Alternatives to land grabbing: exploring conditions for smallholder inclusion in agricultural commodity chains in Southeast Asia

References

• Allen, D.W., and D. Lueck. 1998. The nature of the farm. The Journal of Law and Economics 41, no. 2: 343–86. doi: 10.1086/467393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, I.G. 2010. Land, rubber and people: Rapid agrarian changes and responses in Southern Laos. Journal of Lao Studies 1: 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, I.G., and J. Fox. 2015. How land concessions affect places elsewhere: Teleconnections and large-scale plantations in southern Laos and northeastern Cambodia. Paper presented to Conference on Land Grabbing, Conflict and Agrarian-Environmental Transformations: Perspectives from East and Southeast Asia, June 5–6, Chiang Mai University.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, C. 1978. The natural rubber industry: Its development, technology, and economy in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, C. 1986. Oil palm as a smallholder crop. Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia (PORIM), Ooccasional Paper No. 21. Kuala Lumpur: PORIM.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, C., and S. Jayasuriya. 1984. Problems of investment for technological advance: The case of Indonesian rubber smallholders. Journal of Agricultural Economics 35: 85–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1984.tb01179.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, C., and T. Tomich. 1991. Indonesian agricultural development: The awkward case of smallholder tree crops. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 27, no. 3: 29–53. doi: 10.1080/00074919112331336068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2010. Class dynamics of agrarian change. Halifax: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M. Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2011. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 209–16. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byerlee, D. 2013. Are we learning from history? In The global farms race: Land grabs, agricultural investment, and the scramble for food security, ed. M. Kugelman and S.L. Levenstein, 21–44. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byerlee, D. 2014. The fall and rise again of plantations in tropical Asia: History repeated? Land 3: 574–97. doi: 10.3390/land3030574
   Google Scholar
• Byerlee, D., and S. Haggblade. 2014. African food systems to 2030: Towards inclusive business models for provisioning Africa. In Frontiers in food policy: Perspectives on sub-Saharan Africa, ed. R.L. Naylor and W.P. Falcon, 509–33. Palo Alto, CA: Centre on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Byerlee, D., D. Kyaw, U.S. Thein, and L.S. Kham. 2014. Agribusiness models for inclusive growth in Myanmar: Diagnosis and ways forward. MSU International Development Working Paper 133. East Lansing: Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Byerlee, D., W.A. Masters, and D. Robinson. 2015. From land grab to land development: The past and potential of private investment in frontier agriculture. Paper prepared for the 2015 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, March 23–27, in Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Chambon, B., Ruf, F., Kongmanee, C., and Angthong, S. 2016. Can the cocoa cycle model explain the continuous growth of the rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) sector for more than a century in Thailand? Journal of Rural Studies 44: 187–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chayanov, A.V. [1966] 1925. The theory of peasant economy. Ed. Daniel Thorner, Basile Kerblay, and R.E.F. Smith. Homewood: Richard Irwin (American Economic Association).
   Google Scholar
• Cramb, R.A. 2011. Reinventing dualism: Policy narratives and modes of oil palm expansion in Sarawak, Malaysia. Journal of Development Studies 47: 274–93. doi: 10.1080/00220380903428381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramb, R.A. 2013a. A Malaysian land grab? The political economy of large-scale oil palm development in sarawak. LDPI Working Paper 50. The Hague: Land Deal Politics Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Cramb, R.A. 2013b. Palmed off: Incentive problems in joint-venture schemes for oil palm development on customary land in Sarawak, Malaysia. World Development 43: 84–99. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramb, R.A. 2016. The political economy of large-scale oil palm development in Sarawak. In The oil palm complex: Smallholders, agribusiness and the state in Indonesia and Malaysia, ed. R. Cramb and J.F. McCarthy, 189–246. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cramb, R.A., and G.N. Curry. 2012. Oil palm and rural livelihoods in the Asia-Pacific region: An overview. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 53, no. 3: 223–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2012.01495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramb, R.A., and J.F. McCarthy, eds. 2016. The oil palm complex: Smallholders, agribusiness and the state in Indonesia and Malaysia. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cramb, R.A., and P.S. Sujang. 2011. ‘Shifting ground’: Renegotiating land rights and rural livelihoods in Sarawak, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 52, no. 2: 136–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2011.01446.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramb, R.A., and P.S. Sujang. 2013. The mouse deer and the crocodile: Oil palm smallholders and livelihood strategies in Sarawak, Malaysia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 1–2: 129–54. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.750241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallinger, J. 2011. Oil palm development in Thailand: Economic, social and environmental considerations. Oil Palm Expansion in South East Asia: Trends and Implications for Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples. FPP and SawitWatch.
   Google Scholar
• Dao, N. 2015. Rubber plantations in the Northwest: Rethinking the concept of land grabs in Vietnam. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 2: 347–69. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.990445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deininger, K. 2011. Challenges posed by the new wave of farmland investment. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 217–47. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koninck, R., and J.-F. Rousseau. 2012. Gambling with the land: The contemporary evolution of Southeast Asian agriculture. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dieters, M., J. Newby, R. Cramb, G. Sexton, S. McNamara, M. Johnson, S. Sakanphet, H. Sodarak, S. Kikeo, S. Savathvong, D. Midgley. 2014. Enhancing on-farm incomes through improved silvicultural management of Teak in Luang Prabang Province of Lao PDR. Final Report FST/2004/057. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).
   Google Scholar
• Ducourtieux, O., J.R. Laffort, and S. Sacklokham. 2005. Land policy and farming practices in Laos. Development and Change 36, no. 3: 499–526. doi: 10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00421.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood, R., M. Lipton, and A. Newell. 2010. Farm size. In Handbook of agricultural economics, vol. 4, ed. R. Evenson and P. Pingali, 3323–97. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. 2014. ‘Like gold with yield’: Evolving intersections between farmland and finance. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 777–95. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.873977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2014. Statistics division, food and agriculture organisation of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed August, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Floresteca Group. 2015. Floresteca group overview. http://www.globalforestry.com/floresteca-group-overview (accessed May 1, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., and J.-C. Castella. 2013. Expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Mainland Southeast Asia: what are the prospects for smallholders? The Journal of Peasant Studies 40, no. 1: 155–70. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.750605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D. 2004. Explaining the diversity of Southeast Asian shrimp aquaculture. Journal of Agrarian Change 4, no. 3: 315–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00081.x
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D. 2011. Land grabs, land control, and Southeast Asian crop booms. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4: 837–57. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., P. Hirsch, and T.M. Li. 2011. Powers of exclusion: Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, P.K., H. Sodorak, and S. Savathvong. 1997. Teak production by shifting cultivators in Northern Lao PDR. Paper to a workshop on Indigenous strategies for intensification of shifting agriculture in Southeast Asia, Bogor, Indonesia, June 23–27. Cornell University and the International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Bogor.
   Google Scholar
• Hayami, Y. 1998. The peasant in economic modernisation. In International agricultural development. 3rd ed, ed. C.K. Eicher and J.M. Staatz, 300–15. Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayami, Y. 2010. Plantation agriculture. In Handbook of agricultural economics, vol. 4, ed. R. Evenson and P. Pingali, 3305–22. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmert, A., 2001. Teak in Northern Laos. Minor Field Studies No. 175. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Laungaramsri, P. 2012. Frontier capitalism and the expansion of rubber plantations in southern Laos. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 43, no. 3: 463–77. doi: 10.1017/S0022463412000343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefroy, R. 2014. Non-rice crops in rice-based farming systems in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Trajectories of rice-based farming systems in Mainland Southeast Asia, ed. R.A. Cramb, 111–38. ACIAR Monographs No. 177. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).
   Google Scholar
• Li, T.M., 2002. Local histories, global markets: Cocoa and class in upland Sulawesi. Development and Change 33, no. 3: 415–37. doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.M. 2011. Centering labor in the land grab debate. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 281–98. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.M., 2014. Land’s end: Capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, K. 2015. Rubber, rights and resistance: The evolution of local struggles against a Chinese rubber concession in Northern Laos. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3–4: 817–37. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1036418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J.F. 2010. Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: Oil palm and agrarian change in Sumatra, Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 821–50. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J.F., P. Gillespie, and Z. Zen. 2012. Swimming upstream: Local Indonesian production networks in “globalized” palm oil production. World Development 40, no. 3: 555–69. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahanty, S., and S. Milne. 2016. Anatomy of a boom: Cassava as a ‘gateway’ crop in Cambodia's north eastern borderland. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 57, no. 2: 180–93. doi: 10.1111/apv.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majid Cooke, F., D. Ngidang, and N. Selamat. 2006. Learning by doing: Social transformation of small-holder oil palm economies of Sabah and Sarawak, Malaysia. Report submitted to UNESCO, Participatory Programme Research Project No. 27213203 MAL.
   Google Scholar
• Manivong, V., and R.A. Cramb. 2008a. Economics of smallholder rubber expansion in northern Laos. Agroforestry Systems 74: 113–25. doi: 10.1007/s10457-008-9136-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manivong, V., and R.A. Cramb. 2008b. The adoption of smallholder rubber production by shifting cultivators in Northern Laos. In Smallholder tree growing for rural development and environmental services, ch. 5, ed. D.J. Snelder and R.D. Lasco, 117–38. Dordrecht and London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Manivong, V., and R.A. Cramb. 2015. Impacts of smallholder rubber on shifting cultivation and rural livelihoods in Northern Laos. In Shifting cultivation and environmental change: Indigenous people, agriculture and forest conservation, ed. M.F. Cairns, 826–40. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manoram, K., D. Hall, X. Lu, S. Katima, M.T. Medialdia, S. Siharath, and P. Srisuphan. 2011. Cross-border contract farming arrangements: Variations and implications in the Lao people’s democratic republic. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Midgely, S., M. Blyth, K. Mounlamai, D. Midgley, and A. Brown. 2007. Towards improving profitability of teak in integrated smallholder farming systems in Northern Laos. ACIAR Technical Reports 64. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, S., R.T. Somaiya, P.R. Stevens, A. Brown, Nguyen Duc Kien, and R. Laity. 2015. Planted teak: Global production and markets, with reference to Solomon Islands. ACIAR Technical Reports No. 85. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mohns, B., and R. Laity. 2010. Local processing of logs to increase smallholder share, Lao PDR. ETFRN News 52, December.
   Google Scholar
• NAFRI. 2011. Rubber research in Lao PDR. Vientiane: National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Netting, R.M. 1993. Smallholders, householders: Farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newby, J.C. 2016. Cassava in Asia: Exposing the drivers and trajectories of the hidden ingredient in global supply chains. World Congress on Roots and Tubers, January 18–22. Nanning China. http://www.gcp21.org/wcrtc/ppt/PS05-JNewby.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Newby, J.C., R.A. Cramb, S. Sakanphet, and S. McNamara. 2012. Smallholder teak and agrarian change in northern Laos. Small-Scale Forestry 11: 27–46. doi: 10.1007/s11842-011-9167-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngidang, D. 2002. Contradictions in land development schemes: The case of joint ventures in Sarawak, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 43: 157–80. doi: 10.1111/1467-8373.00171
   Google Scholar
• Nyi Nyi. 2015. Future prospects for cassava starch industrialization in Myanmar. Presentation given at 4th Starch World Conference, January 29–30, in Inya Lake Hotel, Yangon.
   Google Scholar
• Pletcher, J. 1991. Regulation with growth: The political economy of palm oil in Malaysia. World Development 19, no. 6: 623–36. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90198-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rival, A., and P. Levang. 2014. Palms of controversies: Oil palm and development challenges. Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rubber prices may decrease in Luang Namtha. 2015. Vientiane Times, 23 April.
   Google Scholar
• Sheil, D., A. Casson, E. Meijaard, M. van Noordwijk, J. Gaskell, J. Sunderland-Groves, K. Wertz, and M. Kanninen. 2009. The impacts and opportunities of oil palm in Southeast Asia: What do we know and what do we need to know? Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, W. 2008. Rubber Boom in Luang Namtha: A transitional perspective. Rural Development in Mountainous Areas of Northern Laos. Vientiane: Lao-German Program.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. 1986. The new development economics. World Development 14 (2): 257–65. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(86)90057-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, K. 2001. Agribusiness on a grand scale – FELDA’s Sahabat complex in East Malaysia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 22: 90–105. doi: 10.1111/1467-9493.00095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Palm Oil Mill. 2011. April 5. http://palmoilmill.co.nz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=57:management-of-a-palm-oil-mill&catid=62:mill-mangement&Itemid=71 (accessed September 12, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Van Vliet, J.A., Schut, A.G.T., Reidsma, P., Descheemaeker, K., Slingerland, M., Vande Ven, G.W.J., and Giller, K.E. 2015. De-mystifying family farming: Features, diversity and trends across the globe. Global Food Security 5: 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2015.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Vongvisouk, T., and Dwyer, M. 2016. Falling Rubber prices in Northern Laos: Local responses and policy options. Draft Report prepared for Helvetas.
   Google Scholar
• Wandschneider, T. 2008. The role of contract farming in the development of a competitive and sustainable cassava sub-sector in Vietnam. Paper presented at the 8th Asian Cassava Research Workshop, October 20–24, in Vientiane.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S., 2009. Agriculture in transition: The impact of agricultural commercialisation on livelihoods and food access in the Lao PDR. Vientiane: UN World Food Programme Laos (draft report).
   Google Scholar
• Zen, Z., C. Barlow, and R. Gondowarsito. 2005. Oil palm in Indonesian socio-economic improvement: A review of options. Working Papers in Trade and Development No. 2005/11. Canberra: Division of Economics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Zola, A., 2008. A preliminary assessment of contract farming arrangements and plantations in the agriculture and natural resources sector of Southern Lao PDR. Vientiane: ADB.
   Google Scholar