Rights of nature, an ornamental legal framework: water extractivism and backbone rivers with rights in Colombia

References

• Acosta García, Nicolás. 2022. “Can Direct Democracy Deliver and Alternative to Extractivism? An Essay on Popular Consultations.” Political Geography 98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrae, Walter. 1933. Die ionische Säule, Bauform oder Symbol. Berlin: Schlusswort.
   Google Scholar
• Angarita, Hector, Wickel Albertus, Jack Sieber, Jhon Chavarro, Javier Maldonado-Ocampo, Guido Herrera, Juliana Delgado, and David Purkey. 2018. “Basin-scale Impacts of Hydropower Development on the Mompós Depression Wetlands, Colombia.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 22: 2839–2865. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2839-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher, Kiran. 2018. “Fragmented Forest, Fractures Lives: Ethno-Territorial Struggles and Development in the Pacific Lowlands of Colombia.” Antipode 52: 949–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babidge, Sally. 2016. “Contested Value and an Ethics of Resources: Water, Mining and Indigenous Peoples in the Atacama Desert, Chile.” The Australian Journal of Anthropology 27 (1): 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellina, Agnese. 2023. “A Novel Way of Being Together? On Depoliticising Effects of Attributing Rights to Nature.” Environmental Politics 33 (2): 321–339. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2023.2209005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocarejo, Diana. 2018. “Lo público de la historia pública de Colombia: reflexiones desde el Río de la Patria y sus pobladores ribereños.” Historia Crítica 68 (68): 67–91. https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit68.2018.04.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, Rutgerd, Arturo Escobar, Karen Bakker, Lena Hommes, Erik Swyngedouw, Barbara Hogenboom, Edward H. Huijbens, et al. 2022. “Riverhood: Political Ecologies of Socionature Commoning and Translocal Struggles for Water Justice.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (3): 1125–1156. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2022.2120810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, Rutgerd, Juliana Forigua-Sandoval, Bibiana Duarte-Abadía, and Juan Carlos Gutierrez Camargo. 2021. “River Lives, River Movements. Fisher Communities Mobilizing Local and Official Rules in Defense of the Magdalena River.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 53 (3): 458–8476. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.2012376.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, David. 2023. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment. Paying Polluters: The Catastrophic Consequences of Investor-State Dispute Settlement for Climate and Environment Action and Human Rights. A/78/168. United Nations General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Bustamante, Gonzalo. 2015. “The Right to Consultation and Free, Prior and Informed Consent in Latin America: The Governmentality of the Extraction of Natural Resources.” Quebec Journal of International Law, Special Issue: 179–197.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero-Gallardo, Karina, Jenny Palomares-Bolaños and, and Jesus Olivero-Verbel. 2022. “Mercury Concentrations in Water, Sediments, Soils, and Fisch Around Ancestral Afro-Descendant Territories Impacted by Gold Mining in the Cauca Department, Colombia.” Water, Air, Soil Pollution 233 (9): 393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05779-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona, Cesar, Marcela Pinilla, and Aída Gálves. 2016. “A un lado que viene el progreso: Construcción del proyecto Hidroituango en el cañón del Cauca medio Antioqueño, Colombia.” In Extractivismos y postconflicto en Colombia: retos para la paz territorial, edited by Ulloa Astrid, and Coronado Sergio, 303–330. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia and CINEP.
   Google Scholar
• Celermajer, Danielle, David Schlosberg, Laren Rickards, Makere Stewart-Harawira, Mathias Thaler, Petra Tschakert, Blanche Verlie, and Christine Winter. 2021. “Multispecies Justice: Theories, Challenges, and a Research Agenda for Environmental Politics.” Environmental Politics 30 (1-2): 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1827608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centro Socio-jurídico Siembra. 2022. . “El Atrato es la Vida. Conflicto armado y economías extractivas en el río Atrato”. Accessed 14 May2023. file:///Users/GF/Downloads/Siembra_Atrato_informe-digital-07.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chagnon, Christopher, Francesco Durante, Barry Gils, Sophia Hagolani-Albov, Saana Hokkanen, Sohvi Kangaslouma, Heidi Konttinen, et al. 2022. “From Extractivism to Global Extractivism: The Evolution of an Organizing Concept.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (4): 760–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Cristy, Nia Emmanouil, Jhon Page, and Alessandro Pelizzon. 2019. “Can you Hear the Rivers Sing? Legal Personhood, Ontology and the Nitty-Gritty of Governance.” Ecology Law Quarterly 45: 787–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavijo-Bernal, Omar. 2021. “Represando el alto Magdalena: Conflicto ambiental por la construcción y operación de la central hidroeléctrica El Quimbo.” Gestión y Ambiente 24: 75–90. https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v24nSupl2.94349.
   Google Scholar
• Colombian Constitutional Court. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Coomaraswamy, Ananda. 1939. “Ornament.” The Art Bulletin 21: 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.1939.11408996.
   Google Scholar
• Corral-Montoya, Felipe, Max Telias, and Nicolas Malz. 2022. “Unveiling the Political Economy of Fossil Fuel Extractivism in Colombia: Tracing the Processes of Phase-in, Entrenchment, and Lock-in.” Energy Research & Social Science 88: 102377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corte Constitucional de Colombia. 2016. Sentencia T-622 de 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cotula, Lorenzo. 2020. “(Dis)Integration in Global Resource Governance: Extractivism, Human Rights, and Investment Treaties.” Journal of International Economic Law 23 (2): 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, Kristina. 2017. “Politics of Scale and Struggles Over Mining in Colombia.” In Contested Extractivism, Society and the State. Development, Justice and Citizenship, edited by Bettina in Engels, and Dietz Kristina, 127–148. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dussán, Miller. 2017. El Quimbo. Extractivismo, despojo, ecocidio y resistencia. Bogotá: Planeta Paz y Asoquimbo.
   Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, Matt. 2011. Fluid Pasts: Archeology of Flow. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2008. Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fierro Morales, Julio. 2017. “La amenaza de la minería a gran escala en la cuenca del río Atrato.” In Majestuoso Atrato: relatos bioculturales del río, edited by M. González-Serrano, 99–120. Bogotá: Tierra Digna.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz-Henry, Erin. 2022. “Multi-species Justice: A View from the Rights of Nature Movement.” Environmental Politics 31 (2): 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1957615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, Rafael, Steffen Bohm, and Marla Misoczky. 2022. “Contesting Extractivism: International Business and People’s Struggles Against Extractive Industries.” Critical Perspectives on International Business 18 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-07-2020-0093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foro Interétnico Solidaridad Chocó (FISCH). 2014. Acción de Tutela Río Atrato.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Sotonye. 2019. “Stabilization Clauses and Human Rights: The Role of Transparency Initiatives.” In Human Rigths in the Extractive Industries. Transparency, Participation, Resistance, edited by Feichtner Isabel, Markus Krajewski, and Ricarda Roesch, 340–363. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galvis, Germán, and José Mojica. 2007. “The Magdalena River Freshwater Fishes and Fisheries.” Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 10 (2): 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980701357640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Reyes, Paola. 2014. “Tierra, palma africana y conflicto armado en el Bajo Atrato chocoano, Colombia: Una lectura desde el cambio en los órdenes de extracción.” Estudios Socio-Jurídicos 16 (1): 209–244. https://doi.org/10.12804/esj16.1.2014.05.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Jeremy, Elizabeth Macpherson, Emily Jones, and Julia Dehm. 2023. “The Rights of Nature as a Legal Response to the Global Environmental Crisis? A Critical Review of International Law’s ‘Greening’ Agenda.” In Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2021. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol 52, edited by Jong Dam-de, Fabian Daniella, and F. Amtenbrink, 47–74. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• Göbel, Barbara, and Astrid Ulloa. 2014. Extractivismo minero en Colombia y América Latina. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• González-Espinosa, Diana. 2015. “La paradoja del sector minero energético en el Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2014-2018: financiador de la paz y generador de tensiones en el territorio”. Seguimiento y Análisis de Políticas Públicas en Colombia, 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• González-Serrano, María Ximena, Montalván-Zambrano Digno, and Lieselotte Viaene. 2022. “Hacia la descolonización del régimen extractivo: patrones y límites de la judicialización en conflictos mineros.” Iconos – Revista de Ciencias Sociales 72: 97–116.
   Google Scholar
• González-Serrano, María Ximena. Under Review. “The Atrato River as a Bearer and Co-Creator of Rights: Visibilizing Black Communities’ Historical Legal Mobilizations in Colombia.” Journal of Law and Social Inquiry.
   Google Scholar
• González, Viviana. 2020. “El río Atrato como sujeto de derechos. Un aporte político de las luchas étnicas del Chocó.” En: La Lucha por los comunes y las alternativas al desarrollo frente al extractivismo: Miradas desde las ecologías políticas latinoamericanas. Editado por Roca-Servat Denisse y Janni Perdomo-Sánchez. CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• González Gil, Adriana. 2019. “Minería y movilizaciones sociales en Colombia: Consultas populares y derecho al territorio.” Política y Sociedad 56 (1): 87–105. https://doi.org/10.5209/poso.61557.
   Google Scholar
• Grajales, Mateo. 2022. Geografías del Despojo: tierra, violencia, desarrollo, extractivismos en los territorios colectivos de Curvaradó y Jiguamiandó, Colombia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Gudynas, Eduardo. 2013. “Extracciones, extractivismos y extrahecciones. Un marco conceptual sobre apropiación de recursos naturales.” Observatorio de Desarrollo 18: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Women. London: Free Associations Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. 1996. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is Strong Objectivity?” In Feminism & Science, edited by Fox Evelyn, and Helen Longino. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Hekman, Susan. 1997. “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited.” Signs 22 (2): 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1086/495159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, Juan Pablo, Rutgerd Boelens, and Jeron Vos. 2017. “De-colonizing Water. Dispossession, Water Insecurity, and Indigenous Claims for Resources, Authority and Territory.” Water History 9 (1): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12685-016-0186-6.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschl, Ran. 2008. “The Judicialization of Politics’.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics (2008), edited by Caldeira Gregory, Daniel Kelemen, and Keith Whittington, 119–141. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, Elizabeth. 2017. The River Is in Us: Fighting Toxics in a Mohawk Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, David, Elizabeth Macpherson, and Steven Moe. 2023. “Experiments with the Extension of Legal Personality to Ecosystems and Beyond-Human Organisms: Challenges and Opportunities for Company Law.” Transnational Environmental Law 12 (2): 343–365. doi: 10.1017/S2047102523000079
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Segura, Luz, Juan Restrepo-Angel, and Andrés Hernández-Serna. 2022. “Drivers of the Artisanal Fisheries Production in the Magdalena River.” Frontiers in Environmental Science 10: 1–21. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.866575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juez Primero Penal del Circuito, Neiva-Huila. 2019. Rad. 41001-3109-001-2019-00066-00.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffer Michel, Edith. 2018. “Pensar el extractivismo en relación con el agua en América Latina: Hacia la definición de un fenómeno sociopolítico contemporáneo multiforme.” Sociedad y Ambiente 6 (16): 33–57. https://doi.org/10.31840/sya.v0i16.1812.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, Craig, and Pamela Martin. 2019. “How Courts are Developing Rivers Rights Jurisprudence: Comparing Guardianship in New Zealand, Colombia and India.” Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 20: 260–289.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Franz. 2017. “Towards an Amphibious Anthropology of Delta Life.” Human Ecology 45 (3): 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9902-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, Markus. 2020. Politics of Extraction: Theories and New Concepts for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahiri-Dutt, Kuntala, and Smanta Gopa. 2013. Dancing with the River: People and Life’s on the Chars of South Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, Steve. 2010. Sacrifice Zones: The Front Lines of Toxic Chemical Exposure in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Fabiana. 2015. Unearthing Conflict: Corporate Mining, Activism, and Expertise in Peru. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machado, Marilyn, María Mercedes Campo, David López Matta, and Arturo Escobar. 2017. “Weaving Hope in Ancestral Black Territories in Colombia: The Reach and Limitations of Free, Prior, and Informed Consultation and Consent.” Third World Quarterly 38 (5): 1075–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1278686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macpherson, Elizabeth, Axel Borchgrevink, Rahul Ranjan, and Catalina Vallejo Piedrahíta. 2021. “Where Ordinary Laws Fall Short: ‘Riverine Rights’ and Constitutionalism.” Griffith Law Review 30 (3): 438–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.1982119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, Diego. Forthcoming. “Critical Fieldnotes on The River-as-Subject: Situating the Atrato River in its Development Aporias.” Antipode.
   Google Scholar
• Merino, Roger. 2020. “The Cynical State: Forging Extractivism, Neoliberalism and Development in Governmental Spaces.” Third Word Quarterly 41 (1): 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1668264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster, Dictionary. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, Kate. 2013. The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environmental and the Safeguarding of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development. 2019. Environmental Action Plan. Compliance with the Fifth Order of Ruling T-622 of 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mitman, Gregg, Michelle Murphy, and Christopher Sellers, eds. 2004. Landscapes of Exposure: Knowledge and Illness in Modern Environments. Osiris 19. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monitoring Committee. 2020. Sixth Follow-up Report on Ruling T-622 of 2016. On the Management Carried Out in the First Half of 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Michelle. 2008. “Chemicals Regimes of Living.” Environmental History 13 (4): 695–703. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25473297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren, Anja, Markus Kröger, and Barry Gills. 2022. “Global Extractivism and Transformative Alternatives.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (4): 734–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2069495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donell, Erin. 2020. “Rivers as Living Beings: Rights in Law, but not Rights to Water?” Griffith Law Review 29 (4): 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2020.1881304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oslender, Ulrich. 2008. “The Production of ‘Geographies of Terror’ in Colombia’s Pacific Coast Region.” Latin American Perspectives 35 (5): 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X08321961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrone, Nicolás. 2022. “Local Communities, Extractivism and International Investment Law: The Case of Five Colombian Communities.” Globalizations 19 (6): 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2035494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putzer, Alex, Tineke Lambooy, Ronald Jeurissen, and Eunsu Kim. 2022. “Putting the Rights of Nature on the map. A Quantitative Analysis of Rights of Nature Initiatives Across the World.” Journal of Maps 18 (1): 89–96. doi: 10.1080/17445647.2022.2079432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafles, Hugh. 2002. In Amazonia: A Natural History. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raftopoulus, Malayna. 2017. “Contemporary Debates on Social Environmental Conflicts, Extractivism and Human Rights in Latin America.” The International Journal of Human Rights 21 (4): 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1301035.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, Jade-Anne, and Timothy Peters. 2021. “Responding to Anthropocentrism with Anthropocentrism: The Biopolitics of Environmental Personhood.” Griffith Law Review 30 (3): 474–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2022.2037882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restrepo, Juan, and Björn Kjerfve. 2000. “Magdalena River: Interannual Variability (1975-1991) and Revised Water Discharge and Sediment Load Estimates.” Journal of Hydrology 235 (1-2): 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00269-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, Whitney, and Jhon McNeish. 2021. Our Extractive Age. Expressions of Violence and Resistance, edited by Shapiro Judith and Jhon McNeish, 155–175. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• RiverOfLife, Martuwarra, Alessandro Pelizzon, Anne Poelina, Afshin Akhtar-Khavari, Cristy Clark, Sarah Laborde, Elizabeth Macpherson, Katie O’Bryan, Erin O’Donnell, and John Page. 2021. “Yoongoorrookoo.” Griffith Law Review 30 (3): 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.1996882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Garavito, Cesar. 2019. “Empowered Participatory Jurisprudence: Experimentation, Deliberation and Norms in Socioeconomic Rights Adjudication.” In The Future of Economic and Social Rights, edited by K. G. Young, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sales Meyer, Franz. 1894. Handbook of Ornament. A Grammar of art Industrial and Architectural Designing in all its Branches for Practical as Well as Theoretical use. London: Hessling & Spielmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, Jorge, Jonathan Shurin, María Vélez, Andres Link, Laura Lopera-Congote, Catalina González-Arango, Fernando Jaramillo, et al. 2022. “Causes and Consequences of Recent Degradation of the Magdalena River Basin, Colombia.” Limnology and Oceanography Letters 7 (6): 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serje, Margarita. 2005. El revés de la nación: territorios salvajes, fronteras y tierras de nadie. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
   Google Scholar
• Sieder, Rachel. 2020. “The Juridification of Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Anthropology, edited by Marie-Claire Foblets, Mark Goodale, Maria Sapignoli, and Olaf Zenk 701–715. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Dorothy. 1990. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, Milagros, and Margreet Zwarteveen. 2012. “Exploring the Politics of Water Grabbing: The Case of Large Mining Operations in the Peruvian Andes.” Water Alternatives 5 (2): 360–375.
   Google Scholar
• Stensrud, Astrid. 2019. “Water as Resource and Being: Water Extractivism and Life Projects in Peru.” In Indigenous Life Projects and Extractivism: Ethnographies’ from South America, edited by Vindal Ødegaard, and Rivera Andía, 143–164. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stoetzler, Marcel, and Nira Yuval Davis. 2002. “Standpoint Theory, Situated Knowledge and the Situated Imagination.” Feminist Theory 3 (3): 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/146470002762492024.
   Google Scholar
• Tanasescu, Mihnea. 2022. Understanding the Rights of Nature. A Critical Introduction. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Terjung, Stella. 2021. Rivers Behind the Scenes, Bridges Between Asia and Latin America. Blog of the Workshop on “Water Extractivism”. https://rivers-ercproject.eu/rivers-behind-the-scenes-bridges-between-asia-and-latin-america/.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, Robinson, Gerardo Azócar, Roberto Gallardo, and Julio Mendoza. 2022. “Water Extractivism and Decolonial Struggles in Mapuche Territory, Chile.” Water Alternatives 15 (1): 150–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribunal Superior de Medellín. 2019. Sentencia No 38. Radicado No: 05001 31 03 004 2019 00071 01.
   Google Scholar
• Tubb, Daniel. 2020. Shifting Livelihoods. Gold Mining and Subsistence in the Chocó, Colombia. Washington: University Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vélez-Torres, Irene. 2012. “Water Grabbing in the Cauca Basin: The Capitalist Exploitation of Water and Dispossession of Afro-Descendant Communities.” Water Alternatives 5 (2): 431–449.
   Google Scholar
• Vélez-Torres, Irene. 2014. “Governmental Extractivism in Colombia: Legislation, Securitization and the Local Settings of Mining Control.” Political Geography 38 (4): 68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Viaene, Lieselotte. 2021. “Indigenous Water Ontologies, Hydro-Development and The Human/More-Than-Human Right to Water: A Call for Critical Engagement with Plurilegal Water Realities.” Water 13 (12): 1660. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viaene, Lieselotte. 2022. “Can Rights of Nature Save us from the Anthropocene Catastrophe? Critical Reflections from the Field.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 9 (2): 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2022.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesche, Philipp. 2021. “Rights of Nature in Practice: A Case Study on the Impacts of the Colombian Atrato River Decision.” Journal of Environmental Law 33 (3): 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqab021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, Richardson, and John-Andrew McNeish. 2021. “Granting Rights to Rivers in Colombia. Significance for extrACTIVISM and Governance.” In Our Extractive Age. Expressions of Violence and Resistance, edited by Judith Shapiro, and John-Andrew McNeish, 155–175. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willow, Anna. 2018. Understanding ExtrACTIVISM: Culture and Power in Nature Resource Disputes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Jingzhong, Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, Sergio Schneider, and Teodor Shanin. 2020. “The Incursions of Extractivism: Moving from Dispersed Places to Global Capitalism.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 155–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1559834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuleta, Isabel Cristina. 2021. “Hidroituango: un desastre socioambiental con responsabilidad internacional”. IdeAs. Accessed: 14 February 2023. http://journals.openedition.org/ideas/10005.
   Google Scholar