La Via Campesina – transforming agrarian and knowledge politics, and co-constructing a field: a laudatio

References

• Agarwal, B. 2014. “Food Sovereignty, Food Security and Democratic Choice: Critical Contradictions, Difficult Conciliations.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1247–1268. doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.876996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajl, M. 2021. A People's Green New Deal. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, A. H. 2021. “The Ties That Bind? Agroecology and the Agrarian Question in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (4): 687–714. doi:10.1080/03066150.2021.1923010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, A. H., K. Dietz, B. Engels, and B. M. McKay. 2021. “An Introduction to the Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies.” In Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies, edited by A. Akram-Lodhi, K. Dietz, B. Engels, and B. McKay, 1–8. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Alabrese, M., A. Bessa, M. Brunori, and P. F. Giuggioli, eds. 2022. The United Nations’ Declaration on Peasants’ Rights. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-Fradejas, A., S. M. Borras Jr, T. Holmes, E. Holt-Giménez, and M. J. Robbins. 2015. “Food Sovereignty: Convergence and Contradictions, Conditions and Challenges.” Third World Quarterly 36 (3): 431–448. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1023567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri, M. A., and V. M. Toledo. 2011. “The Agroecological Revolution in Latin America: Rescuing Nature, Ensuring Food Sovereignty and Empowering Peasants.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (3): 587–612. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.582947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. R., J. Bruil, M. J. Chappell, C. Kiss, and M. P. Pimbert. 2019. “From Transition to Domains of Transformation: Getting to Sustainable and Just Food Systems Through Agroecology.” Sustainability 11 (19): 5272. doi:10.3390/su11195272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, D. 2020. “Populism from Above and Below: The Path to Regression in Brazil.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (7): 1470–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, D. 2022. “Neoliberal Extractivism: Brazil in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–24. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2030314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsel, M. 2022. “Climate Change and Class Conflict in the Anthropocene: Sink or Swim Together?” Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (1): 67–95. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2113390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsel, M., B. Hogenboom, and L. Pellegrini. 2016. “The Extractive Imperative in Latin America.” The Extractive Industries and Society 3 (4): 880–887. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.10.014.
   Google Scholar
• Ashwood, L. 2018. “Rural Conservatism or Anarchism? The Pro-State, Stateless, and Anti-State Positions.” Rural Sociology 83 (4): 717–748. doi:10.1111/ruso.12226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baletti, B., T. M. Johnson, and W. Wolford. 2008. “‘Late Mobilization’: Transnational Peasant Networks and Grassroots Organizing in Brazil and South Africa.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2-3): 290–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbesgaard, M. 2018. “Blue Growth: Savior or Ocean Grabbing?” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1): 130–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baviskar, A., and M. Levien. 2021. “Farmers’ Protests in India: Introduction to the JPS Forum.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (7): 1341–1355. doi:10.1080/03066150.2021.1998002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello, W. 2008. Deglobalization: Ideas for a New World Economy. London: Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2006. “Is There an Agrarian Question in the 21st Century?” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 27 (4): 449–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2010a. Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2010b. “Introduction: Some Questions Concerning the Productive Forces.” Journal of Agrarian Change 10 (3): 300–314. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00272.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2014. “Food Sovereignty via the ‘Peasant Way’: A Sceptical View.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1031–1063. doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.852082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2018. “The ‘Peasant Problem’ in the Russian Revolution(s), 1905–1929.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (5-6): 1127–1150. doi:10.1080/03066150.2018.1428189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2022. “Marxism(s) and the Politics of Land.” In The Oxford Handbook of Land Politics, edited by S. M. Borras, and J. C. Franco, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618646.013.35
   Google Scholar
• Biekart, K., and M. Jelsma. 1994. Peasants Beyond Protest in Central America. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork-James, C., M. Checker, and M. Edelman. 2022. “Transnational Social Movements: Environmentalist, Indigenous, and Agrarian Visions for Planetary Futures.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 47 (20): 1–20. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-084822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, M. [1954] 1992. The Historian’s Craft. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M. 2020. “Agrarian Social Movements: The Absurdly Difficult but not Impossible Agenda of Defeating Right-Wing Populism and Exploring a Socialist Future.” Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (1): 3–36. doi:10.1111/joac.12311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M. 2023. “Politically Engaged, Pluralist and Internationalist: Critical Agrarian Studies Today.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50: 2. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2163164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., and J. C. Franco. 2013. “Global Land Grabbing and Political Reactions ‘From Below’.” Third World Quarterly 34 (9): 1723–1747. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.843845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., and J. C. Franco. 2023. Scholar-Activism and Land Struggles. Rugby: Practical Action Books.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., J. C. Franco, S. R. Isakson, L. Levidow, and P. Vervest. 2016. “The Rise of Flex Crops and Commodities: Implications for Research.” Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (1): 93–115. doi:10.1080/03066150.2015.1036417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., J. C. Franco, D. Ra, T. Kramer, M. Kamoon, P. Phyu, and K. K. Ju. 2022a. “Rurally Rooted Cross-Border Migrant Workers from Myanmar, Covid-19, and Agrarian Movements.” Agriculture and Human Values 39 (1): 315–338. doi:10.1007/s10460-021-10262-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., I. Scoones, A. Baviskar, M. Edelman, N. L. Peluso, and W. Wolford. 2022b. “Climate Change and Agrarian Struggles: An Invitation to Contribute to a JPS Forum.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1080/03066150.2021.1956473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, T. 1995. New Farmers’ Movements in India. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brem-Wilson, J. 2017. “La Vía Campesina and the UN Committee on World Food Security: Affected Publics and Institutional Dynamics in the Nascent Transnational Public Sphere.” Review of International Studies 43 (2): 302–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, Z. W., A. Alonso-Fradejas, G. Colque, and S. Sauer. 2018. “The ‘Tenure Guidelines’ as a Tool for Democratising Land and Resource Control in Latin America.” Third World Quarterly 39 (7): 1367–1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryceson, D. F., C. Kay, and J. Mooij. 2000. Disappearing Peasantries? Rural Labour in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 2014. “Foreword.” In The Public Sociology Debate: Ethics and Engagement, edited by A. Hanemaayer, and C. Schneider, ix–xviii. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt, H. J., and K. Dietz. 2014. “(Neo-) Extractivism – A New Challenge for Development Theory from Latin America.” Third World Quarterly 35 (3): 468–486. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.893488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, K., and S. Murphy. 2014. “What Place for International Trade in Food Sovereignty?” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1065–1084. doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.876995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calmon, D., C. Jacovetti, and M. Koné. 2021. “Agrarian Climate Justice as a Progressive Alternative to Climate Security: Mali at the Intersection of Natural Resource Conflicts.” Third World Quarterly 42 (12): 2785–2803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvário, R., and A. A. Desmarais. 2023. “The Feminist Dimensions of Food Sovereignty: Insights from La Via Campesina’s Politics.” Journal of Peasant Studies, doi: 10.1080/03066150.2022.2153042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canfield, M., M. D. Anderson, and P. McMichael. 2021. “UN Food Systems Summit 2021: Dismantling Democracy and Resetting Corporate Control of Food Systems.” Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5: 661552. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.661552.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2000. “Professionalisation, Activism, and the University: Whither ‘Critical Geography’?” Environment and Planning A 32 (6): 955–970. doi:10.1068/a3263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chagnon, C. W., F. Durante, B. K. Gills, S. E. Hagolani-Albov, S. Hokkanen, and S. M. Kangasluoma. 2022. “From Extractivism to Global Extractivism: The Evolution of an Organizing Concept.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (4): 760–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambati, W. 2017. “Changing Forms of Wage Labour in Zimbabwe’s New Agrarian Structure.” Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 6 (1): 79–112. doi:10.1177/2277976017721346.
   Google Scholar
• Chayanov, A. V. 1991. The Theory of Peasant Co-Operatives. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/76295499.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chayanov, A. V. [1925] 1986. Theory of Peasant Economy. Madison, WI: Univ of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Claeys, P., and D. Delgado Pugley. 2017. “Peasant and Indigenous Transnational Social Movements Engaging with Climate Justice.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 38 (3): 325–340. doi:10.1080/02255189.2016.1235018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claeys, P., and M. Edelman. 2020. “The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 1–68. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1672665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. 2022. “Concentration and Crises: Exploring the Deep Roots of Vulnerability in the Global Industrial Food System.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2129013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., and S. R. Isakson. 2018. Speculative Harvests: Financialization, Food and Agriculture. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., P. Newell, and Z. W. Brent. 2018. “The Global Political Economy of Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Systems.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1): 80–88. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1381602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, P. 2017. “Neo-Developmentalism and a ‘Vía Campesina’ for Rural Development: Unreconciled Projects in Ecuador’s Citizen’s Revolution.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2): 348–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., and H. Schroeder. 2011. “Governing and Implementing REDD+.” Environmental Science & Policy 14 (2): 89–99. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronado, S. 2019. “Rights in the Time of Populism: Land and Institutional Change Amid the Reemergence of Right-Wing Authoritarianism in Colombia.” Land 8 (8): 119. doi:10.3390/land8080119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulibaly, I., and J. Grajales. 2023. “Being a Peasant is About Resistance: West African Peasant Movements and the Struggle for Agrarian Justice.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50: 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins, B. 2022. “Land, Social Reproduction, and Agrarian Change.” In The Oxford Handbook of Land Politics, edited by S. M. Borras, and J. C. Franco, 1–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618646.013.32
   Google Scholar
• Deere, C. D., and F. S. Royce. 2009. Rural Social Movements in Latin America: Organizing for Sustainable Livelihoods. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Dell’Angelo, J., G. Navas, M. Witteman, G. D’Alisa, A. Scheidel, and L. Temper. 2021. “Commons Grabbing and Agribusiness: Violence, Resistance and Social Mobilization.” Ecological Economics 184: 107004. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O. 2011. “How Not to Think of Land-Grabbing: Three Critiques of Large-Scale Investments in Farmland.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2): 249–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmarais, A. A. 2007. La Vía Campesina. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., P. Claeys, M. G. Rivera-Ferre, E. Oteros-Rozas, B. Van Dyck, C. Plank, and A. A. Desmarais. 2021. “Scholar-Activists in an Expanding European Food Sovereignty Movement.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (4): 875–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, A. 2018. “Counterinsurgency for Wind Energy: The Bíi Hioxo Wind Park in Juchitán, Mexico.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (3): 630–652. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1259221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 1999. Peasants Against Globalization: Rural Social Movements in Costa Rica. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 2009. “Synergies and Tensions Between Rural Social Movements and Professional Researchers.” Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (1): 245–265. doi:10.1080/03066150902820313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 2014. “Food Sovereignty: Forgotten Genealogies and Future Regulatory Challenges.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 959–978. doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.876998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and S. M. Borras Jr. 2016. Political Dynamics of Transnational Agrarian Movements. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., T. Weis, A. Baviskar, S. M. Borras Jr, E. Holt-Giménez, D. Kandiyoti, and W. Wolford. 2014. “Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Food Sovereignty.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 911–931. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.963568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and W. Wolford. 2017. “Introduction: Critical Agrarian Studies in Theory and Practice.” Antipode 49 (4): 959–976. doi:10.1111/anti.12326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekers, M. 2019. “The Curious Case of Ecological Farm Interns: On the Populism and Political Economy of Agro-Ecological Farm Work.” Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (1): 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. 2020. Fields of Gold: Financing the Global Land Rush. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. “Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature?” Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2): 237–261. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, B. M., C. A. Welch, and E. C. Gonçalves. 2010. “Agrofuel Policies in Brazil: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (4): 793–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B. 2000. Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. London: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 1990. “The Challenge of Rural Democratization: Perspectives from Latin America and the Philippines.” Journal of Development Studies 26: 4. special issue.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 1993. The Politics of Food in Mexico: State Power and Social Mobilization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. A. 2010. Coalitions and Networks. Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, UC Santa Cruz. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1(05031j.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, J. C., and S. M. Borras Jr. 2019. “Grey Areas in Green Grabbing: Subtle and Indirect Interconnections Between Climate Change Politics and Land Grabs and Their Implications for Research.” Land Use Policy 84: 192–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, J. C., and S. M. Borras Jr. 2021. “The Global Climate of Land Politics.” Globalizations 18 (7): 1277–1297. doi:10.1080/14747731.2021.1979717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, J., and S. Monsalve Suárez. 2018. “Why Wait for the State? Using the CFS Tenure Guidelines to Recalibrate Political-Legal Struggles for Democratic Land Control.” Third World Quarterly 39 (7): 1386–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2021. “Climates of Capital: For a Trans-Environmental Eco-Socialism.” New Left Review 127: 94–127.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, H., and P. McMichael. 1989. “Agriculture and the State System: The Rise and Decline of National Agricultures, 1870 to the Present.” Sociologia Ruralis 29 (2): 93–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00360.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, S. S., and D. Silva Garzón. 2022. “The Political Life of Mitigation: From Carbon Accounting to Agrarian Counter-Accounts.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–24. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2153043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. 1982. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, J. F. 2020. “Degrowth and Critical Agrarian Studies.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (2): 235–264. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1695601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraldo, O. F., and P. M. Rosset. 2018. “Agroecology as a Territory in Dispute: Between Institutionality and Social Movements.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (3): 545–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giunta, I. 2014. “Food Sovereignty in Ecuador: Peasant Struggles and the Challenge of Institutionalization.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1201–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeub, B. E., M. J. Chappell, H. Wittman, S. Ledermann, R. B. Kerr, and B. Gemmill-Herren. 2016. “The State of Family Farms in the World.” World Development 87: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grajales, J. 2021. Agrarian Capitalism, War and Peace in Colombia: Beyond Dispossession. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grubačić, A., J.-F. Gerber, and A. Rilović. 2022. “Land in the Anarchist Tradition.” In The Oxford Handbook of Land Politics, edited by S. M. Borras, and J. C. Franco, 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618646.013.7
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, L., L. Laura van Oers, J. Smessaert, J. Spanier, G. Raj, and G. Feola. 2023. “Degrowth and Agri-Food Systems: A Research Agenda for the Critical Social Sciences.” Sustainability Science January, doi:10.1007/s11625-022-01276-y.
   Google Scholar
• Guttal, S. 2021. “Re-Imagining the UN Committee on World Food Security.” Development 64 (3): 227–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gyapong, A. Y. 2021. “Land Grabs, Farmworkers, and Rural Livelihoods in West Africa: Some Silences in the Food Sovereignty Discourse.” Globalizations 18 (3): 339–354. doi:10.1080/14747731.2020.1716922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, C. R. 2006. “Activist Research v. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology.” Cultural Anthropology 21 (1): 96–120. doi:10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., M. Edelman, S. M. Borras Jr, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2015. “Resistance, Acquiescence or Incorporation? An Introduction to Land Grabbing and Political Reactions ‘from Below’.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3-4): 467–488. doi:10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., I. Scoones, and D. Tsikata. 2017. “Plantations, Outgrowers and Commercial Farming in Africa: Agricultural Commercialisation and Implications for Agrarian Change.” Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (3): 515–537. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1263187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harriss-White, B. 2022. “Petty Commodity Production.” Journal of Peasant Studies, doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2138354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, T. P. 2018. “The Class Dynamics of Food Sovereignty in Mexico and Ecuador.” Journal of Agrarian Change 18 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1111/joac.12156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández Rodríguez, C. 2022. “Seed Sovereignty as Decommodification: A Perspective from Subsistence Peasant Communities in Southern Mexico.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–28. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2025780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herren, H. R., B. Haerlin, and IAASTD+10 Advisory Group. 2020. Transformation of Our Food Systems: The Making of a Paradigm Shift. Reflections since IAASTD – 10 Years On. Bochum and Zürich: Zukunftsstiftung Landwirtschaft & Biovision. https://www.globalagriculture.org/fileadmin/files/weltagrarbericht/IAASTD-Buch/PDFBuch/BuchWebTransformationFoodSystems.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. J. 1971. “From Social History to the History of Society.” Daedalus 100 (1): 20–45. Win 71. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ038652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holleman, H. 2018. Dust Bowls of Empire. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holt-Giménez, E. 2006. Campesino a Campesino: Voices from Latin America's Farmer to Farmer Movement for Sustainable Agriculture. Oakland: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar
• Holt-Giménez, E., A. Shattuck, and I. Van Lammeren. 2021. “Thresholds of Resistance: Agroecology, Resilience and the Agrarian Question.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (4): 715–733. doi:10.1080/03066150.2020.1847090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt Giménez, E., and A. Shattuck. 2011. “Food Crises, Food Regimes and Food Movements: Rumblings of Reform or Tides of Transformation?” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 109–144. doi:10.1080/03066150.2010.538578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. 2022. “Heroes of the Developing World? Emerging Powers in WTO Agriculture Negotiations and Dispute Settlement.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (3): 561–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., Q. F. Zhang, and J. Donaldson. 2022. “Why Do Farmers’ Cooperatives Fail in a Market Economy? Rediscovering Chayanov with the Chinese Experience.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–31. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2104159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert, C. 2019. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants: A Tool in the Struggle for Our Common Future. Geneva: Centre Europe–Tiers Monde. https://www.cetim.ch/the-united-nations-declaration-on-the-rights-of-peasants-as-e-book-and-pdf/.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsberger, C., E. Corbera, S. M. Borras Jr, J. C. Franco, K. Woods, C. Work, R. de la Rosa, et al. 2017. “Climate Change Mitigation, Land Grabbing and Conflict: Towards a Landscape-Based and Collaborative Action Research Agenda.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 38 (3): 305–324. doi:10.1080/02255189.2016.1250617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAASTD. 2009. Agriculture at a Crossroads: Global Report. Washington, D.C.: International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development & Island Press. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/Investment/Agriculture_at_a_Crossroads_Global_Report_IAASTD.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Iles, A., and M. Montenegro de Wit. 2015. “Sovereignty at What Scale? An Inquiry Into Multiple Dimensions of Food Sovereignty.” Globalizations 12 (4): 481–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakson, S. R. 2014. “Food and Finance: The Financial Transformation of Agro-Food Supply Chains.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (5): 749–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, R. 2018. “An Urban Proletariat with Peasant Characteristics: Land Occupations and Livestock Raising in South Africa.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (5-6): 884–903. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1312354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, K. 2015. “The Debate on Food Sovereignty Theory: Agrarian Capitalism, Dispossession and Agroecology.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (1): 213–232. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.945166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, H. 2022. “Food Anarchy and the State Monopoly on Hunger.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–20. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2101099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, C. 2009. “Development Strategies and Rural Development: Exploring Synergies, Eradicating Poverty.” Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (1): 103–137. doi:10.1080/03066150902820339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, C. 2023. “Land and National Development Strategies in the Cold War Era.” In The Oxford Handbook of Land Politics, edited by S. M. Borras, and J. C. Franco, 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618646.013.5
   Google Scholar
• Kepkiewicz, L., and B. Dale. 2019. “Keeping ‘Our’ Land: Property, Agriculture and Tensions Between Indigenous and Settler Visions of Food Sovereignty in Canada.” Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (5): 983–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkvliet, B. 2009. “Everyday Politics in Peasant Societies (and Ours).” Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (1): 227–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, M. 2021. Iron Will: Global Extractivism and Mining Resistance in Brazil and India. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. 2021. “Class, Caste and Agrarian Change: The Making of Farmers’ Protests.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (7): 1371–1379. doi:10.1080/03066150.2021.1990046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerche, J. 2021. “The Farm Laws Struggle 2020–2021: Class-Caste Alliances and Bypassed Agrarian Transition in Neoliberal India.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (7): 1380–1396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levien, M. 2018. Dispossession Without Development: Land Grabs in Neoliberal India. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levien, M., M. Watts, and H. Yan. 2018. “Agrarian Marxism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (5-6): 853–883. doi:10.1080/03066150.2018.1534101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levkoe, C. Z. 2006. “Learning Democracy Through Food Justice Movements.” Agriculture and Human Values 23 (1): 89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2011. “Centering Labor in the Land Grab Debate.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2): 281–298. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.559009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M., and P. Semedi. 2021. Plantation Life: Corporate Occupation in Indonesia's Oil Palm Zone. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieblein, G., T. A. Breland, C. Francis, and E. Østergaard. 2012. “Agroecology Education: Action-Oriented Learning and Research.” Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 18 (1): 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, C. 2021. Nine-tenths of the Law: Enduring Dispossession in Indonesia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, A. 2021. “Can Public Universities Play a Role in Fostering Seed Sovereignty?” Elem Sci Anth 9 (1): 1–14. doi: 10.1525/elementa.2021.00089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdoff, F., J. B. Foster, and F. H. Buttel, eds. 2000. Hungry for Profit: The Agribusiness Threat to Farmers, Food, and the Environment. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malseed, K. 2008. “Where There is No Movement: Local Resistance and the Potential for Solidarity.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2–3): 489–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamonova, N. 2015. “Resistance or Adaptation? Ukrainian Peasants’ Responses to Large-Scale Land Acquisitions.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3–4): 607–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamonova, N., and J. Franquesa. 2020. “Populism, Neoliberalism and Agrarian Movements in Europe. Understanding Rural Support for Right-Wing Politics and Looking for Progressive Solutions.” Sociologia Ruralis 60 (4): 710–731. doi:10.1111/soru.12291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J. 2003. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J. 2011. “The EROI of Agriculture and its Use by the Via Campesina.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 145–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier, J., L. Temper, D. Del Bene, and A. Scheidel. 2016. “Is There a Global Environmental Justice Movement?” Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (3): 731–755. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1141198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Torres, M. E., and P. M. Rosset. 2010. “La Vía Campesina: The Birth and Evolution of a Transnational Social Movement.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (1): 149–175. doi:10.1080/03066150903498804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1968. “[1852]. “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte.” In Selected Works in One Volume, edited by K. Marx, and F. Engels, 94–179. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [1881] 1983. “The Reply to Zasulich.” In Late Marx and the Russian Road, edited by T. Shanin, 123–124. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McClintock, N. 2014. “Radical, Reformist, and Garden-Variety Neoliberal: Coming to Terms with Urban Agriculture’s Contradictions.” Local Environment 19 (2): 147–171. doi:10.1080/13549839.2012.752797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, B. M., A. A. Fradejas, and A. Ezquerro-Cañete, eds. 2021. Agrarian Extractivism in Latin America. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, B., R. Nehring, and M. Walsh-Dilley. 2014. “The ‘State’ of Food Sovereignty in Latin America: Political Projects and Alternative Pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1175–1200. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.964217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeon, N. 2015. “La Via Campesina: “The ‘Peasants Way’ to Changing the System, not the Climate.” Journal of World-Systems Research 21 (2): 241–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2008. “Peasants Make Their Own History, but not Just as They Please.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2–3): 205–228. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00168.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2013. Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2020. “Does China’s ‘Going Out’ Strategy Prefigure a New Food Regime?” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 116–154. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1693368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, L., G. J. Veldwisch, and J. Franco. 2012. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Water Grabbing? Focus on the (Re) Appropriation of Finite Water Resources.” Water Alternatives 5 (2): 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., C. M. Bacon, and R. Cohen. 2013. “Agroecology as a Transdisciplinary, Participatory, and Action-Oriented Approach.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1): 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho, M., O. F. Giraldo, M. Aldasoro, H. Morales, B. G. Ferguson, P. Rosset, and C. Campos. 2018. “Bringing Agroecology to Scale: Key Drivers and Emblematic Cases.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 42 (6): 637–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, E. N. 2021. “The Politics of Transnational Fishers’ Movements.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (2): 1–26. doi:10.1080/03066150.2021.1975271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monjane, B., and N. Bruna. 2020. “Confronting Agrarian Authoritarianism: Dynamics of Resistance to PROSAVANA in Mozambique.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 69–94. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1671357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsalve, S. M. 2013. “The Human Rights Framework in Contemporary Agrarian Struggles.” Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (1): 239–290. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.652950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M. 2019. “Beating the Bounds: How Does ‘Open Source’ Become a Seed Commons?” Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (1): 44–79. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1383395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M. 2021. “What Grows from a Pandemic? Toward an Abolitionist Agroecology.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (1): 99–136. doi:10.1080/03066150.2020.1854741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M., M. Canfield, A. Iles, M. Anderson, N. McKeon, S. Guttal, and S. Prato. 2021a. “Resetting Power in Global Food Governance: The UN Food Systems Summit.” Development 64 (3): 153–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montenegro de Wit, M., A. Shattuck, A. Iles, G. Graddy-Lovelace, A. Roman-Alcalá, and M. J. Chappell. 2021b. “Operating Principles for Collective Scholar-Activism: Early Insights from the Agroecology Research-Action Collective.” Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 10 (2): 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. 2017. “The Capitalocene, Part I: On the Nature and Origins of our Ecological Crisis.” Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (3): 594–630. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyo, S., and P. Yeros, eds. 2005. Reclaiming the Land: The Resurgence of Rural Movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P. 2022. “Climate Justice.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (5): 915–923. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2080062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P., and O. Taylor. 2018. “Contested Landscapes: The Global Political Economy of Climate-Smart Agriculture.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1): 108–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, P., and S. M. Borras Jr. 2023. “It Wasn’t an Intellectual Construction: The Founding of La Via Campesina, Achievements and Challenges – A Conversation.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50: 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. J., and L. Li. 2006. Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J. R., ed. 1998. Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ody, M., and A. Shattuck. 2013. “Our Struggle is for Humanity”: A Conversation with Morgan Ody, General Coordinator of La Via Campesina International, on Land, Politics, Peasant Life and a Vision for Hope in our Changing world.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Ojeda, D. 2012. “Green Pretexts: Ecotourism, Neoliberal Conservation and Land Grabbing in Tayrona National Natural Park, Colombia.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2): 357–375. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.658777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, J. M. 1975. Agrarian Revolution. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Paprocki, K. 2021. Threatening Dystopias: The Global Politics of Climate Change Adaptation in Bangladesh. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. M. Y., B. White, and Julia. 2015. “We are not All the Same: Taking Gender Seriously in Food Sovereignty Discourse.” Third World Quarterly 36 (3): 584–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, R. 2009. “Food Sovereignty.” Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (3): 663–706. doi:10.1080/03066150903143079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, R. 2022. “Land in World-Ecology Perspective.” In The Oxford Handbook of Land Politics, edited by S. M. Borras, and J. C. Franco, 1–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618646.013.18
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R., and J. W. Moore. 2017. A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things: A Guide to Capitalism, Nature, and the Future of the Planet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pattenden, J. 2023. “Progressive Politics and Populism: Classes of Labour and Rural–Urban Political Sociology.” Journal of Agrarian Change 23 (3): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N., S. Afiff, and N. F. Rachman. 2008. “Claiming the Grounds for Reform: Agrarian and Environmental Movements in Indonesia.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2–3): 377–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• People’s Knowledge Editorial Collective. 2017. Everyday Experts: How People’s Knowledge Can Transform the Food System. Reclaiming Diversity and Citizenship Series. Coventry: Coventry University.
   Google Scholar
• Perfecto, I., and J. Vandermeer. 2010. “The Agroecological Matrix as Alternative to the Land-Sparing/ Agriculture Intensification Model.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (13): 5786–5791. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905455107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschard, K., and S. Randeria. 2020. “‘Keeping Seeds in our Hands’: The Rise of Seed Activism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (4): 613–647. doi:10.1080/03066150.2020.1753705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2001. “Are Latin American Peasant Movements Still a Force for Change? Some New Paradigms Revisited.” Journal of Peasant Studies 28 (2): 83–118. doi:10.1080/03066150108438767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. L. 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putzel, J. 1995. “Managing the ‘Main Force’: The Communist Party and the Peasantry in the Philippines.” Journal of Peasant Studies 22 (4): 645–671. doi:10.1080/03066159508438591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, O. 2021. “Agrarian Marxism and the Proletariat: A Palm Oil Manifesto.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (4): 807–826. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1667772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. B., and C. Lund. 2018. “Reconfiguring Frontier Spaces: The Territorialization of Resource Control.” World Development 101: 388–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. 2022. “Violent Silence: Framing out Social Causes of Climate-Related Crises.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (4): 683–712. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2069016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricciardi, V., Z. Mehrabi, H. Wittman, D. James, and N. Ramankutty. 2021. “Higher Yields and More Biodiversity on Smaller Farms.” Nature Sustainability 4 (7): 651–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, M. J. 2015. “Exploring the ‘Localisation’ Dimension of Food Sovereignty.” Third World Quarterly 36 (3): 449–468. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1024966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, F., and A. Sosa. 2023. “Thirty Years of Sowing Hope to Globalise the Struggle: Women and Youth of La Via Campesina in the Construction of Food Sovereignty – A Conversation.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50: 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman-Alcalá, A. 2016. “Conceptualising Components, Conditions and Trajectories of Food Sovereignty’s ‘Sovereignty’.” Third World Quarterly 37 (8): 1388–1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman-Alcalá, A. 2021. “Agrarian Anarchism and Authoritarian Populism: Towards a More (State-) Critical ‘Critical Agrarian Studies’.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (2): 298–328. doi:10.1080/03066150.2020.1755840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. 2013. “Re-thinking Agrarian Reform, Land and Territory in La Via Campesina.” Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (4): 721–775. doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.826654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., and M. A. Altieri. 2017. Agroecology: Science and Politics. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., B. Machín Sosa, A. M. Roque Jaime, and D. R. Ávila Lozano. 2011. “The Campesino-to-Campesino Agroecology Movement of ANAP in Cuba: Social Process Methodology in the Construction of Sustainable Peasant Agriculture and Food Sovereignty.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 161–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, P., V. Val, L. P. Barbosa, and N. McCune. 2019. “Agroecology and La Via Campesina II. Peasant Agroecology Schools and the Formation of a Sociohistorical and Political Subject.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 43 (7–8): 895–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, S. 2020. “Covid-19, Right-Wing Populism and Agrarian Struggles in Brazil: Interview with João Pedro Stédile, National Leader of the MST.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (5): 927–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidel, A., D. Del Bene, J. Liu, G. Navas, S. Mingorría, F. Demaria, and S. Avila. 2020. “Environmental Conflicts and Defenders: A Global Overview.” Global Environmental Change 63: 102104. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I. 2008. “Mobilizing Against GM Crops in India, South Africa and Brazil.” Journal of Agrarian Change 8 (2–3): 315–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I. 2009. “The Politics of Global Assessments: The Case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD).” Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (3): 547–571. doi:10.1080/03066150903155008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I. 2021. “Pastoralists and Peasants: Perspectives on Agrarian Change.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (1): 1–47. doi:10.1080/03066150.2020.1802249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Edelman, S. M. Borras Jr, R. Hall, W. Wolford, and B. White. 2018. “Emancipatory Rural Politics: Confronting Authoritarian Populism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., R. Hall, S. M. Borras Jr, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2013. “The Politics of Evidence: Methodologies for Understanding the Global Land Rush.” Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (3): 469–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Subsistence and Rebellion in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sekine, Y. 2021. “Emerging ‘Agrarian Climate Justice’ Struggles in Myanmar.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (3): 517–540. doi:10.1080/03066150.2020.1839054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A. 2022. “Rethinking ‘Just Transitions’ from Coal: The Dynamics of Land and Labour in Anti-Coal Struggles.” Journal of Peasant Studies, doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2142568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A., and J. Lerche. 2020. “Migration and the Invisible Economies of Care: Production, Social Reproduction and Seasonal Migrant Labour in India.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45 (4): 719–734. doi:10.1111/tran.12401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanin, T. 1983a. “Late Marx: Gods and Craftsmen.” In Late Marx and the Russian Road, edited by T. Shanin, 3–39. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Shanin, T. 1983b. “Marxism and the Vernacular Revolutionary Traditions.” In Late Marx and the Russian Road, edited by T. Shanin, 243–279. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck, A. 2021. “Generic, Growing, Green? The Changing Political Economy of the Global Pesticide Complex.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (2): 231–253. doi:10.1080/03066150.2020.1839053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck, A. 2023. “Life on the Land: New Lives for Agrarian Questions.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50: 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck, A., C. M. Schiavoni, and Z. VanGelder. 2015. “Translating the Politics of Food Sovereignty: Digging Into Contradictions, Uncovering New Dimensions.” Globalizations 12 (4): 421–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivji, I. G. 2017. “The Concept of ‘Working People’.” Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 6 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1177/2277976017721318.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, A. 2020. “Transforming Urban Food Systems in South Africa: Unfolding Food Sovereignty in the City.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (2): 401–419. doi:10.1080/03066150.2018.1543275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soper, R. 2020. “From Protecting Peasant Livelihoods to Essentializing Peasant Agriculture: Problematic Trends in Food Sovereignty Discourse.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (2): 265–285. doi:10.1080/03066150.2018.1543274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa Varrotti, A. P., and C. Gras. 2021. “Network Companies, Land Grabbing, and Financialization in South America.” Globalizations 18 (3): 482–497. doi:10.1080/14747731.2020.1794208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedile, J. P. 2007. “The Neoliberal Agrarian Model in Brazil.” Monthly Review 58 (9): 50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 2018. “Climate-smart Agriculture: What is it Good for?” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1): 89–107. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1312355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilzey, M. 2019. “Authoritarian Populism and Neo-Extractivism in Bolivia and Ecuador: The Unresolved Agrarian Question and the Prospects for Food Sovereignty as Counter-Hegemony.” Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (3): 626–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tramel, S. 2016. “The Road Through Paris: Climate Change, Carbon, and the Political Dynamics of Convergence.” Globalizations 13 (6): 960–969. doi:10.1080/14747731.2016.1173376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Val, V., P. M. Rosset, C. Zamora Lomelí, O. F. Giraldo, and D. Rocheleau. 2019. “Agroecology and La Via Campesina I. The Symbolic and Material Construction of Agroecology Through the Dispositive of ‘Peasant-to-Peasant’ Processes.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 43 (7–8): 872–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D. 2013. Peasants and the Art of Farming: A Chayanovian Manifesto. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D. 2021. “The Political Economy of Agroecology.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (2): 274–297. doi:10.1080/03066150.2020.1725489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltmeyer, H., and J. Petras. 2014. The New Extractivism: A Post-Neoliberal Development Model or Imperialism of the Twenty-First Century? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L., and C. Kay. 2017. “Agribusiness, Peasants, Left-Wing Governments, and the State in Latin America: An Overview and Theoretical Reflections.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2): 239–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, O., J. Clapp, and S. R. Isakson. 2015a. “Introduction to a Symposium on Global Finance and the Agri-Food Sector: Risk and Regulation.” Journal of Agrarian Change 15 (4): 541–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, O., N. Mamonova, M. Spoor, and A. Nikulin. 2015b. “‘Quiet Food Sovereignty’ as Food Sovereignty Without a Movement? Insights from Post-Socialist Russia.” Globalizations 12 (4): 513–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Redecker, S., and C. Herzig. 2020. “The Peasant Way of a More Than Radical Democracy: The Case of La via Campesina.” Journal of Business Ethics 164 (4): 657–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis, T. 2007. The Global Food Economy: The Battle for the Future of Farming. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Weis, T. 2010. “The Accelerating Biophysical Contradictions of Industrial Capitalist Agriculture.” Journal of Agrarian Change 10 (3): 315–341. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, C. A., and S. Sauer. 2015. “Rural Unions and the Struggle for Land in Brazil.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (6): 1109–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B. 2020. Agriculture and the Generation Problem. Halifax: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• White, B., S. M. Borras Jr, R. Hall, I. Scoones, and W. Wolford. 2012. “The New Enclosures: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Land Deals.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3-4): 619–647. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.691879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B., C. Graham, and L. Savitri. 2023. “Agrarian Movements and Rural Populism in Indonesia.” Journal of Agrarian Change 23 (1): 68–84. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111joac.12506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebe, N. 2023. “Shaping our Collective Futures: Activism, Analysis, Solidarity.”.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50: 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittman, H. 2009. “Reworking the Metabolic Rift: La Vía Campesina, Agrarian Citizenship, and Food Sovereignty.” Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (4): 805–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittman, H., A. Desmarais, and N. Wiebe, eds. 2010. Food Sovereignty: Reconnecting Food, Nature and Community. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. R. 1969. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2010. This Land Is Ours Now. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2021. “The Plantationocene: A Lusotropical Contribution to the Theory.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (6): 1622–1639. doi:10.1080/24694452.2020.1850231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W., S. M. Borras Jr, R. Hall, I. Scoones, and B. White. 2013. “Governing Global Land Deals: The Role of the State in the Rush for Land.” Development and Change 44 (2): 189–210. doi:10.1111/dech.12017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2019. How to be an Anticapitalist in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Xiuhtecutli, N., and A. Shattuck. 2021. “Crisis Politics and US Farm Labor: Health Justice and Florida Farmworkers Amid a Pandemic.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (1): 73–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, H., K. H. Bun, and X. Siyuan. 2021. “Rural Revitalization, Scholars, and the Dynamics of the Collective Future in China.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (4): 853–874. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1694911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaşın, T. Z. 2022. “The Environmentalization of the Agrarian Question and the Agrarianization of the Climate Justice Movement.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (7): 1355–1386. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2101102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, J., J. D. van der Ploeg, S. Schneider, and T. Shanin. 2020. “The Incursions of Extractivism: Moving from Dispersed Places to Global Capitalism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 155–183. doi:10.080/03066150.2018.1559834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, J., C. Wang, H. Wu, C. He, and J. Liu. 2013. “Internal Migration and Left-Behind Populations in China.” Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (6): 1119–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. G., and M. Robbins. 2023. “‘The Food Sovereignty Movement Is Not Part of My Life, It Is My Life’: From Local to International, Reflecting on Korean Women Peasant Organizing – A Conversation.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50: 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zasulich, V. [1881] 1983. “A Letter to Marx.” In Late Marx and the Russian Road, edited by T. Shanin, 98–99. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar