Argentina: Sketch of an expanding world commodity. In The world of soy, ed. Du Bois, C., C. Tan, and S. Mintz, 234–56. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, D. 1999. The hidden hand of American hegemony: Petrodollar recycling and international markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, H., P. Gerber, T. Wassenaar, V. Castel, M. Rosales, and C. de Haan. 2006. Livestock's long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2010. The miracle of the cerrado. Brazil has revolutionised its own farms. Can it do the same for others?. The Economist, 26 August.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2012. Out Lugo. The Economist, 25 June.
   Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. 2014. Soybeans: Historical option data. http://www.tradingeconomics.com/commodity/soybeans (accessed August 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Treviño, L. 2005. Development and volume growth of organized derivatives trade in emerging markets. Ensayos Revista de Economia, 24, no. 2: 31–82.
   Google Scholar
• Turzi, M. 2011. The soybean republic. Yale Journal of International Affaris 6, no. 2: 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations International Trade Statistical Database (UN-Comtrade). 2014. United Nations commodity trade statistics database. http://comtrade.un.org (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1965–1970. Fats and oils situation. Multiple issues. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewTaxonomy.do?taxonomyID=17 (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1975–1995. World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates. Multiple issues. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewTaxonomy.do?taxonomyID=17 (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2000–2013. Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade. Multiple issues. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewTaxonomy.do?taxonomyID=17 (accessed July 30, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Urioste, M. 2012. Concentration and ‘foreignisation’ of land in Bolivia. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 33, no. 4: 439–57. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2012.743878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis, T. 2013. The meat of the global food crisis. Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 1: 65–85. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.752357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesz, V. Jr. 2014. O mercado de soja e as relações de troca entre produtores rurais e empresas no Sudeste do Mato Grosso (Brasil) (The soy market and exchange relations between farmers and firms in the southeast of Mato Grosso (Brazil)). Doctoral dissertation. Graduate Program of Social Sciences, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J. 2009. The Globalization of agribusiness and developing world food systems. Monthly Review 61, no. 04: 38–49. doi: 10.14452/MR-061-04-2009-08_4
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W., S.M. Borras, R. Hall, I. Scoones, and B. White. 2013. Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change 44, no. 2: 189–210. doi: 10.1111/dech.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). 2014. The growth of soy: Impacts and solutions. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International.
   Google Scholar
• Worster, D. 2004. Dust bowl: The southern plains in the 1930s. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshioka, Y. 1992. Development of agricultural policy in post-war Japan. In Agriculture and trade in the Pacific, ed. Coyle, W., D. Hayes, and H. Yamauchi, 91–100. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zibechi, R. 2009. Is Brazil creating its own backyard? Americas Program Report. Washington, DC: Center for International Policy.
   Google Scholar