Exploring what university teachers think about education for sustainability

References

• Åkerlind, G.S., and C. Kayrooz. 2003. Understanding academic freedom: The views of social scientists. Higher Education Research & Development 22: 327–44. doi: 10.1080/0729436032000145176
   Google Scholar
• Bosselmann, K. 2001. University and sustainability: Compatible agendas? Educational Philosophy and Theory 33, no. 2: 167–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2001.tb00261.x
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. 1980. Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.R. 1996. Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 6: 561–67. doi: 10.1177/104973239600600408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, P B., and A.E.J. Wals. 2004. Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problems, promise, and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, D.R.E. 2006. Implementing curriculum guidance on environmental education: The importance of teachers' beliefs. Journal of Curriculum Studies 38: 67–83. doi: 10.1080/00220270500038644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, D.R.E., M.F. Warren, O. Maiboroda, and I. Bailey. 2007. Sustainable development, higher education and pedagogy: A study of lecturers' beliefs and attitudes. Environmental Education Research 13: 579–97. doi: 10.1080/13504620701659061
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, D., I. Bailey, M. Warren, and S. Bissell. 2009. Revolutions and second-best solutions: Education for sustainable development in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 34, no. 7: 719–33. doi: 10.1080/03075070802641552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2010. Council conclusions on education for sustainable development. 3046th Education, Youth, Culture and Sport Council meeting Brussels, 18 and 19 November 2010. European Union. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/educ/117855.pdf (accessed November 22, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R.M. 2004. Exploring attitudes: The case for Q methodology. Health Education Research 20: 206–13. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawe, G., R. Jucker, and S. Martin. 2005. Sustainable development in higher education, Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/sustainability/dawe_report_2005 (accessed November 22, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R.E., and B.K. Marshall. 2007. Environmental sociology. In 21st century sociology: A reference handbook, Vol. 2, ed. C.D. Bryant and D.L. Peck.: 329–40. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. 2008. Save the world on your own time. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, C. 2009. Integrating the disciplines: Successful interdisciplinary subjects. Parkville, Victoria: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, S. 1988. Four forms of herecy in higher education. In Academic freedom and responsibility, ed. M. Tight, 49–65. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gumport, P.J., and S.K. Snydman. 2002. The formal organization of knowledge: An analysis of academic structure. The Journal of Higher Education 73: 375–408. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2002.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefferlin, J.B.L. 1969. Dynamics of academic reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Jickling, B., and A.E.J. Wals. 2008. Globalization and environmental education: Looking beyond sustainable development. Journal of Curriculum Studies 40: 1–21. doi: 10.1080/00220270701684667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A.J., and P.D. Eckel. 2002. The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? The Journal of Higher Education 73: 435–60. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2002.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D., B. Bloom, and B. Masia. 1988. Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook II: The affective domain. New York: David McKay Co.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grange, L.L.L. 2011. Sustainability and higher education: From arborescent to rhizomatic thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43: 742–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 2009. Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., and P. Petocz. 2006. University lecturers' understanding of sustainability. Higher Education 51, no. 1: 105–23. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6379-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmolck, P. 2002. The Q method page. http://www.lrz.de/~schmolck/qmethod/ (accessed September 26, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, K. 2008. Higher education for sustainability: Seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 9, no. 1: 87–98. doi: 10.1108/14676370810842201
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, K. 2010. Higher education's role in ‘Education for sustainability.’. Australian Universities' Review 52, no. 1: 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, K., A. Harland, S. Stein, and T. Tidswell. 2010. Preparing an application for a higher-education teaching-excellence award: Whose foot fits Cinderella's shoe? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 33: 47–56. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2011.537011
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, K., S. Mann, N. Smith, and L. Deaker. 2009. Benchmarking the environmental values and attitudes of students in New Zealand's post‐compulsory education. Environmental Education Research 15: 571–87. doi: 10.1080/13504620903050523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shephard, K., N. Smith, L. Deaker, J. Harraway, Broughton‐Ansin, F., and S. Mann. 2011. Comparing different measures of affective attributes relating to sustainability. Environmental Education Research 17: 329–40. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2010.542450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherren, K. 2008. A history of the future of higher education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research 14: 238–56. doi: 10.1080/13504620802148873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainton Rogers, R. 1995. Q methodology. In Q methodology. Rethinking methods in psychology, ed. J.A. Smith, R. Harre and L. Van Langenhove: 178–92. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stennor, P., S. Watts, and M. Worrell. 2008. Q methodology. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, ed. C. Willig and W. Stainton Rogers: 215–39. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, S., and W. Scott. 2008. Higher education and ‘education for sustainable development’ in England: A critical commentary on recent initiatives. Environmental Education Research 14, no. 4: 386–98. doi: 10.1080/13504620802344001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisl, M., M. Anderson, C. Noblet, G. Criner, J. Rubin, and T. Dalton. 2011. Are environmental professors unbalanced? Evidence from the field. The Journal of Environmental Education 42, no. 2: 67–83. doi: 10.1080/00958961003705899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., M. Prosser, and P. Ginns. 2005. Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised Approaches to teaching inventory. Higher Education Research and Development 24, no. 4: 349–60. doi: 10.1080/07294360500284730
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S., and P. Stennor. 2005. Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2: 67–91. doi: 10.1191/1478088705qp022oa
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Brundtland report: Our common future. http://worldinbalance.net/intagreements/1987-brundtland.php (accessed November 22, 2011).
   Google Scholar