Politics of inclusion and exclusion in the Chinese industrial tree plantation sector: the global resource rush seen from inside China

References

• Alonso-Fradejas, A. 2015. Anything but a story foretold: multiple politics of resistance to the agrarian extractivist project in Guatemala. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3–4: 489–515. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1013468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., J. C. Franco, and C. Wang. 2013. The challenge of global governance of land grabbing: changing international agricultural context and competing political views and strategies. Globalizations 10, no. 1: 161–179. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., and J. C. Franco. 2012. Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change 12, no. 1: 34–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., and J. C. Franco. 2013. Global land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 9: 1723–1747. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, Z. W. 2015. Territorial restructuring and resistance in Argentina. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 671–694. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1013100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, I. R. 2002. 2 eucalyptus, water and the environment. In Eucalyptus: The genus eucalyptus, ed. J. J. Coppen, 36–51. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, I. R., P. T. Rosier, K. T. Prasanna, and S. Parameswarappa. 1997. Eucalyptus water use greater than rainfall input-possible explanation from southern India. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 1, no. 2: 249–256. doi: 10.5194/hess-1-249-1997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carriere, R., and L. Lohmann. 1996. Pulping the south: industrial tree plantations and the world paper economy. London: Zed books.
   Google Scholar
• Castellanos-Navarrete, A., and K. Jansen. 2015. Oil palm expansion without enclosure: smallholders and environmental narratives. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 791–816. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1016920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Toit, A. 2004. ‘Social exclusion’ discourse and chronic poverty: A South African case study. Development and Change 35, no. 5: 987–1010. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1999. Peasants against globalization: rural social movements in Costa Rica. Standford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 1993. The politics of food in Mexico: state power and social mobilization. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J. C., D. Carranza, and J. Fernandez. 2011. New biofuel project in isabela: boon or bane for local people. Amsterdam: TNI.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, J. F. 2011. Conflicts over industrial tree plantations in the south: Who, how and why? Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 21, no. 1: 165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, J. F., and S. Veuthey. 2010. Plantations, resistance and the greening of the agrarian question in coastal Ecuador. Journal of Agrarian Change 10, no. 4: 455–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingembre, M. 2015. Resistance or participation? fighting against corporate land access amid political uncertainty in Madagascar. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 561–584. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1022867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guangxi Forestry Department. 1998. Guangxi Tongzhi, accessed on 30th June 2016, http://www.gxdqw.com/bin/mse.exe?seachword=&K=a&A=46&rec=86&run=13
   Google Scholar
• Guangxi Land and Resources Department. 2012. Opinions about Encouraging Farmers-initiated Farmland Consolidation, accessed on 22nd April 2016, http://www.gxdlr.gov.cn/News/NewsShow.aspx?NewsId = 9595
   Google Scholar
• Guo, X., and Z. Tong. 2015. Hanjun: Now most of Rural Household Earning the Same from Farming 1 ha of Land with Doing Migrant Work for One Year (韩俊:现在大部分农户种一亩地赚的钱跟打工一星期差不多). People's Daily Online.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D. 2011. Land grabs, land control, and Southeast Asian crop booms. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 4: 837–857. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., M. Edelman, S. M. Borras, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2015. Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 467–488. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., P. Hirsch, and T. M. Li. 2011. Powers of exclusion: land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, P., and M. Spoor. 2006. Whose land? The political economy of land titling in transitional economies. Land use Policy 23, no. 4: 580–587. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet, B. J. T. 2009. Everyday politics in peasant societies (and ours). The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, no. 1: 227–243. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. 2012. The expansion of industrial tree plantations and dispossession in Brazil. Development and Change 43, no. 4: 947–973. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01787.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. 2013. Grievances, agency and the absence of conflict: The new suzano pulp investment in the eastern Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics 33: 28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. 2014. The political economy of global tree plantation expansion: a review. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41, no. 2: 235–261. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.890596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M. 2008. Dynamic studies about the forest rescource in guangxi [Guangxi Senlin Ziyuan Dongtai Yanjiu]. Guangxi: Guangxi University.
   Google Scholar
• Li, P., and R. Nielsen. 2010. A case study on large-scale forestland acquisition in China. In The stora enso plantation project in hepu county, guangxi province. Washington, DC: Rights and Resources Initiative. http://www.rightsandresources.org/documents/les/doc_1800.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2011. Centering labor in the land grab debate. Journal of Peasant Studies 38, no. 2: 281–298. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. 2010. APP Guangxi Plantation-Pulp-Paper Integration Proejct, accessed on 7th July 2016. http://finance.people.com.cn/GB/67723/67730/12680269.html
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, K., and P. Westoby. 2014. Carbon colonialism and the new land grab: plantation forestry in Uganda and its livelihood impacts. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malseed, K. 2008. Where there Is No movement: local resistance and the potential for solidarity. Journal of Agrarian Change 8, no. 2-3: 489–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00178.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamonova, N. 2015. Resistance or adaptation? Ukrainian peasants’ responses to large-scale land acquisitions. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 607–634. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.993320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martiniello, G. 2015. Social struggles in Uganda's acholiland: understanding responses and resistance to amuru sugar works. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 653–669. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1032269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, K. E. 2015. Rubber, rights and resistance: the evolution of local struggles against a Chinese rubber concession in northern laos. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 817–837. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1036418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. F. 2010. Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: oil palm and agrarian change in sumatra, Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37, no. 4: 821–850. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElwee, P. 2009. Reforesting “bare hills” in Vietnam: social and environmental consequences of the 5 million hectare reforestation program. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment 38, no. 6: 325–333. doi: 10.1579/08-R-520.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElwee, P. 2012. Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 43, no. 3: 412–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, B., and G. Colque. 2016. Bolivia's soy complex: the development of ‘productive exclusion’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 43, no. 2: 583–610. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1053875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreda, T. 2015. Listening to their silence? The political reaction of affected communities to large-scale land acquisitions: insights from Ethiopia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3–4: 517–539. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.993621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, R. 2002. How migrant labor is changing rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, K. J., L. Li, D. McAdam, S. G. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2006. Rightful resistance in rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeek, W., M. Kröger, and J. F. Gerber. 2012. An overview of industrial tree plantation conflicts in the global South.Conflicts, trends, and resistance struggles. In EJOLT Report No. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, Z. 2006. The general development Status of Eucalyptus tree plantation in guangxi province. https://www.wendangxiazai.com/b-b00a1628bd64783e09122bac.html (accessed June 7, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, D. E. 2015. Networked, rooted and territorial: green grabbing and resistance in chiapas. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42, no. 3-4: 695–723. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.993622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. 2015. What, then, is a Chinese peasant? nongmin discourses and agroindustrialization in contemporary China. Agriculture and Human Values 32, no. 2: 331–346. doi: 10.1007/s10460-014-9559-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale university Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sikor, T. 2012. Tree plantations, politics of possession and the absence of land grabs in Vietnam. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39, no. 3-4: 1077–1101. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.674943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, A. Y. 2007. Peasant conflict and the local predatory state in the Chinese countryside. The Journal of Peasant Studies 34, no. 3-4: 560–581. doi: 10.1080/03066150701804583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoraEnso. 2016. Progress Book. In Stora Enso’s Annual Report 2015: Stora Enso.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M. J. 1994. Life under contract: contract farming, agrarian restructuring, and flexible accumulation. In Living under contract: contract farming and agrarian transformation in sub-Saharan Africa, ed. P. D. Little and M. J. Watts, 21–77. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, J. 2011. The High Eucalyptus Trees and the Timber Production in Southern China (桉树指天高 产木看南国). http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_93d77a2e0101197h.html (accessed June 3, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Ye, J. Z., Y. H. Wang, and N. Long. 2009. Farmer initiatives and livelihood diversification, pp. From the Collective to a Market Economy in Rural China. Journal of Agrarian Change 9, no. 2: 175–203.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C. 2010. Eucalyptus Trees Enclosure Forestland (桉树圈林). Economy & Nation Weekly (财经国家周刊). http://finance.sina.com.cn/chanjing/sdbd/20100720/14578329397.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. F. 2012. The political economy of contract farming in China's agrarian transition. Journal of Agrarian Change 12, no. 4: 460–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00352.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinda, J. A., C. J. Trac, D. Zhai, and S. Harrell. 2017. Dual-function forests in the returning farmland to forest program and the flexibility of environmental policy in China. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 78: 119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar