Enhancing tutorial learning experiences: a programme to develop sessional-tutor teaching skills by raising awareness about learning

References

• Åkerlind, G. S. 2003. Growing and developing as a university teacher – Variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education 28, no. 4: 375–90. doi: 10.1080/0307507032000122242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerlind, G. S. 2004. A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education 9, no. 3: 363–75. doi: 10.1080/1356251042000216679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerlind, G. S. 2007. Constraints on academics' potential for developing as a teacher. Studies in Higher Education 32, no. 1: 21–37. doi: 10.1080/03075070601099416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerlind, G. S., and S. Jenkins 1998. Academics' views of the relative roles and responsibilities of teachers and learners in a first-year university course. Higher Education Research & Development 17, no. 3: 277–89. doi: 10.1080/0729436980170302
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2009. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Higher Education Statistics Collections. http://www.deewr.gov.au.
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, S. C. 2006. Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education 51, no. 2: 215–41. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. 2002. Peer observation of teaching in Australia. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., and R. Mladenovic 2008. The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education 55, no. 6: 735–52. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9093-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. A. 2005. A critical evaluation of peer review via teaching observation within higher education. International Journal of Education Management 19, no. 3: 218–32. doi: 10.1108/09513540510591002
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. 1990. The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. 1995. Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Carnell, E. 2007. Conceptions of effective teaching in higher education: Extending the boundaries. Teaching in Higher Education 12, no. 1: 25–40. doi: 10.1080/13562510601102081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosh, J. 1998. Peer observation in higher education: A reflective approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 35, no. 2: 171–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courneya, C.-A., D. D. Pratt, and J. Collins 2008. Through what perspective do we judge the teaching of peers?. Teaching and Teacher Education 24, no. 1: 69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, M. 2006. Challenging accepted wisdom about the place of conceptions of teaching in university teaching improvement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 18, no. 2: 112–19.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, M., and G. Samarawickrema 2010. The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research & Development 29, no. 2: 111–24. doi: 10.1080/07294360903244398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, R. 2007. Perceived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 19, no. 2: 117–29.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, K. 2007. Take a long talk from a sure peer. The Australian, September 19, Higher Education section.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. 2002. Models of peer observation of teaching. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, L., and P. Orsmond 2004. Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful process?. Studies in Higher Education 29, no. 4: 489–503. doi: 10.1080/0307507042000236380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, L., and P. Orsmond 2005. Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education 30, no. 2: 213–24. doi: 10.1080/03075070500043358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K.-L., K. Farrell, M. Bell, M. Devlin, and R. James 2008. Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: Resources to support institutions in developing and embedding effective policies and practise; Final project report, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne. Centre for Educational Development and Interactive Resources, University of Wollongong. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77, no. 1: 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzipanagos, S., and S. Lygo-Baker 2006. Teaching observations: Promoting development through critical reflection. Journal of Further and Higher Education 30, no. 4: 421–31. doi: 10.1080/03098770600965425
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., and Z. Bone 1998. A ‘how-to’ guide and checklist for peer appraisal of teaching. Innovations in Education and Training International 35, no. 1: 177–82. doi: 10.1080/1355800980350212
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, L., and G. Nicholls 2005. Encouraging teaching quality through peer review of teaching. Quality in Higher Education 11, no. 2: 137–49. doi: 10.1080/13538320500175118
   Google Scholar
• Macquarie University 2008. Teaching and learning plan 2008–2012. North Ryde, NSW: Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., and L. A. Roche 1994. The use of students' evaluations of university teaching to improve teaching effectiveness: Final report. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. A., and J. M. Double 1998. Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 35, no. 2: 161–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and S. Booth 1997. Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and M. F. Pang 2008. The idea of phenomenography and the pedagogy of conceptual change. In International handbook of research on conceptual change, ed. S. Vosniadou, 533–59. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, T., T. Barrett, and G. O'Neill 2007. Using observation of teaching to improve quality: Finding your way through the muddle of competing conceptions, confusion of practice and mutually exclusive intentions. Teaching in Higher Education 12, no. 4: 499–511. doi: 10.1080/13562510701415607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulston, C. B. 1974. Linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL 8, no. 4: 347–62. doi: 10.2307/3585467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, D. 2005. Peer observation as a transformatory tool?. Teaching in Higher Education 10, no. 4: 489–504. doi: 10.1080/13562510500239125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, A., and R. Beaumont 2008. The casualisation of teaching and the subject at risk. Studies in Continuing Education 30, no. 2: 145–57. doi: 10.1080/01580370802097736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortland, S. 2004. Peer observation: A tool for staff development or compliance?. Journal of Further and Higher Education 28, no. 2: 219–28. doi: 10.1080/0309877042000206778
   Google Scholar
• Swaffar, J. 2006. Terminology and its discontents: Some caveats about communicative competence. Modern Language Journal 90, no. 2: 246–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00395_2.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar