Reclaiming the worker's property: control grabbing, farmworkers and the Las Tunas Accords in Nicaragua

References

• Abu-Lughod, D. 2000. Failed buyout: Land rights for contra veterans in postwar Nicaragua. Latin American Perspectives 27, no. 3: 32–62. doi: 10.1177/0094582X0002700303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araghi, F. 2009. The invisible hand and the visible foot: Peasants, dispossession and globalization. In Peasants and globalization: Political economy, rural transformation, and the agrarian question, eds. A.H. Akram-Lodhi and C. Kay, 111–47. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bair, J., and M. Werner. 2011a. Guest editorial. Commodity chains and the uneven geographies of global capitalism: A disarticulation perspective. Environment and Planning A 43: 988–97. doi: 10.1068/a43505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bair, J., and M. Werner. 2011b. The place of disarticulations: Global commodity production in La Laguna, Mexico. Environment and Planning A 43: 988–1015. doi: 10.1068/a43505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biderman, J. 1983. The development of capitalism in Nicaragua: a Political Economic History. Latin American Perspectives 10, no. 36: 7–32. doi: 10.1177/0094582X8301000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M. Jr, and J.C. Franco. 2012. Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change 12, no. 1: 34–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broegaard, R. 2005. Land tenure insecurity and inequality in Nicaragua. Development and Change 36, no. 5: 845–64. doi: 10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00438.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broegaard, R. 2009. Land access and titling in Nicaragua. Development and Change 40, no. 1: 149–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIERA (Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios de la Reforma Agraria). 1989. La Reforma Agraria en Nicaragua 1979–1989. 10 vols. Managua.
   Google Scholar
• Enriquez, L. 1991. Harvesting change: Labor and agrarian reform in Nicaragua, 1979–1990. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Everingham, M. 2001. Agricultural property rights and political change in Nicaragua. Latin American Politics and Society 43, no. 3: 61–93. doi: 10.2307/3177144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassman, J. 2006. Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession, accumulation by ‘extra- economic’ means. Progress in Human Geography 30: 608–25. doi: 10.1177/0309132506070172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, M. 1994. APT: café dulce, café amargo. Revista Envio, 147 http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/847
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. 1998. To die in this way: Nicaraguan Indians and the Myth of Mestizaje, 1880–1965. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 2002. Disabling globalization: Places of power in post-apartheid South Africa. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonakin, J. 1996. The impact of structural adjustment and property rights conflicts on Nicaraguan agrarian reform beneficiaries. World Development 24, no. 7: 1179–91. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00029-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. 2009. To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Antipode 41, no. 1: 66–93.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. 2011. Centering labor in the land grab debate. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 281–298. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitlapan-Envio. 2000. Interbank bankruptcy opens a Pandora's box. Revista Envio. Managua, Nicaragua. http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/1444
   Google Scholar
• NotiCen. 2000. Nicaragua: Bank scandal prompts political fights and complicates debt reduction. The Free Library. Latin American Data Base/Latin American Institute. Accessed December 22, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, F. 2012. The land grabbers: The new fight over who owns the earth. London: Transworld and Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N.L., and C. Lund, eds. 2011. New frontiers of land control. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4: 667–81. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, M. 2000. The invention of capitalism: Classical political economy and the secret history of primitive accumulation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, S. 2011. Adios Muchachos: A memoir of the sandinista revolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J. 2002. Primitive accumulation: The aleatory foundations of capitalism. Rethinking Marxism 14, no. 2: 24–49. doi: 10.1080/089356902101242161
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, J.L. 2001. The chronicle of coffee: History, responsibility and questions. Revista Envio. 241, Managua, Nicaragua. http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/1523
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, J.L. 2003. La Decada de los Años 80: Revolucion en Nicaragua, Revolucion en la Caficultura Nicaraguense. Anuario de Estudios Centroamericanos 29, nos. 1–2: 69–99.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, J.L. 2010. The contradictory legacy of the sandinista agrarian reform. Revista Envio. http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/4212
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez, M. 2000. Agresami hipoteca 9 fincas millonarias. La Prensa Nicaragua, August 16.
   Google Scholar
• Sikor, T., and C. Lund. 2009. The politics of possession: Property, authority, and access to natural resources. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• White, B., Borras, S., Hall, D., Scoones, I., and Wolford, W. 2012. The new enclosures: Critical perspectives on corporate land deals. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, nos. 3–4: 619–47. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.691879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. 2013. Breaking the chains: Coffee, crisis and farmworker struggle in Nicaragua. Environment and Planning A 45: 2592–609. doi: 10.1068/a46262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2010. Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable results? Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zoomers, A. 2010. Globalisation and the foreignization of space: Seven processes driving the current global land grab. Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 2: 429–44. doi: 10.1080/03066151003595325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar