Strategies and hybrid dynamics of soy transnational companies in the Southern Cone

References

• Abiove – Associação Brasileira das Indústrias de Óleos Vegetais. 2014. Capacidade Instalada da Indústria de Óleos Vegetais. http://www.abiove.com.br
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. 2010. Elite landowners in Santarém: ranchers, gaúchos and the arrival of soybeans in the Amazon. PhD diss, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• AGD – Aceitera General Deheza. 2014. Nuestra identidad: história. http://www.agd.com.ar/es/home.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, G., D. Hamrick, and G. Gereffi. 2014. Shifting governance structures in the wheat value chain: implications for food security in the Middle East and North Africa. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Durham: Duke University.
   Google Scholar
• Albuquerque, J.L.C. 2005. Fronteiras em movimento e identidades nacionais: a imigração brasileira no Paraguai. PhD diss., Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, L. S. 2013. Gaúchos, festas e negócios: o agronegócio da soja no Meio-Norte matogrossense. PhD diss., Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Amaggi. 2014. Sobre o Grupo Amaggi. http://www.grupoandremaggi.com.br
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo, G., R. Rama, and F. Rello. 1985. Agricultura y alimentos en América Latina: el poder de las transnacionales. México D.C.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma del México.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, M.Z. and S. Nogueira Jr. 2007. As simetrias entre as agroindústrias de soja no Brasil e na Argentina. Revista de Economia Agrícola, São Paulo 54: 87–107.
   Google Scholar
• Benetti, M.D. 2004. Globalização e desnacionalização do agronegócio brasileiro no pós 1990. Documentos FEE, 61. Porto Alegre: FEE.
   Google Scholar
• BiodieselBR. 2013. Notícias. http://www.biodieselbr.com /
   Google Scholar
• Blanc, J. 2015. Enclaves of inequality: Brasiguaios and the transformation of the Brazil-Paraguay borderlands. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 1: 145–58. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.967685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonanno, A. and D.H. Constance. 2008. Stories of globalization: transnational corporations, resistance and the corporate state. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borras Jr., S., P. McMichael, and I. Scoones. 2010. The politics of biofuels, land, and agrarian change: editors introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 575–92. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., P. Karre, and J. K. Helderman. 2009. The risks of hybrid organizations: expectations and evidence. NISPACEE Conference. Budva.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge. 2010. Bunge y Louis Dreyfus Commodities anuncian una inversión conjunta. http://www.bungeuruguay.com/ing/images/Prensa_Nov3_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bunge. 2012. Promaíz S.A. http://www.bungeargentina.com/site/es/novedades/promaiz-sa
   Google Scholar
• Capeco – Camara Paraguaia de Exportadores y Comercializadores de Cereales y Oleaginosas. 2013. Estadísticas. http://www.tera.com.py/capeco.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, A.C. 2002. Localização e identificação das empresas processadoras de soja, suas áreas de influência, preços e custos de transporte relacionados. Rio de Janeiro: CPDA/UFRRJ.
   Google Scholar
• Ciara – Camara de la Industria Aceitera de la Republica Argentina. 2014. Estadísticas del Sector. http://www.ciaracec.com.ar/ciara/bd/index.php
   Google Scholar
• CIP – Centro de Importadores del Paraguay. 2013. Ranking de exportadores e importadores. http://www.cip.org.py/
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. and M.J. Cohen, eds. 2009. The global food crisis: Governance challenges and opportunities. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. and D. Fuchs, eds. 2009. Corporate power in global agrifood governance. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S.D. 2007. Multinational corporations and foreign direct investment: avoiding simplicity, embracing complexity. New York: OUP Catalogue.
   Google Scholar
• Colque, G. 2013. Land appropriation on the frontier: changes in and struggles for access to land in Bolivia. PhD diss., International Institute of Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Comex. 2013. Relatórios de Comércio Exterior. http://trade.nosis.com/pt/Comex.
   Google Scholar
• Conab – Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. 2013. Série Histórica de Produção. http://www.conab.gov.br
   Google Scholar
• De La Torre, A. and S.L. Schmukler, eds. 2007. Emerging capital markets and globalization: the Latin American experience. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, K., D. Nizalov, and S.K. Singh. 2013. Are mega-farms the future of global agriculture? Exploring the farm size-productivity relationship for large commercial farms in Ukraine. Policy Research Working Paper 6544, The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, G.C. 2005. A questão agrária no Brasil, 1950–2003. In Questão social e políticas sociais no Brasil contemporâneo, ed. L. Jaccoud, 51–90. Brasília: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois, C., C.B. Tan, and S. Mintz, eds. 2008. The world of soy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 2014 [1983]. The division of labor in society. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Embrapa – Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. 2004. Sistema de Produção 6. http://www.cnpso.embrapa.br/download/publicacao.
   Google Scholar
• Estadão. 2014. Gigantes do agronegocio se unem para investir nas novas ferrovias. http://economia.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,gigantes-do-agronegocio-se-unem-para-investir-nas-novas-ferrovias-imp-,1144031
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. et al. 2014. Introduction: New directions in agrarian political economy. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 653–66. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.953490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faostat – División de Estadísticas de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. 2014. Estadísticas generales. http://faostat.fao.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Farina, E.M.M.Q. and D. Zylbersztajn. 1998. Competitividade no Agribusiness Brasileiro. São Paulo: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes Filho, J.F. and Belik, W. 2010. A política de tributação na exportação do complexo soja pelo Brasil: transformação e resultados. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Brazilian Society of Economics, Business and Rural Sociology, in Campo Grande, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, B.M., C.A. Welch, and E.C. Gonçalves. 2010. Agrofuel policies in Brazil: paradigmatic and territorial disputes. Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 793–819. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, A.J.C. 2007. Do Cerrado à Amazônia: as estruturas sociais da economia da soja em Mato Grosso. PhD diss., Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, A.J.C. 2009. Sociedade e economia do agronegócio: estudo exploratório do estado de Mato Grosso. Rio de Janeiro: CPDA/UFRRJ.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. 1996. Markets as politics: a political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review 61: 656–73. doi: 10.2307/2096398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. 2001. The architecture of markets: an economic sociology of 21st century capitalist societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, H. and P. McMichael. 1989. Agriculture and the state system: the rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis 29, no. 2: 93–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspari, C.A. 2004. O paradigma biotecnológico e o processo de reestruturação das grandes empresas: o movimento das bioindústrias na agroindústria brasileira. PhD diss., Universidade Estadual de Maringá.
   Google Scholar
• Genok. 2012. Producción de soya en las Américas: actualización sobre el uso de tierras y pesticidas. Cochabamba: Virmegraf.
   Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, and T. Sturgeon. 2005. The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy 12, no. 1: 78–104. doi: 10.1080/09692290500049805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. 2011. Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giménez, E.H. and A. Shattuck. 2011. Food crises, food regimes and food movements: rumblings of reform or tides of transformation? Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 1: 109–44. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, no. 3: 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gras, C. and V. Hernández. 2013. Los pilares del modelo agribusiness y sus estilos empresariales. In El agro como negócio: produción, sociedad y territórios en la globalización, ed. C. Gras and V. Hernández, 17–48. Buenos Aires: Biblios.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2008. The new bonfire of vanities: soybean cultivation and globalization in South America. Development 51, no. 4: 512–18. doi: 10.1057/dev.2008.55
   Google Scholar
• Guibert, M. et al. 2011. De Argentina a Uruguay: espacios y actores en una nueva lógica de producción agrícola. Pampa 7: 13–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S.B. 2014. Forests lost and found in tropical Latin America: the woodland ‘green revolution’. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 877–909. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.917371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, M., H. James, and W. D. Heffernan. 2013. Vertical integration and concentration in US agriculture. Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics 1, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Heredia, B.M.A., M. Palmeira, and S.P. Leite. 2010. Sociedade e Economia do “Agronegócio” no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 25: 159–76. doi: 10.1590/S0102-69092010000300010
   Google Scholar
• Hinrichsen, J. J. 2013. Annual Yearbook on Oilseeds Markets. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Hinrichsen.
   Google Scholar
• Hoelle, J. 2012. Black hats and smooth hands : elite status, environmentalism and work among the ranchers of Acre, Brazil. Anthropology of Work Review 33, no. 2: 60–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1417.2012.01080.x
   Google Scholar
• IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Economia e Estatística. 2013. Banco de dados agregados. http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• Indec – Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. 2013. Agricultora. http://www.indec.gov.ar/agropecuario/.
   Google Scholar
• INTA – Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuária. 2009. Análisis de la cadena de la soja en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: INTA.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, G. 2012. Can the subaltern eat? Anthropophagic culture as a Brazilian lens on post-colonial theory. Organization 19, no. 2: 159–80. doi: 10.1177/1350508411429396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAG – Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganaderia. 2013. Series Históricas de Cultivos Temporales. http://www.mag.gov.py.
   Google Scholar
• MAGyP – Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca. 2013. Sistema integrado de información agropecuaria. http://www.siia.gov.ar/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, E. M. and J. J. Medeiros. 2011. Governança e coordenação em cadeias de suprimento: proposta de um modelo tecnológico-relacional para análise no agronegócio. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Brazilian Society of Economics, Business and Rural Sociology, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime analysis of the ‘world food crisis’. Agriculture and Human Values 26, no. 4: 281–95. doi: 10.1007/s10460-009-9218-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2010. Agrofuels in the food regime, Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 609–29. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecon – Ministerio de Economia y Finanzas Publicas. 2011. Complexo oleaginoso. Serie Producción Regional por Complejos Productivos. http://www.mecon.gob.ar/peconomica/docs/Complejo_Oleaginoso.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Menéndez, V. and J.C. Gulla. 2013. Cadenas Globales de Valor: los casos de la soja y el trigo. Documento de Trabajo, 89, Núcleo de Estudios Sociales Agrarios, Montevideo.
   Google Scholar
• MGAP – Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca. 2013. Estadísticas Agropecuarias (DIEA). http://www.mgap.gub.uy/.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, G. F. A. et al. 2012. The role of empirical research in the study of complex forms of governance in agroindustrial systems. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 50, no. 4: 667–82. doi: 10.1590/S0103-20032012000400005
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, G. 2007. Terra e poder em Mato Grosso: política e mecanismo de burla (1892 a 1992). Cuiabá/MT: Entrelinhas e EDUFMT.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S., D. Burch, and J. Clapp. 2012. Cereal secrets: the world's largest grain traders and global agriculture. Oxfam Research Report. Oxford: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Ofstehage, A. 2013. Development and dispossession in Soylandia: quotidian realities of the transnational corporate food regime. Society for Economic Anthropology Conference, St. Louis, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G.L.T., and M. Schneider. 2014. The politics of flexing soybeans in China and Brazil. Think Piece Series On Flex Crops & Commodities 3: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Oyhantçabal, G. and I. Narbondo. 2011. Radiografia del agronegocio sojero: descripción de los principales atores y los impactos socioeconómicos en Uruguay. Montevideu: Redes.
   Google Scholar
• Paes Leme, M. F. and D. Zylbersztajn. 2008. Determinantes da escolha de arranjos institucionais: evidências na comercialização de fertilizantes para soja. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 46, no. 2: 517–46. doi: 10.1590/S0103-20032008000200009
   Google Scholar
• Pappalardo, C. 1995. Estrategias y políticas de desarrollo rural. Asunción: El Lector.
   Google Scholar
• Peine, E. 2010. Corporate mobilization on the soybean frontier of Mato Grosso, Brazil. In Contesting development: critical struggles for social change, ed. P. McMichael, 132–46. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierri, J. 2006. El boom de la soja. Un retorno al pasado? Realidad Económica 219: 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Pierri, J. 2008. El desempeño de las grandes empresas y las cooperativas en la “sojización”. Los casos de Cargill y de la Asociación de Cooperativas Agrarias. Documentos del CIEA, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la UBA 3: 69–95.
   Google Scholar
• Piñeiro, D. and M.I. Moraes. 2008. Los cambios en la sociedad rural durante el siglo XX. El Uruguay del Siglo XX: La sociedad. Ediciones de la Banda Oriental, Montevideo, 105–136.
   Google Scholar
• Pires, M.J.S. and G.R. Santos. 2013. Modelo agroexportador, política macroeconômica e a supremacia do mercado: uma visão do modelo brasileiro de exportação de commodities. Brasília: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Raynolds, L. T. 2014. Fairtrade, certification, and labor: global and local tensions in improving conditions for agricultural workers. Agriculture and Human Values 31, no. 3: 499–511. doi: 10.1007/s10460-014-9506-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revista Exame. 2011. O Paraguai é movido a soja. http://exame.abril.com.br/revista-exame/edicoes/0986/noticias/movido-a-soja
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, W. et al. 2009. Análise das estratégias de financiamento/comercialização dos produtores de soja da região de Santa Rosa do Tocantins. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Brazilian Society of Economics, Business and Rural Sociology, in Porto Alegre, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas Villagra, L. 2009. Actores del agronegocio en Paraguay. Asunción: BASE Investigaciones Sociales y Diakonia – Acción Ecuménica Sueca.
   Google Scholar
• Salerno, T. 2014. Capitalising on the financialisation of agriculture: Cargill's land investment techniques in the Philippines. Third World Quarterly 35, no. 9: 1709–27. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2014.971567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, B.S. 2002. Os processos da globalização. In A globalização e as ciências sociais, ed. B. S. Santos, 2° ed., 25–104. São Paulo: Cortez.
   Google Scholar
• Schavarzer, J. and A. Tavosnanska. 2007. El complexo sojero argentino. Evolución y perspectivas. Documento de Trabajo, 10, Centro de Estudios de la Situación y Perspectivas de la Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Secex - Secretaria de Comércio Exterior. 2013. Indicadores e Estatísticas de Comércio Exterior. http://www2.desenvolvimento.gov.br/sitio/secex/secex
   Google Scholar
• Shimoni, B. 2008. Separation, emulation and competition: hybridization styles of management cultures in Thailand, Mexico and Israel. Journal of Organizational Change, v. 21, n. 1, 107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 1985. Reflections on the social relations of simple commodity production. The Journal of Peasant Studies 13, no. 1: 99–108. doi: 10.1080/03066158508438285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, J.F.D. 2007. Integração vertical e financeirização: o caso da agroindústria processadora de grãos no Brasil. Msc. diss., Universidade de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2011. The global food crisis: ABCD of food – how the multinationals dominate trade. http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/jun/02/abcd-food-giants-dominate-trade.
   Google Scholar
• Toit, A. and D. Neves. 2014. The government of poverty and the arts of survival: mobile and recombinant strategies at the margins of the South African economy. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 833–53. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.894910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UruguayXXI. 2012. Trigo y oleaginosas. Montevideo: Departamento de Inteligencia Competitiva.
   Google Scholar
• Valor Econômico. 2014. Notícias. http://www.valor.com.br
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1978 [1922]. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wesz Jr., V.J. 2011. Dinâmicas e estratégias das agroindústrias de soja no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: E-papers.
   Google Scholar
• Wesz Jr., V.J. 2014. O mercado da soja e as relações de troca entre produtores rurais e empresas no Sudeste de Mato Grosso (Brasil). PhD diss., Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J. 2009. Globalization of agribusiness & developing world food systems. Monthly Review 61: 38–49. doi: 10.14452/MR-061-04-2009-08_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J. 2011. From fair trade to responsible soy: social movements and the qualification of agrofood markets. Environment and Planning A 43: 2012–26. doi: 10.1068/a43254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J. and S. Herrera. 2010. Biofuels in Brazil: debates and impacts. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 749–68. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J. and P. Pereira. 2014. Brazilian soy: new patters of investment, finance and regulation. In: Finance, Food and Farmland International Conference, ISS and CESTRAD. The Hague, Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Wood Jr., T. 2010. Organizações híbridas. Revista de Administração de Empresas 50, no. 2: 241–47. doi: 10.1590/S0034-75902010000200008
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, V. A. R. 1997. The social meaning of money. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar