Authoritarian populism and neo-extractivism in Bolivia and Ecuador: the unresolved agrarian question and the prospects for food sovereignty as counter-hegemony

References

• Akram-Lodhi, A. H. 2018. “The Promise? Using and Misusing Authoritarian Populism.” Conference Paper No. 6. ERPI 2018 International Conference: Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World, The Hague, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Almaraz, A. 2015. “Luchas Políticas y Legales por la Tierra en Bolivia: Las Luchas Indígenas y Campesinas en los Dos Ciclos de la Reforma Agraria.” In Recientes Transformaciones Agrarias en Bolivia, edited by Fundación Tierra, 52–53. La Paz: Fundación Tierra.
   Google Scholar
• Arsel, M. 2016. “Poverty, nature, and post-neoliberal developmentalism: Political economy of the foretold demise of Ecuador’s Yasuni-ITT initiative.” Paper presented at the American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 29 March – 3 April.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. 2008. Indians and Leftists in the Making of Ecuador’s Modern Indigenous Movements. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. 2012. Pachakutik! Indigenous Movements and Electoral Politics in Ecuador. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2010. The Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2014. “Food Sovereignty via the ‘Peasant Way’: A Sceptical View.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1031–1063. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.852082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieler, A., and A. Morton. 2004. “A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations.” Capital and Class 82 (Spring): 85–113. doi: 10.1177/030981680408200106
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla, O. 2015. “China’s Geopolitical Strategy in the Andean Region.” In BRICS: An Anti-Capitalist Critique, edited by Patrick Bond, and Ana Garcia, 135–147. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R., and Y. Saillard. 2002. Regulation Theory: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, T. 2000. Peasants, Populism and Postmodernism: The Return of the Agrarian Myth. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, T. 2014. Class, Culture, and the Agrarian Myth. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brassel, F., S. Herrera, and M. Laforge. 2008. ¿Reforma Agraria en el Ecuador? Viejos Temas, Nuevos Argumentos. Quito: SIPAE.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, R. 1977. “The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism.” New Left Review 104: 25–93.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, R. 1985. “The Agrarian Roots of European Capitalism.” In The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe, edited by T. Aston, and C. Philpin, 213–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrión, A. 2016. “Extractivismo Minero y Estrategia de Desarrollo: Entre el Nacionalismo de los Recursos y los Conflictos Socioterritoriales.” In La Revolución Ciudadana en Escala de Grises: Avances, Continuidades y Dilemas, edited by M. Le Quang, 181–204. Quito: Editorial IAEN.
   Google Scholar
• Carrión, D., and S. Herrera Revelo. 2012. Ecuador Rural del Siglo XXI: Soberanía Alimentaria, Inversión Pública y Política Agraria. Quito: Instituto de Estudios Ecuatorianos.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P. 2017. “Neo-Developmentalism and a ‘Via Campesina’ for Rural Development: Unreconciled Projects in Ecuador’s Citizen’s Revolution.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17: 348–364. doi: 10.1111/joac.12203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colque, G., E. Tinta, and E. Sanjines. 2016. Segunda Reforma Agraria: Una Historia que Incomoda. La Paz: Fundación Tierra.
   Google Scholar
• Colque, C., M. Urioste, and J. L. Eyzaguirre. 2015. Marginalizacion de la Agricultura Campesina e Indigena: Dinamicas Locales, Seguridad y Soberania Alimentaria. La Paz: Fundacion Tierra.
   Google Scholar
• Conaghan, C. 1988. Restructuring Domination: Industrialists and the State in Ecuador. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. 1993. “Gramsci, Hegemony, and International Relations: An Essay in Method.” In Gramsci, Historical Materialism, and International Relations, edited by S. Gill, 49–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davalos, P., and V. Albuja. 2014. “Ecuador: Extractivist Dynamics, Politics, and Discourse.” In The New Extractivism: A Post-Neoliberal Development Model or Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century?, edited by H. Veltmeyer, and J. Petras, 144–171. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• De Janvry, A. 1981. The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, C. 2013. “Technocratic Populism in Ecuador.” Journal of Democracy 24 (3): 33–46. doi: 10.1353/jod.2013.0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enzinna, W. 2007. “All We Want is the Earth: Agrarian Reform in Bolivia.” In Socialist Register 2008: Global Flashpoints, Reactions to Imperialism and Neoliberalism, edited by L. Panitch, and C. Leys, 217–236. London: Merlin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1995. “Imagining a Post-Development Era.” In The Power of Development, edited by J. Crush, 211–227. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esteva, G., and M. S. Prakash. 1999. Grassroots Post-Modernism: Remaking the Soil of Cultures. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fabricant, N. 2012. Mobilizing Bolivia’s Displaced: Indigenous Politics and the Struggle Over Land. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farthing, L. 2017. “The State of the Left in Latin America: Ecuador and Bolivia After the Pink Tide.” NACLA. July 19. https://nacla.org/news/.../state-left-latin-america-ecuador-and-bolivia-after-pink-tide
   Google Scholar
• Giunta, I. 2014. “Food Sovereignty in Ecuador: Peasant Struggles and the Challenges of Institutionalization.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1201–1224. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.938057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2012. “Estado Compensador y Nuevos Extractivismos: Las Ambivalencias del Progresismo Sudamericano.” Nueva Sociedad 237: 128–146.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2018. “A Critique of the Idea of Populism and the Urgencies with Authoritarianisms: Some South American Notes on Progressivisms, Development and Alternatives.” Conference Paper No. 75. ERPI 2018 International Conference: Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World, The Hague, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, T. 2017. “State-Peasant Movement Relations and the Politics of Food Sovereignty in Mexico and Ecuador.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (1): 33–55. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1236024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera Revelo, S. 2017. “Lecciones del Contradictorio Progresismo en el Ecuador.” Lalineadefuego.Info January 31: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hylton, F., and S. Thomson. 2007. Revolutionary Horizons: Past and Present in Bolivian Politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• INRA (Instituto de Reforma Agraria). 2010. La Tierra Vuelve a Manos Indígenas y Campesinas. La Paz: INRA.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., and N. L. Sum. 2013. Towards a Cultural Political Economy: Putting Culture in its Place in Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Le Quang, M. 2016. La Revolución Ciudadana en Escala de Grises: Avances, Continuidades y Dilemas. Quito: Editorial IAEN.
   Google Scholar
• Malamud, A. 2017. “Qué cosa fuera la patria sin Correa.” Nueva Sociedad. March 17. http://nuso.org/articulo/que-cosa-fuera-la-patria-sin-correa/
   Google Scholar
• Marini, R. M. 1972. “Brazilian Subimperialism.” Monthly Review 23 (9): 14–24. doi: 10.14452/MR-023-09-1972-02_2
   Google Scholar
• Marini, R. M. 1973. Dialéctica de la Dependencia. Mexico: Editorial Era.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez Valle, L. 2014. “La Concentracion de la Tierra en el Caso Ecuatoriano: Impactos en el Territorio.” In La Concentracion de la Tierra: Un Problema Prioritario en el Ecuador Contemporaneo, edited by A. Berry, L. Martinez Valle, C. Kay, and L. North, 43–62. Quito: Abya-Yala.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez Valle, L. 2017. “Agribusiness, Peasant Agriculture, and Labour Markets: Ecuador in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (4): 680–693. doi: 10.1111/joac.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, B. 2017. “Agrarian Extractivism in Bolivia.” World Development 97 (September): 199–211. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, B., R. Nehring, and M. Walsh-Dilley. 2014. “The State of Food Sovereignty in Latin America: Political Projects and Alternative Pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1175–1200. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.964217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2013. Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions. Halifax/Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mies, M., and V. Bennholdt-Thomsen. 2000. The Subsistence Perspective: Beyond the Globalized Economy. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mooers, C. 1991. The Making of Bourgeois Europe: Absolutism, Revolution, and the Rise of Capitalism in England, France, and Germany. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, K., and G. Lenhardt. 1976. “Social Policy and the Theory of the State.” In Contradictions of the Welfare State, edited by J. Keane, 51–64. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G. 2018. “Chinese Land Grabs in Brazil: Sinophobia and Foreign Investments in Brazilian Soybean Agribusiness.” Globalizations 15 (1): 114–133. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2017.1377374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orellana, L. 2011. “The National Question and the Autonomy of the State in Bolivia.” In Reclaiming the Nation: The Return of the National Question in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, edited by S. Moyo and P. Yeros, 235–254. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ormachea Saavedra, E. 2015. “Pequena y Gran Produccion Agricola Capitalista y Trabajo Asalariado en Bolivia.” In Asalariados Rurales en America Latina, edited by A. Riella and P. Mascheroni, 165–186. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, Karla. 2017. “Will Lenin Moreno Champion Food Sovereignty in Ecuador in Ways Rafael Correa Didn’t?” Upside Down World. September 20. http://upsidedownworld.org/archives/ecuador/will-lenin-moreno-champion-food-sovereignty-ecuador-ways-rafael-correa-didnt/
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2011. Social Movements in Latin America: Neoliberalism and Popular Resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, C., and M. Tilzey. 2005. “Agricultural Policy Discourses in the European Post-Fordist Transition: Neoliberalism, Neomercantilism and Multifunctionality.” Progress in Human Geography 29 (5): 581–600. doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph569oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N. 1978. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Redo, D., A. Millington, and D. Hindery. 2011. “Deforestation Dynamics and Policy Changes in Bolivia’s Post-Neoliberal Era.” Land Use Policy 28: 227–241. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riofrancos, T. 2017. “The State of the Left in Latin America: Ecuador and Bolivia After the Pink Tide.” NACLA. July 19. https://nacla.org/news/…/state-left-latin-america-ecuador-and-bolivia-after-pink-tide
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. 2017. “Passive Revolution: The Transnational Capitalist Class Unravels Latin America’s Pink Tide.” Truthout. June 6. https://truthout.org/articles/passive-revolution-the-transnational-capitalist-class-unravels-latin-america-s-pink-tide/
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Edelman, S. M. Borras Jr, R. Hall, W. Wolford, and B. White. 2018. “Emancipatory Rural Politics: Confronting Authoritarian Populism.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spronk, S., and J. Webber. 2015. Crisis and Contradiction: Marxist Perspectives on Latin America in the Global Economy. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. 2016. Debates Latinoamericanos: Indianismo, Desarrollo, Dependencia y Populismo. Buenos Aires: Edhasa.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. 2017. “Populismos latinoamericanos en el fin del ciclo progresista.” PúblicoGT April 16.
   Google Scholar
• Thwaites Rey, M., and H. Ouviña. 2012. “La Estatalidad Latinoamericana Revisitada: Reflexiones e Hipótesis Alrededor del Problema del Poder Político y las Transiciones.” In El Estado en América Latina: Continuidades y Rupturas, edited by M. Thwaites Rey, 51–92. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Tilzey, M. 2016. “Global Politics, Capitalism, Socio-Ecological Crisis, and Resistance: Exploring the Linkages and the Challenges.” Colloquium Paper No. 14. Global governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges: An international colloquium 4-5 February 2016. ISS, The Hague, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Tilzey, M. 2017. “Reintegrating Economy, Society, and Environment for Cooperative Futures: Polanyi, Marx, and Food Sovereignty.” Journal of Rural Studies 53 (July): 317–334. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilzey, M. 2018a. Political Ecology, Food Regimes, and Food Sovereignty: Crisis, Resistance, and Resilience. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tilzey, M. 2018b. “‘Market Civilization’ and Global Agri-Food: Understanding Their Dynamics and (In)Coherence Through Multiple Resistances.” In Resistance to the Neoliberal Agri-Food Regime: A Critical Analysis, edited by A. Bonanno, and S. A. Wolf, 64–77. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J. D. 2008. The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H. 2014. “Bolivia: Between Voluntarist Developmentalism and Pragmatic Extractivism.” In The New Extractivism: A Post-Neoliberal Development Model or Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century?, edited by H. Veltmeyer, and J. Petras, 80–113. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H., and J. Petras. 2000. The Dynamics of Social Change in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H., and J. Petras, eds. 2014. The New Extractivism: A Post-Neoliberal Development Model or Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L. 2014. Land and Freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas, and Peasant Alternatives to Neoliberalism. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Viaña, J. 2012. “Estado Plurinacional y Nueva Fase del Proceso Boliviano.” In El Estado en América Latina: Continuidades y Rupturas, edited by M. Thwaites Rey, 375–394. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J. 2015. “Revolution Against 'Progress': Neo-Extractivism, the Compensatory State, and the TIPNIS Conflict in Bolivia.” In Crisis and Contradiction: Marxist Perspectives on Latin America in the Global Economy, edited by S. Spronk and J. Webber, 302–333. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J. 2017a. “Evo Morales, Transformismo, and the Consolidation of Agrarian Capitalism in Bolivia.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17: 330–347. doi: 10.1111/joac.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, J. 2017b. The Last Day of Oppression and the First Day of the Same: The Politics and Economics of the New Latin American Left. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. M. 1995. Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. M. 2009. “Peasants and the Market Imperative: The Origins of Capitalism.” In Peasants and Globalization: Political Economy, Rural Transformation, and the Agrarian Question, edited by A. H. Akram-Lodhi, and C. Kay, 37–56. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zibechi, R. 2016a. “Progressive Fatigue? Coming to Terms with the Latin American Left’s New ‘Coyuntura’.” NACLA 48 (1): 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Zibechi, R. 2016b. “El Caudillismo es Cultura de Derecha.” La Jornada. March 4. https://www.jornada.com.mx/2016/03/04/opinion/018a1pol
   Google Scholar