The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environment

References

• Allal , L. 1979 . “ Strategies d’évaluation formative: Conceptions psycho-pedagogiques et modalitats d’application ” . In L’évaluation formative dans un enseignement différéncié , 6 , Edited by: Allal , L. , Cardinet , J. and Perrenoud , P. 153 – 85 . Berne : Peter Lang .
   Google Scholar
• Anson , C. 1999 . Distant voices: Teaching and writing in a culture of technology . College English , 61 ( 3 ) : 261 – 80 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns , R. , Hurley , M. and Wilkinson , B. 2004 . The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis . Review of Educational Research , 74 ( 1 ) : 29 – 58 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blignaut , S. and Trollip , S. 2003 . Developing taxonomy of faculty participation in asynchronous learning environments: An exploratory investigation . Computers & Education , 41 : 149 – 72 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin , N. and Lincoln , Y. 2000 . Handbook of qualitative research , Edited by: Denzin , N. and Lincoln , Y. London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Devere , T. 2008 . Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program . International Journal on E-Learning , 7 ( 2 ) : 311 – 29 .
   Google Scholar
• Dochy , F. , Segers , M. and Sluijsmans , D. 1999 . The use of self- peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review . Studies in Higher Education , 24 ( 3 ) : 331 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe , O. The mutual challenge of writing research and the teaching of writing . Keynote. European Association for the Teaching and Academic Writing & European Writing Centre Association Conference . June 18 . the Netherlands : at the University of Groeningen .
   Google Scholar
• Espasa , A. and Meneses , J. 2010 . Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: An exploratory study . Higher Education , 59 ( 3 ) : 277 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison , D. and Anderson , T. 2003 . E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice , London : RoutledgeFalmer .
   Google Scholar
• Guasch , T. , Alvarez , I. and Espasa , A. 2010 . University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience . Teaching and Teacher Education , 26 : 199 – 206 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner , P. A. 2001 . Using integrated electronic learning environments for collaborative teaching/learning . Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction , 2 ( 1 ) : 1 – 10 .
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner , P. A. , van den Brink , H. and Meester , M. A.M. 1991 . Audiotape feedback for essays in distance education . Innovative Higher Education , 15 : 185 – 95 .
   Google Scholar
• Kulhavy , R. and Stock , W. 1989 . Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude . Educational Psychology Review , 1 ( 4 ) : 279 – 308 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciss , S. and Huth , K. 2004 . “ How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning ” . In Instructional design for multimedia learning , Edited by: Niegemann , H. M. , Brünken , R. and Leutner , D. 181 – 95 . Münster : Waxmann .
   Google Scholar
• Nelson , M. and Schunn , C. 2009 . The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance . Instructional Science , 37 ( 4 ) : 375 – 401 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol , D. and Macfarlane-Dick , D. 2006 . Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice . Studies in Higher Education , 31 ( 2 ) : 199 – 218 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrenaud , P. 1998 . From formative evaluation to a controller regulation of learning processes: Towards a wider conceptual field . Assessment in Education , 5 ( 1 ) : 85 – 102 .
   Google Scholar
• Posner , I. , Mitchell , A. and Baecker , R. 1996 . “ Learning to write together using groupware ” . In Computer supported cooperative writing , Edited by: Rada , R. 161 – 85 . London : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Reeves , T. 2000 . Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education . Journal of Educational Computing Research , 23 ( 1 ) : 101 – 11 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya , A. , Kuo , L. J. , Glina , M. and Anderson , R. 2008 . Measuring argumentative reasoning: What’s behind the numbers? . Learning and Individual Differences , 19 ( 2 ) : 219 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute , V. J. 2008 . Focus on formative feedback . Review of Educational Research , 78 ( 1 ) : 153 – 89 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snack , F. , Beer , M. , Armit , G. and Green , S. 2003 . Assessment and learning outcomes: The evaluation of deep learning in an on-line course . Journal of Information Technology , 2 : 305 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Topping , K. 1998 . Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities . Review of Educational Research , 68 : 249 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuzi , O. 2004 . The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course . Computers and Composition , 21 ( 2 ) : 217 – 35 .
   Google Scholar
• Van der Pol , J. , Admiraal , W. and Simons , P. 2006 . The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts . International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning , 1 ( 3 ) : 339 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Pol , J. , van den Berg , B. , Admiraal , W. and Simons , P. 2008 . The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education . Computers & Education , 5 : 1804 – 17 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsey , T. 2008 . Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program . International Journal on E-learning , 7 ( 2 ) : 311 – 29 .
   Google Scholar
• Zen , D. How to be an effective online instructor? . Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Convention . April 2–5 , New York .
   Google Scholar