A missing link in the agrarian question: the role of ground-rent and landed property in capital accumulation. The case of Argentina (1993-2019)

References

• Akram-Lodhi, Agha Haroon, and Cristóbal Kay. 2010a. “Surveying the Agrarian Question (Part 1): Unearthing Foundations, Exploring Diversity.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (1): 177–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, Agha Haroon, and Cristóbal Kay. 2010b. “Surveying the Agrarian Question (Part 2): Current Debates and Beyond.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (2): 255–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameghino, Azcuy, and Diego Fernández. 2019. ‘El Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2018 Visión General y Aproximación a La Región Pampeana’. CIEA / FCE.
   Google Scholar
• Anglade, Christian, and Carlos Fortin. 1990. “Accumulation, Adjustment and the Autonomy of the State in Latin America.” In The State and Capital Accumulation in Latin America, edited by Christian Anglade and Carlos Fortin, 211–340. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Araghi, Farshad. 2000. “The Great Global Enclosure of Our Times: Peasants and the Agrarian Question at the End of the Twentieth Century.” In Hungry for Profit: The Agribusiness Threat to Farmers, Food, and the Environment, edited by Fred Magdoff, John Bellamy Foster, and Frederick H. Buttel, 145–160. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balardini, Fabian. 2017. “Rent.” In Routledge Handbook of Marxian Economics, edited by David M. Brennan, David Kristjanson-Gural, Catherine O. Mulder, and Peter K. Olsen, 111–121. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Michael. 1977. “Differential Rent and the Role of Landed Property.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1: 380–403.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Michael. 1980. “‘On Marx’s Theory of Agricultural Rent: A Reply to Ben Fine’.” Economy and Society 9 (3): 304–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsa, Javier. 2006. El Desvanecimiento Del Mundo Chacarero. Transformaciones Sociales En La Agricultura Bonaerense. 1937-1988. Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, Matt, and Alejandro Milcíades Peña. 2021. “The Politics of Fiscal Legitimacy in Developmental States: Emergency Taxes in Argentina Under Kirchnerism.” New Political Economy, https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1961215.
   Google Scholar
• Bartra, Armando. 1979. “La Renta Capitalista de La Tierra.” Cuadernos Agrarios 7/8: 41–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. 1986. “Capitalism and Petty Commodity Production.” Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice 20: 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. 1988. “Capitalism and Petty-Bourgeois Production: Class Relations and Divisions of Labour.” Journal of Peasant Studies 15 (2): 258–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. 1991. “Rural Class Structure.” In A Dictionary of Marxist Thought, edited by Tom Bottomore, 486–488. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. 1994. “Agrarian Classes in Capitalist Development.” In Capitalism and Development, edited by Leisle Sklair, 40–71. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. 2006. “Is There an Agrarian Question in the 21st Century?” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 27 (4): 449–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortkiewicz, Ladislaus. 1910. ‘Die Rodbertus’sche Grundrententheorie Und Die Marx’sche Lehre von Der Absoluten Grundrente’. Archiv Für Die Geschichte Des Sozialismus Und Der Arbeiterbewegung, 1910.
   Google Scholar
• Byres, Terence J. 1991. “Agrarian Question.” In A Dictionary of Marxist Thought, edited by Tom Bottomore, 9–11. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Byres, Terence J. 1996. Capitalism From Above and Capitalism From Below: An Essay in Comparative Political Economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Caligaris, Gastón. 2015. “Concentración y Centralización Del Capital Agrario En La Región Pampeana: El Caso de Los Grandes Pooles de Siembra.” Mundo Agrario 16 (31): 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Caligaris, Gastón. 2016. “The Global Accumulation of Capital and Ground-Rent in “Resource Rich” Countries.” In The New International Division of Labour, edited by Greig Charnock, and Guido Starosta, 55–77. International Political Economy Series. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, Chris. 2018. “Rethinking the agrarian question: Agriculture and underdevelopment in the Global South.” Journal of Agrarian Change 18 (4): 703–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnock, Greig, and Guido Starosta, eds. 2016. The New International Division of Labour. Global Transformations and Uneven Development. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Chayanov, Alexander V. 1986. The Theory of Peasant Economy. Homewood, Illinois: The American Economic Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dachevsky, Fernando, and Juan Kornblihtt. 2016. “Reproduction and Crisis of Capitalism in Venezuela during Chavism.” Latin American Perspectives 44 (1): 78–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussel, Enrique. 2002. Towards an Unknown Marx: A Commentary on the Manuscripts of 1861-63. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emmanuel, Arghiri. 1972. Unequal Exchange. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, Diego. 2010. “Concentración Económica En La Región Pampeana: El Caso de Los Fideicomisos Financieros.” Mundo Agrario 11: 21.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, Ben. 1979. “‘On Marx’s Theory of Agricultural Rent’.” Economy and Society 8 (3): 241–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flichman, Guillermo. 1977. La Renta Del Suelo y El Desarrollo Agrario Argentino. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Fröbel, Folker, Jürgen Heinrichs, and Otto Kreye. 1980. The New International Division of Labour: Structural Unemployment in Industrialised Countries and Industrialisation in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, Peter, and Michael Neocosmos. 1985. “Some Problems in the Political Economy of “African Socialism”.” In Contradictions of Accumulation in Africa: Studies in Economy and State, edited by Henry Bernstein, 153–206. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gras, Carla, and Daniel M. Cáceres. 2017. “El Acaparamiento de Tierras Como Proceso Dinámico: Las Estrategias de Los Actores En Contextos de Estancamiento Económico.” Población y Sociedad 24 (2): 163–194.
   Google Scholar
• Gras, Carla, and Valeria Hernández. 2019. Radiografía Del Nuevo Campo Argentino: Del Terrateniente al Empresario Transnacional. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI editores.
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg, Nicolás. 2016. “Patterns of “State-Led Development” in Brazil and South Korea: The Steel Manufacturing Industries.” In The New International Division of Labour, edited by Greig Charnock, and Guido Starosta, 215–244. International Political Economy Series. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg, Nicolás, and Guido Starosta. 2009. “The Limits of Studies in Comparative Development of East Asia and Latin America: The Case of Land Reform and Agrarian Policies.” Third World Quarterly 30 (4): 761–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinberg, Nicolás, and Guido Starosta. 2015. “‘From Global Capital Accumulation to Varieties of Centre-Leftism in South America’.” In Crisis and Contradiction: Marxist Perspectives on Latin American in the Global Economy, edited by Susan Spronk, and Jeffrey R. Webber, 236–272. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2009. Social Justice and the City. London: University of Georgia press.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, William D. 2000. “Concentration of Ownership and Control in Agriculture.” In Hungry for Profit: The Agribusiness Threat to Farmers, Food, and the Environment, edited by Fred Magdoff, John Bellamy Foster, and Frederick H. Buttel, 61–76. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iñigo Carrera, Juan. 2007. La Formación Económica de La Sociedad Argentina. Volumen I, Renta Agraria, Ganancia Industrial y Deuda Externa. 1882-2004. Buenos Aires: Imago Mundi.
   Google Scholar
• Iñigo Carrera, Juan. 2008. ‘Terratenientes, Retenciones, Tipo de Cambio, Regulaciones Específicas: Los Cursos de Apropiación de La Renta de La Tierra Agraria. 1882-2007’. Documento de Investigación del Centro para la Investigación como Crítica Práctica. CICP. http://www.cicpint.org/Investigaci%C3%B3n/JIC/Argentina/Assets/JIC%20documento%20renta%20cicp%202008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Iñigo Carrera, Juan. 2014. “The Historical Determination of the Capitalist Mode of Production and of the Working Class as the Revolutionary Subject.” Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory 42 (4): 555–572.
   Google Scholar
• Iñigo Carrera, Juan. 2016. “The General Rate of Profit and Its Realisation in the Differentiation of Industrial Capitals.” In The New International Division of Labour, edited by Greig Charnock, and Guido Starosta, 25–53. International Political Economy Series. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Economics of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. 1957. Political Economy. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Itoh, Makoto. 1988. The Basic Theory of Capitalism. The Forms and Substance of the Capitalist Economy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kautsky, Karl. 1988. The Agrarian Question. London: Zwan Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, Cristóbal. 2002. “Why East Asia Overtook Latin America: Agrarian Reform, Industrialisation and Development.” Third World Quarterly 23 (6): 1073–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli, Atul. 2004. State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. 1969. “Modos de Producción, Sistemas Económicos y Población Excedente. Aproximación Histórica a Los Casos Argentino y Chileno.” Revista Latinoamericana de Sociología 2: 276–316.
   Google Scholar
• Lapidus, Iosif, and Konstantin Ostrovitianov. 1929. An Outline of Political Economy: Political Economy and Soviet Economics. London: Martin Lawrence.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, Vladimir Ilich. 1964. The Development of Capitalism in Russia. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Levien, Michael, Michael Watts, and Hairong Yan. 2018. “Agrarian Marxism.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (5-6): 853–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyubimov, Lev. 1930. Essays on Ground Rent Theory [in Russian]. Moscow: Gosizdat.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, Ernest. 1998. Late Capitalism. London: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Francesca. 2020. ‘A Defense and Expansion of the Theory of Capitalist Ground Rent: Speculation, Securitization, and Struggles over Land and Housing’. PhD Thesis. New York: University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Francesca. 2021. “The Housing Question, ground rent theory, and differentiation vs. Homogenization.” Human Geography 14 (2): 227–242.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1976. Capital. Volume 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1988. “Economic Manuscript of 1861-63.” In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Collected Works. Vol. 30, edited by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, 9–501. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1991. Capital. Volume 3. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1992. Capital. Volume 2. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1994. “Economic Manuscript of 1861-63.” In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Collected Works. Volume 34, edited by Karl Marx, and Friedrich Engels, 7–336. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang, and Christel Neusüss. 1975. “The Illusion of State Socialism and the Contradiction between Wage Labor and Capital.” Telos 25 (Fall): 13–90.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Trento, Nicolás. 2021. “Social Classes and Capital Accumulation in Recent Argentina: The 2008 Agrarian Conflict.” Latin American Perspectives 48 (6): 160–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postone, Moishe. 1993. Time, Labor and Social Domination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preobrazhensky, Eugene. 1965. The New Economics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, Thomas F. 2016. ““Post-Neoliberalism” in the International Division of Labour: The Divergent Cases of Ecuador and Venezuela.” In The New International Division of Labour, edited by Greig Charnock, and Guido Starosta, 107–126. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-53872-7_5.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, Thomas F. 2018. ““Hot Chocolate”: Financialized Global Value Chains and Cocoa Production in Ecuador.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (5–6): 904–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1446000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakisaka, Itsurō. 1930. Studies in the Theory of Rent [in Japanese]. Tokyo: Kaizo-sha.
   Google Scholar
• Starosta, Guido. 2010. “Global Commodity Chains and the Marxian Law of Value.” Antipode 42 (2): 433–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starosta, Guido. 2015. Marx’s Capital, Method and Revolutionary Subjectivity. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Starosta, Guido. 2016. “Revisiting the New International Division of Labour Thesis.” In The New International Division of Labour, edited by Greig Charnock, and Guido Starosta, 79–103. International Political Economy Series. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Starosta, Guido, Gastón Caligaris, and Alejandro Fitzsimons. 2021. Value, Money and Capital. The Critique of Political Economy and Contemporary Capitalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uno, Kōzō. 1977. Principles of Political Economy. Theory of a Purely Capitalist Society. Sussex: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Villar, Ana Beatriz. 2022. ‘Paraguay: Transformaciones Productivas Agrarias, Superpoblación Obrera Relativa y Conflictos Sociales (2000-2012)’. Doctoral, Ciudad de Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.
   Google Scholar
• Villulla, Juan Manuel. 2021. ‘Las Cosechas Son Ajenas: Historia de Los Trabajadores Rurales Detrás Del Agronegocio.’ Editorial Cienflores.
   Google Scholar
• Weis, Tony. 2007. The Global Food Economy: The Battle for the Future of Farming. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar