Taking Monsanto to court: legal activism around intellectual property in Brazil and India

References

• Abdelgawad, W. 2012. “The Bt Brinjal Case: The First Legal Action Against Monsanto and its Indian Collaborators for Biopiracy.” Biotechnology Law Report 31 (2): 136–139. doi: 10.1089/blr.2012.9926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agha, E. 2018. “Modi Govt Being Blackmailed by MNCs on GM Crops, say RSS-linked Farmers’ Unions.” News18. Accessed June 17, 2018. https://www.news18.com/news/india/modi-govt-being-blackmailed-by-mncs-on-gm-crops-say-rss-linked-farmers-unions-1637129.html.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, W., and S. D. Damle. 2019. Messengers of Hindu Nationalism. How the RSS Reshaped India. London: C. Hurst and Company (Publishers) Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, K. 2008. Seed Wars. Controversies and Cases on Plant Genetic Resources and Intellectual Property. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arya, S., and S. Shrivastav. 2015. “Seeds of Doubt: Monsanto Never had Bt Cotton Patent.” Times of India, June 8. Accessed April 23, 2018. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Seeds-of-doubt-Monsanto-never-had-Bt-cotton-patent/articleshow/47578304.cms.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, D. B. 2013. “Dois estudos sobre os aspectos jurídicos do patenteamento da tecnologia Roundup Ready no Brasil.” A questão da soja transgênica, February 28. Accessed April 23, 2018. http://pidcc.com.br/artigos/072014/16082014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bera, S., and S. Sen. 2016. “Center tells Delhi high court Bt cotton’s Resistance to Pests has Waned.” Live Mint, January 29. Accessed July 4, 2018. https://www.livemint.com/Politics/oZHYGceXXVZB3lit9PytEN/Centre-tells-Delhi-high-court-Bt-cottons-resistance-to-pest.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj, M., R. Jain, and T. Lasseter. 2017. “Seed Giant Monsanto Meets its Match as Hindu Nationalists Assert Power in Modi’s India.” Reuters, March 28.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, R. V., and M. N. Madhyastha. 2007. “Preserving the Heritage of Mattu Gulla. A Variety of Brinjal Unique to Udupi District.” Current Science 93 (7): 905–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. 2018. “Fake it Till You Make It: Meet the Wolves of Instagram.” The Guardian, April 19. Accessed April 20, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/apr/19/wolves-of-instagram-jordan-belmont-social-media-traders.
   Google Scholar
• Caduff, C., and S. Randeria. 2010. “Reinventing the Commons.” In Turn Over. Cultural Turns in der Soziologie, edited by S. Frank, and J. Schwenk, 289–305. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, D. 2001. Lords of the Harvest: Biotech, big Money and the Future of Food. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chowgule, A. 2015. “Govt Must Stand up to Anti-science Opponents of GM Technology: Ashok Chowgule.” Smart Indian Agriculture (blog). Accessed June 20, 2018. https://www.smartindianagriculture.com/vhp-leader-wants-govt-to-take-on-anti-science-opponents-of-gm-technology/.
   Google Scholar
• ClicRBS. 2005. “Justiça nega suspensão do pagamento de royalties à Monsanto.” February 17. Accessed April 23, 2018. http://revistagloborural.globo.com/GloboRural/0,6993,EEC913161-1485,00.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cullet, P. 2005a. “Case law Analysis. Monsanto v Schmeiser: A Landmark Decision Concerning Farmer Liability and Transgenic Contamination.” Journal of Environmental Law 17 (1): 83–108. doi: 10.1093/envlaw/eqi004
   Google Scholar
• Cullet, P. 2005b. “Seed Regulation, Food Security and Sustainable Development.” Economic and Political Weekly 40 (32): 3607–3613.
   Google Scholar
• Damodaran, H. 2016. “Janus-faced Policy to IPR: Farm vs drugs?” The Indian Express, March 10. accessed July 4, 2018. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/bt-cotton-monsanto-janus-faced-policy-to-ipr-farm-vs-drugs/.
   Google Scholar
• Down to Earth. 2019. “Pepsico India Withdraws all Cases Against Gujarat Potato Farmers.” Down to Earth. Accessed August 6, 2019. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/agriculture/pepsico-india-withdraws-all-cases-against-gujarat-potato-farmers-64482.
   Google Scholar
• Ewens, L. E. 2000. “Seed Wars: Biotechnology, Intellectual Property and the Quest for High Yield Seeds.” Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 23: 285–310.
   Google Scholar
• FAMATO. 2013. “Análise Jurídica: Acordo de licenciamento de tecnologia e quitação geral.” Accessed April 23, 2018. www.sistemafamato.org.br/site/arquivos/05022013043646.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, V. 2018. “Bt Cotton Seed Price Control: How Seed Companies Shot Themselves in the Foot.” Financial Express.” March 15. Accessed June 7, 2018. https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/bt-cotton-seed-price-control-how-seed-companies-shot-themselves-in-the-foot/1099219/.
   Google Scholar
• Filomeno, F. A. 2014. Monsanto and Intellectual Property in South America. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Flachs, A. 2019. Cultivating Knowledge. Biotechnology, Sustainability, and the Human Cost of Cotton Capitalism in India. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• GoI (Government of India). 1970. Patents Act, 1970. Act No. 39.
   Google Scholar
• GoI (Government of India). 2001. The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001. Act No. 53.
   Google Scholar
• GoI (Government of India). 2015. “Cotton Seeds Price (Control) Order.” Accessed March 11, 2020. https://seednet.gov.in/cms/home/readyreckoner/Seed_4/19_Cotton_Seeds_Price_Control_Order_2015.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN and LVC. 2015. “Seed Laws that Criminalize Farmers: Resistance and Fightback.” Accessed August 1, 2019. https://www.grain.org/e/5142.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, A. P. 2018. “Hybrid Bt Cotton: A Stranglehold on Subsistence Farmers in India.” Current Science 115 (12): 2206–2210. doi: 10.18520/cs/v115/i12/2206-2210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, A. P., L. Ponti, H. R. Herren, J. Baumgärtner, and P. E. Kenmore. 2015. “Deconstructing Indian Cotton: Weather, Yields, and Suicides.” Environmental Sciences Europe 27 (12): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, C. 2002. “From Scientific Risk to Paysan Savoir-Faire: Peasant Expertise in the French and Global Debate Over GM Crops.” Science as Culture 11 (1): 5–37. doi: 10.1080/09505430120115707
   Google Scholar
• IAASTD (International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development). 2009. Agriculture at a Crossroads. Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, D. J., G. D. Graff, C. L. Chi-Ham, and A. B. Bennett. 2015. “The Emergence of Agbiogenerics.” Nature Biotechnology 33: 819–823. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, B. 2016. “RSS Stand on Bt Cotton Forced Government’s Hand on Monsanto.” The Wire, March 13. accessed July 5, 2018. https://thewire.in/agriculture/rss-stand-on-bt-cotton-forced-governments-hand-on-monsanto.
   Google Scholar
• Kassai, L. 2005. “Monsanto cobra desde já royalties da soja.” Gazeta Mercantil, August 23. Accessed April 23, 2018. https://www.agrolink.com.br/noticias/monsanto-cobra-desde-ja-royalties-da-soja_30739.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchy, A. 2012. Seeds, Science and Struggle. The Global Politics of Transgenic Crops. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. 2004 [1988]. First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology, 1492-2000. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapegna, P., and T. Perelmuter. 2020. “Genetically modified crops and seed/food sovereignty in Argentina: scales and states in the contemporary food regime.” Journal of Peasant Studies.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjunatha, B. L., et al. 2015. “Need for Government Intervention in Regulating Seed Sale Price and Trait fee: a Case of Bt Cotton.” Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 20: 375–387.
   Google Scholar
• Marden, E., R. Nelson Godfrey, and R. Manion. 2016. The Intellection Property–Regulatory Complex: Overcoming Barriers to Innovation in Agricultural Genomics. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massarini, L. 2012. “Monsanto may Lose GM Soya Royalties Throughout Brazil.” Nature News, June 15. Accessed April 23, 2018. https://www.nature.com/news/monsanto-may-lose-gm-soya-royalties-throughout-brazil-1.10837.
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, U. 2003. “A Theory of Imperial law: a Study on U.S. Hegemony and the Latin American Resistance.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10 (1): 383–448. doi: 10.2979/gls.2003.10.1.383
   Google Scholar
• Monsanto Technology LLC. 2008. Methods for Transforming Plants to Express Bacillus Thuringiensis Delta-endotoxins. Patent No214436. Indian Patent Office. Accessed June 13, 2018. http://www.allindianpatents.com/patents/214436-methods-for-transforming-plants-to-express-bacillus-thuringiensis-delta-endotoxins.
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M. 2020. “Democratizing CRISPR? Stories, Practices, and Politics of Science and Governance on the Agricultural Gene Editing Frontier.” Elem Sci Anth 8 (1), doi:10.1525/elementa.405.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, S. 2017. “Cotton Seed Firms No Longer Need NOC from License Providers.” Business Standard, June 3. Accessed April 24, 2018. http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/cotton-seed-firms-no-longer-need-noc-from-license-providers-like-monsanto-117060201411_1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, B. 2006. “Infringing and Trespassing Plants: Patented Seeds at Dispute in Canada’s Courts.” Focaal 48: 83–98. doi: 10.3167/092012906780646361
   Google Scholar
• Pechlaner, G. 2012. Corporate Crops. Biotechnology, Agriculture and the Struggle for Control. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peschard, K. 2014. “Farmers’ Rights and Food Sovereignty: Critical Insights From India.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1085–1108. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2014.937338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschard, K., and S. Randeria. 2020. “‘Keeping Seeds in our Hands’: The Rise of Seed Activism.” Journal of Peasant Studies. Special Forum on Seed Activism.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pray, C., and L. Nagarajan. 2010. “Price Controls and Biotechnology Innovation: Are State Government Policies Reducing Research and Innovation by the ag Biotech Industry in India?” AgBioForum 13 (4): 197–307.
   Google Scholar
• Purdue, D. 1996. “Contested Expertise: Plant Biotechnology and Social Movements.” Science as Culture 5 (4): 526–545. doi: 10.1080/09505439609526446
   Google Scholar
• Randeria, S. 2003a. “Domesticating Neo-Liberal Discipline. Transnationalisation of law, Fractured States and Legal Plurality in the South.” In Entangled Histories and Negotiated Universals. Centers and Peripheries in a Changing World, edited by W. Lepenies, 146–182. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Randeria, S. 2003b. “Glocalization of law. Environmental Justice, World Bank, NGOs and the Cunning State in India.” Current Sociology 51 (3-4): 305–328. doi: 10.1177/0011392103051003009
   Google Scholar
• Randeria, S. 2003c. “Cunning States and Unaccountable International Institutions. Legal Plurality, Social Movements and Rights of Local Communities to Common Property Resources.” European Journal of Sociology 44 (1): 27–60. doi: 10.1017/S0003975603001188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randeria, S. 2007. “The State of Globalization. Legal Plurality, Overlapping Sovereignties and Ambiguous Alliances Between Civil Society and the Cunning State in India.” Theory, Culture and Society 24 (1): 1–33. doi: 10.1177/0263276407071559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randeria, S., and C. Grunder. 2011. “Policy-making in the Shadow of the World Bank: Resettlement and Urban Infrastructure in the MUTP (India).” In Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, edited by Chris Shore, Sue Wright, and Davide Però, 187–204. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• RFB (República Federativa do Brasil). 1996. Lei de Propriedade Industrial. Lei N° 9.279.
   Google Scholar
• RFB (República Federativa do Brasil). 1997. Lei N° 9.456.
   Google Scholar
• Sally, M. 2016. M. Prabhakar Rao Appointed as Member of Plant & Farmer Protection body. Economic Times, October 12. Accessed April 25, 2018. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/agriculture/m-prabhakar-rao-appointed-as-member-of-plant-farmer-protection-body/articleshow/54819144.cms.
   Google Scholar
• Sally, M., and K. Singh. 2019. “Monsanto Abused Dominant Position in India: CCI probe.” The Economic Times, May 22. accessed June 11, 2019. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/agriculture/monsanto-abused-dominant-position-in-india-cci-probe/printarticle/69437310.cms.
   Google Scholar
• Schapiro, M. 2018. Seeds of Resistance. The Fights to Save our Food Supply. New York: Hot Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I. 2006. Science, Agriculture and the Politics of Policy. The Case of Biotechnology in India. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Sehgal, R. 2015. “Thanks to Modi’s push, GM mustard set to it Indian markets.” Rediff, June 22. accessed July 2, 2018. http://www.rediff.com/business/report/thanks-to-modis-push-gm-mustard-set-to-hit-indian-markets/20150622.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, S. K. 2003. Private Power, Public law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, S. K. 2009. “Corporations, Seeds and Intellectual Property Rights Governance.” In Corporate Governance in Global Agrifood Governance, edited by J. Clapp, and D. Fuchs, 186–223. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 2016a. “Clash of Civilisations: India’s Ancient Love for Nature is Losing Out to Modern Disregard for It.” Scroll. Accessed July 31, 2019. https://scroll.in/article/808855/clash-of-civilisations-how-our-ancient-love-for-nature-is-losing-ground-to-modern-disregrard-for-it.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 2016b. “Why the Government is Right in Controlling the Price of Monsanto’s Bt Cotton Seeds.” Scroll. Accessed 31 July 2019. https://scroll.in/article/print/814476.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza Junior, S. P. 2012. “Justiça deve estar atenta a abuso de direito de patente.” Consultor Jurídico, December 20. Accessed April 23, 2018. https://www.conjur.com.br/2012-dez-20/sidney-pereira-justica-estar-atenta-abusos-direito-patente.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., and J. De Tavernier. 2017. “Farmer-suicide in India: Debating the Role of Biotechnology.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (8): 1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Dycke, L., and G. Van Overwalle. 2017. “Genetically Modified Crops and Intellectual Property law. Interpreting Indian Patents on Bt Cotton in View of the Socio-Political Background.” JIPITEC 8 (151): 151–165.
   Google Scholar
• Young, N., and D. Hannah. 2018. “Let $289 Million Jury Award Stand in Monsanto case.” San Francisco Chronicles, October 14. Accessed May 21, 2019. https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Let-289-million-jury-award-stand-in-Monsanto-case-13303640.php.
   Google Scholar
• ¶Court cases
   Google Scholar
• Bowman v. Monsanto 569 U.S. 278 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• ESG v. NBA. Writ Petition N° 41532/2012 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ex parte Hibberd 227 U.S.P.Q. 443 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Monsanto v. Schmeiser 1 S.C.R. 902, 2004 SCC 34 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Monsanto v. Sindicato rural de Passo Fundo. N° 70049447253 (N° CNJ: 0251316-44.2012.8.21.7000) (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Monsanto v. INPI. Denegatoria de patente: Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Civil y Comercial Federal (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Monsanto v. INPI. REsp N° 1.359.965 - RJ (2012/0271279-4) (2013).
   Google Scholar
• NBA v. UAS Dharwad. C.C. N° 579/2012 (PCR N° 267/2012) (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Nuziveedu v. Monsanto. FAO (OS) (COMM) 86/2017 & 76/2017 (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Sindicato rural de Passo Fundo v. Monsanto. N° 001/1.09.0106915-2 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Sindicato rural de Passo Fundo v. Monsanto. Recurso Especial N° 1.610.728-RS (2016/0171099-9) (2019).
   Google Scholar