Struggles for autonomy from and within the market of southeast Mexico's small coffee producers

References

• Akram-Lodhi, A.H. 2007. Land, markets and neoliberal enclosure: An agrarian political economy perspective. Third World Quarterly 28, no. 8: 1437–56. doi: 10.1080/01436590701637326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri, M.A., and V.M. Toledo. 2011. The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 3: 587–612. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.582947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, C., V. Méndez, S. Gliessman, D. Goodman, and J. Fox. 2008. Confronting the coffee crisis: Fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, C.M. 2010. Who decides what is fair in fair trade? The agrienvironmental governance of standards, access, and price. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 1: 111–47. doi: 10.1080/03066150903498796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkin, D. 2002. The reconstruction of a modern Mexican peasantry. The Journal of Peasant Studies 30, no. 1: 73–90. doi: 10.1080/03066150412331333242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartra, A. 1982. El comportamiento económico de la producción campesina. Texcoco: Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo.
   Google Scholar
• Bartra, A. 2001. Sur: Megaplanes y utopías en la América equinoccial. In Mesoamérica: Los Ríos Profundos, ed. A. Bartra, 1–71. Mexico City: El Atajo.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development 27, no. 12: 2021–44. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello, W., and M. Baviera. 2009. Food wars. Monthly Review 61, no. 3: 17–31. doi: 10.14452/MR-061-03-2009-07_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 1979. African peasantries: A theoretical framework. The Journal of Peasant Studies 6, no. 4: 421–43. doi: 10.1080/03066157908438084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2009. V.I. Lenin and A.V. Chayanov: Looking back, looking forward. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1: 55–81. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, H., and H. Parsons. 2007. Family farms: Survival and prospect: A worldwide analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calo, M., and T. Wise. 2005. Revaluing peasant coffee production: Organic and fair trade markets in Mexico. Medford: Global Development and Environment Institute Tufts University [online]. http://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/rp/RevaluingCoffee05.pdf (accessed July 25, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Castellanos-Navarrete, A., and K. Jansen. 2015. Oil palm expansion without enclosure: Smallholders and environmental narratives. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3–4: 791–816. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1016920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. 2004. Planet of slums. Urban involution and the informal proletariat. New Left Review 26: 5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, T. 1988. A macro-organisational analysis of the Mexican coffee industry 1888–1977. In The hidden crisis in development: Development bureaucracies, ed. P. Q. van Ufford, D. Kruijt, and T. Downing, 175–94. Amsterdam: Free University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M., J. Fox, S.R. Isakson, M. Levien, N. Peluso, S. Razavi, I. Scoones, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2014. Introduction: New directions in agrarian political economy. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 5: 653–66. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.953490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIRA. 2015. Fortalece FIRA esquema de renovación de cafetales en Chiapas [online]. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/78000/09_de_febrero.pdf (accessed August 18, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, H. 1980. Household production and the national economy: Concepts for the analysis of agrarian formations. The Journal of Peasant Studies 7, no. 2: 158–84. doi: 10.1080/03066158008438099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Grammont, H.C. 2004. La nueva ruralidad en América Latina. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 66: 279–300. doi: 10.2307/3541454
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, N. 2011. Mexico. Political, social and economic evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, T.P. 2017. La Reestructuración de los Sectores del Café y el Cacao en México y Ecuador, y el Control Agroempresarial de la Tierra y el Trabajo Campesino. LiminaR. Estudios Sociales y Humanísticos 15, no. 1: 128–41. doi: 10.29043/liminar.v15i1.499
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, L. 1992. Cafetaleros: del adelgazamiento estatal al la guerra del mercado. In Autonomía y Nuevos Sujetos Sociales en el Desarrollo Rural, ed. J. Moguel, C. Botey, and L. Hernández, 78–97. Mexico City: Siglo veintiuno editores.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández Castillo, R., and R. Nigh. 1998. Global processes and local identity among Mayan coffee growers in Chiapas, Mexico. American Anthropologist 100, no. 1: 136–47. doi: 10.1525/aa.1998.100.1.136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICO. 2014. History [online]. http://www.ico.org/icohistory_e.asp?section=About_Us (accessed September 20, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• INEGI. 2010. Mapas para imprimir [online]. http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/mapas/default.aspx?tema=M (accessed September 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Isakson, R. S. 2009. No hay ganancia en la milpa: The agrarian question, food sovereignty, and the on-farm conservation of agrobiodiversity in the Guatemalan highlands. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 4: 725–59. doi: 10.1080/03066150903353876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffee, D., and P.H. Howard. 2010. Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values 27, no. 4: 387–99. doi: 10.1007/s10460-009-9231-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannessen, S., and H. Whilite. 2010. Who really benefits from fairtrade? An analysis of value distribution in fairtrade coffee. Globalizations 7, no. 4: 525–44. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2010.505018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, C. 2008. Reflections on Latin American rural studies in the neoliberal globalisation period: A new rurality? Development & Change 39, no. 6: 915–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00518.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., and D. Runsten. 2008. Is fair trade-organic coffee sustainable in the face of migration? Evidence from a Oaxacan community. Globalizations 5, no. 2: 275–90. doi: 10.1080/14747730802057738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Torres, M. 2006. Organic coffee: Sustainable development by Mayan farmers. Ohio: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, M.M. 2016, March 10. Vivero de productores de Amsa de Jaltenango (video file). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhu77FhRoBU (accessed September 20, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Moguel, J. 1992. La Lucha por la Apropiación de la Vida Social en la Economía Cafetalera. La Experiencia de la CNOC. 1990–1991. In Autonomía y Nuevos Sujetos Sociales en el Desarrollo Rural, ed. J. Moguel, C. Botey, and L. Hernández, 98–118. Mexico City: Siglo veintiuno editores.
   Google Scholar
• Moguel, J., and J. Aranda. 1992. Los Nuevos Caminos en la Construcción de la Autonomía. La Experiencia de la Coordinadora Estatal de Productores de Café de Oaxaca. In Autonomía y Nuevos Sujetos Sociales en el Desarrollo Rural, ed. J. Moguel, C. Botey, and L. Hernández, 167–93. Mexico City: Siglo veintiuno editores.
   Google Scholar
• Mutersbaugh, T. 2002. Building co-ops, constructing cooperation: Spatial strategies and development politics in a Mexican village. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92, no. 4: 756–76. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigh, R. 1997. Organic agriculture and globalization: A Maya associative corporation in Chiapas, Mexico. Human Organization 56, no. 4: 427–36. doi: 10.17730/humo.56.4.w761q3q1h4h8m247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J.D. 2008. The new peasantries. Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an Era of empire and globalisation. London: earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J.D. 2010. The peasantries of the twenty-first century: The commoditization debate revisited. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 1: 1–30. doi: 10.1080/03066150903498721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J.D. 2012. The peasant mode of production revisited [online]. http://www.jandouwevanderploeg.com/EN/publications/articles/the-peasant-mode-of-production-revisited (accessed September 20, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J.D. 2014. Peasant-driven agricultural growth and food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 6: 999–1030. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.876997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, D. 2009. What do corporations have to do with fair trade? Positive and normative analysis from a value chain perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 86: 3–26. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9757-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard, M.-C. 1999. The interstices of globalization: The example of fair coffee. Sociologia Ruralis 39, no. 4: 484–500. doi: 10.1111/1467-9523.00120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard, M.-C. 2010. The Mexican coffee crisis. Latin American Perspectives 37: 21–33. doi: 10.1177/0094582X09356956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles, H. 2011. Los Productores de Café en México: Problemática y Ejercicio del Presupuesto. Mexican Rural Development Research Reports 14: 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P.M., and M.E. Martínez-Torres. 2012. Rural social movements and agroecology: Context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society 17, no. 3: 17. doi:10.5751/ES-05000-170317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAGARPA. 2016. Café oro azteca, variedad 100 por ciento mexicana [online]. https://www.gob.mx/sagarpa/articulos/cafe-oro-azteca-variedad-100-por-ciento-mexicana (accessed September 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Juárez, G. 2015. Los pequeños cafeticultores de Chiapas: Organización y resistencia frente al mercado. México: Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas (UNICACH).
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S., and P.A. Niederle. 2010. Resistance strategies and diversification of rural livelihoods: The construction of autonomy among Brazilian family farmers. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 2: 379–405. doi: 10.1080/03066151003595168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, R. 1999. After neoliberalism: The politics of reregulation in Mexico. World Politics 51, no. 2: 173–204. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, R. 2001. Politics after neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The 4C Association. 2010. The 4C Code of Conduct [online]. http://www.4c-coffeeassociation.org/uploads/media/4CDoc_001a_Code_of_Conduct_v1.4_en.pdf (accessed September 25, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L. 2009. The MST and the EZLN struggle for land: New forms of peasant rebellions. Journal of Agrarian Change 9, no. 3: 365–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00216.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L. 2012. The legacy of social conflicts over property rights in rural Brazil and Mexico: Current land struggles in historical perspective. Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 5: 1133–58. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.653345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L. 2014. Land and freedom. The peasant development alternatives to neoliberalism of the landless people in Brazil and the Zapatista movement in Chiapas. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E.M. 2002. The question of market dependence. Journal of Agrarian Change 2, no. 1: 50–87. doi: 10.1111/1471-0366.00024
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2016. Global Economic Monitor (GEM) Commodities [online]. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=Global-Economic-Monitor-(GEM)-Commodities (accessed September 15, 2016)
   Google Scholar