3,228
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Oil palm expansion without enclosure: smallholders and environmental narratives

References

  • Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Akram-Lodhi, A.H., and C. Kay. 2010. Surveying the agrarian question (part 2): Current debates and beyond. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 2: 255–284. doi: 10.1080/03066151003594906
  • Alonso-Fradejas, A. 2012. Land control-grabbing in Guatemala: The political economy of contemporary agrarian change. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 33, no. 4: 509–528. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2012.743455
  • Arellano Nucamendi, M., and M.A. García. 2009. Agrocombustibles y palma africana: Peligros sobre nuestras comunidades y sobre la Madre Tierra. San Cristóbal de Las Casas: Maderas del Pueblo del Sureste, A.C.
  • Assies, W. 2007. Land tenure and tenure regimes in Mexico: An overview. Journal of Agrarian Change 8, no. 1: 33–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00162.x
  • Barraza, D., K. Jansen, B. van Wendel de Joode, and C. Wesseling. 2013. Social movements and risk perception: Unions, churches, pesticides and bananas in Costa Rica. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 19, no. 1: 11–21. doi: 10.1179/2049396712Y.0000000018
  • Bernstein, H. 2010. Class dynamics of agrarian change. Black Point: Fernwood Publishing.
  • Borras, S.M., Jr., and J.C. Franco. 2013. Global land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1723–1747. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843845
  • Borras, S.M., Jr., P. McMichael, and I. Scoones. 2010. The politics of biofuels, land and agrarian change: Editors’ introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 575–592. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512448
  • Brenner, R. 1986. The social basis of economic development. In Analytical Marxism, ed. J. Roemer, 23–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cano Castellanos, I. 2014. Entre sueños agrarios y discurso ecologista. Las encrucijadas contemporáneas de la colonización de la Selva Lacandona (Chiapas, México). Entre Diversidades, primavera-verano 2014.
  • Cárdenas, R. 2012. Green multiculturalism: Articulations of ethnic and environmental politics in a Colombian ‘black community’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 2: 309–333. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.665892
  • Carlson, K.M., L.M. Curran, D. Ratnasari, A.M. Pittman, B.S. Soares-Filho, G.P. Asner, S.N. Trigg, D.A. Gaveau, D. Lawrence, and H.O. Rodrigues. 2012. Committed carbon emissions, deforestation, and community land conversion from oil palm plantation expansion in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 7559–7564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200452109
  • Castellanos-Navarrete, A. 2013. Elaboración de criterios de certificación para el desarrollo de plantaciones agroindustriales: Certificación del cultivo de palma africana en Marqués de Comillas (Chiapas). Reporte para la Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). México, D.F.
  • Castro-Soto, G. 2009. Monocultivos desastrosos: La producción de aceite de palma en Chiapas. San Cristóbal de Las Casas: Otros Mundos, A.C.
  • CONEVAL. 2010. Medición de la pobreza, Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Indicadores de pobreza, por municipio. México, D.F.: Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social.
  • Conklin, B.A., and L.R. Graham. 1995. The shifting middle ground: Amazonian Indians and eco-politics. American Anthropologist 97, no. 4: 695–710. doi: 10.1525/aa.1995.97.4.02a00120
  • Cramb, R.A., and P.S. Sujang. 2013. The mouse deer and the crocodile: oil palm smallholders and livelihood strategies in Sarawak, Malaysia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 1: 129–154. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.750241
  • Cuarto Poder. (2013). Siembra de palma africana afectó ganadería, Cuarto Poder, October 13 2013.
  • Deibel, E. 2013. Open variety rights: Rethinking the commodification of plants. Journal of Agrarian Change 13, no. 2: 282–309. doi: 10.1111/joac.12004
  • De Vos, J. 2002. Una tierra para sembrar sueños: Historia reciente de la Selva Lacandona 1950–2000. México, D.F.: CIESAS, FCE.
  • Doane, M. 2008. The political economy of the ecological native. American Anthropologist 109, no. 3: 452–462. doi: 10.1525/aa.2007.109.3.452
  • Doering III, O.C., and W.E. Tyner. 2009. US and international policies affecting liquid biofuels’ expansion and profitability. International Journal of Biotechnology 11, no. 1: 150–167.
  • Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 2: 237–261. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770
  • Fargione, J., J. Hill, D. Tilman, S. Polasky, and P. Hawthorne. 2008. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319, no. 5867: 1235–1238. doi: 10.1126/science.1152747
  • Feintrenie, L., W.K. Chong, and P. Levang. 2010a. Why do farmers prefer oil palm? Lessons learnt from Bungo District, Indonesia. Small-scale forestry 9: 379–396. doi: 10.1007/s11842-010-9122-2
  • Feintrenie, L., S. Schwarze, and P. Levang, 2010b. Are local people conservationists? Analysis of transition dynamics from agroforests to monoculture plantations in Indonesia. Ecology and Society 15, no. 4: 37.
  • Fletes-Ocón, H.B., and A. Bonanno. 2013. Responses to the crisis of neo-liberal globalization: State intervention in palm oil production in Chiapas, Mexico. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 20, no. 3: 313–334.
  • García, M.A. 2009a. ¿¿¡¡¡Órale!!! ¡¡Ya vieron que rete chulas palmitas pusieron nuestros vecinos!!?? San Cristóbal de Las Casas: Maderas del Pueblo del Sureste, A.C.
  • García, M.A. 2009b. ¿¿Quésque en vez de tortillas, el maíz se hará gasolina?? San Cristóbal de Las Casas: Maderas del Pueblo del Sureste, A.C.
  • García de León, A. 1997. Resistencia y utopía: Memorial de agravios y crónicas de revueltas y profecías acaecidas en la Provincia de Chiapas durante los últimos quinientos años de su historia. México, D.F.: Ediciones ERA.
  • Gerber, J.F. 2011. Conflicts over industrial tree plantations in the South: Who, how and why? Global Environmental Change 21, no. 1: 165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.005
  • Gerber, J.F., and S. Veuthey. 2010. Plantations, resistance and the greening of the agrarian question in coastal Ecuador. Journal of Agrarian Change 10, no. 4: 455–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00265.x
  • Gilbert, N. 2012. Palm-oil boom raises conservation concerns. Nature 487: 14–15. doi: 10.1038/487014a
  • Gobierno del Estado. 2009. Mil 300 hectáreas de palma en 2009; en los últimos 10 años, 900 has, Boletín 1739, 19 de agosto del 2009. Tuxtla Gutiérrez: Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas.
  • Gobierno del Estado. 2010a. Chiapas: hacia la producción de más de 30,000 litros diarios de biodiesel, Boletín 0833, 24 de Marzo del 2010. Tuxtla Gutiérrez: Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas.
  • Gobierno del Estado. 2010b. Buenas expectativas para la palma de aceite en la región del Soconusco, Boletín 1124, 28 de Abril del 2010. Tuxtla Gutiérrez: Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas.
  • Gobierno de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. 2007. Plan de Desarrollo Nacional 2007–2012: Poder Ejecutivo Federal. México, D.F.: Presidencia de la República (Gobierno de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos).
  • Greenpeace. 2013. Palm oil. http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/forests/palm-oil (accessed December 19, 2014).
  • Guha, R. 1993. The malign encounter: The Chipko movement and competing visions of nature. In Who Will save the forests? Knowledge, power and environmental destruction, ed. T. Banuri and F. Apffel Marglin, 80–113. London: Zed Books.
  • Guha, R., and J. Martinez-Alier. 1997. Varieties of environmentalism: Essays North and South. London: Earthscan Publications.
  • Hall, D. 2011. Land grabs, land control, and Southeast Asian crop booms. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4: 837–857. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607706
  • Harvey, N. 1990. Peasant strategies and corporatism in Chiapas. In Popular movements and political change in Mexico, ed. J. Foweraker and A.L. Craig, 183–198. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Harvey, N. 1998. The Chiapas rebellion: The struggle for land and democracy. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Harvey, D. 2005. The new imperialism. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Index Mundi. 2014. Palm oil and nitrogen fertiliser prices between the year 2000 and the year 2011. http://www.indexmundi (accessed date December 19, 2014).
  • INEGI. 2007a. Censo agrícola, ganadero y forestal 2007. Aguascalientes: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
  • INEGI. 2007b. Censo ejidal. Aguascalientes: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
  • Ishiyama, N. 2003. Environmental justice and American Indian tribal sovereignty: Case study of a land–use conflict in Skull Valley, Utah. Antipode 35, no. 1: 119–139. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00305
  • Jansen, K. 1998. Political ecology, mountain agriculture, and knowledge in Honduras. Amsterdam: Thela Publishers.
  • Jansen, K. 2004. Greening bananas and institutionalizing environmentalism: Self-regulation by fruit corporations. In Agribusiness and society: Corporate responses to environmentalism, market opportunities and public regulation, ed. K. Jansen and S. Vellema, 145–175. London: Zed.
  • Julia and B. White. 2012. Gendered experiences of dispossession: Oil palm expansion in a Dayak Hibun community in West Kalimantan. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3&4: 995–1016. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.676544
  • Kautsky, K. 1988. The agrarian question. London: Zwan Publications. First published in 1899.
  • Kelly, A.B. 2011. Conservation practice as primitive accumulation. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4: 683–701. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607695
  • Kloppenburg, J. 2010. Impeding dispossession, enabling repossession: Biological open source and the recovery of seeds sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change 10, no. 3: 367–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00275.x
  • Koczberski, G., and G.N. Curry. 2004. Divided communities and contested landscapes: Mobility, development and shifting identities in migrant destination sites in Papua New Guinea. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 45, no. 3: 357–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2004.00252.x
  • Koh, L.P., and D.S. Wilcove. 2007. Cashing in palm oil for conservation. Nature 448: 993–994. doi: 10.1038/448993a
  • Lamers, P., C. Hamelinck, M. Junginger, and A. Faaij. 2011. International bioenergy trade – A review of past developments in the liquid biofuel market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15, no. 6: 2655–2676. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.022
  • Lee, J.S.H., S. Abood, J. Ghazoul, B. Barus, K. Obidzinski, and K.P. Koh. 2014. Environmental impacts of large-scale oil palm enterprises exceed that of smallholdings in Indonesia. Conservation Letters 7, no. 1: 25–33. doi: 10.1111/conl.12039
  • Lenin, V.I. 1967. The development of capitalism in Russia. Moscow: Progress Publishers. First published in 1899.
  • Leyva Solano, X., and A. Burguete Cal y Mayor. 2007. La remunicipalización de Chiapas: Lo politico y la política en tiempos de contrainsurgencia. México, D.F.: CIESAS, Miguel Ángel Porrua.
  • Luke, T.W. 1997. Ecocritique: Contesting the politics of nature, economy, and culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Mackinlay, H., and G. Otero. 2004. State corporatism and peasant organizations: Towards new institutional arrangements. In Mexico in transition: Neoliberal globalism, the state and civil society, ed. G. Otero, 72–88. London: Zed.
  • Maher, D. 2014. Rooted in violence: Civil war, international trade and the expansion of palm oil in Colombia. New Political Economy 20, no. 2: 299–330. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2014.923825
  • Marin-Burgos, V. 2014. Access, power and justice in commodity frontiers: The political ecology of access to land and palm oil expansion in Colombia. PhD diss., University of Twente.
  • Martinez-Alier, J. 2002. The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • McAfee, K. 1999. Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17: 133–154. doi: 10.1068/d170133
  • McCarthy, J.F. 2010. Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: Oil palm and agrarian change in Sumatra, Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 821–850. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512460
  • Mekhilef, S., S. Siga, and R. Saidur. 2011. A review on palm oil biodiesel as a source of renewable fuel. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15, no. 4: 1937–1949. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.12.012
  • Nash, J. 2001. Mayan visions: The quest for autonomy in an age of globalization. New York: Routledge.
  • Novo, A., K. Jansen, M. Slingerland and K. Giller. 2010. Biofuel, dairy production and beef in Brazil: Competing claims on land use in São Paulo State. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 769–92. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512458
  • Obidzinski, K., R. Andriani, H. Komarudin, and A. Andrianto. 2012. Environmental and social impacts of oil palm plantations and their implications for biofuel production in Indonesia. Ecology and Society 17, no. 1: 25. doi: 10.5751/ES-04775-170125
  • Osborne, T.M. 2011. Carbon forestry and agrarian change: Access and land control in a Mexican rainforest. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4: 859–883. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.611281
  • Pérez Castañeda, J.C. 2002. El nuevo sistema de propiedad agrarian en México. México, D.F.: Textos y Contextos.
  • Pye, O. 2010. The biofuel connection – transnational activism and the palm oil boom. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 851–874. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512461
  • Reyes Ramos, M.E. 2002. Conflicto agrario en Chiapas: 1934–1964. Tuxtla Gutiérrez: CONECULTA.
  • Rist, L., L. Feintrenie, and P. Levang. 2010. The livelihood impacts of oil palm: Smallholders in Indonesia. Biodiversity and Conservation 19, no. 4: 1009–1024. doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9815-z
  • SAGARPA. 2009. Programa de producción sustentable de insumos para bioenergéticos y desarrollo científico y tecnológico. México, D.F.: Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA).
  • Saldaña, J. 2012. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage: London.
  • Schoneveld, G.C., L.A. German, and E. Nukator. 2011. Land-based investments for rural development? A grounded analysis of the local impacts of biofuel feedstock plantations in Ghana. Ecology and Society 16, no. 4: 10. doi: 10.5751/ES-04424-160410
  • Scott, J.C. 1987. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Sheng Goh, C., and K. Teong Lee. 2010. Will biofuel projects in Southeast Asia become white elephants? Energy Policy 38, no. 8: 3847–3848. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.009
  • SIAP-SAGARPA. 2013. Oil palm surfaces for the period between 2007 and 2013. México, D.F.: Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera (SIAP) de la Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA).
  • Stonich, S.C., and C. Bailey. 2000. Resisting the blue revolution: Contending coalitions surrounding industrial shrimp farming. Human Organization 59, no. 1: 23–36. doi: 10.17730/humo.59.1.86281132l884231k
  • Toleubayev, K., K. Jansen, and A. van Huis. 2010. Knowledge and agrarian de-collectivisation in Kazakhstan. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 2: 353–377. doi: 10.1080/03066151003595069
  • Torres, A. 2011. Fracasa proyecto de biodiesel. El Economista, 18 Julio.
  • Trench, T. 2008. From “orphans of the state” to the comunidad conservacionista institucional: The case of the Lacandón Community, Chiapas. Identities 15, no. 5: 607–634. doi: 10.1080/10702890802333827
  • Veuthey, S., and J.F. Gerber. 2012. Accumulation by dispossession in coastal Ecuador: Shrimp farming, local resistance and the gender structure of mobilizations. Global Environmental Change 22, no. 3: 611–622. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.010
  • Wolff, C. 1999. The economics of oil palm production in Chiapas, Mexico. Working Paper 99–09, Department of Agricultural Resource, and Managerial Economics. Ithaca: Cornell University.
  • Yengoh, G.T., and F.A. Armah. 2014. Land access constraints for communities affected by large-scale land acquisition in Southern Sierra Leone. GeoJournal, November 2014.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.