2,210
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘More soy on fewer farms’ in Paraguay: challenging neoliberal agriculture's claims to sustainability

References

  • Adger, W.N., T.A. Benjaminsen, K. Brown, and H. Svarstad. 2001. Advancing a political ecology of global environmental discourses. Development and Change 32: 681–715. doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00222
  • Aide, T.M., M.L. Clark, H.R. Grau, D. López-Carr, M.A. Levy, D. Redo, and M. Muñiz. 2013. Deforestation and reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001–2010). Biotropica 45, no. 2: 262–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00908.x
  • Altieri, M. 2009. The ecological impacts of large-scale agrofuel monoculture production systems in the americas. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 29, no. 3: 236–244. doi: 10.1177/0270467609333728
  • Altieri, M., and M. Pengue. 2005. Roundup ready soybean in Latin America: A machine of hunger, deforestation and socio-ecological devastation. http://www.biosafety-info.net/article.php?aid=284 (accessed November 1, 2010).
  • Angelsen, A. 2010. Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 107: 19639–44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912014107
  • Angelsen, A., and D. Kaimowitz. 1999. Rethinking the causes of deforestation: Lessons from economic models. World Bank Research Obs. 14: 73–98. doi: 10.1093/wbro/14.1.73
  • Arima, E.Y., P.D. Richards, R.T. Walker, and M.M. Caldas. 2011. Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters. doi:10.1099/1748-9326/6/2/024010.
  • Arsel, M., and B. Büscher. 2012. Nature™ inc.: Changes and continuities in neoliberal conservation and market-based environmental policy. Development and Change 43, no. 1: 53–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01752.x
  • ASEED. 2006. Declaration: The development model for soy in Paraguay: Irresponsible, unsustainable and anti-democratic. http://www.aseed.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=285&Itemid=107 (accessed September 6, 2007).
  • Bäckstrand, K., J. Khan, A. Kronsell, and E. Lovbrand. 2010. The promise of new modes of environmental governance. In Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance, eds. K. Backstrand, J. Khan, A. Kronsell, and E. Lovbrand, 3–27. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Bailis, R., and J. Baka. 2011. Constructing sustainable biofuels: Governance of the emerging biofuel economy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101, no. 4: 827–38. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.568867
  • Balch, O. 2007. Paraguay's soya barons. The Guardian,. www.theguardian.com/world/2007/nov/2026/paraguay-farming (accessed July 2008, 2013).
  • Baletti, B. 2014. Saving the Amazon? Sustainable soy and the new extractivism. Environment and Planning A 46, no. 1: 5–25. doi: 10.1068/a45241
  • Barona, E., N. Ramankutty, G. Hyman, and O.T. Coomes. 2010. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 5, no. 1: 1–9.
  • Barrionuevo, A. 2008a. Argentina blocks farm export tax. New York Times, July 18. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/18/world/americas/18argentina.html?_r=0.
  • Barrionuevo, A. 2008b. Left-leaning president's election gives hope to landless Paraguayans. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/2010/2014/world/americas/2014paraguay.html?pagewanted=print&module=Search&mabReward=relbias%2003Ar%2002C%2007B%2222%2022%2003A%2022RI%2003A2014%2022%2007D.
  • Benegas, G. 1999. Análisis de la coyuntura económica. In Derechos humanos en Paraguay 1999, 273. Asunción: CODEHUPY.
  • Berry, A. 2010. The role of agriculture. In Losing ground in the employment challenge: The case of Paraguay, ed. A. Berry, 61–84. New Brunswick and London: Transaction.
  • Besky, S. 2008. Can a plantation be fair? Paradoxes and possibilities in fair trade darjeeling tea certification. Anthropology of Work Review 29, no. 1: 1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1417.2008.00006.x
  • Bloomfield, M.J. 2012. Is forest certification a hegemonic force? The FSC and its challengers. The Journal of Environment and Development 21, no. 4: 391–413. doi: 10.1177/1070496512449822
  • Borras, S.M. Jr, C. Kay, S. Gómez, and J. Wilkinson. 2012. Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: Key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne d'Études du Développement 33, no. 4: 402–16. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2012.745394
  • Boucher, D. 2011. Soybeans the root of the problem: What's driving tropical deforestation today? Cambridge: Union of Concerned Scientists.
  • Brigham, A.M. 2004. Just hungry? Analyzing the relationship between land concentration and food insecurity. phd thesis., Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of sociology and political science.
  • Brosius, J.P. 1999. Green dot, pink hearts: Displacing politics from the Malaysian rain forest. American Anthropologist 101, no. 1: 36–57. doi: 10.1525/aa.1999.101.1.36
  • Bryant, R.L., and S. Bailey. 1997. Third world political ecology. London: Routledge.
  • Byerlee, D., J. Stevenson, and N. Villoria. 2014. Does intensification slow crop land expansion or encourage deforestation. Global food security. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.04.001.
  • Carter, M.R., B.L. Barham, and D. Mesbah. 1996. Agricultural export booms and the rural poor in Chile, Guatemala, and Paraguay. Latin American Research Review 31, no. 1: 33–65.
  • Castree, N. 2014. Making sense of nature. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Cohen, J. 1995. Population growth and earth's human carrying capacity. Science 269, no. 5222: 341–46. doi: 10.1126/science.7618100
  • Conservation International. 2006. Biodiversity hotspots. http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/Hotspots/hotspotsScience/hotspots_defined.xml.
  • Corporate Europe Observatory. 2012. ‘Responsible soy’ nominated for Belgian greenwash award.
  • DAP. 2012. http://www.dap.com.py/index.php (accessed August 3, 2012).
  • Davis, D.K. 2007. Resurrecting the granary of Rome: Envrionmental history and French colonial expansion in North Africa. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
  • DCEA. 2009. Censo agropecuaria nacional 2008. San Lorenzo, Paraguay: Dirección de Censo y Estadística Agropecuaria.
  • DCEA/MAG. 2012. Análisis del comportamiento de rubros agrícolas. San Lorenzo, Paraguay: MAG.
  • Derpsch, R. 1999. Frontiers in conservation tillage and advances in conservation practice. Paper presented at the 10th ISCO Conference, West Lafayette In.
  • Desantis, D., and M. Cristaldo. 2011a. Paraguay wants 6 pct soy export tax, farmers balk. Reuters, August 25. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/08/25/paraguay-soy-tax-idUKN1E77O0HS20110825.
  • Desantis, D., and M. Cristaldo. 2011b. Paraguay wants 6 pct soy export tax; farmers balk. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/08/25/paraguay-soy-tax-idUKN1E77O0HS20110825 (accessed August 1, 2012).
  • DGEEC. 2012. Compendio estadístico 2010. Fernando de la Mora, Paraguay: Dirección General de Estadística Encuestas y Censos.
  • Dros, J.M. 2004. Managing the soy boom: Two scenarios of soy production. Amsterdam: AIDEnvironment.
  • E'a: Periódico de Interpretación y Análisis. 2012. Blas n. Riquelme y las tierras malhabidas de curuguaty. http://ea.com.py/blas-n-riquelme-y-las-tierras-malhabidas-de-curuguaty/ (accessed June 25, 2012).
  • Ebert, J. 2005. Nine more crisis areas for biodiversity. Nature. doi:10.1038/news050131-10.
  • Elgert, L. 2009. Politicizing sustainable development; the co-production of globalized evidence-based policy. Critical Policy Studies 3, no. 3–4: 375–90. doi: 10.1080/19460171003619782
  • Elgert, L. 2011. Certified community development? Local participation in corporate governance. In Deliberations in community development: Balancing on the edge, eds. J.P.R. Rothe, L.J.C. Carroll, and D. Ozegovic, 277–88. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Elgert, L. 2012. Certified discourse? The politics of developing soy certification standards. Geoforum 43, no. 2: 295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.08.008
  • Elgert, L. 2013. Hard facts and software: The coproduction of indicators in a land-use planning model. Environmental Values 22, no. 6: 765–86. doi: 10.3197/096327113X13781997646610
  • Ewers, RM., J.P.W. Scharlemann, A. Balmford, and R.E. Green. 2009. Do increases in agricultural yield spare land for nature?. Global Change 15: 1716–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01849.x
  • Fairhead, J., and M. Leach. 1996. Misreading the African landscape: Society and ecology in a forest-savanna mosaic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • FAO. 2001. Perfiles nutricionales por paises: Paraguay. Rome: FAO.
  • FAO. 2011. The state of food insecurity of the world: How does international price volatility affect domestic economies and food security? Rome: FAO.
  • Fearnside, P.M. 2001. Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environmental Conservation 28, no. 1: 23–38.
  • Feindt, P.H., and A. Oels. 2005. Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7, no. 3: 161–73. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339638
  • Fischer, F. 2009. Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Forsyth, T. 2011. Expertise needs tranparency not blind trust: A deliberative approach to integrating science and social participation. Critical Policy Studies 5, no. 3: 317–22. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2011.606305
  • Galeano, L. 2010. Potential and future of Paraguayan family farming. In Losing ground in the employment challenge: The case of Paraguay, ed. A. Berry, 101–22. New Brunswick and London: Transaction.
  • Galeano, L. 2012. Paraguay and the expansion of Brazilian and Argentinian agribusiness frontiers. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 33, no. 4: 458–70. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2012.744301
  • Garcia-Lopez, G.A., and N. Arizpe. 2010. Participatory processes in the soy conflicts in Paraguay and Argentina. Ecological Economics 70, no. 2: 196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.013
  • Gieryn, T. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Goldman, M., and Rachel A. Schurman. 2000. Closing the “great divide”: New social theory on society and nature. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 563–84. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.563
  • Grajales, J. 2011. The rifle and the title: Paramilitary violence, land grab and land control in Colombia. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4: 771–92. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607701
  • Guerena, A. 2013. The soy mirage: The limits of corporate social responsibility: The case of the company Desarrollo Agrícola del Paraguay. Oxfam.
  • Guthman, J. 2007. The polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode 39, no. 3: 456–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00535.x
  • Hajer, M. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hajer, M., and W. Versteeg. 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7, no. 3: 175–84. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
  • Hetherington, K. 2011. Guerrilla auditors: The politics of transparency in neoliberal Paraguay. Duke University Press.
  • Hetherington, K. 2012. ‘Tierra malhabida’ y el engaño de la institucionalidad. Revista Novapolis, 5(Abril-Octubre), 31–54.
  • Hetherington, K. 2013. Beans before the law: Knowledge practices, responsibility, and the Paraguayan soy boom. Cultural Anthropology 28, no. 1: 65–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01173.x
  • Heynen, N., J. McCarthy, S. Prudham, and P. Robbins, eds. 2007. Neoliberal environments: False promises and unnatural consequences. Routledge.
  • Higgins, V., J. Dibden, and C. Cocklin. 2008. Neoliberalism and natural resource management: Agri-environmental standards and the governing of farming practices. Geoforum 39, no. 5: 1776–85. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.05.004
  • Hobbs, J. 2012. Paraguay's destructive soy boom. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/opinion/paraguays-destructive-soy-boom.html.
  • Howarth, D.R., and S. Griggs. 2012. Poststructuralist policy analysis: Discourse hegemony and critical explanation. In The arugmentative turn in policy analysis, eds. F. Fischer and J. Forester, 305–42. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  • Huang, C., S. Kim, K. Song, J.R.G. Townshend, P. Davis, A. Altstatt, and J. Musinsky. 2009. Assessment of Paraguay's forest cover change using landsat observations. Global and Planetary Change 67: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.12.009
  • Huggins, D.R., and J.P. Reganold. 2008. No till: The quiet revolution. Scientific American 299, no 1: 70–77. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0708-70
  • Hutchinson, S. 2008. Innovation in conservation: The case of Paraguay's atlantic forests. www.wwf.org.uk (accessed July 6, 2014).
  • Ingram, M., H. Ingram, and R. Lejano. 2014. What's the story? Creating and sustaining environmental networks. Environmental Politics 23, no. 6: 984–1002. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.919717
  • Itriago, D. 2012. Taxation in Paraguay: Marginalization of small-scale farming. Oxfam. http://www.oxfam.org/en/policy/taxation-paraguay.
  • Jasanoff, S. 2004. The idiom of co-production. In States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order, ed. Jasanoff, 1–12. London: Routledge.
  • Jasanoff, S., and M.L. Martello. 2004. Earthly politics: Local and global in environmental governance. In Politics, science, and the environment, vol. viii, 356. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Jasanoff, S., and B. Wynne. 1998. Science and decisionmaking. In Human choice and climate change, vol.1: The societal framework, eds. S. Rayner and E. Malone, 1–87. Batelle.
  • Jenkins, J.C., and S.J. Scanlan. 2001. Food secruity in less developed countries, 1970 to 1990. American Sociological Review 66, no. 5: 718–44. doi: 10.2307/3088955
  • Johnson, A. 2012. Green governance or green grab? The biopolitics of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil (RSPO) and its processes in Ecuador. International Conference on Global Land Grabbing II.
  • Jones, H.C. 2003. Participation in FSC certified community forest management projects in the Brazilian Amazon. Paper presented at the International Conference on Rural Livelihoods, Forests and Biodiversity, 19–23 May, in Bonn, Germany.
  • Kay, C. 2002. Why East Asia overtook Latin America: Agrarian reform, industrialisation and development. Third World Quarterly 23, no. 6: 1073–02. doi: 10.1080/0143659022000036649
  • Kleinpenning, J.M.G., and E.B. Zoomers. 1988. Internal colonisation as policy instrument for changing a country's rural system: The example of Paraguay. Journal of Economic and Social Geography 79, no. 4: 257–65.
  • Klooster, D. 2010. Standardizing sustainable development? The Forest Stewardship Council's plantation policy review process as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum 41, no. 1: 117–29. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.02.006
  • Lambert, P. 2000. A decade of electoral democracy: Continuity, change and crisis in Paraguay. Bulletin of Latin American Research 19: 379–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2000.tb00113.x
  • Lambin, E.F., and P. Meyfroidt. 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 108: 3465–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100480108
  • Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Licker, R., M. Johnston, J.A. Foley, C.J. Barford, C. Kucharik, C. Monfreda, and N. Ramankutty. 2010. Mind the gap: How do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world?. Global Ecology and Biogeography 9: 769–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00563.x
  • Litfin, K. 1994. Ozone discourses: Science and politics in global environmental cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • López, R., and T. Thomas. 2000. Rural poverty in Paraguay: The determinants of farm household income. In Rural poverty in Latin America, eds. R. López and A. Valdés, 244–57. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
  • López, R., and A. Valdés. 2000. Fighting rural poverty in Latin America: New evidence of the effects of education, demographics, and access to land. Economic Development and Cultural Change 49, no. 1: 197–211. doi: 10.1086/452497
  • Lövbrand, E. 2007. Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science. Environmental Science and Policy 10, no. 1: 39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.003
  • Macedo, M.N., R.S. DeFries, D.C. Morton, C.M. Stickler, G.L. Galford, and Y.E. Shimabukuro. 2012. Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, no. 4: 1341–46. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111374109
  • MAG. 2010. Produccion de soja en el Paraguay: Zafra 2008–2010. Asuncion: Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganaderia.
  • Masi, F., and F. Ruiz Diaz. 2010. The role of international trade in growth and employment generation in Paraguay. In Losing ground in the employment challenge: The case of Paraguay, ed. A. Berry, 215–39. New Brunswick and London: Transaction.
  • Meadowcroft, J. 2007. Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9, no. 3–4: 299–314. doi: 10.1080/15239080701631544
  • Merry Baker, M., and D. Small. 2005. Brazil's agricultural ‘sucess’ in the cerrado is a disaster. Executive Intelligence Review 32, no. 8: 20–23.
  • Meyfroidt, P., T.K. Rudel, and E.F. Lambin. 2010. Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 107: 20917–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014773107
  • Moog, S., A. Spicer, and S. Böhm. 2014. The politics of multi-stakeholder initiatives: The crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics: 1–25.
  • Myers, N. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, no. 24: 853–58. doi: 10.1038/35002501
  • Nagel, B.Y. 1999. “Unleashing the fury”: The cultural discourse of rural violence and land rights in Paraguay. Comparative Studies in Society and History 41, no. 1: 148–81. doi: 10.1017/S0010417599001905
  • Nepstad, D., D. McGrath, C. Stickler, A. Alencar, A. Azevedo, B. Swette, et al. 2014. Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 344, no. 6188: 1118–23. doi: 10.1126/science.1248525
  • Neumann, R.P. 2003. The production of nature: Colonial recasting of the African landscape in Serengeti national park. In Political ecology: An integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies, eds. K.S. Zimmerer and T.J. Basset, 240–55. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Nickson, A., and P. Lambert. 2002. State reform and the ‘privatized state’ in Paraguay. Public Administration and Development 22: 163–74. doi: 10.1002/pad.218
  • Palau, T., G. Ortega, L. Rojas Villagra, M. Pereira, and R. Doughman. 2010. Socioenvironmental impacts of soybean in Paraguay - 2010. São Paulo and Asuncion: Repórter Brasil and Base Investigaciones Sociales.
  • Peiretti, R.A. 2005. The necessity of a sustainable agriculture: The global focus and the Mercosur-la Confederación de Asociaciones Americanas para la Producción de la Agricultura Sustentable (CAAPAS) view. Paper presented at the First Roundtable on Sustainable Soy Conference, Foz de Iguacu.
  • Perfecto, I., and J. Vandermeer. 2010. The agricultural matrix as an alternative to the land-sparing/agricultural intensification model: Facing the food and biodiversity crises. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 107: 5786–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905455107
  • Phalan, B., M. Onial, A. Balmford, and R.E. Green. 2011. Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: Land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333, no. 6047: 1289–91. doi: 10.1126/science.1208742
  • Richards, P.D. 2011. Soy, cotton, and the final Atlantic forest frontier. The Professional Geographer 63, no. 3: 343–63. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.566516
  • Richards, P.D., R.J. Myers, S.M. Swinton, and R.T. Walker. 2012. Exchange rates, soybean supply response, and deforestation in South America. Global Environmental Change 22: 454–62. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.004
  • Robertson, M. 2007. Discovering price in all the wrong places: The work of commodity definition and price under neoliberal environmental policy. Antipode 39, no. 3: 500–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00537.x
  • Rocha, J. 2005. Brazil declares forest havens after nun's killing. The Guardian, February 19. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2005/feb/19/endangeredhabitats.activists.
  • Rohter, L. 2002. Amazon forest still burning despite the good intentions. The New York Times,. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/2008/2023/international/americas/2023BRAZ.html?pagewanted=print.
  • Rohter, L. 2003. Relentless foe of the Amazon jungle: Soybeans. New York Times, September 17.
  • RTRS. 2014. Volumenes y productores certificados. http://www.responsiblesoy.org/mercado/volumenes-y-productores-certificados/?lang=en (accessed July 8, 2014).
  • Rudorff, B.F.T., M. Adami, D.A. Aguiar, M.A. Moreira, M.P. Mello, L. Fabiani, and B.M. Pires. 2011. The soy moratorium in the Amazon biome monitored by remote sensing images. Remote Sensing 3: 185–202. doi: 10.3390/rs3010185
  • Sen, A. 1975. Employment, technology and development. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Sen, A. 1981. Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Setrini, G. 2008. Stiglitz goes to Paraguay: Move over Chicago, a Cambridge boy's in town. http://upsidedownworld.org/main/paraguay-archives-44/1439-stiglitz-goes-to-paraguay-move-over-chicago-a-cambridge-boys-in-town (accessed July 5, 2009).
  • Silva-Castañeda, L. 2012. A forest of evidence: Third-party certification and multiple forms of proof – a case study of oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Agriculture and Human Values 29, no. 3: 361–70. doi: 10.1007/s10460-012-9358-x
  • Spieldoch, A., and Murphy, S. 2009. Agricutlural land acquisitions: Implications for food security and poverty alleviation. In Land grab? The race for the world's farmland, eds. M. Kugelman and S. L. Levenstein, 39–54. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
  • Toledo, R. 2010. Farm size-productivity relationship in Paraguay's agricultural sector. In Losing ground in the employment challenge: The case of Paraguay, ed. A. Berry, 85–100. New Brunswick and London: Transaction.
  • The Economist. 2012. Out Lugo. http://www.economist.com/blogs/americasview/2012/06/paraguayan-politics (accessed August 3, 2012).
  • Tscharntke, T., Y. Clough, T.C. Wanger, L. Jackson, I. Motzke, I. Perfecto, and A. Whitbread. 2012. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation 151, no. 1: 53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068
  • UNDP. 2009. Human development report 2009. Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. New York: United Nations Development Program.
  • USDA. 2011. USDA Awards Grant to Virginia Tech to Improve Soybean Production and Sustainability. http://www.csrees.usda.gov/newsroom/news/2011news/03281_vt_soybean.html (accessed August 8, 2012).
  • Walker, G., and E. Shove. 2007. Ambivalence, sustainability and the governance of socio-technical transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 9, no. 3–4: 213–25. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622840
  • WWF. 2006. Consensus reached on impacts of soy production at workshop. Forest Conversion News, 11June.
  • WWF. 2010. RTRS finalizes standards for responsible soy at annual meeting. Forest Conversion News, (26), 1.
  • WWF. 2011. Making a pact to tackle deforestation in Paraguay. WWF report, 1–18 March.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.