The ideology of innovation: philanthropy and racial capitalism in global food governance

References

• African Centre for Biodiversity. 2016. Farm Input Subsidy Programmes (FISPs): A Benefit for, or the Betrayal of, SADC’s Small-Scale Farmers. Johannesburg, South Africa: African Centre for Biodiversity. https://www.acbio.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Input-Subsidies-Report-ACBio.pdf
   Google Scholar
• AGRA Watch. 2020. Messengers of Gates’ Agenda: A Case Study of the Cornell Alliance for Science Global Leadership Fellows Program. Seattle: Community Alliance for Global Justice. https://cagj.org/wp-content/uploads/Messengers-of-Gates’-Agenda-A-Case-Study-of-the-Cornell-Alliance-for-Science-Global-Leadership-Fellows-Program.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aijuka, Joshua, Mariann Bassey, Million Belay, Lena Bassermann, Mamadou Goïta, Roman Herre, Josephine Koch, et al. 2021. A Sting in the AGRA Tale: Independent Expert Evaluations Confirm That the Alliance for a Green Revolution Has Failed. Bamako, Benin City, Berlin, Cologne, Dar es Salaam, Johannesburg, Kampala, Lusaka, Morogoro, Thika, Zondoma: Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA, Uganda), Association Monde Rural (AMR, Burkina Faso), Biodiversity and Biosafety Association of Kenya (BIBA), Brot für die Welt (Germany), Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/FoEN), FIAN Germany, Forum on the Environment and Development (Germany), INKOTA-netzwerk (Germany), L'Institut de Recherche et de Promotion des Alternatives en Développement (IRPAD, Mali), PELUM Tanzania, PELUM Uganda, PELUM Zambia, Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung (Germany and South Africa), Tanzania Alliance for Biodiversity (TABIO), and Tanzania Organic Agriculture Movement (TOAM).
   Google Scholar
• Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA). 2017. Seeding an African Green Revolution: The PASS Journey. Nairobi, Kenya: AGRA. https://agra.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PASS-Book-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2020. A Fair Shot: Ensuring Universal Access to Covid-19 Diagnostics, Treatments, and Vaccines. London: Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/POL3034092020ENGLISH.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Colin R., and Chris Maughan. 2021. “‘The Innovation Imperative’: The Struggle Over Agroecology in the International Food Policy Arena.” Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5.
   Google Scholar
• Anghie, Antony. 2007. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhandar, Brenna. 2018. Colonial Lives of Property: Law, Land, and Racial Regimes of Ownership. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 2021. “Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Pledges $315 Million to Support Innovations that Help Smallholder Farmers Adapt to Climate Threats.” https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2021/11/gates-foundation-pledges-315-million-smallholder-farmers-cgiar-climate-change.
   Google Scholar
• Birn, Anne-Emanuelle. 2014. “Philanthrocapitalism, Past and Present: The Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, and the Setting (s) of the International/Global Health Agenda.” Hypothesis 12 (1): e8.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Matthew, and Michael Green. 2010. Philanthrocapitalism: How Giving Can Save the World. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, Saturnino M, Elyse N. Mills, Philip Seufert, Stephan Backes, Daniel Fyfe, Roman Herre, and Laura Michéle. 2020. “Transnational Land Investment Web: Land Grabs, TNCs, and the Challenge of Global Governance.” Globalizations 17 (4): 608–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canfield, Matthew. 2020. “From Colonialism to Collaboration: Disputing Biofuels in the Age of the Anthropocene.” Working Paper No. 201. Halle, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_3243842/component/file_3244455/content.
   Google Scholar
• Canfield, Matthew C., Molly D. Anderson, and Philip McMichael. 2021. “UN Food Systems Summit 2021: Dismantling Democracy and Resetting Corporate Control of Food Systems.” Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5.
   Google Scholar
• Cheyns, Emmanuelle. 2011. “Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives for Sustainable Agriculture: Limits of the ‘Inclusiveness’ Paradigm.” In Governing Through Standards: Origins, Drivers and Limitations, edited by Stefano Ponte, Jakob Vestergaard, and Peter Gibbon, 210–235. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cheyns, Emmanuelle, and Lone Riisgaard. 2014. “Introduction to the Symposium: The Exercise of Power through Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives for Sustainable Agriculture and Its Inclusion and Exclusion Outcomes.” Agriculture and Human Values 31 (3): 409–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, Jennifer, and Gyorgy Scrinis. 2017. “Big Food, Nutritionism, and Corporate Power.” Globalizations 14 (4): 578–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, Gordon. 1998. The Doubly Green Revolution: Food for All in the Twenty-First Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• “Declaration of the International Forum for Agroecology, Nyéléni, Mali: 27 February 2015”. 2015. Development 58 (2): 163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Drayton, Richard. 2000. Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain, and the “Improvement” of the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton, Terry. 1991. Ideology: An Introduction. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Eddens, Aaron. 2017. “White Science and Indigenous Maize: The Racial Logics of the Green Revolution.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (3): 653–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, Timothy. 2020. “Opinion | Bill Gates Is the Most Interesting Man in the World.” The New York Times, May 22, 2020, sec. Opinion. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/22/opinion/bill-gates-coronavirus.html.
   Google Scholar
• El Bilali, Hamid. 2019. “Innovation-Sustainability Nexus in Agriculture Transition: Case of Agroecology.” Open Agriculture 4 (1): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, Jan, and Bart Verspagen. 2009. “Innovation Studies—The Emerging Structure of a New Scientific Field.” Research Policy 38 (2): 218–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa, Meleiza. 2015. “Food Sovereignty in Everyday Life: Toward a People-Centered Approach to Food Systems.” Globalizations 12 (4): 498–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouché, Rayvon. 2006. “Say it Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud: African Americans, American Artifactual Culture, and Black Vernacular Technological Creativity.” American Quarterly 58 (3): 639–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. London: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, Bill. 2016. “Accelerating Innovation with Leadership.” GatesNotes. Accessed January 11, 2022. https://www.gatesnotes.com/About-Bill-Gates/Accelerating-Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, Bill. 2021. How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• George, Gerard, Anita M. McGahan, and Jaideep Prabhu. 2012. “Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda.” Journal of Management Studies 49 (4): 661–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getachew, Adom. 2020. Worldmaking After Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, Ruth Wilson. 2002. “Race and Globalization.” In Geographies of Global Change: Remapping the World, edited by Ronald John Johnston, and Michael Watts, 261–275. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gleckman, Harris. 2018. Multistakeholder Governance and Democracy: A Global Challenge. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît. 2015. Innovation Contested : The Idea of Innovation Over the Centuries. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodell, Jeff. 2014. “Bill Gates: The Rolling Stone Interview.” Accessed January 11, 2022. https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/bill-gates-the-rolling-stone-interview-111915/#ixzz38CtmOUPA.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2021. How the Gates Foundation Is Driving the Food System, in the Wrong Direction. Girona, Spain: GRAIN.
   Google Scholar
• Halewood, Michael, Nelissa Jamora, Isabel Lopez Noriega, Noelle L. Anglin, Peter Wenzl, Thomas Payne, Marie-Noelle Ndjiondjop, et al. 2020. “Germplasm Acquisition and Distribution by CGIAR Genebanks.” Plants 9 (10): 1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Cheryl I. 1993. “Whiteness as Property.” Harvard Law Review 106 (8): 1707–1791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydon, Steph, Tobias Jung, and Shona Russell. 2021. “‘You’ve Been Framed’: A Critical Review of Academic Discourse on Philanthrocapitalism.” International Journal of Management Reviews 23 (3): 353–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, Laurence R. 2004. “Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking.” Yale Journal of International Law 29 (1): 1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Holt-Giménez, Eric. 2008. “Out of AGRA: The Green Revolution Returns to Africa.” Development 51 (4): 464–471.
   Google Scholar
• Ince, Onur Ulas. 2018. Colonial Capitalism and the Dilemmas of Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, Lilly. 2019. Chasing Innovation: Making Entrepreneurial Citizens in Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jayne, Thomas S., Nicole M. Mason, William J. Burke, and Joshua Ariga. 2018. “Review: Taking Stock of Africa’s Second-Generation Agricultural Input Subsidy Programs.” Food Policy 75 (February): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelty, Christopher M. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kiviat, Barbara, and Bill Gates. 2008. “Making Capitalism More Creative.” Time Magazine, July 31, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, Jack Ralph. 2004. First the Seed : The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology, 1492-2000. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krattiger, Anatole, Thomas Bombelles, and Ania Jedrusik. 2018. “Driving Innovation for Global Health Through Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Public-Private Partnerships, Intellectual Property Governance, and Sustainable Development, edited by Ahmed Abdel-Latif, Margaret Chon, and Pedro Roffe, 47–71. Cambridge Law Handbooks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Tania Murray. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, Ann Louise. 2021. “‘We are not a Partnership’ – Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy of Global Public–Private Partnerships: The Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement.” Globalizations 18 (2): 237–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, John. 1988. Locke: Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malleret, Thierry, and Klaus Schwab. 2020. Covid-19: The Great Reset. Geneva: Forum Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, Mariana. 2015. Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public Vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, Mariana. 2018. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. New York: Penguin Books Limited.
   Google Scholar
• McGoey, Linsey. 2015. No Such Thing as a Free Gift: The Gates Foundation and the Price of Philanthropy. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, Richard B., and William F. Shughart. 1998. “Is Microsoft a Monopolist?” The Independent Review 3 (2): 165–197.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, Philip. 2021. “Shock and Awe in the UNFSS.” Development 64 (3): 162–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melamed, Jodi. 2015. “Racial Capitalism.” Critical Ethnic Studies 1 (1): 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Michéle, Laura, Patti Rundall, and Stefano Prato. n.d. “Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships: What are the Risks? The Case of Scaling up Nutrition (SUN).” http://www.babymilkaction.org/archives/23052.
   Google Scholar
• Moench-Pfanner, Regina, and Marc Van Ameringen. 2012. “The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN): A Decade of Partnerships to Increase Access to and Affordability of Nutritious Foods for the Poor.” Food and Nutrition Bulletin 33 (4_suppl3): S373–S380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Money Flows: What is Holding Back Investment in Agroecological Research for Africa?” 2020. “Biovision Foundation for Ecological Development & International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems.” http://www.ipes-food.org/_img/upload/files/Money%20Flows_Full%20report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, Maywa. 2021. “What Grows from a Pandemic? Toward an Abolitionist Agroecology.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (1): 99–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, Maywa, Matt Canfield, Alastair Iles, Molly Anderson, Nora McKeon, Shalmali Guttal, Barbara Gemmill-Herren, Jessica Duncan, Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, and Stefano Prato. 2021. “Editorial: Resetting Power in Global Food Governance: The UN Food Systems Summit.” Development 64 (3): 153–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, Maywa, Antonio Roman-Alcalá, Alex Liebman, and Siena Chrisman. 2021. “Agrarian Origins of Authoritarian Populism in the United States: What Can We Learn from 20th-Century Struggles in California and the Midwest?” Journal of Rural Studies 82 (February): 518–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morvaridi, Behrooz. 2012a. “Capitalist Philanthropy and the New Green Revolution for Food Security.” The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 19 (2): 243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Morvaridi, Behrooz. 2012b. “Capitalist Philanthropy and Hegemonic Partnerships.” Third World Quarterly 33 (7): 1191–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MSI Integrity. 2020. “Not Fit-for-Purpose: The Grand Experiment of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives in Corporate Accountability, Human Rights and Global Governance.” https://www.msi-integrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/MSI_Not_Fit_For_Purpose_FORWEBSITE.FINAL_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MSI Integrity, and Duke Human Rights Center at the Kenan Institute for Ethics. 2017. “The New Regulators? Assessing the Landscape of Multi-Stakeholder Initiative.” https://msi-database.org/data/The%20New%20Regulators%20-%20MSI%20Database%20Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Birgit. 2011. “The Elephant in the Room: Multistakeholder Dialogue on Agricultural Biotechnology in the Food and Agriculture Organization.” In Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, edited by Cris Shore, and Susan Wright, 282–299. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nally, David, and Stephen Taylor. 2015. “The Politics of Self-Help: The Rockefeller Foundation, Philanthropy and the ‘Long’ Green Revolution.” Political Geography 49 (November): 51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navdanya International. 2020. “Gates to a Global Empire: Over Seed, Food, Health, Knowledge … and the Earth.” Navdanya International. https://navdanyainternational.org/publications/gates-to-a-global-empire/.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, Ruth. 1999. Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women and Modern Machines in America, 1870-1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, Mario, and Richard Owen. 2018. “Framing Inclusive Innovation Within the Discourse of Development: Insights from Case Studies in India.” Research Policy 47 (1): 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou, Theo. 2020. “Innovation, Value-Neutrality and the Question of Politics: Unmasking the Rhetorical and Ideological Abuse of Evolutionary Theory.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (2): 238–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, Raj. 2013. “The Long Green Revolution.” Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (1): 1–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patnaik, Priti. 2021. COVID-19 Vaccine Governance: Sidelining Multilateralism. People’s Health Movement.
   Google Scholar
• Pechlaner, Gabriela. 2012. Corporate Crops: Biotechnology, Agriculture, and the Struggle for Control. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, Jamie, and Adam Tickell. 2002. “Neoliberalizing Space.” Antipode 34 (3): 380–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, John H. 1997. Geopolitics and the Green Revolution: Wheat, Genes, and the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peschard, Karine, and Shalini Randeria. 2020. “‘Keeping Seeds in Our Hands’: The Rise of Seed Activism.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (4): 613–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimbert, Michel. 2006. Transforming Knowledge and Ways of Knowing for Food Sovereignty. London: IIED.
   Google Scholar
• Pingali, Prabhu. 2012. Scaling up in Agriculture, Rural Development, and Nutrition: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: Catalyzing Agricultural Innovation | IFPRI : International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. https://www.ifpri.org/publication/scaling-agriculture-rural-development-and-nutrition-bill-melinda-gates-foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Karl. 2001. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, Diane. 2013. Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Cedric J. 2005. Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnurr, Matthew A. 2019. Africa’s Gene Revolution: Genetically Modified Crops and the Future of African Agriculture. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuftan, Claudio, and Radha Holla. 2012. “Two Contemporary Challenges: Corporate Control Over Food and Nutrition and the Absence of a Focus on the Social Determinants of Nutrition.” In Who Decides About Global Food and Nutrition? Strategies to Regain Control, 24–31. Stuttgart: Right to Food and Nutrition Watch. Brot für die Welt, FIAN International, Interchurch Organisation for Development Cooperation (ICCO).
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. [1939] 2017. Business Cycles [Volume One]: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Fine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schurman, Rachel. 2017. “Building an Alliance for Biotechnology in Africa.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (3): 441–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurman, Rachel. 2018. “Micro(Soft) Managing a ‘Green Revolution’ for Africa: The New Donor Culture and International Agricultural Development.” World Development 112 (December): 180–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz, Karolin, and Jens Martens. 2017. “Philanthrolateralism: Private Funding and Corporate Influence in the United Nations.” Global Policy 8 (S5): 46–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, Ronen. 2008. “The Age of Responsibilization: On Market-Embedded Morality.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Chris J. 2005. “Imperial Science: The Rockefeller Foundation and Agricultural Science in Peru, 1940–1960.” Science as Culture 14 (2): 113–137.
   Google Scholar
• Slobodian, Quinn. 2020. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Elta. 2009. “Imaginaries of Development: The Rockefeller Foundation and Rice Research.” Science as Culture 18 (4): 461–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snipstal, Blain. 2015. “FS – Repeasantization, Agroecology and the Tactics of Food Sovereignty.” Canadian Food Studies / La Revue Canadienne des études sur L'alimentation 2 (2): 164–173.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, Michael, and Jeremy Youde. 2021. “Public-Private Partnering as a Modus Operandi: Explaining the Gates Foundation’s Approach to Global Health Governance.” Global Public Health 16 (3): 401–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweezy, Paul M. 1943. “Professor Schumpeter’s Theory of Innovation.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 25 (1): 93–96.
   Google Scholar
• Swinburn, Boyd A., Vivica I. Kraak, Steven Allender, Vincent J. Atkins, Phillip I. Baker, Jessica R. Bogard, Hannah Brinsden, et al. 2019. “The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission Report.” The Lancet 393 (10173): 791–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Carol. 2018. “Philanthrocapitalism: Rendering the Public Domain Obsolete?” Third World Quarterly 39 (1): 51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermann, Cristian. 2020. “The Multiple Dimensions of Social Justice Affected by Agricultural Innovation.” In Social Justice and Agricultural Innovation, edited by Cristian Timmermann, 1–26. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tzouvala, Ntina. 2020. Capitalism As Civilisation: A History of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dycke, Lodewijk. 2021. “Accumulation by Dispossession and African Seeds: Colonial Institutions Trump Seed Business Law.” The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vats, Anjali. 2020. The Color of Creatorship: Intellectual Property, Race, and the Making of Americans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vinsel, Lee, and Andrew L. Russell. 2020. The Innovation Delusion: How Our Obsession with the New Has Disrupted the Work That Matters Most. New York: Currency Books.
   Google Scholar
• Von Braun, Joachim, Kaosar Afsana, Louise O. Fresco, and Mohamed Hassan. 2021. “Science for Transformation of Food Systems: Opportunities for the UN Food Systems Summit.” Scientific Committee of the UN Food Systems Summit. https://sc-fss2021.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Scientific-Group-Strategic-Paper-Science-for-Transformation-of-Food-Systems_August-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wezel, Alexander, Barbara Gemmill Herren, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Edmundo Barrios, André Luiz Rodrigues Gonçalves, and Fergus Sinclair. 2020. “Agroecological Principles and Elements and their Implications for Transitioning to Sustainable Food Systems. A Review.” Agronomy for Sustainable Development 40 (6): 40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Monica M. 2018. Freedom Farmers: Agricultural Resistance and the Black Freedom Movement. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, Timothy. 2017. AGRA at Ten Years: Searching for Evidence of a Green Revolution in Africa. Tufts University and the Small Planet Institute. http://agrichub.org/media/AGRAWisePrelimFindings2017_x_125_BW.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, Timothy. 2019. Eating Tomorrow: Agribusiness, Family Farmers, and the Battle for the Future of Food. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, Timothy. 2020. “Failing Africa’s Farmers: An Impact Assessment of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa.” Working Paper No. 20-01. Global Development and Environment Institute. Tufts University.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Neal. 1984. John Locke and Agrarian Capitalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 2016. The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View. New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zoomers, Annelies. 2010. “Globalisation and the Foreignisation of Space: Seven Processes Driving the Current Global Land Grab.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (2): 429–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar