Technology-mediated supervision of undergraduate students' dissertations

References

• Balacheff, N., S. Ludvigsen, T. De Jong, A. Lazonder, and S. Barnes 2009. In Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products, ed. N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. De Jong, A. Lazonder and S. Barnes, Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Belderrain, Y. 2006. Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27, no. 2: 139–53. doi: 10.1080/01587910600789498
   Google Scholar
• Bonk, C.J., and D.J. Cunningham 1998. Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse, ed. C.J. Bonk, K.S. King, 25–50. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.S., A. Collins, and P. Duguid 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 17, no. 1: 32–42. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Carlén, U., and O. Jobring 2005. The rationale of online learning communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 1, no. 3: 272–95. doi: 10.1504/IJWBC.2005.006927
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., M. Baker, A. Blaye, C. O'Malley 1995. The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science, ed. P. Reimann and H. Spada, 189–211. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E., and U.P. Lundgren 2006. Examensarbetet inom den nya lärarutbildningen. [The degree-project at the new teacher training programme]. Tematiska Studier. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Higher Education. http://www.hsv.se/download/18.539a949110f3d5914ec800082139/0647R.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, N. 2009. Re-thinking e-learning research: Foundations, methods, and practices. New York: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B.M. 2005a. Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, no. 3: 337–54. doi: 10.1080/09518390500082483
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B.M. 2005b. The pedagogy of graduate supervision: Figuring the relations between supervisors and students. PhD diss., University of Auckland
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B.M. 2009. Uneasy translations: Taking theories of supervision into teaching. London Review of Education, 7, no. 2: 463–72. doi: 10.1080/14748460902990385
   Google Scholar
• Greenbank, P., and C. Penketh 2009. Student autonomy and reflections on researching and writing the undergraduate dissertation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33, no. 4: 463–72. doi: 10.1080/03098770903272537
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J.G. 1998. The situativity of knowing, learning and research. American Psychologist, 53, no. 1: 5–26. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. 2008. Learning relations and networks in web-based communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 4, no. 2: 140–58. doi: 10.1504/IJWBC.2008.017669
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, A., and B. Heinze 2009. Blended e-learning skeleton of conversation: Improving formative assessment in undergraduate dissertation supervision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, no. 2: 294–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00923.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, C., K. Schenk, and R. Discenza 2004. In Distance learning and university effectiveness: Changing educational paradigms for online learning, ed. C. Howard, K. Schenk and R. Discenza, Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Högberg, M., Å. Eriksson 1998. Från akilleshäl till flaggskepp: En idébok kring grundutbildningens examensarbete [From Achilles' heel to flagship: An ideabook for the degree-project in undergraduate studies]. Uppsala, Sweden: Enheten för utveckling och utvärdering, Uppsala universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Jaldemark, J. 2008. Changes within the practice of higher education: Participating in educational communication through distance settings. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 4, no. 2: 173–87. doi: 10.1504/IJWBC.2008.017671
   Google Scholar
• Jaldemark, J. 2010. Participating in a boundless activity: Computer-mediated communication in Swedish higher education. PhD diss., Umeå University
   Google Scholar
• Jaldemark, J. 2012. Boundless writing: Applying a transactional approach to design of a thesis course in higher education. In Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching, ed. A.D. Olofsson, J.O. Lindberg, 135–51. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson, B., and L. Christensen 2004. Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches 2nd ed. London: Pearson, Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D.H., and S.M. Land 2000. Preface. In Theoretical foundations of learning environments, ed. D.H. Jonassen, S.M. Land, iii–xiii. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, D. 1996. Foundations of distance education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T.D. 1996. Paradigm shifts and instructional technology. In CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm, ed. T.D. Koschmann, 1–23. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Källkvist, M., S. Gomez, H. Andersson, and D. Lush 2009. Personalised virtual learning spaces to support undergraduates in producing research reports: Two case studies. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, no. 1: 25–44. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. 1997. The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In Situated cognition: Social semiotic, and psychological perspectives, ed. D. Kirschner, J.A. Whitson, 17–36. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKeogh, K. 2006. Supervising undergraduate research using online and peer supervision. In 7th international virtual university conference, ed. M. Huba, 19–24. Bratislava, Slovakia: Technichal University Bratislava.
   Google Scholar
• Palloff, R.M., and K. Pratt 2005. Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., B. O'Donovan, and C. Rust 2007. Putting a social-constructivist assessment process model into practice: Building the feedback loop into the assessment process through peer review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, no. 2: 143–52. doi: 10.1080/14703290701241059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, C., B. O'Donovan, and M. Price 2005. A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, no. 3: 231–40. doi: 10.1080/02602930500063819
   Google Scholar
• Shih, T.K., and J.C. Hung 2007. Future directions in distance learning and communication technologies. Hershey, PA: Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E.K., D. Ó. Murchú 2006. In Enhancing learning through technology, ed. E.K. Sorensen and D. Ó. Murchú, Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, K., K. MacKeogh, and P. Sander 2006. Working with student expectations of tutor support in distance education: Testing an expectations-led quality assurance model. Open Learning, 21, no. 2: 139–52. doi: 10.1080/02680510600713169
   Google Scholar
• Todd, M., P. Bannister, and S. Clegg 2004. Independent inquiry and the undergraduate dissertation: Perceptions and experiences of final-year social science students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, no. 3: 335–55. doi: 10.1080/0260293042000188285
   Google Scholar
• Todd, M., K. Smith, and P. Bannister 2006. Supervising a social science undergraduate dissertation: Staff experiences and perceptions. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, no. 2: 161–73. doi: 10.1080/13562510500527693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. 2010. Using online shared workspaces to support group collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 55, no. 3: 1270–76. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, J.W. 2009. In Constructivist instructional design (c-id): Foundations, models, and examples, ed. J.W. Willis, Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. 1987. Thinking and speech. In The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, ed. R.W. Rieber and A.S. Carton, 39–285. New York: Plenum. (Orig. pub. 1934).
   Google Scholar