15,934
Views
147
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

Sacred groves, sacrifice zones and soy production: globalization, intensification and neo-nature in South America

References

  • Aldrich, S., R. Walker, M. Caldas, and S. Perz. 2012. Contentious land change in the Amazon's Arc of deforestation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102, no. 1: 103–128.
  • Alencar, A., P. Brando, and F. E. Putz. 2015. Landscape fragmentation, severe drought, and the new Amazon forest fire regime. Ecological Applications 25, no. 6: 1493–1505.
  • Alkimim, A., G. Sparovek, and K. C. Clarke. 2015. Converting Brazil's pastures to cropland: An alternative way to meet sugarcane demand and to spare forestlands. Applied Geography 62: 75–84.
  • Altieri, M., C. Nicholls, and M. A. Lana. 2015. Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35, no. 3: 869–890.
  • Altieri, M., and W. Pengue. 2006. GM soybean: Latin America's new colonizer. Seedling, 17, no.1: 13–17.
  • Anadon, J., O. Sala, and F. T. Maestre. 2014. Climate change will increase savannas at the expense of forests and treeless vegetation in tropical and subtropical Americas. Journal of Ecology 102, no. 6: 1363–1373.
  • Arancibia, F. 2013. Challenging the bioeconomy: The dynamics of collective action in Argentina. Technology in Society 35, no. 2: 79–92.
  • Arvor, D., M. Meirelles, Agnès Bégué, and Y. E. Shimabukuro 2012. Analyzing the agricultural transition in Mato Grosso, Brazil, using satellite-derived indices. Applied Geography 32, no. 2: 702–713.
  • Asner, G., S. Loarie, and U. Heyder. 2010. Combined effects of climate and land-use change on the future of humid tropical forests. Conservation Letters 3, no. 6: 395–403.
  • Baldi, G., J. Houspanossian, Adriel A. Rosales, Carla V. Rueda , and E. G. Jobbágy 2015. Cultivating the dry forests of South America: Diversity of land users and imprints on ecosystem functioning. Journal of Arid Environments 123: 47–59.
  • Baletti, Brenda. 2014. Saving the Amazon? Sustainable soy and the new extractivism. Environment and Planning A, 46, no. 1: 5–25.
  • Barbier, E., and J. Burgess. 2001. Tropical deforestation, tenure insecurity, and unsustainability. Forest Science 47, no. 4: 497–509.
  • Barlow, J., and C. Peres. 2008. Fire-mediated dieback and compositional cascade in an Amazonian forest. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 363, no. 1498: 1787–1794.
  • Benachour, N., and G.-E. Séralini. 2009. Glyphosate formulations induce apoptosis and necrosis in human umbilical, embryonic, and placental cells. Chemical Research in Toxicology 22: 97–105.
  • Beuchle, R., R. Grecchi, et al. 2015. Land cover changes in the Brazilian Cerrado and Caatinga biomes from 1990 to 2010 based on a systematic remote sensing sampling approach. Applied Geography 58: 116–127.
  • Berger, M., and F. Ortega. 2010. Poblaciones expuestas a agrotóxicos: autoorganización ciudadana en la defensa de la vida y la salud, Ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina. (Populations exposed to agrotoxins: citizen self-organization in defense of life and health, City of Cordoba, Argentina). Physis: Revista de Saúde Coletiva 20, no. 1: 119–143.
  • Bianchi, C., and S.M. Haig. 2013. Deforestation Trends of Tropical Dry Forests in Central Brazil. Biotropica 45, no. 3: 395–400.
  • Binimelis, R., W. Pengue, and I. Monterroso. 2009. ‘Transgenic treadmill’: Responses to the emergence and spread of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass in Argentina. Geoforum 40, no. 4: 623–633.
  • Borlaug, N. 2006. In: Cerrado. Available at: www.worldfoodprize.org/en/laureates/20002009_laureates/2006_lobato_mcclung_paolinelli/cerrado/ [Accessed January 4, 2016].
  • Borner, J., S. Wunder, S. Wertz-Kanounnikoff, G. Hyman, and N. Nascimento 2014. Forest law enforcement in the Brazilian Amazon: Costs and income effects. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 29: 294–305.
  • Borras, S., J. Franco, et al. 2015. The rise of flex crops and commodities: implications for research. Journal of Peasant Studies 43, no. 1: 9–115.
  • Brando, P., J. Balch, et al. 2014. Abrupt increases in Amazonian tree mortality due to drought-fire interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, no. 17: 6347–6352.
  • Brando, P., M. Coe, et al. 2013. Ecology, economy and management of an agroindustrial frontier landscape in the southeast Amazon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 368, no. 1619: 20120152.
  • Browder, J., and B. Godfrey. 1997. Rainforest cities: urbanization, development, and globalization of the Brazilian Amazon. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Brown, L. 2012. Full planet, empty plates: The new geopolitics of food scarcity. New York: WW Norton & Company.
  • Carrero, G., and P. Fearnside. 2011. Forest clearing dynamics and the expansion of landholdings in Apui, a deforestation hotspot on Brazil's Transamazon Highway. Ecology and Society 16, no. 2: 26–0.
  • Cavalett, O., and E. Ortega. 2010. Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 18, no. 1: 55–70.
  • Ceddia, M., N. Bardsley, and S. Sedlacek 2014. Governance, agricultural intensification, and land sparing in tropical South America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, no. 20: 7242–7247.
  • Cerdeira, A., D. Gazziero, and M. B. Matallo. 2011. Agricultural impacts of glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivation in South America. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59, no. 11: 5799–5807.
  • Chase, J. 2003. Regional prestige: Cooperatives and agroindustrial identity in southwest Goiás, Brazil. Agriculture and Human Values 20, no. 1: 37–51.
  • Clapp, J. 2014. Financialization, distance and global food politics. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 797–814.
  • Coe, M., M. Costa, et al. 2009. The influence of historical and potential future deforestation on the stream flow of the Amazon River: Land surface processes and atmospheric feedbacks. Journal of Hydrology 369, no. 1–2: 165–174.
  • Coe, M., T. Marthews, et al. 2013. Deforestation and climate feedbacks threaten the ecological integrity of south-southeastern Amazonia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 368, no. 1619: 20120155.
  • Cotacora-Vargas, G., P. Galeano, S. Agapito-Tenfen, D. Aranda, T. Palau, and R. Nodari. 2012. Soybean production in the Southern Cone of the Americas: Update on land and pesticide use. Tromso, Norway: Center for Biosafety–GenOk.
  • Cotacora-Vargas, G. 2014. Sustainability assessment of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops: the case of Intacta Roundup Ready 2 Pro soybean farming in Brazil in light of the Norwegian Gene Technology Act. Biosafety Report 2014/02. Tromso, Norway: Center for Biosafety–GenOk.
  • Deegan, L., C. Neill, M. Victoria R. Ballester, Alex V. Krusche, Reynaldo L. Victoria, Suzanne M. Thomas , and E. de Moor . 2011. Amazon deforestation alters small stream structure, nitrogen biogeochemistry and connectivity to larger rivers. Biogeochemistry 105, no. 1–3: 53–74.
  • DeFries, R., M. Herold, M. N. Macedo, and Y. Shimabukuro. 2013. Export-oriented deforestation in Mato Grosso: harbinger or exception for other tropical forests? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 368, no. 1619: 20120173.
  • DeFries, R., T. Rudel, and M. Hansen. 2010. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience 3, no. 3: 178–181.
  • Desconsi, C. 2011. A Marcha dos ‘Pequenos Proprietários Rurais’: trajetórias de migrantes do Sul do Brasil para o Mato Grosso. (The march of the ‘small rural landowners’: Trajectories of southern Brazilian migrants to Mato Grosso.) Rio de Janeiro: E-papers.
  • EcoNexus and Berne Declaration. 2013. Agropoly: A handful of corporations control world food production. Oxford: Berne Declaration & EcoNexus. Available at: http://econexus.info/publication/agropoly-handful-corporations-control-world-food-production [Accessed August 29, 2014].
  • Edwards, D., J. Gilroy, et al. 2015. Land-sparing agriculture best protects avial phylogenetic diversity. Current Biology 25, no. 18: 2384–2391.
  • Fairbairn, M. 2014. ‘Like gold with yield': evolving intersections between farmland and finance. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 777–795.
  • Fairbairn, M., J. Fox, et al. 2014. Introductions: New directions in agrarian political economy. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 653–666.
  • Fajardo, S. 2005. As cooperativas paranaenses e o novo padrão de desenvolvimento agroindustrial. (The cooperatives from Paraná and the new standard of agroindustrial development). Formação 12, no. 1: 165–192.
  • Fearnside, P. 2007. Brazil's Cuiabá-Santarém (BR-163) Highway: The environmental cost of paving a soybean corridor through the Amazon. Environmental Management 39, no. 5: 601–614.
  • Fearnside, P., A. Figueiredo, and S. C. M. Bonjour. 2013. Amazonian forest loss and the long reach of China's influence. Environment Development and Sustainability 15, no. 2: 325–338.
  • Ferro, S. 2013. Gènero y Propiedad Rural en la Repùblica Argentina. (Gender and rural property in the Republic of Argentina.) 2. ed. Buenos Aires: UCAR-MAGyP.
  • Foster, J. B. 2000. Marx's ecology: Materialism and nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  • Gardner, B. 2009. Are livestock a troublesome commodity? Geoforum 40, no. 5: 781–783.
  • Garrett, R., E. Lambin, and R. L. Naylor. 2013. Land institutions and supply chain configurations as determinants of soybean planted area and yields in Brazil. Land Use Policy 31: 385–396.
  • Gasparri, N., H. Grau, and L. Valeria Sacchi. 2015. Determinants of the spatial distribution of cultivated land in the North Argentine Dry Chaco in a multi-decadal study. Journal of Arid Environments 123: 31–39.
  • Gibbs, H., A. Ruesch, M. K. Clayton, P. Holmgren, N. Ramankutty , and J. A. Foley 2010. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, no. 38: 16732–16737.
  • Goldsmith, P., B. Li, J. Fruin, and R. Hirsch. 2004. Global shifts in agro-industrial capital and the case of soybean crushing: implications for managers and policy makers. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 7, no. 2: 87–115.
  • Gonçalves, K., A. Siqueira, and S. de Souza Hacon. 2014. Indicator of socio-environmental vulnerability in the Western Amazon. The case of the city of Porto Velho, State of Rondonia, Brazil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 19, no. 9: 3809–3818.
  • Goodman, D., B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson. 1987. From farming to biotechnology: A theory of agro-industrial development. New York: Basil Blackwell.
  • Gordillo, G. 2014. Rubble. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Graesser, J., T. Aide, and N. Ramankutty. 2015. Cropland/pastureland dynamics and the slowdown of deforestation in Latin America. Environmental Research Letters 10, no. 3: 034017.
  • Grain. 2013. The United Republic of Soybeans: Take two. Against the Grain, June. Barcelona: Grain.
  • Grandin, G. 2009. Fordlandia. New York: Metropolitan.
  • Grau, H., R. Torres, Pedro G. Blendinger, Sofía Marinaro, and L. Macchi. 2015. Natural grasslands in the Chaco: A neglected ecosystem under threat by agriculture expansion and forest-oriented conservation policies. Journal of Arid Environments 123: 40–46.
  • Grau, R., T. Kuemmerle, and L. Macchi. 2013. Beyond ‘land sparing versus land sharing': environmental heterogeneity, globalization and the balance between agricultural production and nature conservation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5, no. 5: 477–483.
  • Grupo de Reflexión Rural (GRR). 2009. Pueblos Fumigados: Informe sobre la problemática del uso de plaguicidas en las principales provincias sojeras de la Argentina. Fumigated Peoples: Report on the problem of pesticide use in the main soy-producing provinces of Argentina. Available at: www.grr.org.ar/trabajos/Pueblos_Fumigados__GRR_.pdf
  • Gudynas, E. 2008. The new bonfire of vanities: soybean cultivation and globalization in South America. Development 51, no. 4: 512–518.
  • Guyton, K., D. Loomis, et al. 2015. Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate. Lancet Oncology 16, no. 5: 490–491.
  • Haslberger, A. 2006. Need for an ‘integrated safety assessment’ of GMOs, linking food safety and environmental considerations. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54, no. 9: 3173–3180.
  • Hecht, S.B. 1985. Environment, Development and Politics - Capital Accumulation and the Livestock Sector in Eastern Amazonia. World Development 13, no. 6: 663–684.
  • Hecht, S.B. 2005. Soybeans, development and conservation on the Amazon frontier. Development and Change 36, no. 2: 375–404.
  • Hecht, S.B. 2012. From eco-catastrophe to zero deforestation? Interdisciplinarities, politics, environmentalisms and reduced clearing in Amazonia. Environmental Conservation 39, no. 1: 4–19.
  • Hecht, S.B., and A. Cockburn. 1989. The fate of the forest: Developers, destroyers, and defenders of the Amazon. New York: Verso.
  • Hecht, S.B., and C. Mann. 2008. How Brazil outfarmed the Americans. Fortune 157, no. 1: 92–106.
  • High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE). 2011. Price volatility and food security. Report to the Committee on World Food Security of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome: CFS/FAO.
  • HighQuest Partners and Soyatech. 2011. How the global oilseed and grain trade works. St. Louis, MO: United Soybean Board/US Soybean Export Council.
  • Hoelle, J. 2014. Cattle culture in the Brazilian Amazon. Human Organization 73, no. 4: 363–374.
  • Isakson, S. R. 2014. Food and finance: The financial transformation of agro-food supply chains. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5): 749–775.
  • Jepson, W. 2005. A disappearing biome? Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna. Geographical Journal 171: 99–111.
  • Jepson, W., C. Brannstrom and R. Stancato. 2005. A Case of Contested Ecological Modernization: Governance of Genetically Modified Crops in Brazil. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23: 295–310.
  • Jepson, W., C. Brannstrom, et al. 2010. Access regimes and regional land change in the Brazilian Cerrado, 1972–2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100, no. 1: 87–111.
  • Klink, C., and R. Machado. 2005. Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Biology 19, no. 3: 707–713.
  • Larson, A. 2011. Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: Lessons for REDD+. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 21, no. 2: 540–549.
  • Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Laurance, W., A. Albernaz, et al. 2004. Deforestation in Amazonia. Science 304, no. 5674: 1109–1109.
  • Laurance, W., D. Useche, et al. 2012. Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489, no. 7415: 290–294.
  • Macchi, L., H. Grau, and S. Marinaro. 2013. Trade-offs between land use intensity and avian biodiversity in the dry Chaco of Argentina: A tale of two gradients. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 174, no. 0: 11–20.
  • Macedo, M., M. Coe, et al. 2013. Land-use-driven stream warming in southeastern Amazonia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 368, no. 1619: 20120153–20120153.
  • Macedo, M., R. DeFries, C. M. Stickler, G. L. Galford, and Y. E. Shimabukuro 2012. Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, no. 4: 1341–1346.
  • Malhi, Y., L. Aragão, et al. 2009. Exploring the likelihood and mechanism of a climate-change-induced dieback of the Amazon rainforest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, no. 49: 20610–20615.
  • Mann, M., R. Kaufmann, et al. 2010. The economics of cropland conversion in Amazonia: The importance of agricultural rent. Ecological Economics 69, no. 7: 1503–1509.
  • Marinaro, S., H. Grau, and P.V. Zelaya. 2015. Land tenure and biological communities in dry Chaco forests of northern Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 123: 60–67.
  • Marc, J., R. Belle, et al. 2004. Formulated glyphosate activates the DNA-response checkpoint of the cell cycle leading to the prevention of G2/M transition. Toxicological Sciences 82, no. 2: 436–442.
  • Marsik, M., F. Stevens, et al. 2011. Amazon deforestation: Rates and patterns of land cover change and fragmentation in Pando, northern Bolivia, 1986 to 2005. Progress in Physical Geography 35, no. 3: 353–374.
  • Mazoyer, M., and L. Roudart. 2006. A history of world agriculture: from the neolithic age to the current crisis. New York: Monthly Review.
  • McMichael, P. 2012. The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3–4: 681–701.
  • Meyfroidt, P., K. Carlson, et al. 2014. Multiple pathways of commodity crop expansion in tropical forest landscapes. Environmental Research Letters 9, no. 7: 1–13.
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Land of the Bolivarian Government of Venezuela. 2015. Plan nacional de agricultura de riego y saneamiento de tierras. (National Plan for Irrigated Agriculture and Land Reclamation.) Caracas: MPPAT/National Institute for Rural Development.
  • Miranda, H. 2012. The expansion of agriculture and its relationship with the urbanization process in the Northeast Region of Brazil (1990–2010). Eure-Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Urbano Regionales 38, no. 114: 173–201.
  • Moreira, P., W. Pignati, et al. 2010. Avaliação do risco à saúde humana decorrente do uso de agrotóxicos na agricultura e pecuária na região Centro-Oeste do Brasil. (Evaluation of risk to human health due to agrotoxic use in agriculture and ranching in the Center-West region of Brazil.) Report 555193/2006–3, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. Brasília: CNPq.
  • Morgan, D. 2000 [1979]. Merchants of Grain: the power and profits of the five giant companies at the center of the world's food supply. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.
  • Morton, D., R. Defries, L. Giglio, W. Schroeder, and G. R. Van Der Werf. 2008. Agricultural intensification increases deforestation fire activity in Amazonia. Global Change Biology 14, no. 10: 2262–2275.
  • Murphy, S., D. Burch, and J. Clapp. 2012. Cereal secrets: the world's largest grain traders and global agriculture. Oxfam Research Report. Oxford: Oxfam.
  • Neill, C., M. Coe, et al. 2013. Watershed responses to Amazon soya bean cropland expansion and intensification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368, no. 1619: 20120425–20120425.
  • Nepstad, D., S. Irawan, et al. 2013. More food, more forests, fewer emissions, better livelihoods: linking REDD plus, sustainable supply chains and domestic policy in Brazil, Indonesia and Colombia. Carbon Management 4, no. 6: 639–658.
  • Nepstad, D., D. McGrath, et al. 2014. Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 344, no. 6188: 1118–1123.
  • Nepstad, D., S. Schwartzman, et al. 2006a. Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conservation Biology 20, no. 1: 65–73.
  • Nepstad, D., B. Soares, et al. 2009. The End of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 326, no. 5958: 1350–1351.
  • Nepstad, D., C. Stickler, and O. T. Almeida. 2006b. Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: Opportunities for conservation. Conservation Biology 20, no. 6: 1595–1603.
  • Newton, P., A. Agrawal, and L. Wollenberg. 2013. Enhancing the sustainability of commodity supply chains in tropical forest and agricultural landscapes. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 23, no. 6: 1761–1772.
  • Nicholls, C., and M. Altieri. 1997. Conventional agricultural development models and the persistence of the pesticide treadmill in Latin America. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 4, no. 2: 93–111.
  • Nobre, P., M. Malagutti, D. Urbano, R. de Almeida, and E. Giarolla. 2009. Amazon deforestation and climate change in a coupled model simulation. Journal of Climate, 22, no. 21: 5686–5697.
  • Oliveira, G. de L. T. 2010. Prescrições agroecológicas para a crise atual (Agroecological prescriptions for the current crisis). Revista NERA 13, no. 16: 33–47.
  • Oliveira, G. de L. T., and M. Schneider. 2015. The politics of flexing soybeans: China, Brazil, and global agroindustrial restructuring. The Journal of Peasant Studies 43, no. 1: 167–194.
  • Oliveira, N., G. Moi, Ageo Mário Candido Silva, and Wanderlei Antônio Pignati. 2014. Malformações congênitas em municípios de grande utilização de agrotóxicos em Mato Grosso, Brasil. (Birth defects in municipalities with intensive use of agrotoxins in Mato Grosso, Brazil). Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 19, no. 10: 4123–4130.
  • Oliveira, L., M. Costa, and M. T. Coe. 2013. Large-scale expansion of agriculture in Amazonia may be a no-win scenario. Environmental Research Letters 8, no. 2: 024021.
  • Oyhantçabal, G., and I. Narbondo. 2011. Radiografía del agronegocio sojero: Descripción de los principals actors y los impactos socio-econónicos en Uruguay. (Radiography of the soybean agribusiness: Description of the main actors and socio-economic impacts in Uruguay.) Montevideo: REDES-AT.
  • Pacheco, P. 2006. Agricultural expansion and deforestation in lowland Bolivia: The import substitution versus the structural adjustment model. Land Use Policy 23, no. 3: 205–225.
  • Paganelli, A., V. Gnazzo, Silvia L. López, and A. E. Carrasco. 2010. Glyphosate-based herbicides produce teratogenic effects on vertebrates by impairing retinoic acid signaling. Chemical Research in Toxicology 23, no. 10: 1586–1595.
  • Palma, D., C. Lourencetti, et al. 2014. Simultaneous determination of different classes of pesticides in breast milk by solid-phase dispersion and GC/EDC. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 25, no. 8: 1419–1430.
  • Patel, R. 2013. The long green revolution. Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 1: 1–63.
  • Peres, C., and B. Zimmerman. 2001. Perils in parks or parks in peril? Reconciling conservation in Amazonian reserves with and without use. Conservation Biology 15, no. 3: 793–797.
  • Perfecto, I., J. Vandermeer, and A. Wright. 2009. Nature's matrix: Linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. London: Earthscan.
  • Perfecto, I., and J. Vandermeer. 2010. The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, no. 13: 5786–5791.
  • Pfaff, A., and R. Walker. 2010. Regional interdependence and forest “transitions”: Substitute deforestation limits the relevance of local reversals. Land Use Policy 27, no. 2: 119–129.
  • Pinto-Ledezma, J., and M. Mamani. 2014. Temporal patterns of deforestation and fragmentation in lowland Bolivia: implications for climate change. Climatic Change 127, no. 1: 43–54.
  • Porro, R. 2005. Palms, Pastures, and Swidden Fields: The Grounded Political Ecology of ?Agro-Extractive/Shifting-cultivator Peasants? in Maranhão, Brazil. Human Ecology 33, no. 1: 17–56.
  • Porto, M. and B. Milanez. 2009. Economic development axis and socio-environmental conflict generation in Brazil: Challenges to sustainability and environmental justice. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 14, no. 6: 1983–1994.
  • Redo, D. 2012. Mapping land-use and land-cover change along Bolivia's Corredor Bioceanico with CBERS and the Landsat series: 1975–2008. International Journal of Remote Sensing 33, no. 6: 1881–1904.
  • Redo, D., A. Millington, and D. Hindery. 2011. Deforestation dynamics and policy changes in Bolivia's post-neoliberal era. Land Use Policy 28, no. 1: 227–241.
  • Richard, S., S. Moslemi, Nora Benachour, and Gilles-Eric Seralini. 2005. Differential effects of glyphosate and roundup on human placental cells and aromatase. Environmental Health Perspectives 113: 716–720.
  • Richards, D. 2010. Contradictions of the ‘New Green Revolution': A view from South America's Southern Cone. Globalizations 7, no. 4: 563–576.
  • Richards, P. 2015. What drives indirect land use change? How Brazil's agriculture sector influences frontier deforestation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105, no. 5: 1026–1040.
  • Richards, P., H. Pellegrina, and S. Spera. 2015. Soybean development: The impact of a decade of agricultural change on urban and economic growth in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Plos One 10, no. 4: 0122510.
  • Richards, P., and L. VanWey. 2015. Where Deforestation Leads to Urbanization: How Resource Extraction Is Leading to Urban Growth in the Brazilian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105, no. 4: 806–823.
  • Richards, P. 2011. Soy, cotton, and the final Atlantic forest frontier. Professional Geographer 63, no. 3: 343–363.
  • Richards, P., R. Myers, R. T. Walker. 2012. Exchange rates, soybean supply response, and deforestation in South America. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 22, no. 2: 454–462.
  • Richards, P., R. Walker, and E. Y. Arima. 2014. Spatially complex land change: The Indirect effect of Brazil's agricultural sector on land use in Amazonia. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 29: 1–9.
  • Rodrigues, A., R. Ewers, C. Souza, A. Verissimo, and A. Balmford. 2009. Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science 324, no. 5933: 1435–1437.
  • Rudel, T., L. Schneider, et al. 2009. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970–2005. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, no. 49: 20675–20680.
  • Rulli, J. 2007. The refugees of the agroexport model. In United Soya Republics: The truth about soya production in South America, ed. J. Rulli. Buenos Aires: Grupo de Reflexión Rural, pp. 193–216.
  • Rumstain, A. 2012. Peões no trecho: trajetórias e estratégias de mobilidade no Mato Grosso. (Farmhands on the road: Trajectories and mobility strategies in Mato Grosso.) Rio de Janeiro: E-papers.
  • Santos, J., I. Leal, et al. 2011. Caatinga: the scientific negligence experienced by a dry tropical forest. Tropical Conservation Science 4, no. 3: 276–286.
  • Sauer, S., and S. Leite. 2012. Agrarian structure, foreign investment in land, and land prices in Brazil. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3–4: 873–898.
  • Sawyer, D. 2008. Climate change, biofuels and eco-social impacts in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363, no. 1498: 1747–1752.
  • Schiesari, L. A. Waichman, et al. 2013. Pesticide use and biodiversity conservation in the amazonian agricultural frontier. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368, no. 20120378: 1–9.
  • Scott, J. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Schmink, M., and C. Wood. 1992. Contested frontiers in Amazonia. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Schneider, M. 2014. Developing the meat grab. Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 4: 613–633.
  • Schneider, M., and P. McMichael. 2010. Deepening, and repairing, the metabolic rift. Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 3: 461–484.
  • Schulz, C., A. Ioris, and K. Glenk. 2015. Prospects for payments for ecosystem services in the Brazilian pantanal: A scenario analysis. Journal of Environment & Development 24, no. 1: 26–53.
  • Shurtleff, W., and A. Aoyagi. 2009. History of soybeans and soyfoods in South America (1882–2009): Extensively annotated bibliography and sourcebook. Lafayette, CA: Soyinfo Center.
  • Silva, M., and L. Costa. 2012. A indústria de defensivos agrícolas (The pesticide and herbicide industry). BNDES Setorial 35: 233–276.
  • Silva, J., A. Silva, Ricardo Dutra Aydos, and Inês Echenique Mattos 2015a. Correlação entre produção agrícola, variáveis clínicas-demográfcas e câncer de próstata: um estudo ecológico. (Correlation between agricultural production, clinical-demography variables, and prostate cancer: an ecological study). Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 20, no. 9: 2805–2812.
  • Silva, C., K. Sousa, et al. 2015b. Biodiversity and its drivers and pressures of change in the wetlands of the Upper Paraguay-Guapore Ecotone, Mato Grosso (Brazil). Land Use Policy 47: 163–178.
  • Smil, V. 2001. Feeding the world: A challenge for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Soares-Filho, B., R. Silvestrini, Paulo Brando, Hermann Rodrigues, Ane Alencar, Michael Coe, Charton Locks, Letícia Lima, Letícia Hissa, and C. Stickler. 2012. Forest fragmentation, climate change and understory fire regimes on the Amazonian landscapes of the Xingu headwaters. Landscape Ecology 27, no. 4: 585–598.
  • Soares-Filho, B., R. Rajão, M. Macedo, A. Carneiro, W. Costa, M. Coe, H. Rodrigues, and A. Alencar. 2014. Cracking Brazil's Forest Code. Science 344, no. 6182: 363–364.
  • Sousa, I., and L. Busch. 2006. Standards and state-building: The construction of soybean standards in Brazil. In Agricultural standards: The shape of the global food and fiber system, ed. J. Bingen and L. Busch, Dordrecht, Netherlands: pp. 125–135.
  • Sorj, B., M. Pompermayer, et al. 2008. Camponeses e agroindústria: Transformação social e representação política na avicultura brasileira. (Peasants and agroindustry: Social transformation and political representation in Brazilian poultry production). Rio de Janeiro: Scielo/Centro Edelstein de Pesquisas Sociais.
  • Steinfeld, H., P. Gerber, et al. 2006. Livestock's long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: FAO.
  • Steininger, M., C. Tucker, Timothy J. Killeen, Arthur Desch, Vivre Bell, and Peter Ersts. 2001. Tropical deforestation in the Bolivian Amazon. Environmental Conservation 28, no. 2: 127–134.
  • Stickler, C., D. Nepstad, and D. G. McGrath. 2013. Defending public interests in private lands: compliance, costs and potential environmental consequences of the Brazilian Forest Code in Mato Grosso. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 368, no. 1619: 20120160.
  • Swann, A., M. Longo, Lee, Eunjee, and Moorcroft, Paul R. 2015. Future deforestation in the Amazon and consequences for South American climate. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 214-215: 12–24.
  • Tsing, A. 2005. Friciton: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Turzi, M. 2011. The soybean republic. Yale Journal of International Affaris, 6, no. 2: 59–68.
  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2015. World Agricultural Production. Circular Series WAP 12-15. Washington, DC: USDA/FAS.
  • Urcola, H., X. de Sartre, Elverdin, Julio, and A. Christophe. 2015. Land tenancy, soybean, actors and transformations in the pampas: A district balance. Journal of Rural Studies 39: 32–40.
  • Vallejos, M., J. Volante, Laura M. Vale, M. Laura Bustamante, and J. Paruelo. 2015. Transformation dynamics of the natural cover in the Dry Chaco ecoregion: A plot level geo-database from 1976 to 2012. Journal of Arid Environments 123: 3–11.
  • VanBeek, K., J. Brawn, and M. P. Ward. 2014. Does no-till soybean farming provide any benefits for birds? Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 185: 59–64.
  • VanWey, L., and P. Richards. 2014. Eco-certification and greening the Brazilian soy and corn supply chains. Environmental Research Letters 9, no. 3.
  • VanWey, L., S. Spera, et al. 2013. Socioeconomic development and agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 368, no. 1619: 20120168.
  • Volante, J., and J. Paruelo. 2015. Is forest or Ecological Transition taking place? Evidence for the Semiarid Chaco in Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 123: 21–30.
  • Walker, R., J. Browder, Cynthia Simmons, Ritaumaria Pereira, Marcellus Caldas, Ricardo Shirota, Sergio de Zen. 2009a. Ranching and the new global range: Amazonia in the 21st century. Geoforum 40, no. 5: 732–745.
  • Walker, R., R. DeFries, et al. 2009b. The expansion of intensive agriculture and ranching in Brazilian Amazonia. In Amazonia and Global Change, ed. M. Keller, M. Bustamante, et al., Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, pp. 61–81.
  • Weinhold, D., E. Killick, and E. J. Reis. 2013. Soybeans, poverty and inequality in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development 52: 132–143.
  • Weis, T. 2010. The accelerating biophysical contradictions of industrial capitalist agriculture. Journal of Agrarian Change 10, no. 3: 315–341.
  • Weis, T. 2013a. The ecological hoofprint: The global burden of industrial livestock. London: Zed Books.
  • Weis, T. 2013b. The meat of the global food crisis. Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 1: 65–85.
  • Wolford, W. 2008. Environmental Justice and the construction of scale in Brazilian agriculture. Society & Natural Resources 21, no. 7: 641–655.
  • World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). 2014. The growth of soy: Impacts and solutions. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International.
  • Zhang, K., A. Castanho, et al. 2015. The fate of Amazonian ecosystems over the coming century arising from changes in climate, atmospheric CO2, and land use. Global Change Biology 21, no. 7: 2569–2587.
  • Zhouri, A. 2010. Adverse forces in the Brazilian Amazon: Developmentalism versus environmentalism and indigenous rights. Journal of Environment and Development 19, no. 3: 252–273.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.