Notes
- 1957 . Government of Pakistan , 1, 4
- 1956 . Government of Pakistan , II : 19 – 21 . 115 – 137 .
- 1957 . Government of Pakistan , : 309 – 10 .
- 1956 . Government of India, Planning Commission , 179
- 1952 . India's First Five Year Plan , : 9 – 11 . 184 – 85 .
References
- Ahmad , Mushtaq . 1959 . ‘Land Reform in Pakistan’ . Pakistan Horizon , XII ( 1 ) March
- All India Congress Committee . 1969 . Resolutions on Economic Policy and Programme New Delhi
- Baran , Paul . 1958 . The Political Economy of Growth , Indian edition New Delhi
- Beteille , André . 1965 . Caste, Class and Power , Bombay : Oxford University Press .
- Blyn , George . 1966 . Agricultural Trends in India: 1891–1947, Output, Availability and Productivity , Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press .
- Boserup , Mogens . 1963 . “ ‘Agrarian Structure and Taff‐Off’ ” . In The Economics of Take‐off into Self‐sustained Growth , Edited by: Rostow , W. W. London : Macmillan .
- Bredo , Williams . 1961 . “ ‘Land Reform and Development in Pakistan’ ” . In Land Tenure, Industrialisation and Social Stability , Edited by: Froehlich , W. Milwaukee, Wisconsin : Marquette University Press .
- Desai , M. B. 1958 . Report on Enquiry into the Working of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (As amended up to 7953 in Gujarat (excluding Baroda District) , Bombay : Indian Society of Agricultural Economics .
- Gough , Kathleen . 1968–69 . ‘Peasant Resistance and Revolt in South India’ . Pacific Affairs , Winter
- Government of India, Planning Commission . 1952 . India's First Five Year Plan (1950/51–1955/56) New Delhi
- Government of India, Planning Commission . 1956 . India's Second Five Year Plan New Delhi
- Government of Pakistan . May 1956 . The First Five Year Plan May , Karachi (draft)
- Government of Pakistan . December 1957 . The First Five Year Plan (1955–60) December , Karachi
- Government of Pakistan, Land Reforms Commission . 1959 . Report Lahore
- Hunter , Guy . 1969 . Modernising Peasant Societies , London : Oxford University Press .
- Joshi , P. C. 1967 . ‘Pre‐lndependence Thinking on Agrarian Policy’ . Economic and Political Weekly , 25 February
- Joshi , P. C. 1969 . “ ‘Land Reform in India’ ” . In Rural Sociology in India , Edited by: Desai , A. R. Bombay : Popular Prakashan .
- Ladejinsky , Wolf . 1964 . ‘Agrarian Reform in Asia’ . Foreign Affairs , XLII ( 3 ) April
- Ladejinsky , Wolf . 1965 . A Study of Tenurial Conditions in Package Districts , New Delhi : Government of India, Planning Commission .
- Malaviya , H. D. 1954 . Land Reforms in India , New Delhi : All India Congress Committee .
- Myrdal , Gunnar . 1968 . Asian Drama , 3 vols. , London : Allen Lane, The Penguin Press .
- Rosen , George . 1966 . Democracy and Economic Change in India , Bombay : Vora and Company .
- Srinivas , M. N. . ‘Sociologists and Social Change in India’ . Presidential Address to the Seventh All India Sociological Conference . October.
- Tai , Hung‐chao . 1968 . The Political Process of Land Reform: A Comparative Study’ . Civilisations , XVIII : 1
- Thorner , Daniel . 1956 . The Agrarian Prospect in India , Delhi : Delhi University Press .
- Tinker , Hugh . 1962 . India and Pakistan, A Political Analysis New York
- United Nations . Department of Economic Affairs (UNDEA), 1954, Progress in Land Reform New York
- United Provinces (UP) Zamindari Abolition Committee . 1948 . Report Allahabad
- United States, Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service . November 1965 . Changes in Agriculture in 26 Developing Nations, 1948 to 1963 November ,
- Warriner , Doreen . 1969 . Land Reform in Principle and Practice , London : Oxford University Press .
- West Pakistan Land Reform Commission . 1959 . Report Lahore
- World Land Reform Conference . 1968 . Report , New York : United Nations .
- Professor of Economic Sociology, Institute of Economic Growth, University of Delhi The author is grateful to several persons for their help in preparation of this paper: especially to Professor Ajit Biswas for his valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper; to Dr. Dharm Narain, Dr. C. H. Hanumantha Rao and Dr. Andre Beteille for discussions on a number of points; and to Dr. Suren Navlakha for help in preparing the final draft of this paper. This article first appeared In Studies in Asian Social Development. I.