Rightless rurality: the illegalization of Myanmar migrant laborers in Thailand’s agro-industry

References

• Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon, Kristina Dietz, Bettina Engels, and Ben M. McKay, eds. 2021. Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies. Glos, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972468.
   Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon, and Cristóbal Kay. 2010a. “Surveying the Agrarian Question (Part 1): Unearthing Foundations, Exploring Diversity.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (1): 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903498838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon, and Cristóbal Kay. 2010b. “Surveying the Agrarian Question (Part 2): Current Debates and Beyond.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (2): 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066151003594906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Bridget. 2010. “Migration, Immigration Controls and the Fashioning of Precarious Workers.” Work, Employment and Society 24 (2): 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017010362141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araghi, Farshad. 2009. “The Invisible Hand and the Visible Foot Peasants, Dispossession and Globalization.” In Peasants and Globalization: Political Economy, Rural Transformation and the Agrarian Question, edited by A. Haroon Akram-Lodhi and Cristóbal Kay. Routledge ISS Studies in Rural Livelihoods 2, 111–147. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, Dennis, and John Pickles. 2011. “Global Work, Surplus Labor, and the Precarious Economies of the Border.” Antipode 43 (5): 1598–1624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00899.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banki, Susan. 2013. “Precarity of Place: A Complement to the Growing Precariat Literature.” Global Discourse 3 (3): 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2014.881139.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. 2004. “‘Changing Before our Very Eyes’: Agrarian Questions and the Politics of Land in Capitalism Today.” Journal of Agrarian Change 4 (1-2): 190–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00078.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Henry. 2006. “Is There an Agrarian Question in the 21st Century?” Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne d’études Du Développement 27 (4): 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2006.9669166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, Tendayi, and Rayah Feldman. 2011. “Migration and Citizenship: Rights and Exclusions. Rethinking International Development Series.” In Migration and Social Protection, edited by R. Sabates-Wheeler and R. Feldman, 36–60. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla, Chiara. 2015. “Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept.” Geopolitics 20 (1): 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.884561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Stephen. 2018. Border Capitalism, Disrupted: Precarity and Struggle in a Southeast Asian Industrial Zone. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiengkul, Prapimphan. 2017. The Political Economy of the Agri-Food System in Thailand: Hegemony, Counter-Hegemony, and Co-Optation of Oppositions. 8th ed. New York: Routledge. Series: Routledge Contemporary Southeast Asia; 90. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315267920.
   Google Scholar
• Coutin, Susan Bibler. 2005. “Contesting Criminality: Illegal Immigration and the Spatialization of Legality.” Theoretical Criminology 9 (1): 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480605046658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannecker, Petra, and Wolfram Schaffar. 2016. “The Thai-Burmese Borderland: Mobilities, Regimes, Actors and Changing Political Contexts.” Asian Anthropology 15 (2): 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2016.1214343.
   Google Scholar
• Decha, Tangseefa. 2015. “Illegality and Alterity: Preliminary Notes on SEZ, Civil Society, and the Thai-Burmese Borderland.” The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies 2 (2): 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• De Genova, Nicholas P. 2002. “Migrant ‘Illegality’ and Deportability in Everyday Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (1): 419–447. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, Nicholas. P. 2016. “The “Crisis” of the European Border Regime: Towards a Marxist Theory of Borders.” International Socialism 150: 31–54. http://isj.org.uk/the-crisis-of-the-european-border-regime-towards-amarxist-theory-of-borders/.
   Google Scholar
• De Genova, Nicholas, and Ananya Roy. 2020. “Practices of Illegalisation.” Antipode 52 (2): 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sardan, Jean-Pierre Olivier. 2015. “Practical Norms: Informal Regulations Within Public Bureaucracies (in Africa and Beyond).” In Governance and Practical Norms in Sub-Saharan Africa, edited by De Herdt and De Sardan, 19–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, Cheryl R. 2018. “Women and Agricultural Productivity: Reframing the Issues.” Development Policy Review 36 (1): 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Zophia. 2020. “Applying the Black Radical Tradition: Class, Race, and a New Foundation for Studies of Development.” In Political Power and Social Theory, edited by Barry Eidlin and Michael A. McCarthy, 155–183. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0198-871920200000037008.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, Didier. 2001. “The Biopolitics of Otherness: Undocumented Foreigners and Racial Discrimination in French Public Debate.” Anthropology Today 17 (1): 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.00039.
   Google Scholar
• Faxon, Hilary Oliva. 2021. “After the Rice Frontier: Producing State and Ethnic Territory in Northwest Myanmar.” Geopolitics 28 (1): 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1845658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici, Silvia. 2014. Caliban and the Witch. 2nd, rev. ed. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, Anja Karlsson, and Joseph Trawicki Anderson. 2019. “The Cost of Legality: Navigating Labour Mobility and Exploitation in Malaysia.” IQAS 50: 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido, Natalia Flores. 2020. “Precarity from a Feminist Perspective: A Note on Three Elements for the Political Struggle.” Review of Radical Political Economics 52 (3): 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613420906930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, Ruth Wilson. 2022. Abolition Geography: Essays Towards Liberation. Edited by Brenna Bhandar and Alberto Toscano. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gruß, Inga. 2017. “The Emergence of the Temporary Migrant: Bureaucracies, Legality and Myanmar Migrants in Thailand.” Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 32 (1): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1355/sj32-1a.
   Google Scholar
• Harkins, Benjamin. 2019. “IOM Thailand Report 2019.” Thailand: United Nations Thematic Working Group on Migration in Thailand. International Organization for Migration.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Jill Lindsey, and Sarah E. Lloyd. 2012. “Illegality at Work: Deportability and the Productive New Era of Immigration Enforcement.” Antipode 44 (2): 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00841.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, Kasper, and Mariève Pouliot. Forthcoming. “Everyday Property-Making: Land Rights and Precariousnessin Urban Congo.” Development and Change.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. 2022. “Working and Employment Conditions in the Agriculture Sector in Thailand: A Survey of Migrants Working on Thai Sugarcane, Rubber, Oil Palm and Maize Farms.” Thailand: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ILO, and UN Women. 2021. Public Attitudes towards Migrant Workers in Thailand. Bangkok: ILO & UN Women.
   Google Scholar
• Ingalls, Micah, Jean-Christophe Diepart, Nhu Truong, Daniel Hayward, Tony Neil, Chanthavone Phomphakdy, Rasso Bernhard, et al. 2018. State of Land in the Mekong Region. Application/pdf. Bern: Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern and Mekong Region Land Governance. https://boris.unibe.ch/120285/.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. 2020. “Recruitment Fees and Related Costs: What Migrant Workers from Cambodia, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, and Myanmar Pay to Work in Thailand.” ILO.
   Google Scholar
• IOM. 2018. “Flow Monitoring Surveys: Insights into the Profiles and Vulnerabilities of Myanmar Migrants to Thailand.” UN Migration.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Deborah. 2007. “Who Needs Immigrant Farm Workers? A South African Case Study.” Journal of Agrarian Change 7 (4): 33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilkey, Majella, and Domenica Urzi. 2017. “Social Reproduction in Sicily’s Agricultural Sector: Migration Status and Context of Reception.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (15): 2573–2590. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1286971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Russell, Aija Lulle, and Emilia Melossi. 2021. “New Perspectives on the Agriculture–Migration Nexus.” Journal of Rural Studies 85 (July): 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• Laohaudomchok, Wisanti, Noppanun Nankongnab, Somkiat Siriruttanapruk, Pakasinee Klaimala, Witoon Lianchamroon, Prokchol Ousap, Marut Jatiket, et al. 2021. “Pesticide Use in Thailand: Current Situation, Health Risks, and Gaps in Research and Policy.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 27 (5): 1147–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2020.1808777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Tania Murray. 2011. “Centering Labor in the Land Grab Debate.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2): 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.559009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loong, Shona. 2019. “The Neoliberal Borderscape: Neoliberalism’s Effects on the Social Worlds of Migrants Along the Thai-Myanmar Border.” Political Geography 74 (October): 102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102035.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, Christian. 2022. “An Air of Legality – Legalization Under Conditions of Rightlessness in Indonesia.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (4): 1295–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2096448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkki, Liisa. 1992. “National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity among Scholars and Refugees.” Cultural Anthropology 7 (1): 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschke, Melissa, and Peter Vandergeest. 2016. “Slavery Scandals: Unpacking Labour Challenges and Policy Responses Within the Off-Shore Fisheries Sector.” Marine Policy 68: 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekong Migration Network. 2020. “Migrant Agricultural Workers in Thailand.” Chiang Mai.
   Google Scholar
• Mekong Migration Network. 2023. Neighbours in Need: Examining Thailand’s Response to Mixed Migration from Post-Coup Myanmar. Chiang Mai: Mekong Migration Network.
   Google Scholar
• Mies, Maria. 1994. “‘Gender’ and Global Capitalism.” In Capitalism and Development, edited by Leslie Sklair, 17. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Labor. 2023. “Minimum Wage.” 2023. mol.go.th/en/minimum-wage.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Sally Falk. 1973. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study.” Law & Society Review 7 (4): 719–746. https://doi.org/10.2307/3052967
   Google Scholar
• Morton, Micah F., and Ian G. Baird. 2019. “From Hill Tribes to Indigenous Peoples: The Localisation of a Global Movement in Thailand.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 50 (1): 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463419000031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Statistical Office. 2013. 2013 Agricultural Census Northern Region. Krung Thēp Mahā Nakhō̜n: สำนักงานสถิติแห่งชาติ กระทรวงเทคโนโลยีสารสนเทศและการสื่้อสาร.
   Google Scholar
• Pattenden, Jonathan. 2021. “Labour.” In Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies, edited by A. H. Akram-Lodhi, Kristina Dietz, Bettina Engels, and Ben M. McKay, 91–98. Glos, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972468.
   Google Scholar
• Perrotta, Domenico, and Timothy Raeymaekers. 2023. “Caporalato Capitalism. Labour Brokerage and Agrarian Change in a Mediterranean Society.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (5): 2002–2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2072213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poapongsakorn, Nipon, and Phunjasit Chokesomritpol. 2017. Agriculture 4.0: Obstacles and How to Break Through. TDRI Insight. Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Podhisita, Chai. 2017. “Household Dynamics, the Capitalist Economy, and Agricultural Change in Rural Thailand.” Southeast Asian Studies 6 (2): 247–273.
   Google Scholar
• Prasse-Freeman, Elliot. 2021. “Necroeconomics: Dispossession, Extraction, and Indispensable/Expendable Laborers in Contemporary Myanmar.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (7): 1466–1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1943366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preibisch, Kerry. 2010. “Pick-Your-Own Labor: Migrant Workers and Flexibility in Canadian Agriculture.” International Migration Review 44 (2): 404–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00811.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proglio, Gabriele, Camilla Hawthorne, Ida Danewid, Khalil Saucier, Giuseppe Grimaldi, Angelica Pesarini, Timothy Raeymaekers, Giulia Grechi, and Vivian Gerrand, eds. 2021. The Black Mediterranean: Bodies, Borders and Citizenship. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, Laura. 2017. “Geographies of Race and Ethnicity II: Environmental Racism, Racial Capitalism and State-Sanctioned Violence.” Progress in Human Geography 41 (4): 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516646495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, Oliver. 2021. “Agrarian Marxism and the Proletariat: A Palm Oil Manifesto.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (4): 807–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1667772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattanaprateeptong, S. 2020. “Foreign Labor in the Thai Agricultural Sector.” FFTC Agricultural Policy Platform (FFTC-AP). https://ap.fftc.org.tw/article/2608.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, Shahra. 2003. “Introduction: Agrarian Change, Gender and Land Rights.” Journal of Agrarian Change 3 (1-2): 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0366.00049.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, J. F., and K. O’Reilly, eds. 2021. International Labour Migration to Europe’s Rural Regions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saltsman, Adam P. 2022. Border Humanitarians Gendered Order and Insecurity on the Thai-Burmese Frontier. New York: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schierup, Carl-Ulrik, and Martin Bak Jørgensen. 2017. “From ‘Social Exclusion’ to ‘Precarity’. The Becoming-Migrant of Labour: An Introduction.” In Politics of Precarity: Migrant Conditions, Struggles and Experiences, edited by Martin Bak Jørgensen and Carl-Ulrik Schierup, 1–29. Leiden: BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004329706.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, Nandita. 2006. Home Economics: Nationalism and the Making of ‘Migrant Workers’ in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck, Annie, Jacobo Grajales, Ricardo Jacobs, Sergio Sauer, Shaila Seshia Galvin, and Ruth Hall. 2023. “Life on the Land: New Lives for Agrarian Questions.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (2): 490–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2023.2174859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Than, Than Twe. 2003. “Gendered Spaces: Women in Burmese Society.” Transformations 6: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Thetkathuek, Anamai, and William Daniell. 2016. “Migrant Workers in Agriculture: A View from Thailand.” Journal of Agromedicine 21 (1): 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2015.1043169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Caroline C., and Mary Ann Burris. 1997. “Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment.” Health Education & Behavior 24 (3): 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, Michael James. 2009. “The Southern Question Agrarian Questions of Labour and Capital.” In Peasants and Globalization: Political Economy, Rural Transformation and the Agrarian Question, edited by A. Haroon Akram-Lodhi and Cristóbal Kay. Routledge ISS Studies in Rural Livelihoods 2, 262–287. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar