The evolving force of community: peasant uprisings and post-agrarian aspirations in Ecuador

References

• Aftab, M., and N. Ali. 2023. “Agrarian Change, Populism, and a New Farmers’ Movement in 21st Century Pakistani Punjab.” Journal of Agrarian Change 23 (1): 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, A. H. 2021. “Land.” In Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies, edited by A. H. Akram-Lodhi, K. Dietz, B. Engels, and B. McKay, 72–79. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, A. H., C. Kay, and S. Borras. 2008. “The Political Economy of Land and the Agrarian Question in an Era of Neoliberal Globalization.” In Peasants and Globalization, edited by H. A. Akram-Lodhi and C. Kay, 226–250. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Araghi, F. 1995. “Global Depeasantization, 1945–1990.” The Sociological Quarterly 36 (2): 337–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00443.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babb, F. 2019. “Culture and Economy in the Urban Global South: Braided Inequalities among Andean Migrants in Lima, Peru.” In The Popular Economy in Urban Latin America: Informality, Materiality, and Gender in Commerce, edited by J. Müller and E. Dürr, 133–151. Lexington: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, I., and S. Gill. 2019. “Rethinking Power, Production, and Social Reproduction: Toward Variegated Social Reproduction.” Capital & Class 43 (4): 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816819880783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M. 1999. “Comunas and Indigenous Protest in Cayambe, Ecuador.” The Americas 55 (4): 531–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/1008320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2003. “Farewells to the Peasantry.” Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa 52 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2003.0027.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2014. “Food Sovereignty Via the ‘Peasant Way’: A Skeptical View.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1031–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.852082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2016. “Agrarian Political Economy and Modern World Capitalism: The Contributions of Food Regime Analysis.” Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (3): 611–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1101456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2021. “Unpacking ‘Authoritarian Populism’ and Rural Politics: Some Comments on ERPI.” In Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World, edited by M. Edelman, S. Borras Jr., L. Forero, R. Hall, W. Wolford, and B. White, 448–464. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bezanson, K. 2006. Gender, The State, and Social Reproduction: Household Insecurity in Neo-Liberal Times. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borras Jr., S. 2009. “Agrarian Change and Peasant Studies: Changes, Continuities and Challenges–An Introduction.” Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (1): 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. 2023. “Politically Engaged, Pluralist and Internationalist: Critical Agrarian Studies Today.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (2): 449–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2163164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, T. 2002. “Latin American Peasants - New Paradigms for Old?” Journal of Peasant Studies 29 (3–4): 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150412331311019c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryceson, D. 1996. “Deagrarianization and Rural Employment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Sectoral Perspective.” World Development 24 (1): 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00119-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryceson, D. 1999. “African Rural Labour, Income Diversification & Livelihood Approaches: A Long-Term Development Perspective.” Review of African Political Economy 26 (80): 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056249908704377.
   Google Scholar
• Chiriboga, M. 1988. El Problema Agrario en el Ecuador. Quito: Instituto Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Sociales.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P. 2019. “Campesino Organizations and Public Policies in Ecuador: From Neoliberal to Post-Neoliberal Rural Development, 2006–2016.” PhD diss., Carleton University.
   Google Scholar
• Colloredo-Mansfeld, R. 1998. “‘Dirty Indians’, Radical Indígenas, and the Political Economy of Social Difference in Modern Ecuador.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 17 (2): 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.1998.tb00171.x.
   Google Scholar
• Colloredo-Mansfeld, R. 1999. The Native Leisure Class: Consumption and Cultural Creativity in the Andes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colloredo-Mansfeld, R. 2009. Fighting Like a Community: Andean Civil Society in an Era of Indian Uprisings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colloredo-Mansfeld, R., A. Ordoñez, H. P. López, J. Quick, D. Quiroga, and J. Williams. 2018. “Conflicts, Territories, and the Institutionalization of Post-Agrarian Economies on an Expanding Tourist Frontier in Quilotoa, Ecuador.” World Development 101: 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronel, V. 2011. “A Revolution in Stages: Subaltern Politics, Nation-State Formation, and the Origins of Social Rights in Ecuador, 1834–1943.” PhD diss., New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, B., A. Dubb, D. Hornby, and F. Mtero. 2020. “Social Reproduction of ‘Classes of Labour’ in the Rural Areas of South Africa: Contradictions and Contestations.” In Agrarian Marxism, edited by M. Levien, M. Watts, and Y. Hairong, 208–233. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dávalos, P. 2005. “Movimiento indígena ecuatoriano: construcción política y epistémica.” In Cultura, política y sociedad: perspectivas latinoamericanas, edited by D. Mato, 337–357. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dávalos, P. 2022. “Neoliberalismo, austeridad y resistencia social: la movilización indígena de Ecuador de junio de 2022.” Yeiyá, Revista de Estudios Críticos 3 (1): 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Degnbol, T. 1996. “The Interactive Approach to the Study of State and Society Relations.” Forum for Development Studies 23 (2): 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.1996.9666038.
   Google Scholar
• De la Cadena, M. 1992. “Las mujeres son más indias.” Espejos y travesías 16: 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. 2013. “What is a Peasant? What are Peasantries? A Briefing Paper on Issues of Definition.” Intergovernmental Working Group on a United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas. Accessed April 05, 2023. www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/WGPleasants/MarcEdelman.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and S. Borras Jr. 2016. Political Dynamics of Transnational Agrarian Movements. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. 2021. “Fictitious Commodification and Agrarian Change: Indigenous Peoples and Land Markets in Highland Ecuador.” Journal of Agrarian Change 21 (1): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeub, B., M. Chappell, H. Wittman, S. Ledermann, R. Kerr, and B. Gemmill-Herren. 2016. “The State of Family Farms in the World.” World Development 87: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudeman, S. 2005. “Community and Economy: Economy’s Base.” In A Handbook of Economic Anthropology, edited by J. G. Carrier, 94–106. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, A. 1996. “El levantamiento indígena de 1994: Discurso y representación política en Ecuador.” Nueva Sociedad 142: 32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, A. 1998. “Ciudadanía, frontera étnica y compulsión binaria.” Íconos: Revista de Ciencias Sociales 4: 112–122.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, F., and P. Ospina. 2003. El poder de la comunidad: movimiento indígena y ajuste estructural en el Ecuador. Buenos Aires: FLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 2023. “General Introduction.” In Rural Development: Theories of Peasant Economy and Agrarian Change, edited by J. Harris, 15–36. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss-White, B. 2023. “Petty Commodity Production.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (1): 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2138354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, C. 2008. “Reflections on Latin American Rural Studies in the Neoliberal Globalization Period: A New Rurality?” Development and Change 39 (6): 915–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00518.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. 1996. Reconceptualizing the Peasantry: Anthropology in Global Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, G. 2017. “Mountain Agriculture for Global Markets: The Case of Greenhouse Floriculture in Ecuador.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (2): 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1203282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofman, E. 2012. “Rethinking Care through Social Reproduction: Articulating Circuits of Migration.” Social Politics 19 (1): 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korovkin, T. 1992. “Indians, Peasants, and the State: The Growth of a Community Movement in the Ecuadorian Andes.” Centre for Research on Latin America and the Caribbean (CERLAC), Occasional Paper Series 3: 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Korovkin, T. 2003. “Cut-Flower Exports, Female Labor, and Community Participation in Highland Ecuador.” Latin American Perspectives 30 (4): 18–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X03030004005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. 2016. “Land's End: Response by Tania M. Li.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (4): 954–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucero, J. 2003. “Locating the ‘Indian Problem’ Community, Nationality, and Contradiction in Ecuadorian Indigenous Politics.” Latin American Perspectives 30 (1): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X02239143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, A. 2010. Los usos de la memoria: poder y resistencia en Cayambe. Quito: Abya-Yala and FLACSO-Ecuador.
   Google Scholar
• Lyall, A. 2014. Assessing the Impacts of Fairtrade on Worker-Defined Forms of Empowerment on Ecuadorian Flower Plantations. Fairtrade International.
   Google Scholar
• Lyall, A. 2017. “Voluntary Resettlement in Land Grab Contexts: Examining Consent on the Ecuadorian oil Frontier.” Urban Geography 38 (7): 958–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1235933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, A. 2021. “Resistencia en retrospectiva: la multitemporalidad del extractivismo en la Amazonía.” ÍCONOS: Revista de Ciencias Sociales 69: 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lyall, A., R. Colloredo-Mansfeld, and J. Quick. 2020. “Post-Agrarian Aspirations: Tourism and Rural Politics in Ecuador.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 41 (1): 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2019.1675610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, A., R. Colloredo-Mansfeld, and M. Rousseau. 2018. “Development, Citizenship, and Everyday Appropriations of Buen Vivir: Ecuadorian Engagement with the Changing Rhetoric of Improvement.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 37 (4): 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, A., and E. Havice. 2019. “The Politics of Development Metrics and Measurement: Impact Evaluations in Fairtrade-Certified Plantation Agriculture.” Development and Change 50 (6): 1531–1553. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, A., F. Vallejo, R. Colloredo-Mansfeld, and E. Havice. 2021. “Agroecology, Supply Chains, and COVID-19: Lessons on Food System Transitions from Ecuador.” Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment 43 (2): 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/cuag.12278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez Valle, L. 2009. “La pluriactividad entre los pequenos productores rurales: el caso ecuatoriano.” In In La pluriactividad en el campo latinamericano, edited by H. C. De Grammont and L. Martinez Valle, 81–102. Quito: FLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez Valle, L. 2013. “Flores, trabajo y territorio: el caso Cotopaxi.” Eutopía: Revista de desarrollo económico territorial (4): 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Novo, C. 2021. Undoing Multiculturalism: Resource Extraction and Indigenous Rights in Ecuador. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCune, N., and P. Rosset. 2021. “Agroecology.” In Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies, edited by A. H. Akram-Lodhi, K. Dietz, B. Engels, and B. McKay, 438–452. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, B. 2022. “Between the Mine and the Farm: Livelihood Diversification and Social Differentiation in the Bolivian Highlands.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2013. Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2015. “A Comment on Henry Bernstein’s Way with Peasants, and Food Sovereignty.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (1): 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.936853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2016. “Commentary: Food Regime for Thought.” Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (3): 648–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1143816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezzadri, A. 2020. “The Informal Labours of Social Reproduction.” Global Labour Journal 11 (2): 156–163. https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v11i2.4310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J., and E. Dürr. 2019. “Popular Economy and Commerce: (In)Formality, Materiality, and Gender in Latin American Cities.” In The Popular Economy in Urban Latin America: Informality, Materiality, and Gender in Commerce, edited by J. Müller and E. Dürr, 1–21. Lexington: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, P. 2022. “‘Nada solo para los indios’ ¿Por qué la Conaie sigue liderando las protestas en Ecuador?” Nueva Sociedad. Accessed July 30, 2022. www.nuso.org/articulo/protestas-Ecuador-conaie/.
   Google Scholar
• Pahnke, A. 2018. “Institutionalizing Economies of Opposition: Explaining and Evaluating the Success of the MST’s Cooperatives and Agroecological Repeasantization.” In Brazilian Agrarian Social Movements, edited by R. Tarlau and A. Pahnke, 31–52. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pattenden, J., L. Campling, E. Castañón Ballivián, C. Gras, J. Lerche, B. O’Laughlin, Carlos Oya, Helena Pérez-Niño, and S. Sinha. 2021. “Introduction: Covid-19 and the Conditions and Struggles of Agrarian Classes of Labour.” Journal of Agrarian Change 21 (3): 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, K. 2016. “Social Movements, the State, and the Making of Food Sovereignty in Ecuador.” Latin American Perspectives 43 (1): 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15571278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce, K., A. Vasquez, P. Vivanco, and R. Munck. 2020. “The October 2019 Indigenous and Citizens’ Uprising in Ecuador.” Latin American Perspectives 47 (5): 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X20931113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. 2020. “Contradictions of Community: Capitalist Relations in Highland Peru.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 41 (1): 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2020.1691980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera Cusicanqui, S. 2010. Violencias (re)Encubiertas en Bolivia. La Paz: Editorial La Piedra Rota.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera Cusicanqui, S. 2015. Sociología de la imagen: Miradas ch'ixi desde la historia andina. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P., and L. Barbosa. 2021. “Peasant Autonomy: The Necessary Debate in Latin America.” Interface: A Journal on Social Movements 13 (1): 46–80.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago-Vera, T., P. M. Rosset, A. Saldivar, B. G. Ferguson, and V. E. Méndez. 2021. “Re-Conceptualizing and Decolonizing Resilience from a Peasant Perspective.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 45 (10): 1422–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüren, U. 2003. “Reconceptualizing the Post-Peasantry: Household Strategies in Mexican Ejidos.” Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe/European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 75: 47–63. https://doi.org/10.18352/erlacs.9693.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Edelman, S. M. Borras, R. Hall, W. Wolford, and B. White. 2018. “Emancipatory Rural Politics: Confronting Authoritarian Populism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2010. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanin, T. 1990. Defining Peasants: Essays Concerning Rural Societies, Expolary Economies, and Learning from Them in the Contemporary World. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck, A., J. Grajales, R. Jacobs, S. Sauer, S. S. Galvin, and R. Hall. 2023. “Life on the Land: New Lives for Agrarian Questions.” Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (2): 490–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2023.2174859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck, A., and N. Peluso. 2021. “Territoriality.” In Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies, edited by A. H. Akram-Lodhi, K. Dietz, B. Engels, and B. McKay, 197–204. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simbaña, F. 2021. “El movimiento indígena ecuatoriano y la recuperación de la historia.” Ecuador Today. Accessed July 11, 2023. www.ecuadortoday.media/2021/06/25/el-movimiento-indigena-ecuatoriano-y-la-recuperacion-de-la-historia/.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, R. 2016. “Food Sovereignty on the Ground: Export Agriculture, Peasant Communities, and the Indigenous Movement in Ecuador.” PhD diss. San Diego.: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Striffler, S. 2020. “Rebellion, Revolution, and Reversal in Ecuador’s Countryside.” In Fifty Years of Peasant Wars in Latin America, edited by L. Binford, L. Gill, and S. Striffler, 50–70. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thurner, M. 1993. “Peasant Politics and Andean Haciendas in the Transition to Capitalism: An Ethnographic History.” Latin American Research Review 28 (3): 41–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100016952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touraine, A. 2004. “The Subject and Societal Movements.” In The Blackwell Companion to Sociology, edited by J. Blau, 437–449. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Trauger, A. 2014. “Toward a Political Geography of Food Sovereignty: Transforming Territory, Exchange and Power in the Liberal Sovereign State.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6): 1131–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.937339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J. 2008. The New Peasantries. Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J. 2013. Peasants and the Art of Farming: A Chayanovian Manifesto. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J., A. H. Akram-Lodhi, K. Dietz, B. Engels, and B. McKay. 2021. “Peasants.” In Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies, 109–119. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vela-Almeida, D., A. Lyall, G. Lasso, and D. Andreucci. 2021. “Resisting Austerity in the Era of COVID-19: Between Nationwide Mobilisation and Decentralised Organising in Ecuador.” In The Political Ecology of Austerity: Crisis, Social Movements, and the Environment, edited by R. Calvário, M. Kaika, and G. Velegrakis, 135–155. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L., and K. Jansen. 2022. “Autonomy in Agrarian Studies, Politics, and Movements: An Inter-Paradigm Debate.” Journal of Agrarian Change 22 (3): 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. 1983. Historical Capitalism with Capitalist Civilization. New York: VERSO.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. 2020. “Rural Youth, Today and Tomorrow.” IFAD Research Series 48. Rome: IFAD.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. 1966. Peasants. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zamosc, L. 1994. “Agrarian Protest and the Indian Movement in the Ecuadorian Highlands.” Latin American Research Review 29 (3): 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100035536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar