The right to resist: disciplining civil society at Rio+20

References

• Anand, P. 2007. Right to water and access to water: an assessment. Journal of International Development 19, no. 4: 511–526. doi: 10.1002/jid.1386
   Google Scholar
• Arsel, M., and B. Büscher. 2012. Nature Inc.: changes and continuities in neoliberal conservation and market-based environmental policy. Development and Change 43, no. 1: 53–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01752.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, K. 2007. The ‘commons’ versus the ‘commodity’: alter-globalization, anti-privatization and the human right to water in the global south. Antipode 39, no. 3: 430–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banisar, D., S. Parmar, L. de Silva, and C. Excell. 2012. Moving from principles to rights: Rio 2012 and access to information, public participation, and justice. Sustainable Development Law and Policy 12, no. 3: 8–66.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, E.B. 2009. Rethinking the economic recovery: a global green new deal. Report prepared for the Economics and Trade Branch in the Division of Technology Industry and Economics of the United Nations Environment Programme. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., and J.C. Franco. 2013. Global land grabbing and political reaction ‘from below’. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1723–1747. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., J.C. Franco, and C. Wang. 2013. The challenge of global governance of land grabbing: changing international agricultural context and competing political views and strategies. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 161–179. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S.M., R. Hall, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2011. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 209–216. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracking, S. 2012. How do investors value environmental harm/care? Private equity funds, development finance institutions and the partial financialization of nature-based industries. Development and Change 43, no. 1: 271–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockington, D., and R. Duffy. 2010. Capitalism and conservation: the production and reproduction of biodiversity conservation. Antipode 42, no. 3: 469–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00760.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosius, J.P., and L.M. Campbell. 2010. Collaborative event ethnography: conservation and development trade-offs at the Fourth World Conservation Congress. Conservation and Society 8, no. 4: 245–255. doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.78141
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M.F. 1996. On resisting resistance. American Anthropologist 98, no. 4: 729–735. doi: 10.1525/aa.1996.98.4.02a00030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., S. Sullivan, K. Neves, J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2012. Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 23, no. 2: 4–30. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2012.674149
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L.M., C. Corson, N.J. Gray, K.I. MacDonald, and J.P. Brosius. 2014. Collaborative event ethnography at the 10th conference of the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Global Environmental Politics 14, no. 3: 1–20. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_e_00236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, L.M., N.J. Gray, L.W. Fairbanks, J.J. Silver, and R.L. Gruby. 2013. Oceans at Rio+20. Conservation Letters 6, no. 6: 439–447. doi: 10.1111/conl.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin, M. 2004. A challenge to conservationists. World Watch 17, no. 6: 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P., and M. Finger. 1994. The earth brokers: power, politics and world development. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Climate and Capitalism. 2011. Alba nations declare: nature has no price! [Accessed June 28 2013]. http://climateandcapitalism.com/2010/11/15/alba-nations-declare-nature-has-no-price/
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., and U. Kothari, eds. 2001. Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Corson, C., and K.I. MacDonald. 2012. Enclosing the global commons: The Convention on Biological Diversity and green grabbing. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 2: 263–283. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.664138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corson, C., K.I. MacDonald, and L.M. Campbell. 2014. Capturing the personal in politics: ethnographies of global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 14, no. 3: 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Corson, C., K.I. MacDonald, and B. Neimark. 2013. Grabbing ‘green:’ markets, environmental governance and the materialization of natural capital. Human Geography 6, no. 1: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cotula, L. 2013. The new enclosures? Polanyi, international investment law and the global land rush. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1605–1629. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cúpula dos Povos. 2012. The People's Summit: what is it? http://cupuladospovos.org.br/en/what-is-it/ (Accessed December 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Death, C. 2010. Governing sustainable development: partnerships, protests and power at the world summit. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle, A.A. 2010. The politics of indigeneity: indigenous strategies for inclusion in climate change negotiations. Conservation and Society 8, no. 4: 286–291. doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.78142
   Google Scholar
• Dowie, M. 2005. Conservation refugees: when protecting nature means kicking people out. Orion November/December: 16–27.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, R. 2006. Non-governmental organisations and governance states: the impact of transnational environmental management networks in Madagascar. Environmental Politics 15, no. 5: 731–749. doi: 10.1080/09644010600937173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, R. 2013. Global environmental governance and north-south dynamics: the case of the CITES. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31, no. 2: 222–239. doi: 10.1068/c1105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and C. James. 2011. Peasants’ rights and the UN system: Quixotic struggle? Or emancipatory idea whose time has come? The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 1: 81–108. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., and D. Hulme. 1996. Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development 24, no. 6: 961–973. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00019-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 2: 237–261. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. 2011. Ethiopia's climate-resilient green economy: green economy strategy. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Environmental Protection Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., and A. Gupta. 2002. Spatializing states: toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist 29, no. 4, 981–1002. doi: 10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W.F. 1997. Doing good? The politics and antipolitics of NGO practices. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 439–464. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, L.H. 2003. Challenging global environmental governance: social movement agency and global civil society. Global Environmental Politics 3, no. 2: 120–134. doi: 10.1162/152638003322068254
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J.C., L. Mehta, and G.J. Veldwisch. 2013. The global politics of water grabbing. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1651–1675. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golay, C., and I. Biglino. 2013. Human rights responses to land grabbing: a right to food perspective. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1630–1650. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 2010 [1971]. Selections from the prison notebooks. Translation by Q. Hoare and G.N. Smith. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 2001. Progress reports - Development critiques in the 1990s: culs de sac and promising paths. Progress in Human Geography 25, no. 4: 649–658. doi: 10.1191/030913201682689002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, J.A., and R.L. Einwohner. 2004. Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum 19, no. 4: 533–554. doi: 10.1007/s11206-004-0694-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, D. 2010. A guidebook for IUCN's thematic programme area on greening the world economy. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Ibon International, Vitae Civilis Institute, Stakeholder Forum, Council of Canadians, Consumers International, Sustainlabour, International Trade Union Confederation, CIVICUS, Women in Europe for a Common Future, Ecoropa, Global Ecovillage Network, World Transforming Initiatives, and World Alliance to Transform the United Nations. 2012. Rights at risk at the United Nations. http://rio20.net/en/iniciativas/rights-at-risk-at-the-united-nations/ (Accessed May 9, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Igoe, J., S. Sullivan, and D. Brockington. 2009. Problematising neoliberal biodiversity conservation: displaced and disobedient knowledge. Current Conservation 3, no. 3: 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kashwan, P. 2013. The politics of rights-based approaches in conservation. Land Use Policy 31: 613–626. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M.E., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Künnemann, R., and S.M. Suárez. 2013. International human rights and governing land grabbing: a view from global civil society. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 123–139. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.760933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, M.C., and A. Agrawal. 2006. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31, no. 1: 297–325. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, K.I., and C. Corson. 2012. ‘TEEB begins now': a virtual moment in the production of natural capital. Development and Change 43, no. 1: 159–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01753.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis, M.E., N. McKeon, and S.M. Borras. 2013. Land grabbing and global governance: critical perspectives. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 1–23. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee, K. 1999. Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17, no. 2: 133–154. doi: 10.1068/d170133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., and S. Prudham. 2004. Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum 35, no. 3: 275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeon, N. 2009. The United Nations and civil society: legitimating global governance – whose voice? London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, N. 2013. ‘One does not sell the land upon which the people walk’: land grabbing, transnational rural social movements, and global governance. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 105–122. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.760911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D.H., D.L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W.W. Behrens III. 1972. Limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Mirosa, O., and L.M. Harris. 2012. Human right to water: contemporary challenges and contours of a global debate. Antipode 44, no. 3: 932–949. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00929.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, G., and K. Stokke. 2000. Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism. Third World Quarterly 21, no. 2: 247–268. doi: 10.1080/01436590050004346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. 2012. After Rio, we know. Governments have given up on the planet. The Guardian 25 June.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N.L., and C. Lund. 2011. New frontiers of land control: introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4: 667–681. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay, N. 2012. Open letter from the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, to all the permanent missions in New York and Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Quintos, P. Deleting our rights, bracketing our future: why we need a people's summit at Rio+20, 2012 [Accessed 14 May 2013]. http://iboninternational.org/page/whats_new/138.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J.C., and N.L. Peluso. 2003. A theory of access. Rural Sociology 68, no. 2: 153–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rights for Sustainability. 2012. Reclaiming peoples’ rights for a transformative agenda at Rio+20 and beyond Political Report, January to October 2012 [Accessed 17 June 2013]. http://peoplesgoals.org/download/policy_positions/Reclaiming%20Peoples%20Rights%20for%20a%20Transformative%20Agenda%20at%20Rio20%20and%20Beyond.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R.J., and W. Dressler. 2012. Market-oriented conservation governance: the particularities of place. Geoforum 43, no. 3: 363–366. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, S.J., and R.J. Gregg. 2006. Johannesburg and beyond: the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development and the rise of partnerships. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 18: 425–490.
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, M. 2008. Political geography – political geographies of globalization III: resistance. Progress in Human Geography 32, no. 3: 423–440. doi: 10.1177/0309132507086878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez, D., and C. Corson. 2013. Seizing center stage: ecosystem services, live, at the Convention on Biological Diversity! Human Geography 6, no. 1: 64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, S.M. 2013. The human rights framework in contemporary agrarian struggles. Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 1: 239–290. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.652950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. 2013. Banking nature? The spectacular financialisation of environmental conservation. Antipode 45, no. 1: 198–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.00989.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 2005. The new transnational activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1972. Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 5–16 June, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1987. Our common future. Report of the Brundtland Commission, A/42/427, General Assembly, Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2012a. Compilation document for the zero-draft of the Rio+20 outcome document. Compiled by the Secretariat of Rio+20. January 10. http://www.uncsd2012.org/compdocument.html (Accessed January 13, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2012b. The future we want. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July. A/RES/66/288.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. 2011. Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication – a synthesis for policy makers (advanced copy online release). Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme. http://www.unep.org/GreenEconomy/Portals/93/documents/Full_GER_screen.pdf (Accessed June 28, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Verzola, P.J., and Paul Quintos. 2011. Green economy: gain or pain for the earth's poor? Policy Brief. Quezon City, Philippines: IBON International.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, C., and T.C. Esakin. 2011. A green economy for Canada: consulting with Canadians. Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Wilshusen, P., and K.I. MacDonald. in prep. Fields of green: Corporate sustainability and the production of reform at Rio+20 and beyond.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W., S.M. Borras Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones, and B. White. 2013. Governing global land deals: the role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change 44, no. 2: 189–210. doi: 10.1111/dech.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Z. 1999. NGOs and the Global Environmental Facility: friendly foes? Environmental Politics 8, no. 1: 243–267. doi: 10.1080/09644019908414446
   Google Scholar