State–peasant movement relations and the politics of food sovereignty in Mexico and Ecuador

References

• Agarwal, B. 2014. Food sovereignty, food security and democratic choice: Critical contradictions, difficult conciliations. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 1247–68. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.876996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Fradejas, A., S.M. Borras, T. Holmes, E. Holt-Giménez, and M.J. Robbins. 2015. Food sovereignty: Convergence and contradictions, conditions and challenges. Third World Quarterly 36, no. 3: 431–48. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1023567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvaro, M. 2015. Ecuador’s oil export revenue falls 44% in January [online]. The Wall Street Journal, March 6. http://www.wsj.com/articles/ecuadors-oil-export-revenue-falls-44-in-january-1425661953 (accessed March 17, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Bartra, A. 2001. Sur: Megaplanes y utopías en la América equinoccial. In Mesoamérica: Los Ríos Profundos, ed. A. Bartra, 1–71. México: El Atajo.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. 2011. Correa, indigenous movements, and the writing of a new constitution in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives 38, no. 1: 47–62. doi: 10.1177/0094582X10384209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2014. Food sovereignty via the ‘peasant way’: A sceptical view. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 1031–63. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.852082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretón, V. 2008. From agrarian reform to ethnodevelopment in the highlands of Ecuador. Journal of Agrarian Change 8, no. 4: 583–617. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretón, V. 2013. Toacazo. En Los Andes Equinocciales tras la Reforma Agraria. Quito: FLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, K., and S. Murphy. 2014. What place for international trade in food sovereignty? The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 1065–84. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.876995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrion, D., and S. Herrera. 2012. Ecuador rural del siglo XXI: soberanía alimentaria, inversión pública y política agraria. Quito: Instituto de Estudios Ecuatorianas.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W.K., and R.S. Ratner. 2010. Social movements and counter-hegemony: Lessons from the field. New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry 4, no. 1: 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Celis, F. 2005. Debate sobre el campo El movimiento que no aguantó más [online]. http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2005/04/03/mas-celis.html (accessed August 1, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Chartock, S. 2013. “Corporatism with adjectives”? Conceptualizing civil society incorporation and indigenous participation in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 55, no. 2: 52–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00193.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, P. 2015. Can the state foster food sovereignty? Insights from the case of Ecuador. Journal of Agrarian Change. doi:10.1111/joac.12094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COPISA. 2011. Propuesta: Ley orgánica de tierras y Territorios (versión final) [online]. http://www.soberaniaalimentaria.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/PROPUESTA-FINAL-DE-LEY-DE-TIERRAS-Y-TERRITORIOS-DE-LA-COPISA-01-12-11.pdf (accessed August 2, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• COPISA. 2014. Quiénes somos: Conferencia Plurinacional e Intercultural de Soberanía Alimentaria [online]. http://www.soberaniaalimentaria.gob.ec/?page_id=1863 (accessed August 2, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Coronel, A.V. 2011. A revolution in stages: Subaltern politics, nation-state formation, and the origins of social rights in Ecuador, 1834–1943. PhD Dissertation, Department of History, New York University, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, C. 2010. El gobierno de Rafael Correa: posneoliberalismo, confrontación con los movimientos sociales y democracia plebiscitaria. Revista temas y debates 20: 157–72.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, A. 2007. La Vía Campesina. London: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1999. Peasants against globalisation: Rural social movements in Costa Rica. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 2014. Food sovereignty: Forgotten genealogies and future regulatory challenges. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 959–78. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.876998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and S.M. Borras. 2016. Political dynamics of transnational agrarian movements. Warwickshire: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• FENOCIN. 1999. FENOCIN Hacia el Nuevo Milenio. Tierra, Desarrollo, Identidad, Vida. Ecuador: FENOCIN.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 1992. Democratic rural development: Leadership accountability in regional peasant organizations. Development and Change 23, no. 2: 1–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1992.tb00444.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 1993. The politics of food in Mexico: State power and social mobilisation. London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., and L. Haight. 2010. Mexican agricultural policy: Multiple goals and conflicting interests. In Subsidizing inequality: Mexican corn policy since NAFTA, eds. J. Fox and L. Haight, 9–50. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Giunta, I. 2014. Food sovereignty in Ecuador: Peasant struggles and the challenge of institutionalization. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 1201–24. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.938057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godek, W. 2015. Challenges for food sovereignty policy making: The case of Nicaragua’s Law 693. Third World Quarterly 36, no. 3: 526–43. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1005437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grammont, H., and H. Mackinlay. 2006. Las organizaciones sociales y la transición política en el campo mexicano. In La construcción de la democracia en el campo latinoamericano, ed. H. Grammont, 23–68. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 2007. Selection from the prison notebooks, Trans. and eds. Q. Hoare and G.N. Smith. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, T. 2016. The class dynamics of food sovereignty in Mexico and Ecuador. Journal of Agrarian Change. doi:10.1111/joac.12156.
   Google Scholar
• Holt-Giménez, E., and A. Shattuck. 2011. Food crises, food regimes and food movements: Rumblings of reform or tides of transformation? Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 1: 109–44. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.538578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNL. 2015. NGO law moniror: Ecuador [online]. http://www.icnl.org/research/monitor/ecuador.html (accessed March 16, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Mackinlay, H., and G. Otero. 2004. State corporatism and peasant organizations: Towards new institutional arrangements. In Mexico in transition: Neoliberal globalism, the state and civil society, ed. G. Otero, 72–88. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mallon, F.E. 1994. Reflections on the Ruins: Everyday forms of state formation in nineteenth-century Mexico. In Everyday forms of state formation: Revolution and the negotiation of rule in modern Mexico, eds. G.M. Joseph and D. Nugent, 69–106. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, B., R. Nehring, and M. Walsh-Dilley. 2014. The ‘State’ of food sovereignty in Latin America: political projects and alternative pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 1175–200. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.964217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2006. Peasant prospects in the neoliberal age. New Political Economy11, no. 3: 407–18. doi: 10.1080/13563460600841041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2008. Peasants make their own history, but not just as they please … . Journal of Agrarian Change 8, no. 2 and 3: 205–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino, M. 2010. Los programas de subsidios al campo: las razones y las sinrazones de una política mal diseñada. In Subsidizing inequality: Mexican corn policy since NAFTA, eds. J. Fox and L. Haight, 55–72. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Moguel, J. 1992. Crisis del capital y reorganización productiva en el medio rural. In Autonomía y nuevos sujetos sociales en el desarrollo rural, coordinators. J. Moguel, C. Botey, and L. Hernández, 15–24. México: Siglo XXI/CEHAM.
   Google Scholar
• Novo, C.M. 2010. ‘The citizen’s revolution’ and the indigenous movement in Ecuador: Re-centring the Ecuadorian state at the expense of social movements. Quito: FLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, G. 2004. ¿Adiós al Campesinado? Democracia y formación política de las clases en el México rural. Mexico: Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R. 2009. Food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 3: 663–706. doi: 10.1080/03066150903143079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, K. 2015. Social movements, the state, and the making of food sovereignty in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives XX, no. XXX: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ploeg, J. D. 2008. The new peasantries. Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalisation. London: earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 2002. The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Political Database of the Americas. 2011. Constitution of the republic of Ecuador [online]. http://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/Ecuador/english08.html (accessed August 2, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Puricelli, S. 2008. Contradicciones y aportes del movimiento El Campo No Aguanta Más (2002–2004). In Desafíos de la Sociedad Rural al Despuntar el Siglo XXI. Economia y Politica, ed. I.L. Acosta Reveles, 103–29. Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, R., and S. Kozameh. 2012. Ecuador’s economy since 2007 [online]. Center for Economic and Policy Research. http://www.proecuador.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ecuador-2012-05.pdf (accessed April 11, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, M.J. 2015. Exploring the ‘localisation’ dimension of food sovereignty. Third World Quarterly 36, no. 3: 449–68. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1024966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodarte, O.A. 2003. Towards an equitable, inclusive, and sustainable agriculture: Mexico’s basic grains producers unite. In Confronting globalisation – economic integration and popular resistance in Mexico, eds. T. Wise, H. Salazar, and L. Carlsen, 129–48. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. 2011. Food sovereignty and alternative paradigms to confront land grabbing and the food and climate crises. Development 54, no. 1: 21–30. doi: 10.1057/dev.2010.102
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P., and M.E. Martinez-Torres. 2012. Rural social movements and agroecology: Context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society 17, no. 3: 17. Art. doi:10.5751/ES-05000-170317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, B. 2004. ¡El campo no aguanta mas! A un ano de distancia. El Cotidiano 19, no. 124: 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• SAGARPA. 2003. Acuerdo Nacional Para el Campo [online]. http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/desarrolloRural/Publicaciones/Lists/Documentos20de20inters/Attachments/16/anc.pdf (accessed June 17, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Schiavoni, C.M. 2015. Competing sovereignties, contested processes: Insights from the Venezuelan food sovereignty experiment. Globalizations 12, no. 4: 466–80. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2015.1005967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2010. Agricultural subsidies in Mexico: Who gets what? In Subsidizing inequality: Mexican corn policy since NAFTA, eds. J. Fox and L. Haight, 67–118. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck, A., C.M. Schiavoni, and Z. VanGelder. 2015. Translating the politics of food sovereignty: Digging into contradictions, uncovering new dimensions. Globalizations 12, no. 4: 421–33. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2015.1041243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, E. 2009. Challenging neoliberalism in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subsidios al Campo en México. 2016. http://subsidiosalcampo.org.mx/.
   Google Scholar
• Terán, R.M. 2010. Centenario de la Revolución Mexicana: contexto y reseña histórica de las organizaciones campesinas nacionales. México, DF: CIOAC.
   Google Scholar
• Teubal, M. 2010. Peasant struggles for land and Agrarian reform in Latin America. In Peasants and globalisation. Political economy, rural transformation and the agrarian question, eds. A.H. Akram-Lodhi and C. Kay, 148–66. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. 2016. [online]. http://www.tradingeconomics.com/ecuador/wages (accessed March 16, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Trauger, A. 2014. Toward a political geography of food sovereignty: Transforming territory, exchange and power in the liberal sovereign state. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 1131–52. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.937339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo, J.L. 2010. Las organisaciones indígenas y el gobierno de Rafael Correa. FLACSO Ecuador Revista de Ciencias Sociales 37: 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Villafuerte, D. 2002. La tierra en Chiapas: viejas problemas nuevos. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2014. Ecuador overview [online]. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/ecuador/overview (accessed April 11, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Zamosc, L. 1994. Agrarian protest and the Indian movement in the Ecuadorian highlands. Latin American Research Review 29, no. 3: 37–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar